Ashes Anniversaries: 6229 wickets at 8.33 - happy 150th to the 'finest bowler there ever was'

By All day Roseville all day / Roar Guru

“He was relentless, a chill wind of antagonism blew from him on the sunniest day.” Neville Cardus

Sydney Francis Barnes was born 150 years ago this week, on 19 April 1873. It’s timely for him to again be acknowledged as the greatest bowler ever.

Unfortunately we can’t directly compare him with modern greats such as Wasim Akram, Dennis Lillee, Malcolm Marshall and Shane Warne. Instead we must rely on statistics, and on those who having seen Barnes, then watched cricket right through to the 1970s.

The recognition 

In 2013, Wisden named him Barnes in an all-time World XI that marked 150 years of its Cricketers’ Almanack. In 2009, he was an inaugural member of the ICC Cricket Hall of Fame. When the “ICC Best-Ever Test Championship Ratings” were published in 2008, Barnes’s 932 in 1914 was the highest achieved.

As no-one alive now ever saw Barnes, peers’ opinions must suffice. Here are some, years later-

“The best of ‘em today is half as good as ‘Barnie.’” England great Wilfred Rhodes in 1973

“He was the finest bowler there ever was.” England ex-captain Arthur Gilligan in 1967

“If Barnes wasn’t the greatest bowler ever born, he was so close to it that it doesn’t matter.” Historian and ex-Australian player Johnny Moyes in 1950

Cricketer Syd Barnes, who is reckoned by many observers and cricketers as the best bowler ever in the game of cricket. (Photo by PA Images via Getty Images)

The statistics

In 27 Tests, Barnes took 189 wickets at 16.43. His combination of average, strike-rate and workload will never be matched.

His aggregate was a record until Clarrie Grimmett passed it in 1936, after delivering 13,500 balls to Barnes’ 7,873. Only George Lohmann has 100 wickets at a lower average. Barnes’ team-mates’ collective average in the same games was almost double at 29.59.

Barnes’ seven wickets per match is unsurpassed. The closest are the 1890s’ Tom Richardson (88 wickets at 6.29 per game) and Lohmann (112 at 6.22), and Muttiah Muralitharan (800 at 6.02). He also claimed a wicket every 41 deliveries. Only Kagiso Rabada has more at a better strike-rate.

In Australia he claimed 77 wickets from 13 games. Only Curtly Ambrose, with 78 from 14, has a higher tally among tourists. In 1911/12 alone he claimed 34 wickets. Maurice Tate, with 38 wickets in 1924/25, is the only visitor to have done better.

Barnes took 49 wickets in South Africa in 1913/14, from four games. The next best is Jim Laker’s 46 against Australia in 1956. Barnes’ figures included 17/159 in Johannesburg, a record until Laker’s 19/90.

He averaged 292 balls per match. The only non-spinners with higher workloads have been Tate, Alec Bedser and Max Walker. And Barnes’ era hustled through 21 overs per hour, compared to the current 14.

The calibre of Barnes’ victims was high, the most frequent being Victor Trumper (13 times) and Clem Hill (11). Both fell more often to Barnes, than to any other bowler.

The performance

Barnes’ greatest performance took place in Australia in 1911/12, when England regained the Ashes 4-1. He claimed 34 wickets at 22.88, in generally perfect batting conditions and against a very strong top-order.

At the MCG, a ‘flu-stricken Barnes produced a first-morning spell matched only by that of Stuart Broad at Trent Bridge in 2015. Here are three accounts-

“Barnes was magnificent. When the first six Australian wickets were down, his bowling showed: Overs, 11; maidens, 7; runs, 6; wickets, 5. This on a perfect wicket, and I look back on it as the finest bowling that I have ever witnessed.” Jack Hobbs

“I played three different balls. Three balls to play in a split second- a straight ‘un, an in-swinger and a break back ! Then along came one which was straight half-way, not more than medium pace. Then it swerved to my legs, perfect for tickling around the corner for a single. But the ruddy thing again broke across after pitching, quick off the ground and took my off stump !” Clem Hill

“There had never been a more astounding piece of bowling than this on a perfect piece of turf. His control was superb. Though conditions favoured the batsman, this man could get five of them in eleven overs for 6 runs.” Johnny Moyes

The skills

Barnes was six feet one inch tall, with unusually long arms. By using his full height and reach he extracted maximum bounce from a pitch. He was muscular, broad-shouldered and superbly fit. He also had large hands and long, strong fingers.

Like Warne and Bill O’Reilly he intimidated without bowling fast. He instead combined well-concealed drift, drop, turn and changes of pace, with relentless accuracy.

Barnes insisted that he spun the ball rather than swinging, seaming or cutting it. Fieldsmen described hearing his fingers snap as he released it. His strength and unique grips enabled him to turn the ball so much that it would swerve late, as it did for Warne.

He benefitted from mastering new deliveries. They pre-dated Bernard Bosanquet’s googly, Grimmett’s flipper, Jack Iverson’s carrom ball, Sarfraz Nawaz’s reverse-swing and Saqlain Mushtaq’s doosra.

Barnes’ biggest weapon was termed the “Barnes ball.” It swerved into batsmen, dipped late in flight, and after pitching moved away. He also possessed one that did the opposite, swerving away before moving back in. And by spinning the ball from the front of the hand, he could conceal its movement in a way that a wrist-spinner could not.

When conditions warranted he reduced his pace to medium-fast, from an approach of 15 yards. He was slow enough that a good wicketkeeper could stand up to the stumps, while sufficiently fast that a batsman couldn’t advance down the pitch.

Here are some descriptions by leading contemporaries-

“On his great Australian tour he clean-bowled Victor Trumper at the height of his powers, a ball swerving from the leg stump to the off and then breaking back to hit the leg. It was the sort of ball, that a man might see when he was tight. I was at the other end, I should know.” Charlie Macartney

“On a perfect wicket Barnes could swing the new ball in and out very late, could spin from the ground, pitch on the leg stump and miss the off.” Clem Hill

“He had the advantage of being tall and used his great height to bringing the ball well over. He could bowl both the leg and the off spinner, and he kept a perfect length, with clever and subtle variations of pace and flight.” Jack Hobbs

“He relied on disguised changes of pace and of break, which he never overdid. His best ball was one, very nearly fast, which pitched on the leg-stump to hit the top of the off, sometimes even on a good wicket.” CB Fry

“In bringing his arm high over his head, his powerful fingers could spin the ball either way on any wicket. Fast-medium in pace, he could bowl with the old ball as well as with the new.” Johnny Moyes

“Most deadly of all was the ball which he would deliver from rather wide on the crease, move in with a late swerve the width of the wicket, and then straighten back off the ground to hit the off stump. The secret of his mastery, though, was strictly and supremely physical- the supple steel of his fingers and hand.” Harry Altham

The pathway

Barnes saw cricket as a job. If you paid, he bowled. He put club before country, a century before Twenty20 freelancers such as Chris Gayle and Andre Russell.

As a result he appeared in a mere seven county games across nine seasons, before making his Test debut aged 28. And his 38-year first-class career included just 89 such matches in England, with only two full county seasons. He instead plied his trade in Saturday leagues, midweek Minor Counties games, tour and Gentlemen v Players fixtures, and for his country.

Barnes’ stance was prompted by the refusal of Warwickshire and Lancashire to find him off-season work. He calculated that he could quadruple his earnings by instead combining an office job with playing only on Saturdays, as a league club “pro.”

He duly played first-class cricket occasionally until he was 57, and league cricket until 67. He also worked until his death at 94. Only 12 Test cricketers have lived longer.

The longevity

James Anderson was recently judged the world’s number-one bowler, at age 40. Barnes’ Test career was ended at the same age by WWI’s onset. However he kept playing professionally and between ages 54 and 57, in his final 11 first-class matches, claimed 60 wickets at 16.68.

When aged 55, he took 7/51 and 5/67 for Wales against the West Indies, who rated him the best bowler they faced during their tour. He then claimed 6/58 and 2/29 against county champions Lancashire.

When aged 56, he twice dominated the touring South Africans. For Minor Counties he took 8/41 from 32 consecutive overs and 1/19, and for Wales he claimed 6/28 and 4/62. The performances helped earn him fifth position in that season’s averages.

For Staffordshire until the age of 62, he took 1,441 wickets at 8.15, mostly against first-class counties’ Second XIs. And as a club pro until the age of 67, he took 4,069 wickets at 6.08.

His tally from Tests down to leagues was a phenomenal 6,229 wickets at 8.33.

What might have been

In different circumstances his Test haul would have exceeded 400 wickets, and stood as a record until overtaken by Richard Hadlee in 1990. After debuting late at age 28, he then did not appear between 30 and 34. Consequently he participated in just 27 of England’s last 59 games before WWI.

Barnes often feuded with administrators, selectors, captains or team-mates. Books and articles describe him as taciturn, stubborn, combative, intimidating, misunderstood and demanding. When questioned about the best captain he had played under, he responded “There’s only one captain of a side when I’m bowling, and that’s me.”

Archie Maclaren made Barnes a “captain’s pick” for the 1901/02 tour to Australia, on the basis of a Second XI game and a net session. The league cricketer quickly riled team-mates. When storms endangered their ship, Maclaren comforted players with “If we go down, at least that bugger Barnes will go down with us.”

In 1902 he was selected just once against Australia. And only then because Maclaren, after inspecting the pitch on the match’s first morning, summonsed him by telephone from Manchester to Sheffield. He arrived late and took 6/49 and 1/50.

Of Barnes’ phenomenal performance at the MCG in 1911/12, journalist Ralph Barker wrote, “His meticulous, fussy field-placing irritated the crowd and they shouted at him to get on with it, so he threw the ball down, folded his arms, and refused to bowl until the noise had subsided.”

Having taken 49 wickets in South Africa in 1913/14, he refused to play in the series’ final match when organisers refused to cover his family’s travel. He withdrew from England’s first post-war tour to Australia for the same reason, at age 47.

Finally, it’s noteworthy that he moved between 13 different clubs in eight different leagues. Staffordshire team-mate and famed writer Bernard Hollowood famously wrote that “I was frankly afraid… of his scowling displeasure, his ferocious glare, his crippling silences and his humiliating verbal scorn.”

Happy birthday, Barnie. You would be a champion now, just as you were 120 years ago.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2023-06-06T07:43:15+00:00

All day Roseville all day

Roar Guru


Grade cricket back then was interesting. Usually at full strength with only four Shield games each season, and an Ashes series every fourth one. Games spread over three Saturday afternoons each of 4 hours, with a ferry trip to Manly, and the only other long trip being to Parramatta. And the suburb of Paddington was a slum !

AUTHOR

2023-06-06T07:36:40+00:00

All day Roseville all day

Roar Guru


The first time in a saw-mill, and the second time showing how he'd done it ! Larwood was desperately unlucky that Ironmonger caught him out for 98.

2023-06-06T02:12:33+00:00

Easybeat

Roar Rookie


Curly got upset once during a tour game. He'd scored a ton when Trumper let him get run out. "Gotta give the other batters a go Curly!" Sound advice. There's bibs and bobs out there. What is quite extraordinary is that he, Cotter, Ransford and Oldfield ALL went to Forest Lodge PS together, where Curly's dad was principal. ALL played for Oz. Must be some kind of record. Our cricket past certainly is QI!

2023-06-06T02:00:48+00:00

Easybeat

Roar Rookie


You're on to it All day! Have you ever read how poor old Dainty got the two finger stumps that allowed him to impart so much spin on the ball? A. real yarn about a real character of cricket.

2023-06-06T01:55:54+00:00

Easybeat

Roar Rookie


Don't forget All day, the same applied in England in '48. How much better would the Poms have been with Farnes and Verity. Ah! the vagaries of life!

AUTHOR

2023-06-05T22:39:01+00:00

All day Roseville all day

Roar Guru


Thanks Easybeat, I'll have to go hunting for Bardsley's biography or whatever other sources are available. Haigh's bio of Armstrong certainly mentioned how obsessive Bardsley was about batting, and how upset he used to get whenever "rested" from a tour game.

AUTHOR

2023-06-05T22:36:26+00:00

All day Roseville all day

Roar Guru


Thanks Easybeat, So many great stories about Barnes. I could have written a 3-part series. Worth noting that pitches were generally easy when not rain-affected, hence some high-scoring draws in Eng and timeless Tests in Aus. Plus many Laws benefitted batsmen far more than they do now.

AUTHOR

2023-06-05T22:32:26+00:00

All day Roseville all day

Roar Guru


Charlie Macartney, Jack Massie, Bert Ironmonger, Perc Hornibrook...

AUTHOR

2023-06-05T22:29:47+00:00

All day Roseville all day

Roar Guru


Fair call, Easybeat. Timeless Tests meant no escaping with draws. But without WWI and other lesser issues a younger and stronger Eng side might have included Foster, Barnes and Sutcliffe, not to mention Spooner, Jupp, Knight and Wood (all of whom declined invitations). Plus any potential greats that didn't survive the war. And perhaps jagged the third or fourth Test ? Having said that, in similar circumstances the Aus side might have included a Test-hardened and experienced Massie and Grimmett, to go with Gregory, McDonald, Ryder, Oldfield, Mailey, Collins etc !

2023-06-05T14:14:33+00:00

Easybeat

Roar Rookie


Can't agree with that last sentence, All day. 1920 it was all Jack Gregory who terrified the English whist Mailey bamboozled them for 36 wickets

2023-06-05T13:49:56+00:00

Easybeat

Roar Rookie


Sheek, not "Bradman's rules," rather, Armstrong's that's how he did it in '19-'21 when he wasn't beaten in Tests. And... don't overlook left hand orthodox like Saunders, same effect as right hand leggies. Then there was Whitty and Toshack.

2023-06-05T13:41:28+00:00

Easybeat

Roar Rookie


So you say, Pope Paul. Unlikely. Remember what Verity did to Braddles twice in one day in '34 and according to Wilf "he weren't half the bowler Barnie were. I doubt whether he would have taken Warne apart, either.

2023-06-05T08:49:26+00:00

Easybeat

Roar Rookie


Hi All Day If Bradman, as a batter, can be regarded as the greatest cricketer, why not Barnes? One notion, your excellent story conjures up is: how good would Bradman have been against Barnes, or indeed, Warne? And interestingly, the answer could come from an unlikely source. Clarrie Grimmett (who may have a bias against the Don for dropping him from the test team) believed that Braddles was suspect to accurate, sustained leg breaks. Hedley Verity, a left arm offie certainly showed that. But another tidbit for you and your readers: Warren Bardsley, one of Barnie's victims in that series and again in England, apparently had nightmares about the bowler to the point that he had to change his batting: stance, backswing the lot. You reckon when he retired from all cricket in his fifties, he would nominate Barnes as the greatest bowler he faced. You reckoned wrong? To whom did he give the palm? Jack Marsh.

2023-06-05T02:14:47+00:00

Easybeat

Roar Rookie


Great assessment of Sydney F. He, like his contemporaries had a huge advantage from uncovered pitches which probably enhanced his figures and detracted from the oppositions' averages. Omitting him from England's 1902 side probably cost England the Ashes as he was the only bowler who could "keep Victor quiet." Overall he was an ornery cuss, who, when he didn't get his own way, sulked and underperformed. In fact his own captain Archie McLaren, bemoaning an approaching gale when sailing to Australia, said,"At least that bugger Barnes will go down with us." Like Bradman, an extraordinary performer, but definitely NOT a team man. PS He only played 7 tests but "Ranji Hordern" averaged 6.57 wickets per test and Betty Wilson, 6.18 @ 11.8 (still not surpassed in test cricket). A fresh debate on the "greatest cricketer?" Same argument as Margaret Court or Serena Williams in tennis. Oh! and Betty's batting average was 57.6. The first cricketer, in a test, to score a ton and take 10 wickets, with a hat trick to boot. Frank Foster meet those standards, Sheek? (lol)

AUTHOR

2023-04-21T10:18:30+00:00

All day Roseville all day

Roar Guru


Fair enough DaveJ, A number of biographies and articles do include photographs showing his various grips. Unfortunately I don't have the expertise to analyse let alone replicate them. This extract from MA Noble's book on the Ashes of 1928/29 is topical, in which he was lamenting Aus's inability to prevent Eng (Hammond, Hendren, Hobbs, Sutcliffe etc) from racking up mammoth score after mammoth score- "The trouble lies with the bowlers. I have endeavoured to study this problem from every possible angle, and my matured verdict is that our bowlers, since the introduction of seam swinging, have concentrated too much upon its development, to the neglect of spin bowling as we used to know it. After seven or eight overs, when the surface of the ball has lost its polish, they find the seam useless for all practical purposes, and are then compelled to bowl mechanically..."

2023-04-21T07:07:42+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


I guess what puzzles me is why no one has been able to replicate it since on good wickets, despite several more generations of players and a much larger player pool around the world.

AUTHOR

2023-04-21T04:56:47+00:00

All day Roseville all day

Roar Guru


Thanks DaveJ, While I agree that it's hard to accept, I keep coming back to- consistent accounts by Barnes' contemporaries; that something must have differentiated Barnes from his peers; and that if something can be done once, it can be replicated. But no doubt Barnes did benefit from being an inventor or "early adopter" like Bosanquet, Hirst and Noble (of his era), and Iverson and others (in subsequent ones).

2023-04-21T04:31:55+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


Nice article AD, missed it last week. He was obviously a very special bowler, but I have my doubts about some of these eyewitness accounts. It’s pretty much impossible to bowl breakbacks or balls that swing anwa and cutback on what we would call a “perfect wicket” today. And you can only make the ball curve and spin like Warne did - occasionally- if you bowl like Warne. And Barnes claimed he did it with “finger twist”. On a perfect wicket? I don’t buy it.

AUTHOR

2023-04-18T21:39:38+00:00

All day Roseville all day

Roar Guru


Happy 150th today, Barnie

AUTHOR

2023-04-18T00:06:22+00:00

All day Roseville all day

Roar Guru


I've read somewhere about a possible encounter. If so it must have been in 1930, when Bradman toured England for the first time and Barnes aged 56 or 57 was still playing league cricket. However while Australia played Scotland during that tour, it didn't play either Wales or Minor Counties. So it's probably wishful thinking.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar