ANALYSIS: Lacking belief and constrained by uncertainty, the All Blacks are suffering in the land of the long dark cloud

By Geoff Parkes / Expert

In the week following an All Blacks loss, the literal English translation of Aotearoa changes to ‘the land of the long, dark cloud’.

While the nation’s psyche is no longer as intrinsically intertwined with the All Blacks like was in the days pre the 1981 Springbok tour, the truth is that rugby – and the performance of the All Blacks – still matters. A lot.

A long dark cloud is an uncomfortable place under which to reside. Particularly for fans whose memories extend only back as far as 2008. For them, the All Blacks have been associated mostly with the good vibes of success.

In recent times, with four losses in five Tests, that hasn’t been so much the case. And definitely not where Ireland, arriving at the series decider with confidence and momentum, is concerned.

So, when Saturday in Wellington dawned not under the cover of heavy, dark cloud, but sparkling, sunny blue skies, it was as if the rugby gods were sending a message. Coach Ian Foster and captain Sam Cane had emerged from underneath the gloom that had been enveloped upon them by all and sundry to announce, “It’s okay, we’ve got this.”

Except they hadn’t. Someone forgot to tell Andy Farrell and his excellent Ireland side. And Scott Barrett’s achilles.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

In two Test matches, the All Blacks had been held scoreless in the first quarter. That needed to change, but when Nepo Laulala missed a tackle on the first play, Ireland was once again first out of the blocks.

Captain Johnny Sexton has led from the front all series, and with confidence levels high, it was an easy call for him to turn down a shot at goal and back his lineout maul.

(Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

Errors dominated the All Blacks’ performance in Dunedin and things weren’t much improved here. Balls were dropped despite the absence of contact; cleanouts were inaccurate, and a loose carry from Laulala in his own 22 – which led directly to an Ireland try – showed an inherent lack of feel for the situation.

By halftime, Codie Taylor had missed four line-out throws. How was that going to provide a platform for the All Blacks to get on to the front foot and put serious heat on Ireland’s defence?

That hurts even more when your opponent is in the process of banking two tries from their lineout maul. It’s like giving your opponent 15m head start in a 100m dash; not a winning strategy.

So, for the third week in a row, the All Blacks had failed to trouble the scorer in the first quarter. But a 50:22 from David Havili led to a penalty, and with an emphatic kick-off receipt off Brodie Retallick, the first signs of cohesion and confidence were there.

It felt like a stepping stone, but Ireland engineered a three-on-two on a switch to the short side and a perfectly timed in-pass by James Lowe provided Hugo Keenan with a straight run in.

Join The Roar experts Brett McKay, Harry Jones and Jim Tucker for their verdict on England’s series win.

Differences in attacking shape were apparent; the All Blacks switching from side to side, looking in vain for a hole, almost hoping to find one rather than creating one through incursions closer to the ruck.

By contrast, Ireland was far more creative, playing off 10 with higher levels of deception. And they were far more cohesive, and clinical in their execution.

More slick work put Robbie Henshaw through, clean as a whistle, and it was 22-3. Never before in their 119-year history had the All Blacks trailed by so much at halftime.

The backlash that everyone had expected in the first quarter finally came after the break when, after sustained pressure, Ardie Savea wriggled over.

(Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

22-10 didn’t feel quite so bad, but in the aftermath Ofa Tu’ungafasi was removed; concussed, hit high by Bundee Aki, at a ruck close to the try-line.

Despite the nature of the injury, and Tu’ungafasi complaining to referee Wayne Barnes, neither he nor TMO Tom Foley deemed it worthy of further examination.

Given where the tolerance level has been set, and with Tu’ungafasi taken out of a game due to an action that wasn’t accidental or caused by himself, this felt inexplicable and inexcusable.

Retallick followed soon after, courtesy of a heavy head clash with Ireland defender Andrew Porter.

No two instances are ever exactly the same, but one could excuse Angus Ta’avao from wondering how the card shown to him last week by Jaco Peyper was red, and the one shown by Barnes to Porter, yellow.

The All Blacks pressed again and Akira Ioane’s irresistible burst past four Ireland defenders bought the score to 22-17. Check back in a year or so’s time to see if this was a moment that defined Ioane’s career, or it was just another false dawn.

Big moments were coming thick and fast. The All Blacks dithered on their exit and a Sexton penalty pushed the lead to 8 points. Minutes later, he then bounced one off the crossbar from halfway.

In the 60th minute Jordie Barrett expertly tidied up a loose ball, which led to Savea putting Jordan into a hole, and away on a thrilling 70m run. The All Blacks were now back to 25-22, and closing.

But a harsh penalty against Savea, who thought, like most of the crowd, the ball was out of a ruck, proved telling. Sexton went again to his lineout maul drive, and again came up with a result.

32-22 was all Ireland needed to ride the wave home, their defensive composure impressive, and their skill execution maintained throughout.

Tadgh Beirne led the way in the trenches, and when they needed to scramble from deep, it was the boots of James Lowe and Keenan, who kept Ireland well out of trouble.

At the end, a wave of emotion took hold of Ireland warrior, Peter O’Mahony, while Byrne had just enough energy in his legs to dance a jig on the sideline. Many more will have been danced since, all across Ireland.

(Photo by Joe Allison/Getty Images)

It was interesting to hear in the after-match excitement, Lowe and Sexton both talk about the All Blacks as “the best team in the world”. That’s understandable in terms of their preparation and the magnitude of their win, albeit that it is patently untrue.

When they were the best team in the world, the All Blacks threw in the odd shocker; usually at the start of a season, or perhaps right at the very end, and usually not for than half a match at a time. Certainly nothing like the sustained incoherence seen across this series.

It’s no disrespect to Ireland – and indeed it’s in some part due to the pressure Ireland has imposed on them – to point out the obvious; matched or bettered physically up front, and when faced with an opposition who make fewer errors and convert scoring opportunities, the game plan that has served the All Blacks so well since 2010 is no longer fit for purpose.

There are caveats: it’s fair to say that in Dunedin and in Wellington, the All Blacks never got the rub of the card lotto. But that’s really a bigger problem that World Rugby has to sort out on another day.

Whether coach Ian Foster is the man to find and deliver the necessary answers is a question that has already been answered by the majority of fans and rugby press.

Whether he will be allowed the opportunity to be that man is a different question altogether; one that might be answered – one way or another – as early as this week.

Make no mistake; there is not a bunch of players lined up, ready to inject into this team, who can be guaranteed to turn things around. Yes, there are always quibbles here and there over selection, but by and large, contained within the squad are the vast majority of New Zealand’s best.

But this team currently lacks self-belief, and feels constrained.

Constrained by Ireland, and by their own uncertainty around their on-field discipline, and their ability to catch, pass and support in a way that was previously second nature.

Whether it be under Foster or Scott Robertson, until that happy place is found again – until the engine is re-powered and all parts are working in smooth cohesion – New Zealand can expect more days under a long, dark cloud.

The Crowd Says:

2022-07-20T06:23:43+00:00

Paulo

Roar Rookie


So these contacts that are being carded, while part of the problem, barely scratch the surface of the dementia issue. When I refer to head contact, I’m not just meaning in a high profile tackle situation like Ta’avao or Porter. I’m talking about what gave Whitelock a massive black eye after the last test. I’m talking about 200+ clean outs a game. There are so many times head contact is made, but not in the situations that are deemed as illegal. All of those add up. Some are concussive impacts, most are Sub-concussive impacts. A lot happen in training. My remark about the arbitrariness of it is because we have drawn a circle around one particular type of head contact and said, “This. This is what’s causing problems, and we need to stop this.” All that statement does is remove the rest of the detrimental impacts from the conversation. And World Rugby will pay for that one day.

2022-07-20T06:13:55+00:00

Coker

Roar Rookie


Actually no, the forwards are decent, despite not having Moody, the selection of some awful props, and an unbalanced back row. The real problem is in the backs — anybody who's watched the 6 recent tests in Oz/NZ would have seen that easily the most dysfunctional backline (even worse than England) is the NZ one. And most (although not quite all) of that stems from BB. As well as having an abysmal kicking game, he has precisely no idea of how to manipulate defenses to put others in space. It's either 'shovel it on to put the pressure on my team mates', or 'kick it to the opposition in the hope they'll drop it', or (once every 4-5 games) 'run round that prop who's so thoughtfully been allocated to mark me'.

2022-07-20T06:13:14+00:00

Paulo

Roar Rookie


Apparently so. All we ask for is consistency though. If this is how the are ruling on these, they need be consistent and clear. But just like the Bell spear that was deemed not a Red, while we have to accept the judiciary, we don’t have to agree. I said in another post, it’s time to move on now though. And one last thing, to be clear, Ireland were always the better team, regardless of these cards and their colours.

2022-07-20T02:58:59+00:00

PeterK

Roar Guru


But it seems the judiciary clearly thought the tackles WERE different and he got off, YC was the correct decision by Barnes. AB's not hard done after all.

2022-07-20T02:18:18+00:00

Malotru

Roar Rookie


Spot on Paulo.

2022-07-20T02:12:47+00:00

Malotru

Roar Rookie


How many times have we heard 'direct contact to the head, red card. Bundee Aki was very fortunate, Porter also, must be the luck of the Irish.

2022-07-19T20:02:11+00:00

HenryHoneyBalls

Guest


I wouldnt say that at all. Its impossible to see on the Aki video where the point of impact is or if he makes head contact at all.

2022-07-19T16:27:20+00:00

HenryHoneyBalls

Guest


Porter has not been cited for his tackle on Brodie Retallick. The citing comissioner has agreed that Porters tackle as it was passive did not meet the threshold for a red card. Think this is a sensible outcome as he is clearly stationary in the tackle and therefore the guidelines do allow mitigation in this case.

2022-07-19T16:09:10+00:00

HenryHoneyBalls

Guest


There was mitigation. The guidelines do allow you to mitigate a red card offense to yellow where the action is passive. Porter was stationary in the tackle and as you can see from the replay was the one driven backwards in the tackle. Above all it was very unfortunate that Retallick got injured and hopefully he recovers well.

2022-07-19T16:06:18+00:00

HenryHoneyBalls

Guest


As an Irish fan I think Porter was a bit lucky as there was head contact above all its regrettable that Retallick has a broken jaw, hope he recovers well and soon. No one deserves that. The two incidents werent exactly the same though. Ta'avao had forward momentum when he clashes with Ringrose whereas Porter was stationary on impact. The guidelines do allow for a distinction as they do state that where the action is passive (stationary in Porters case) this should be considered low danger and therefore yellow. Ta'avao's tackle wasnt considered passive as he followed through with the tackle with forward momentum. You could consider both players unlucky and argue that neither had time to readjust, late changes in direction etc. However, the referees both concluded that that wasnt a factor and did follow the guidelines and they did give rationale on field which did explain the difference.

2022-07-19T13:11:48+00:00

Paulo

Roar Rookie


5 minutes to say “offside”? Righto :laughing:

AUTHOR

2022-07-19T12:42:34+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


For sure, of course they should aim high. Just making the point that there's nothing wrong with pausing to reflect on the series win and enjoy it (which the players clearly were doing on Sat night). Whatever people think about where the AB's sit today, so few sides have won series in NZ. It's a great achievement.

2022-07-19T11:54:41+00:00

FunBus

Roar Rookie


I think Derm is exactly right. Sitting back and 'soaking in' beating a side that has last their most recent match against all the other teams in the top 5, is not the way to win a RWC, which must now be Ireland's aim.

2022-07-19T11:51:23+00:00

FunBus

Roar Rookie


Probably because Barnes couldn't be bothered to give a 5 minute presentation on all the reasons for why it was a penalty. Savea clearly and obviously never, at any point, went back through the 'gate.'

2022-07-19T11:43:46+00:00

FunBus

Roar Rookie


Some people have been pointing out that the AB pack has been on the decline since 2017. All 8 AB forwards would have had a case to be in a world XV in 2015, and 6 of them were certainties. If you go from the best pack in the world to the 4th or 5th best pack in the world, your results are going to reflect that.

2022-07-19T11:36:41+00:00

FunBus

Roar Rookie


But it's not. There's a set procedure the refs go through. They ask the same questions. You can still have accidental contact to the head that isn't a penalty. There's a series of 'mitigating' questions. Will you ever get perfect consistency - of course not. You'll also get stone cold errors. Ask the French winger who had to have a plate inserted in his face after Tu'uangafasi stuck his shoulder in his head. But, there's a choice. You either try and reduce the number of concussions, and the number of early onset dementias, or you say, sod it, we don't care because there may have been a couple of inconsistent decisions.

2022-07-19T10:55:32+00:00

ozziedude

Roar Rookie


Taavo accelerated into contact and has 3 weeks suspension. Apples and oranges.

2022-07-19T10:50:33+00:00

ozziedude

Roar Rookie


Theyre not playing badly, Ireland are simply playing better

2022-07-19T10:22:19+00:00

ozziedude

Roar Rookie


Dude youre the annoying cliche kiwi bloke we all know, too loud with nothing much to say, ya sound like a bit of a hater so I disengaged a while back..feel free to do the same. See ya.

2022-07-19T05:04:45+00:00

Paulo

Roar Rookie


Always stuck out that there are so many head contacts that are ‘ok’ but then we deem some to be send off offences. Players are getting busted open and black eyes, from accidental contacts. Which isn’t that exactly what Ta’avao and Porter were? The line that’s been drawn does seem very arbitrary, and flexible depending on the ref.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar