Why the Wallabies lost and how they can turn it around

By T Bradley / Roar Rookie

Richard Harris was the Australian anaesthetist who helped save the Thai children who were stuck in a flooded cave. During a recent podcast he explained how he dealt with high pressure environments.

When cave diving, one uses a distance line which is essentially a piece of guideline trailing you to help you get out of a cave in situations of low visibility. On one occasion this snapped leaving him trapped with limited oxygen with no obvious exit strategy.

He described the pressure as a physical visceral sensation slowly rising through his body up to his neck. What he did and how he survived I will come back to during the article.

This was a pivotal high pressure rugby series for so many reasons. There’s tension over the Super Rugby competition moving forward with New Zealand, there’s much needed leverage for a potential private equity sale and there’s some renewed fan interest with the first sold out Wallabies match in quite some time.

Australia had some bad luck in the form of injuries and if you subscribe to Ben Darwin’s GainLine Analytics, you’d understand the detrimental impact injuries have on cohesion. However other than providing some broader context doesn’t achieve much dwelling on. Dave Rennie himself dismissed injuries as an excuse.

Australia dominated multiple statistical measures, but this wasn’t reflected in the scoreboard. I will reference four key areas the match was lost and four key stats that are important in the broader context of the game:

Australia versus England

59% Possession 41%
17 Kicks in Play 26
13 Turnovers Conceded 8
2 Offloads 7

The forward battle

England won the physicality. As bad as Australia were, credit must go to the English forwards who were fantastic. Even without the talismanic Maro Itoje, England dominated the gain-line. Rob Valetini, Ray Leota and Harry Wilson were picked for their running games yet they all struggled to penetrate the gainline due to strong, willing and well-drilled English defence.

When the forwards did pick and go they sometimes strayed down blind alleys, got isolated and resulted in turnovers.

Australia were inaccurate in the cleanout. There were countless examples of this. At the 32-minute mark, Wilson is unable to clean out Bill Vunipola resulting in an English penalty goal. Again in the 39th minute, Wilson and Hunter Paisami fail to cleanout Lawes resulting in a penalty and try shortly thereafter.

The English forwards constantly competed in rucks which slowed our ball down or turned it over. Courtney Lawes achieved three turnovers alone. The Wallaby forwards, didn’t achieve many turnovers, didn’t break the gain-line and were inconsistent at the set piece.

Tactics

England kicked a lot more than Australia (26-17). They were happy ceding possession (59% to 41%) in order to gain territory. They challenged at the breakdown where they affected more turnovers than the Wallabies (13-8). England were able to generate kickable penalties by aggressive defending.

When Australia turned to Reece Hodge to kick them out of trouble, England had all the answers led by Fred Steward. Australia didn’t know how to counter the territory pressure and ultimately succumbed.

The Australians gave up trying to penetrate around the ruck and predictably went wide early far before they’d earned it.

This made it easy for England’s cover defence to swallow them up. To counter England’s defensive pressure, Australia played very deep often conceded significant amounts of territory behind the gain-line in attack. Noah Lolesio, like a lot of five-eighths, thrives on front foot ball behind a strong Brumbies pack but really struggles to manage a game without it.

Noah Lolesio. (Photo by Mark Kolbe/Getty Images)

In defence, there were times Australia panicked and raced up to shut down an overlap. Both times Wallabies were eliminated enabling England line breaks which they should have scored from.

Basic skill errors

To compound matters, there were some basic passing errors at key times by Taniela Tupou, Dave Porecki and Hodge. Tupou’s over the head pass flick in the 36th minute resulted in James Slipper knocking on.

Passes were often behind the man forcing the player to check, lost speed and afford the defence extra time. When you go wide to outflank a team, you cannot afford these inaccurate passes.

You can see in the table above that England achieved five more offloads despite much less possession. Australians too often threw low percentage passes resulting in turnovers rather than taking the contact, committing defenders and looking for an offload.

Australia lost the territory kicking battle. Perhaps this was a pre-determined strategy having big boot Reece Hodge however during the exchanges teams rotate who is at the back and quite often that is Lolesio or Koroibete who lack penetrating kicks.

England has multiple skilled kickers in Marcus Smith, Steward and Jack Nowell.

Australia’s general play kicking lacked intention. It was often not into space but rather straight to their well-positioned backfield players.

An example of this was in the 19th minute, Paisami’s grubber straight to Smith who returned it with interest. There’s no real positional or strategic gain here. It resulted in a massive net territory loss. Compare this to Smith’s kick at 22:30 where he put up a contested bomb that Steward re-gathered.

Kicking for the sidelines is tricky in an oval-shaped field however Hodge took this on and kicked out on the full which resulted in an England lineout 15 metres out from our line. Nic White’s box kicking is usually a real strength however he often kicked too deep and infield, resulting in uncontested easy diffusion.

The kick-offs weren’t accurate. They were neither contested nor deep in the corner.

This made for easy England exits. I’ve written a piece on the importance of accurate kick-offs here which about three people read:

Discipline

If you are going to commit errors, you must consider risk-reward. Wilson committed multiple penalties for no real gain by not rolling away and then tackling a player deep past the ruck. There was no real benefit to either of those plays for Australia yet you’re risking a costly penalty.

Compare this to England. When they were down a penalty advantage in their own 22, they would commit again to kill the play. They’ve lost nothing.

At first glance, a lot of penalties looked lazy and unnecessary however some of them were also born out of pressure. Fatigue, frustration and poor decision making are all compounded under pressure.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

Summary

So how what did the diver do to survive in my intro? He found a way to stay calm during the pressure. He used a simple distraction technique that psychologists often prescribe to patients.

He slowly started counting to 10. Once he reached 10, he would start again.

This was a temporising measure that helped keep the pressure at bay. This slowed down his breathing and prolonged his oxygen supply.

By staying calm, he was able to stop a silt-out and improve his visibility. He was able to slowly think his way through the situation and revert to his back-up plan. He found cracks of light and eventually identified his way to the surface.

When Australia’s “Plan A” didn’t work, they panicked both in attack and defence. This led to basic errors, disciplinary issues and aimless kicking. Australian fans hope that with time their team will develop composure.

(Photo by Anthony Au-Yeung/Getty Images)

Recently I noted Hugh Van Cuylenburg, who is an expert in mental health and high performance, was involved with the Queensland rugby league team in their recent Origin win.

Perhaps this would be a sensible addition to a young team who struggles with pressure.

Quade Cooper helps manage pressure by having a balanced lifestyle so that one’s whole life isn’t defined by their sporting success.

Patsy Tremayne is a Sydney-based performance psychologist with a background in elite sports. With only 13 months until the next World Cup, Australia’s developing team will need all the help they can get.

Australia will be hoping that’s long enough for their developing team to build confidence and composure to help win them an unlikely World Cup.

The Crowd Says:

2022-07-24T11:37:44+00:00

Malo

Guest


Roarers put all their chips that Rennie was to solve the wallabies woes. It was unrealistic, unless you address super rugby and pathways, the wallabies will never win the Bledisloe or get out of the quarters RWCUP. Wake up and accept change and work with the clubs and public.

2022-07-20T23:01:51+00:00

The Late News

Roar Rookie


Sports psychology? Send them over for a barbie at my place.

2022-07-20T02:00:26+00:00

Malotru

Roar Rookie


But what year Andrew?

2022-07-19T13:28:40+00:00

Wooliej

Roar Rookie


No inference intended. Just a general comment.

2022-07-19T13:18:27+00:00

Cec

Roar Rookie


Resting on the successes of the 80/90’s would probably leave any team back in that era while the competition evolves & moves ahead. So your inferences is that NL has no spatial awareness, no flair and will perhaps not develop into a great 10. It seems a host of professional coaches and selectors at SR and WB have a different subjective view to yours.

2022-07-19T12:08:52+00:00

Wooliej

Roar Rookie


This article from 2018 is rather sobering! https://amp.rugbypass.com/news/australian-rugbys-10-year-search-for-a-wallaby-flyhalf-a-systemic-failure-to-identify-and-develop-an-international-10/

2022-07-19T12:03:02+00:00

Wooliej

Roar Rookie


I’m interested in how/why this may or may not have been a problem in the 80’s/90’s. I really do think only certain players have the spatial awareness to do well at 10. Have there been other periods where we have lacked the flare of a young 10?

2022-07-19T11:53:08+00:00

Cec

Roar Rookie


If comparing NL to other international 10s of the same age then he’ll always be behind in games & training completed. NL won’t catch up to Smith and Ntamack for experience playing SR if those two are a benchmark. NL will need to play in Europe to get that same volume of experience to reach his potential. In that case all young 10s only playing in SR would be in the same boat as NL.

2022-07-19T11:34:55+00:00

Wooliej

Roar Rookie


That’s right for sure. Some of us take a while to reach our potential, others seem to just have natural flare straight off. NL may or may not mature to be a great fly half. Hopefully the best is soon to come.

2022-07-19T10:33:22+00:00

Cec

Roar Rookie


Great question Wooliej. Smith is coming up to 24yrs with 126 games for Quins! And 25 caps for England and England u18/20s. Noah is coming Up to 23yrs with 36 games for Brums and 15 for WB and WB U20s. Yeah MS and NL are about 1yr apart in age but a chasms difference in experience. It’s a development issue in Oz. Even Ntamack also 23yrs has 83 Caps for Toulouse! And 43 caps for France and France u20s. I wonder how many games at top flight club and national level will Smith and Ntamack pile up by RWC27 when they are 28yrs old and at their physical peak. This is not NL fault that he’s so far behind other international 10s of the same age. This is why not having a 26-28yr fly half now with similar experience to Smith and Ntamack really hurts us. I haven’t looked but I’ll bet it’s the same issue for WB across all positions that we just don’t have the same experience to similar aged players. Look at Mo’unga who is 28yrs. He has 145 games in SRNZ and 40 caps with AB and AB U20s. Interesting they are similar to Smith’s experience but Marcus is 5yrs younger. NL may have to play 5yrs (28yrs old) more to catch up to the games Smith has played to date at just 23yrs old.

2022-07-19T09:46:09+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


Nah mate, you clearly said He shirks this work, preferring to count his millions and flick his hair out in the backs, presumably waiting for the ball that will never come because the opposition’s 8 forwards just beat Australia’s 7 forwards at the ruck. How he can never turn up to rucks yet whenever Nic Bishop counts he is always at or near the top of the numbers is incredible. NB has stated that he only counts if the action was meaningful, not just arriving and resting a hand on the ruck. Now you want to change your position to he turns up but he gets rag-dolled? That's a pretty major shift but exactly what I was saying in my comment. You are entitled to challenge the quality of his ruck work (although you should give examples), just very hard to complain about the quantity of it.

2022-07-19T00:27:00+00:00

Jimbo81

Roar Rookie


I’m amazed Hooper survived the France series in 2021… wallabies gave up 13 penalties IN ATTACK because Hooper couldn’t or wouldn’t prioritise the ruck! Unbelievable. Are the wingers supposed to do this work? The halfback? Pretty sure it’s the first responsibility of a 7…

AUTHOR

2022-07-18T23:29:26+00:00

T Bradley

Roar Rookie


Thx Jez. Hooper may not be everyone’s first choice for captain but he’s certainly in my team. We will only appreciate how good he is once he retires

AUTHOR

2022-07-18T23:28:28+00:00

T Bradley

Roar Rookie


Thx Jimbo but this is harsh. If a world XV was picked tomorrow, hooper would be one of the few wallabies in contention. Hooper’s strength isn’t his cleaning but he punches above his weight and brings so much else. I quite rate his work ethic

AUTHOR

2022-07-18T23:26:34+00:00

T Bradley

Roar Rookie


Yes waxhead I agree those 2 golden opportunities hurt.Wright still would have had Steward to best so wasn’t a certain try. If we execute those 2 tries, we may have gotten out of jail but we will would have had so much room for improvement still and I still would have written this article…but I would have needed a different title :silly:

2022-07-18T23:25:31+00:00

Jimbo81

Roar Rookie


No no you’ve missed the point. Change the personnel involved in the backrow. Change them to whoever you like. Pocock, Timani, Palu, George Smith even, Valetini, Wilson, Swinton. It makes absolutely no difference. The common element consistently M.I.A in the ruck battle is Hooper. If Foxsports or whoever want to give him a point for being rag-dolled at the ruck as the ball is turned over time and time again and that leads to some stat where Hooper looks passable on paper that’s fine but it’s not useful or relevant in a debate about the merits of Hooper as a test 7. You’d think doing the same thing over and over for a decade would convince people it’s a dud idea…

2022-07-18T22:48:57+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


I never understand this type of post. What makes someone claim the guy with the highest ruck involvements doesn’t get involved in rucks? Sure challenge the quality of his ruck involvements (although I thought they were good on the weekend) but the quantity? How can the quantity of his ruck involvements draw this kind of comment. Happens all the time and I find it bizarre. It’s like bagging Cooper for the quality of his passing, complaining Folau couldn’t catch a high ball or saying Hodge can’t kick long enough.

2022-07-18T22:35:56+00:00

Wooliej

Roar Rookie


But how old is Marcus Smith?

2022-07-18T22:00:12+00:00

Jimbo81

Roar Rookie


How exactly does Hooper escape a scathing mention in Australia’s inability to clean out defenders at the ruck? It’s half the reason Australia has stuttered in attack for the past decade: we keep picking Hooper and we consistently give away turnovers in attack; we lose the battle of the ruck because Hooper is not test level in this regard. He shirks this work, preferring to count his millions and flick his hair out in the backs, presumably waiting for the ball that will never come because the opposition’s 8 forwards just beat Australia’s 7 forwards at the ruck.

2022-07-18T21:56:40+00:00

Waxhead

Roar Rookie


Yes agree, The basics are simple and sometimes the fixes are complex. But looking at the WB loss last Sat it came down to 2 simple errors. 2 bad passes - if Hodge had hit Wright on chest and not thrown a pass over sideline and ...... if Tupou had not passed to the feet of Frost WBs would have scored 2 more tries and won the game/series. Both bad passes were unforced errors. Now reality is that if an international team can't nail those prime opportunities they don't deserve to win. So the fixes were not complex last Sat - they were simple execution errors :thumbup:

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar