Unifying the belts: Australia could become cricket’s first triple champions ... but Proteas can put the choke on them

By Paul Suttor / Expert

Australia’s current crop of stars is coming to the end of a lengthy period of sustained success without ever becoming truly great like dominant teams of the recent past. 

But the cohort under Pat Cummins has the opportunity looming on the horizon of becoming the first side to “unify the belts” in boxing parlance. 

In the relatively short 16-year history of the T20 era, no men’s side has simultaneously held the two white-ball World Cups while also being ranked No.1 in the five-day format or in possession of the World Test Championship trophy. 

England became the first side to be the reigning T20 and ODI World Cup champions and they had designs on their Bazballing brigade to get them to the top in Tests to complete the treble but they’ve already surrendered the 50-over trophy with their meek recent display in India. 

Australia have the Test crown in their keeping after triumphing over India at The Oval but their beaten opponents are No.1 on the rankings by virtue of their Border-Gavaskar Trophy victory on home soil earlier in the year. 

India are also atop the ODI and T20 rankings but haven’t touched a World Cup trophy since winning the 50-over crown at home 12 years ago. That drought may be ending on Sunday after they made it 10 straight with Wednesday’s semi-final win over New Zealand in Mumbai. 

For the Aussies to deny India first they have to get past the Proteas. 

It’s a dangerous scenario for Australia. They are considered the bookmakers favourites after recovering from their 0-2 start with a seven-game winning streak. 

But they are facing a team that walloped them last month to make it four straight stretching back to their warm-up series in South Africa. 

And with memories of past World Cup chokes being brought up all over the place, there’s a possibility of complacency consciously or subconsciously entering the Australian camp’s psyche. 

It’s not as simple as putting up a big total and waiting for Temba Bevuma’s team to fall in a heap under pressure. 

This South African team does not have the big names of past iterations but it also doesn’t have the battle scars. 

Sporting teams tend to break hoodoos when they’re least expected to do so. 

Quinton de Kock. (Photo by Steve Bell – ICC/ICC via Getty Images)

It’s wrong to think a team with this much talent is destined to fall short just because there’s a history of underachievement. 

With the batting firepower of Quinton de Kock, Aiden Markham, Rassie van der Dussen, Heinrich Klaasen and David Miller combined with a balanced attack featuring Kagiso Rabada, Gerald Coetzee, Lungi Ngidi, Marco Jansen and Keshav Maharaj, the Proteas have enough oomph to take any opponent down. 

Bevuma, who is in doubt with a hamstring strain, is the only player who doesn’t have the ability to take the game away from Australia with flashes of brilliance.

Australia need to be bold, which has not been evident too often in a tactical sense from Cummins and coach Andrew McDonald in the white or red-ball arenas. 

They tend to play at their best when individuals go off. 

Whether it’s David Warner, Travis Head or Mitchell Marsh at the front end or Glenn Maxwell in the closing overs, the Aussies have tended to play with patience unless those four are having a day out. 

Adam Zampa’s return to form after a rare poor series in South Africa has masked the lack of impact or accuracy with the new ball from Mitchell Starc. 

Adam Zampa celebrates the wicket of Moeen Ali. (Photo by Gareth Copley/Getty Images)

Josh Hazlewood’s miserly reliability has also made up for Cummins being hot and cold spell to spell, game to game. 

Win or lose, the end is high for this group of players who have dominated Australian selection across the three formats for several years. 

Even if they can defy the odds to win this World Cup in India, the selectors need to refresh the T20 squad with young blood for the following showpiece tournament in the Caribbean and US next June. 

They paid the price of rolling out a veteran squad on home soil at last year’s T20 World Cup and BBL-bred stars like Matt Short, Tim David, Ashton Turner, Spencer Johnson and Nathan Ellis need to given a decent crack rather than occasional brief forays into the national team. 

The fact that Matthew Wade has been brought back from the Tasmanain Retirement Lounge to lead the team in the five-match T20 series after this World Cup in India isn’t a great sign that the Australian “brains trust” is thinking about the future.

But the selectors will have to finally locate their big boy pants, put them on and tell a few of these current stars their time is up in a format or two – David Warner is going, on his own terms it seems despite mediocre Test form, Steve Smith couldn’t be more vague about his plans while Starc said earlier this week he wouldn’t be quitting the ODI format for another year or so at least even though he’s returning to the IPL and looks fatigued from representing Australia in the three versions of the game.

Cummins was non-committal about whether he would continue as ODI skipper when clearly a new leader is needed for the white-ball squads, Head should be ahead of Mitchell Marsh, so the seamer can concentrate on Test duties.

Winning all three titles is a mammoth task that may be beyond the rising superpower of India in the future but as it stands Australia are a chance, albeit a long way from unifying the belts. 

Doing so would lift this group up alongside the golden generation that dominated the Test and ODI landscape under Mark Taylor, Steve Waugh and Ricky Ponting either side of the turn of the century. 

But you get the sense they will continue to occupy that space just below the legendary teams of the pace as a very good squad that was not quite in that stratosphere.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2023-11-24T11:11:51+00:00

Paul Suttor

Expert


and now? :silly:

2023-11-17T10:07:05+00:00

Barb Dwyer

Roar Rookie


Touché. Thought I had that one covered.

2023-11-17T09:43:59+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


He was in Judean Liberation Front

2023-11-17T09:12:58+00:00

Barb Dwyer

Roar Rookie


Hehe. Yes. He was part of the Judean People's Front. Or was that the People's Front of Judea?

2023-11-17T07:11:53+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


My phone is dancing a Mexican jumping bean dance. I've gotta bite the bullet and take it to the phone psychologist. ----- What getz me is that normal pages are all jumbling around but the ads come thru unscathed. Praise be to the Dollar

2023-11-17T07:08:56+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


As you may know George Harrison bankrolled "Life of Brian" but did you know that George Harrison had a small cameo in it?

2023-11-16T14:03:23+00:00

Barb Dwyer

Roar Rookie


As a python fan, you'd appreciate: "Old man?" "I'm 37."

2023-11-16T10:00:19+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


A year or 32 :laughing: I’d tell the kids at school I’m having the 27th anniversary of my 24th birthday. Ir whatever it was at the time

2023-11-16T09:26:48+00:00

Barb Dwyer

Roar Rookie


In all fairness, Rowdy, Don was hassling me on something, being presumptious on my age, so I may have exaggerated a year or 32. Apologies. Your music tastes certainly match mine and my older brothers!

2023-11-16T09:11:48+00:00

Ace

Roar Rookie


Oh, thanks Vamsi

2023-11-16T09:01:22+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


Yes l remember that. From memory Chappelli didn't like the selection. Mallet went but maybe Jenner didn't go when he should've. Jenner was a better bowler. Jenner was great bloke but got himself into trouble doing a bit of time. And then died really quickly. I forget who the spinners were.

2023-11-16T08:57:09+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


I don't think you get what l mean. You jump to a lot of delusions and seem antagonistic. You could try being a little more amenable than you currently present. It's a discussion board, not the Rosetta Stone. I've got no problem with you having a different point of view. But you appear to not reciprocate. Your postings on here and the AF board are somewhat peurile. You accused someone of being on social security without knowing the situation. -------- Just try being a little more mature.

2023-11-16T08:52:32+00:00

Barb Dwyer

Roar Rookie


I believe he was the only man to tour England and not make a run. He was going to once and Ian Chappell declared on him!

2023-11-16T08:35:59+00:00

Shire

Roar Rookie


If Waugh wasn't good in Pakistan, then Ponting wasn't good in England - 41.5 vs 41.79. Of course, most players would be quite happy to average 40+ in a strong opposition country where they've played plenty of innings. My point isn't even that Ponting isn't a first XI pick, it's purely that there ARE reasons that people would pick any of Australia's other great batsmen ahead of him.

2023-11-16T08:01:41+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


Clarke really was only a good tactician but a good one nonetheless

2023-11-16T08:00:37+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


I just saw the update

2023-11-16T07:51:02+00:00

BigGordon

Roar Rookie


I think Michael Clarke was a very good tactical skipper but had lousy people skills while Cummins is Mr Nice, but is an average to poor tactician. As you say, Waugh might well be our last great Test captain. Hopefully someone will come along soon with similar leadership ability to Tugga

2023-11-16T07:49:40+00:00

Vamsi K

Roar Rookie


Surya Kumar Yadav.

2023-11-16T07:47:55+00:00

Vamsi K

Roar Rookie


I am not sure likeability is a factor as the Aussies under Steve and Ponting weren't liked by all but still recognised as great teams. I also believe that we have a tendency to romanticise the past and not recognise greatness as it happens. Once his career ends Steve Smith will be counted amongst the great batsmen, even if his average falls back to around 50's. Warner may not be a great batsman in all conditions but what he brings to the team isn't just runs, but the mad fighting spirit, which sometimes can get a bit too much, but still is essential. Same with Cummins and Lyon and Starc. An example of looking at past with rosy lens is the fact that many tend to diminish batting averages of current batsmen saying that the pitches, bats and rules are in their favour but at the same time don't recognise that in the light of the above, the achievements of current crop of top bowlers are probably even more great than the greats of the past who played in conditions which still had something for the bowler, especially fast bowlers. Another major aspect is that when the past great teams of Aussies played the number of countries which could put on a strong team was probably limited. After 90's WI were on a terminal decline apart from a few individuals who still took the fight forward. India had good batsmen but never had the bowling resources to compete anywhere other than at home. Pakistan was Pakistan. Sri Lanka was just emerging to be a contender, but just like India just didn't have enough to put on a fight apart from their home conditions. NZ were a good team which never became a great one, though still had a great fight in them. England, apart from a few years in the mid 2000's weren't a great team in spite of being a traditional cricketing power. It was only SA which had a great team and I believed gave the Aussies their toughest challenge, at least in Tests. If the Indian batting line up of 2000's had the current pace bowling resources, that would have been something. The current Aussie team has to fight with teams which have evolved and become pretty good over the years. So, there are more challengers, at least 4 teams, which can and have pushed this team. In this context what this team has achieved may not be as great the one's under Waugh or Ponting but certainly not too far behind. I believe that even a bowler as great as McGrath would find the going not so easy with the batsmen friendly pitches. And to top that, during those times the bowlers knew the shots a batsmen could play. Now even a traditional batsmen like Joe Root is reverse scooping a fast bowler, and even in Tests.

2023-11-16T07:46:56+00:00

Doctor Rotcod

Roar Rookie


No thrash. WA snuck in front due to some Rocchiocolli belligerence and now have SA 2/6, Paris has 1/1, Hardie has 1/2...

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar