No Pant, Iyer or Bumrah but India have plenty of depth as Aussies miss pace duo for Border-Gavaskar Trophy

By Tsat / Roar Guru

When the news of Rishabh Pant’s car accident came in, apart from being worried for the man’s health, Indian fans started to murmur about the team’s chances reducing drastically in the Border-Gavaskar Trophy.

India’s middle and lower order, led by Pant, has been saving the Test team for some time now so his loss has put a big question on the chances of the Indian team in the series against Australia.

The news that Shreyas Iyer, the other reliable middle-order bat, will miss the first Test has added more worries to the fans.

How is the Indian team looking despite all these worries?

India’s batting

The current top order of KL Rahul, Cheteshwar Pujara and Virat Kohli does not inspire confidence after seeing how they played spin at Mirpur. They did not look good against New Zealand when the Kiwis toured India towards the end of 2021.

The return of Rohit Sharma should add strength to the top order. However, Mayank Agrawal going out of the reckoning because he failed in Tests outside India has further dented the team. The selection committee will need to relook at Mayank and keep him in the side, at least as a sub-continent specialist.

The team will miss Pant and Iyer in the middle order considering how impactful their performances have been in the home Tests. Their replacements KS Bharat and Surya Kumar Yadav/Shubman Gill, are yet to prove themselves in Tests.

Considering Gill’s fantastic run in white-ball cricket, he should replace Iyer. SKY has not found form yet in cricket longer than 20 overs. However much he uses Twitter to profess his love for the red cherry, the selectors must resist parochuting him into the team in place of Gill.

The lower order of Ravi Ashwin, Ravindra Jadeja and Axar Patel will contribute runs. However, the India top order will have to stand up and make big hundreds. Otherwise, this is the flank that the Aussies will look to exploit during the series.

India’s bowling

India has plenty of choices in this aspect of the game. They have five fantastic fast bowlers in Mohammed Shami, Mohammed Siraj, Umesh Yadav, Jaydev Unadkat and Jasprit Bumrah. The spin attack comprises Ravi Ashwin, Ravindra Jadeja, Axar Patel and Kuldeep Yadav. Rohit Sharma will have a big challenge to pick five bowlers from this lot to play at Nagpur.

For the first Test, they should go with three spinners (Ashwin, Jadeja, Axar) and two fast bowlers (Mohammed Shami, Mohammed Siraj).

In India, Siraj, with an average of 16 at 35 and Shami, with an average of 21 at 42, get the nod over Umesh Yadav, with an average of 25 at 47.

Ravichandran Ashwin (Photo by Peter Mundy/Speed Media/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)

Umesh has the highest number of wickets in India, but the numbers of Shami and Siraj aren’t low either. Rohit has the liberty to not even speak of Jasprit Bumrah and Jaydev Unadkat; such are the riches!

Kuldeep Yadav misses out despite his fantastic return to Test cricket. It is hard to look past Axar, with an average of 12 at 33 and 39 wickets. Jadeja makes the cut above Kuldeep due to his batting. Jadeja has an outstanding bowling average of 20 with 172 wickets in India.

Similarly, Ashwin, with a bowling average of 21 with 312 wickets and a batting average of 29, is hard to replace. Such is the competition for places that a bowler like Kuldeep, with an average of 24 and 16 wickets, has to warm the benches.

The strategy for the Aussies will be somehow to eke out 250-plus runs from this Indian attack and then go ballistic against the questionable Indian batting. Their task to win has become even more complicated with the news of Josh Hazlewood missing the first match, possibly two, due to injury.

Australia have left no stone unturned, preparing on turning pitches in Sydney and hiring a bunch of Indian spin doppelgangers to bowl at them in India. But how does this series look for them?

Australia’s batting

Despite seemingly thorough preparations, Australia’s chances will depend on how well Steve Smith plays and how much he scores. He is that important for their chances. Their lone Test win in India for the past 15-plus years came when Smith scored a hundred.

India kept Smith quiet in the previous series in Australia. Has Smith figured out a way to work around the leg side strangling? The fate of this series depends on the quality of the answer to this question. If India takes Smith out of the series, I don’t see Australia competing in this series, leave alone winning it.

We know Marnus “coffee slugger” Labuschagne is a run machine for Australia. However, he is yet to prove himself on India’s turning tracks. He averages 34 in Pakistan and 20 in UAE. The pitches in Pakistan and UAE are slow tracks; none of them are vicious turners like in India. Marnus averages better in Sri Lanka, with an average of 49. The Sri Lankan spin attack is nowhere near the quality of the Indian attack. However, Marnus will play an important role in this series as the second-best batter on the Australian side.

Marnus Labuschagne and David Warner. (Photo by Darrian Traynor/Getty Images)

Usman Khawaja has an astonishing average of 165 in Pakistan and 76 in the UAE. However, he averages only 28 from 6 matches in Sri Lanka and one from 2 innings in Bangladesh. Despite having a mixed bag of returns in the subcontinent, the experience of having scored big runs against Pakistan will help his confidence against the Indians.

Apart from these three, Australia will look at David Warner to provide the big runs. However, he averages 33 against India after 34 innings. His average goes down to 24 in 16 innings if we take his performances in India.
Travis Head has gone through a transformation since his failures against India in Australia. His fast scoring game could be a trump card for Australia if he manages to conquer Indian conditions.

The other motley of batters like Cameron Green, Alex Carey are unknown commodities on Indian pitches.

Australia’s bowling

Apart from Smith’s batting, Australia’s bowling comprising Pat Cummins, Josh Hazlewood, Mitchell Starc and Nathan Lyon, will be India’s biggest threat.

This quartet is peerless and has proven itself in all conditions. India were lucky in 2017 that Starc missed half of the series due to injury. Hazlewood and Starc rattled the Indian in Pune before their spinners got into the act. Cummins joined the party in Ranchi and bowled testing spells to the Indian batters.

Although Lyon has an excellent overall record, I expect the Indians to handle his bowling without much trouble. He averages 34 at a strike rate of 67 against India, which is hardly match-winning. But he can become deadly if the pace bowlers rattle the Indian batters upfront. Shane Warne’s best returns in India came in 2004 when the Aussie pacers strangled the India batters.

CLICK HERE for a seven-day free trial to watch cricket on KAYO

Considering the composition of Australia’s squad and the Indian pitch conditions, Australia will play another spinner alongside Lyon. Going by the social media chat, Aussies might play Ashton Agar who averages 23 with seven wickets from two tests in Bangladesh. That is a good record in similar conditions, but the sample size is small.

Apart from Agar’s good form in the subcontinent, the other primary reason could be the success of slow left-arm spinners against Indian batters. If Agar gets his speed, line, and length right, Indian batters will have a contest.

They should go with six batters and five bowlers for the Nagpur Test. Boland will replace Hazlewood and they could use Todd Murphy or even Lance Morris as the fifth bowler with Starc also out.

The Crowd Says:

2023-02-11T16:45:20+00:00

Sedz

Guest


Don, you are making a fool out of yourself. Yes Aswin is falt and predictable yet Aussies can't bat vs him. Lyon is the best lol.

2023-02-07T01:18:25+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


Yep. I'm expecting an Australian 3-0.

2023-02-07T01:13:39+00:00

Kalva

Roar Rookie


Well only another couple of days and we’ll get to judge?.can’t wait!

2023-02-07T00:05:23+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


Oh, he has it...just not to the level of Lyon. Most "observers" tend to be pessimistic - and wrong.

2023-02-06T23:57:23+00:00

Kalva

Roar Rookie


Lyon has developed all this since he last played India? Or has only been able to display as he hasn't been playing India recently? I'm surprised that you think Ashwin doesn't have variety, control and cunning. Most observers would disagree.

2023-02-06T23:45:19+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


Nup. Based on the now. Lyon has developed such variety, control and cunning. Ashwin is flat and predictable. The past never has anything to do with the now in any sport. It figures only in press and social media conversation…always misused.

2023-02-06T23:38:31+00:00

Kalva

Roar Rookie


The past is the past but you're the one who made the comparison between Ashwin and Lyon(based on the past) and I was just pointing out that Lyon has been very predictable in recent times vs India. That may change now...will be interesting to see.

2023-02-06T23:20:21+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


The past has nothing to do with the now. Kohli was a fearsome batsman once. Scotty Boland couldn't take a wicket 2 years ago.

2023-02-06T22:17:50+00:00

Kalva

Roar Rookie


I would add that the 2011-12 Indian team which toured Australia was very strong on paper and reputation but it was weak in reality. Dravid and Sachin were on their last legs...Laxman should have been pensioned off way before, Sehwag and Gambhir were lazy and complacent after the WC triumph, Dhoni didn't give a damn about Tests and Kohli was struggling to make it in Tests. A terrible batting lineup.

2023-02-06T22:15:09+00:00

Kalva

Roar Rookie


India have been heavily dependent on Rishabh and Jadeja in the batting in the last 2 years. Rohit will really need to come to the party. I agree that India's batting is very nervy.

2023-02-06T22:12:40+00:00

Kalva

Roar Rookie


I love Test cricket way more but I think people are excited about this because it feels like a contest after soooo many white ball matches.

2023-02-06T22:11:40+00:00

Kalva

Roar Rookie


In the last 3 series between these two teams, Lyon has started off very quickly but become extremely and innocuous by the 3rd and definitely the 4th Tests. His bowling in 2020-21 was a big reason for Australia failing to win..apart from the poor leadership by captain/coach.

2023-02-06T14:44:14+00:00

La grandeur d'Athéna

Roar Rookie


People often mistake the word depth for just having numbers on the table. When we talk about depth, we need to take the quality into account. Our batting is paper thin. And we are championing batters who are "whack it and pray standing on one feet" types. Our bowling is fairly good. But the problem is, Aussies match all of them with one of their own. Untested is a murky word here,because our own batters have not been tested against quality bowling in home condition. Most team we faced, do not have the caliber of Nathan Lyon and Pat Cummins. So we will see. Jaddu is going to have to be the trump card again, specially with his batting. I have no idea why Washi is not in the team. We will see. But i believe Australia is going to win this 2-1, at least.

2023-02-06T09:58:37+00:00

Brasstax

Guest


Whew! Its been a very long time since an Indian test batting lineup can and has been called weak. The last time I remember an Indian test batting lineup that was weak and spineless was the one that toured here in 1999-2000 led by Tendulkar. And the absence of Pant and Iyer makes it worse. Best chance for Aussies to win in India and I expect them to win 3-0 or worse, 2-1.

2023-02-06T07:47:29+00:00

jammel

Roar Rookie


Renshaw needs to play as many Tests as possible

2023-02-06T07:46:25+00:00

jammel

Roar Rookie


Neser or Hardie should have been in the squad imo

2023-02-06T06:42:28+00:00

Harvey Wilson

Roar Rookie


Warner should have had a happy retirement after his double in Sydney instead of being on the plane to one of his worst locations. The selectors will hopefully make the right call and dump him if he fails. There is no 'I' in team, unless your name is David Warner.

2023-02-06T05:47:12+00:00

Cam

Roar Rookie


I’m am worried for the Aussies with both bat and ball. I’m not expecting Warner to get anywhere near his paltry average in of 24 (in India) and reckon the selectors will be forced to make a tough call after the 2nd or 3rd test. Interesting to hear Crash speaking today about Travis Head and apparently his training sessions vs the spinners continues to be average. I was kind of hoping he’d remodelled his technique for India as Matty Hayden did years ago, but apparently that isn’t the case. Early reports have the Aussies naming just the 4 specialist bowlers with Agar, Cummins, Lyon and Boland. If India target Agar and belt him out of the attack, much like the Aussies successfully did with Graeme Swann, the Aussie attack is going to look very skinny. They really missed a trick by not taking the recently crowned Domestic Cricketer of the Year in Michael Neser, who would add good depth as a bowling all-rounder. Really looking forward to this one!

2023-02-06T05:42:16+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


Happy with that team. If Green can bat and catch but not bowl? I'd leave it as you have it, just to get him right to bowl. If he can bowl, Morris misses.

2023-02-06T05:41:38+00:00

badmanners

Roar Rookie


Rahul wouldn't have looked too good against NZ as he didn't play against them! Kohli played in only the 1 test in the 2 test series (out to spin both innings) and Pujara was out to pace in the first test and spin in the second. But seeing as the whole Indian team got out to the same spinner (Ajax Patel) in the first dig in the second test he ain't quite Robinson Crusoe there!

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar