India win series but Aussies favourites for rematch, player of series award a cop-out, Head stuck in 90s: Talking Points

By Paul Suttor / Expert

Day five of the fourth Test has been put out of its misery early in the final session with any hope of a result long gone.

With Australia 2-175 and in front by 84 runs early in the final session, the match was called off early with India finishing 2-1 winners for the series, retaining the Border-Gavaskar Trophy.

The teams will meet again at The Oval in London on June 7 in the World Test Championship final after India qualified when Sri Lanka were beaten by New Zealand in Christchurch earlier in the day.

Travis Head’s 90 was the only on-field highlight on a dreary final day of the fourth Test, a match ruined by the benign pitch prepared for the contest which made it no contest between the batters and the bowlers with the bat dominating ball for the first time this series after raging turners kept scores low in the opening three matches.

Aussies favourites for rematch despite losing series

Australia will meet India again in much different conditions in the World Test Championship final but the English pitch doesn’t mean Pat Cummins’ team will be clear favourites. 

The Indians advanced to the decider on Monday by virtue of Sri Lanka’s narrow loss in the cliffhanger against New Zealand in Christchurch after rain wiped out the first session on the final day. 

While they won’t be on their beloved/tailored/doctored spinning home track, India are no longer shot ducks in foreign conditions. 

Australian fans shouldn’t need reminding that India have won their past two Test tours Down Under while their recent record in England is a vast improvement on previous eras.

CLICK HERE for a seven-day free trial to watch cricket on KAYO

India have gone 2-3 with one draw in their past six Tests in England. They lost 11 of their previous 14 up until 2018 with just two victories. 

(Photo by Robert Cianflone/Getty Images)

One of the recent defeats was to New Zealand in the 2021 World Test Championship final which would have also been against Australia if not for a slow over rate penalty. 

Seven of the Indian XI from this Test in Ahmedabad played in that eight-wicket loss to the Black Caps, including the top four batters. 

They made just 217 and 170 in that match at the Rose Bowl in Southampton with all 20 wickets falling to New Zealand’s seamers – they didn’t even pick a spinner while India had Ravindra Jadeja and Ravichandran Ashwin, who only managed five scalps between them.

This year’s decider will be played at The Oval in London, where Australia have traditionally struggled even when they dominated Ashes series.

They’ve won just three of their past 14 matches at the venue, drawing six and losing five, including their most recent visit in 2019 when Jofra Archer took 6-62 as England won the Test to draw the series after the Aussies had already retained the urn.

India have suffered a blow with world-class seamer Jasprit Bumrah suffering a setback with his back injury and recent surgery now putting him in doubt for the ODI World Cup on home soil in October.

(Photo by Quinn Rooney/Getty Images)

Australia will have Pat Cummins back from personal leave and Josh Hazlewood should also be available after he also left the Border-Gavaskar Trophy tour early with an Achilles problem. 

Australia will reverse their three spinners and a quick set-up from this tour but whether Hazlewood should get the nod ahead of Scott Boland is debatable.

Hazlewood has only played four Tests in the past two years due to a mix of injuries and spinning wickets while Boland has 28 wickets in his seven appearances at 13.42 despite going wicketless in the India tour opener in Nagpur.

Head getting nervous in 90s

Travis Head has been dismissed three times in the 90s over the past eight Tests.

He was bowled for 99 in Perth against the West Indies at the start of the summer, made a match-winning 92 on the Gabba greentop against South Africa and has now fallen for 90 on the final day of the India tour in Ahmedabad. 

Head went on to reach his ton the four previous times he’d entered the 90s. 

His 163-ball innings, featuring 10 fours and two sixes, was the only thing worth watching as the last day of the last Test lasted a lot longer than it needed to. 

If it’s any consolation to Head, the 29-year-old left-hander has a long way to go to catch Michael Slater for the most 90s by an Aussie batter. He was out nine times within sight of a ton as he amassed 14 centuries in 74 Tests.

Slater was overtaken by Sachin Tendulkar for the most all time with the Indian legend dismissed 10 times in the 90s but when you hold the record for most Test hundreds with 51, it won’t be keeping him up at night too often.

Player of the series award a cop-out

Ravichandran Ashwin was named player of the series for his efforts with the ball. And so was Ravindra Jadeja.

After David Warner was named player of the series after Australia’s 2-0 win over South Africa on the strength of one good innings, you never can tell which way these awards are going to go with too much confidence. 

And so it turned out to be with the judges deciding they couldn’t split Ashwin or Jadeja.

Australian opener Usman Khawaja was the leading run-scorer for the series with 333 at 47.57, with those numbers coming under the toughest of circumstances which have reduced some of the best batters on the planet to mere mortals. 

The veteran opener, who missed the chance to add to his tally on the final day of the fourth Test due to a leg injury suffered while fielding on the boundary, was the only player to have passed 50 three times who went on to make a century. 

More than half of his series tally came from his 180 on the only batter-friendly pitch in Ahmedabad – if he had scored slightly more in the first three Tests, he would have been the odds-on favourite to win player of the series.

Ashwin was the leading wicket-taker with 25 wickets at 17.28, striking at every 39.9 deliveries.

Jadeja bagged 22 at 18.86, with a strike rate of 43.9 and they both made decent contributions with the bat to stymie the Australian attack.

Australian off spinner Nathan Lyon also toiled hard for 22 scalps, adjusting his tactics after the first Test, averaging 22.56 and working hard for a wicket every 51.7 balls, including his 65-over marathon stint in the first innings of the final Test.

Ravichandran Ashwin. (Photo by Robert Cianflone/Getty Images)

Apart from Khawaja, it was Patel who was the only other player to raise the willow for a half-century three times, topping out at 84, to be the third-highest scorer with 264 at 88.

However, he only managed three wickets in four Tests, averaging 62, in his primary role.

Kuhnemann joins exclusive club of opening No.11s

Matt Kuhnemann may have played as an opener in the second innings but he was still treated like a tailender.

He was out for six early on the final day, given out LBW to Ravichandran Ashwin after he had fulfilled his nightwatchman role the previous evening. 

The Queenslander asked Travis Head whether he should send the decision up to the third umpire but after the briefest of chats, kept walking to the Ahmedabad pavilion, not wanting to dare waste one of Australia’s three reviews. 

Replays showed Ashwin’s arm ball from around the wicket would have missed the leg stump altogether.  

Kuhnemann became the sixth player in Test history to open the batting and come in at No.11 in the same game.

In modern times, fellow left-arm spinner Jack Leach did likewise playing for England against Ireland in 2019 when used as an opening nightwatchman while South Africa skipper Graeme Smith went from the top of the order to the bottom in Sydney when he unsuccessfully tried to hold out for a draw with a broken hand a decade earlier.

English keeper Harry Butt was the first to complete the unlikely double on debut in South Africa in 1896 and Pakistani fast bowler Azeem Hafeez also did it in his first Test against India in 1983.

The other member of the top and tails club was New Zealand seamer Danny Morrison, who went out to hit the winning runs against India in 1990 when the Black Caps were chasing a target of just two runs to clinch victory in Christchurch.

He and fellow tailender Martin Snedden went out to bat and hit a single each to seal the 10-wicket win.

The Crowd Says:

2023-03-18T02:42:48+00:00

Hari

Roar Rookie


It is the premiers and seems to be pre planned that both nations didn't lose. Politricks.

2023-03-15T20:17:43+00:00

Clear as mud

Guest


I don’t like the heading. The made up world championship one off game is not a rematch. India have beaten us the last two away and the last two home series. I can’t think of a team that has done that to us since the Windies, ending in 95. So well done India We will get a chance to try and win a home series in a few years. We get a chance to try and finally win again in India in around 2027. We will be due - 68-70…. 2004…… 2027…

2023-03-15T09:19:28+00:00

Doctor Rotcod

Roar Rookie


Great portmanteau. If India wanted to see a closer contest, instead of a one-sided one, based on the excellence of Ashwin and Jadeja on slow wickets, in particular their batting, then the pitches would have been neutral .

2023-03-15T09:08:16+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


I would analogize Head’s career to that of the great Liam Neeson. Both had trouble reaching their heights till later in their careers but both are coming home; men of substance. “….. but what I do have are a very particular set of skills. Skills I have acquired over a very long career. Skills that make me a nightmare for people like you. …….” ——– I could be having could be having Supertramp vocals and piano melding with Jimmy Page.

2023-03-15T08:42:52+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


The selector's are acting without dignity. I'm not a fan of him but he was treated shabbily by the selector's. Not quite Maxxie level but still reprehensible. The selector's couldn't fight their way out of a wet paper bag

2023-03-15T08:38:30+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


We can only hope

2023-03-15T07:59:01+00:00

Ramesh Somasunderam

Guest


I honestly believe Australia is the best men's cricket team in the longer and short forms of the game. India did prepare wickets to suit their spin bowlers and Australia swept themselves to defeat in the second test which was unfortunate and careless on their part but the series was much closer than what I anticipated

2023-03-15T07:27:28+00:00

Johnno

Roar Rookie


Yeah Murphy showed a lot. Good control.

2023-03-15T02:37:23+00:00

Tempo

Roar Rookie


Your argument was: “Agar bowls all over the place” and “the extra few runs he might have scored would have been quickly wiped out by the extra runs he would have conceded” You conveniently ignore that I supplemented the subjective observations of his erratic bowling with his terrible first class bowling record. Last time I checked bowling average was still the single most important indicator of the effectiveness of a bowler – and Agar’s is frankly terrible in red ball cricket. I haven’t heard your argument as to why a bowler averaging over 50 in FC cricket in recent years (and over 40 overall) would make a good test bowler? We all know Agar is not a frontline spinner – he’s an all rounder. Would he have done better than 2/110 off 28 overs at 3.85 and 6 & 0 in Dehli? We’ll never know but many of us believe he should have been given a crack before Kuhnemann. You're right that we will never know how Agar might have done if selected. We also will never know how you or I would have done if selected. However, there is good evidence from Agar's performances in red ball cricket to suggest he wouldn't have done very well. And clearly he was struggling to perform even in the nets over there. Agar has done nothing to demand selection in the test side. I can only assume the “many of us” who believe Agar was hard done-by are one-eyed West Australian fans.

2023-03-15T01:54:35+00:00

DTM

Roar Rookie


I think he will but maybe not until Lyon retires.

2023-03-15T01:53:49+00:00

DTM

Roar Rookie


Your argument was: "Agar bowls all over the place" and "the extra few runs he might have scored would have been quickly wiped out by the extra runs he would have conceded" I proved, even in red ball cricket, Agar does not bowl all over the place and his economy rate is comparable to other (more skilled) spinners like Lyon, Swann, Maharaj etc. Therefore he would not necessarily have conceded extra runs. Of course, I could have pointed out that the "extra few runs he might have scored" might have amounted to 50 or so more over two innings and could have changed the course of a test match. I could also have pointed out that Cummins has no idea how to handle these guys - his captaincy of Agar in Sydney was embarrassing and he didn't do much better with Kuhnemann in Dehli. We all know Agar is not a frontline spinner - he's an all rounder. Would he have done better than 2/110 off 28 overs at 3.85 and 6 & 0 in Dehli? We'll never know but many of us believe he should have been given a crack before Kuhnemann.

2023-03-15T01:50:19+00:00

Brian

Guest


Shouldn't one of Kuhnemann or Swepson leave Qld so they get some games before the next tour?

2023-03-15T01:49:01+00:00

Brian

Guest


I don't know on what basis we would be favourites for the final. They beat us 2-1 here and 2-1 there We are generally bad players of swing bowling and if conditions do go that way India can play Jadeja and 4 seamers. The only galring weakness in either side is Australia missing an opener.

2023-03-15T01:35:56+00:00

Tempo

Roar Rookie


I certainly think Murphy has given an option to pick a second spinner when conditions suit.

2023-03-15T01:34:11+00:00

Brian

Guest


Don't confuse batting in India where opening is easier then batting at No 5 with Australian or English conditions. Head did well but there's a reason spinners were given the new ball

2023-03-15T01:31:27+00:00

Brian

Guest


Warne won it rightly in the 2005 Ashes too.

2023-03-15T01:26:49+00:00

Clear as mud

Guest


i would love us to consider Cummins + 1 + Green plus Lyon and Murphy the days of the Fab 3 being Fab or playing every test should be long gone

2023-03-15T01:24:41+00:00

Clear as mud

Guest


especially left arm wrist spinners. their time should be between 1130 and 1227 on day 4.

2023-03-15T01:09:20+00:00

Tempo

Roar Rookie


I don’t expect him to feature outside of Asia, but he’s a decent chance of playing a third or second spinner role in Asia in the future. He’s clearly behind Murphy in terms of his bowling skills but he can complement Lyon and Murphy on spinning pitches. Murphy has much more versatile skills to perform on non-spinning pitches – I think we saw that pretty clearly in the fourth test. Our next Asian test tour is currently scheduled to be Sri Lanka in 2025, then India in 2027 so probably not a lot of opportunities for Kuhnemann over the next 4 years, and another left armer could emerge prior to then – but he’s still got a lot of years left in his career to play more tests. I’m probably more interested in how Murphy’s career develops from here. He seems ready for test cricket now, but again he’s not going to have a lot of opportunities over the next few years unless Lyon’s form drops off or he gets injured. Good problem to have though given the difficulties we experienced replacing Warne when he retired.

2023-03-15T00:59:30+00:00

Tempo

Roar Rookie


What evidence did you present that Agar is currently a better red ball bowler than Kuhnemann? I’ve pointed out Agar has averaged over 50 in First Class cricket since 2020. Kuhnemann has averaged 34 over the same period. I have no bias against Agar. I’m a big fan of his and it would have solved a lot of problems if he was able to get his red ball game back on track for this series, particularly the value he adds with the bat. But unfortunately 5 years spent working almost exclusively on his white ball skills put paid to that. Looking forward to him getting a chance to show his skills in the upcoming ODI series in India.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar