ANALYSIS: How Wallabies' 'precise, intelligent plan' blunted world's best player and showed way forward

By Nicholas Bishop / Expert

It was late 2004, and the autumn leaves were spiralling gently out of the trees as I pulled up at the gleaming, all-in-one Welsh national training facility near Hensol, in the Vale of Glamorgan.

The vista opening wide before me, amid 700 acres of panoramic Welsh countryside, had everything a professional sporting team could possibly need. There were two immaculately-manicured outside training pitches, marked out as clearly as the twin cuts of rough at Golf’s US Masters in Augusta.

There was a lavishly-appointed indoor version when the weather closed in; a luxury hotel for the players in camp, encircled by vast gymnasiums and an 18-hole golf course, and cosseted by a family of bars and restaurants that catered to every taste.

On the other side of the property there were a succession of spacious ‘war-rooms’, with plentiful laptops for all the scheming minds at work before a game is ever played. Gimlet eyes looked up as I passed by, on my way to meet the new Welsh head coach Mike Ruddock.

Mike kicked off the conversation with a quote from the Chinese philosopher-general Sun Tzu: “Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.” At that moment, I knew we were on the same wavelength, and there was a common, unified understanding that most battles are won before they are ever fought.

Wales won the Six Nations championship and a Grand Slam six months later, and the pain of 27 years of waiting was washed away on one sunny, cathartic afternoon in March. Even the Irish did not mind that much when we beat them in the climax at the Millennium Stadium, they understood what it meant to a proud rugby nation which had been starved of success for too long.

If he was looking down and watching events unfold in Paris on Saturday evening, Sun-Tzu might have found himself repeating another of his own maxims: “Attack is the secret of defence; defence is the planning of an attack.”

Defensive consistency is probably the special ingredient which Dave Rennie’s Wallabies have found most elusive, but one which has to be added to a tasty and fulfilling recipe for success. He may like his attacking meat, but there is no taste without the fundamental salt of a robust D.

Even though Rennie’s long-term defensive assistant at Glasgow, Matt Taylor was moved aside mid-term, Australia still had the worst defensive record in The Rugby Championship. They conceded an average of 32.3 points, and 4.1 tries per game, and you cannot expect to win too many titles with those numbers.

Despite the one-point loss to France, Rennie will be very happy that the twin targets of accurate preparation, and intelligent on-field defensive execution were met for more of the time. He said as much after the game:

“No-one really gave us a chance to come to Paris and take on a French side that’s been very impressive over the last 15 months.

“I thought we defended really well. Our defensive maul was really good [again] and our set-piece was reasonably solid.

“Our preparation was excellent this week. They’re a big team, great athletes, you have to bar up defensively and put your body in harm’s way, and I thought we did that really well… The offloading count was 16 [France] to 2 [Australia], so when they have got an advantage, they are prepared to throw the ball around.

“I think we defended really well for a big chunk of the game, and there was a handful of times where they had a bit of time and space, and we were able to scramble and fight for each other and shut them down.

“So, considering the amount of ball they had, to only get a couple of tries [conceded] tonight highlights the fact that we defend them pretty well for big chunks.”

Halving the number of tries conceded against a side which can be so potent in broken-field attack was an excellent harbinger for the rest of the tour. There were no breakdown pilfers against France, but equally the Wallabies only gave up four penalties at the defensive breakdown as they achieved their aim of plugging the rich gusher of attacking play which derives from 2021 World Player of the Year, scrum-half Antoine Dupont.

Australia learned some of the lessons from Murrayfield, targeting Dupont around the base and neutralizing both his kicking and running games. Le petit general of French rugby only ran for 18 metres on 13 carries with no clean breaks, and his run-to-pass ratio dropped to a measly one run for every nine passes made. It was all very un-Dupont like.

The pressure started with the ding-ding of the opening bell still resonating in the ears:

This is intelligent pressure, coming from Dupont’s blind-side through Nic White and Lalakai Foketi, with ‘Whitey’ taking generous Ali Price-like license with the offside line.

Dupont’s next two exits from kick-off receipts failed to make the French 40 metre line and the fourth went straight into touch off his weaker left foot – advantage Australia:

As soon as Dupont makes a move to his left, White rushes up and there are three Wallabies right on top of him. On most phases in open play, the Wallaby scrum-half was the ‘spy’ taking care of all the escape routes for Dupont and forcing him to move play away from the base:

When White was out of the play, there was always another defender on hand to spot Dupont at the base. In this case it is Michael Hooper, rushing Dupont in the ‘boot-space’ and flushing him out sideways and towards trouble:

The compact, powerful half-back was also the main focus of Wallaby attention at set-piece, from lineout drives:

Whatever attacking chances France were going to be able to conjure on the day, they were not going to come up the guts, not through the maul, not via Dupont. In both cases it is Will Skelton destroying the French lineout drive and forcing Les Bleus to expose Dupont on Australian terms, with the spy (Folau Fainga’a or Hooper) waiting to pounce. Things were not much better for the mainspring of French offence from scrums:

In the first instance, White and Hooper between them comprehensively take care of the dual threat of Dupont and Damian Penaud off the short-side wing, while Jake Gordon’s scrag tackle in the second offered the Wallabies one last lifeline in the final moments of the game.

The Wallabies even used Dupont’s kicking game as a platform for counter attacks of their own, not least for a memorable ‘try from the end of the world’ which stunned the home crowd.

Dupont chips through and Len Ikitau regathers in the shadow of his own posts, before initiating a length-of-the-field counter in which Tom Wright skins Penaud on the outer before creating a score for Foketi. The rest was silence, at least a for few minutes.

It was not the only time when a Dupont kick had a better outcome for Australia than it did for France:

A short box-kick off 9 only serves to highlight the fractured nature of the Tricolores’ chase, with Andrew Kellaway making the incision on the return in midfield. The Wallabies may have lost by the odd point, but at least foundations of their defence were never going to be blown over by Dupont, however hard he huffed and puffed.

The diminutive scrum-half had to resort to a strong kick-chase and pilfer to make his inevitable mark on the match:

Dupont takes down Kellaway before reloading to win the turnover at the breakdown and set up a short-range plunge by Julien Marchand for the score.

Summary

Whether or not Dave Rennie and his coaches have read Sun-Tzu, they finally looked to have arrived at a deeper understanding of the importance of defence, and the detailed planning needed to defuse the main opposition threats on Saturday evening in Paris.

You devote as much time to your enemy as you do to yourself. You do not just pick up your weapons, go outside and hope to find a way.

Defence is one legitimate half of the game, as France’s women so eloquently proved in their titanic semi-final against the Black Ferns at the Women’s World Cup in New Zealand. If you are conceding an average of over four tries and 32 points per game, as Australia was in The Rugby Championship, nobody will spend too much time admiring your try-scoring feats.

Not before time, the Wallaby coaching hierarchy appears to have recognised that fact. They had a precise and intelligent plan for the world’s best scrum-half Dupont, a plan which was probably prompted by events at Murrayfield the previous weekend. And it worked.

The Wallabies always made sure they exerted as much pressure around the base as possible, with a spare man ready to spy on Dupont and rush his actions. They forced him to kick before he was ready to kick, or to kick off the wrong foot, or to pass when he really wanted to run.

The outcome was probably as ineffective a performance on attack by Le Petit Generale as any in the past two seasons. And when Dupont isn’t fully firing, neither are Les Bleus. It was an important step forward for the Wallabies, and hopefully it is one which will be reinforced in the remaining three tour matches. When they see both sides of the picture, and keep seeing it to the end of the match, the Wallabies are a pretty good international side after all.

Please note that ‘Coach’s Corner’ will be moving to a new slot on Saturday morning until the end of the autumn series. Hope to see you then!

The Crowd Says:

2022-11-17T09:47:21+00:00

Muglair

Roar Rookie


Low ball in play time in SRP, does that equate to fitness not being up to the mark? That seemed to be an obvious explanation, but hard to accept in 2022. I also feel that DR, and Aussie rugby in general, seem a bit obsessed with post contact metres. The old rules still apply, getting as far forward as you can is only useful if you are still closer to your supports than the defence. I note your reluctance to identify the ‘quick fix’.

AUTHOR

2022-11-11T16:11:13+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Radwan has prob dropped away in the pecking order...

AUTHOR

2022-11-11T16:10:40+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


I think that is closer to the truth. They thought they were going to turn Ireland over physically and did not get the outcome they expected. Hence all the excuses afterwards....

AUTHOR

2022-11-11T12:41:42+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


I can still recall the endless circling of comments around Ford/Farrell v Cipriani. Don't remind me!

2022-11-11T12:22:41+00:00

FunBus

Roar Rookie


Ah, Tuquri, what memories. As a pom I'll never forget his arrogant little wink to camera as he strutted out in Marseilles in 2007 before the inevitable stuffing of the English O'Neill had promised the world.

2022-11-11T11:59:29+00:00

FunBus

Roar Rookie


The quality of England fans’ ‘rugby knowledge’ can be gleaned from the outrage that May has been picked for tomorrow. It’s difficult to know whether to laugh or cry. Apparently Radwan should be in because, like, he’s really quick.

2022-11-11T11:49:35+00:00

FunBus

Roar Rookie


It's not great Highlander, but compared to the quality of Aussie rugby TV commentary...

2022-11-11T11:21:57+00:00

FunBus

Roar Rookie


A SAS Major would, almost by definition, be excellent at the tactical level. Invariably also excellent at the operational level. There’s no particular reason why they should be better than anyone else at the strategic level. I suppose the parallel in coaching (about which I know a great deal less) is the tactical ability to put together a scrum, defensive system, lineout etc; the operational level would be where you get to integrate these areas into an overall team ‘plan’. The strategic level would be the ability to integrate and balance ends, ways, and means. Where is the game heading and what are the consequent requirements? Where are the strengths and weaknesses not just in the team but in what’s coming through? How do our plans interact with the ‘enemies’? What can I delegate to ‘tactical and operational commanders/coaches? – would all be strategic questions. I’m guessing most coaches excel at one, maybe two, but rarely all three.

2022-11-11T11:07:39+00:00

FunBus

Roar Rookie


Less so at Sandhurst, which is very junior education designed to produce ‘entry level’ Lieutenants. More so at the UK Defence Academy. You’re right, though, your Advanced Command education is heavily based on the Brits.

2022-11-11T11:01:13+00:00

FunBus

Roar Rookie


I also thought the Saffas threw absolutely everything at it. No side goes into a game saying ‘right lads, we’re giving 95% today’ but you can often tell when a team is REALLY up for it – and the Boks were for this one. Like you, therefore, I’m puzzled by Harry’s ‘it’s all in the plan’ tone about the loss.

2022-11-10T23:32:45+00:00

adam smith

Roar Rookie


No worries mate! Gives a fascinating book unequivocal depth.

2022-11-10T19:33:31+00:00

Cheika_Mate

Roar Rookie


Didn’t do so well at the Brums at 10 looked okay at 12 on the recent Japan tour. Tall man good boot needs to improve his pass game limited on one side. Watch this pace at the force next year.

2022-11-10T13:45:28+00:00

Fox

Roar Guru


That game should be very interesting indeed Nick. I'm going to back the Boks in a very close one. At this point they more of a point to prove as World Champions and France won't be able to bully the Boks. They would have being paying close attention to how the Wallabies nullified the effectiveness of playing from their 9. And I think that France will be a different side but still not fully cooked whereas SA will be IMO. And I don't think the Boks will allow them back into the game as easily as the Wallabies did if they get a similar early lead.

2022-11-10T13:21:54+00:00

Fox

Roar Guru


No at this point they cannot claim that Nick…though of course they still posess some of the best players in the world like Ardie Savea. No I was merely making an argument for an alternative perspective. I could just as easily have replied with equal sarcasm …”Ah ofc, the AB’s didn’t fight back, France just decided not to play as well as they had been”…if you get my drift. So we could equally say both are true – France took their peddle of the metal and NZ did not shine in the coaching and selections and tactic department. What we cannot say is that France were not the better side that day as clearly they were and comfortably I might add. Hats off. I even gave them some leeway in the Wallabies game – that they were undercooked even though Australia played very well also and IMO both are true.

AUTHOR

2022-11-10T13:18:05+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


He does bugger all communication for defence and is no where near a second play maker. That first part is nonsense Tez.

AUTHOR

2022-11-10T13:17:16+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


He hasn't recovered by the look of his latest comments on the two-up Miz :shocked:

2022-11-10T13:13:42+00:00

Fox

Roar Guru


No such thing as the last bastion of hope for sides like the AB's and the Boks Nick. Too much history in the game. And some histories are short lived and some like AB's lacking cohesion and consitency will not be. 5 wins in a row now and new coaching staff - thank god. They are not back quite yet but the signs are there and maybe the Irish series loss was the shot in the arm the AB's needed before a WC. And full credit to them - they deserved it. People have short memories Nick - not saying you do of course - but in general. The late 90's AB's did not deliver as they should have for a short period and the AB's lost 3-0 to the Boks and we heard exactly the same songs from the UK media and others - lost their aura - don't have the depth they once did - and the usual list that is always trucked out goes on and then look what happened; greatest winng record of all time over 6 years and longest running no1 world ranking that will arguably never be repeated - so the one thing kiwis do know is we are never down for very long and when we come back - it is with a vengence. Hats off to Ireland and France for their recent form and good on them but....have they peaked to early ? And have they woken the Bear before the WC? We shall see I guess. Who knows might be an Ireland v France final depending upon what happens in the group stages but I doubt it some how....I would actually back France to get there more than Ireland. Ireland do not have the depth if they get too many injuries to key players and without Sexton they are not the same side IMO and his backups are not anywhere near his class at managing the game and this is an issue for Ireland. And he is very injury prone these days. Hell of a player though no question.

2022-11-10T12:30:28+00:00

Fox

Roar Guru


Ahh nice touch at the end there Nick and yes true enough. Believe it or not I have soft spot for Scotland Wales and Ireland when they are not playing the AB's or the Wallabies due my Scotish Celtic heritrage on my fathers side. Have tattoos of my clan emblem etc.

2022-11-10T11:29:52+00:00

Tez

Roar Rookie


Yes I agree but it depends on the game plan .... Kerevi is more crash ball and freeing the arms for an off load or setting quick recycle for a second or third phase. He does bugger all communication for defence and is no where near a second play maker. Whereas Foketi can do the crash ball, but not to the same effect, but he is a far better defensive organizor and second play maker. As I said both suited to differing game plans but imo Foketi offers much more up side than Kerevi.

2022-11-10T11:08:20+00:00

mzilikazi

Roar Pro


Yes, Harry is a bit out of sorts over it all just now !

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar