Last week I wrote how records in test cricket can last an incredibly long time before they’re broken (if they are at all). I looked at five or six records that will last the test of time, and also some records that have stood for a while but might still be broken.
Pivoting to One Day Internationals (ODIs), it’s a curious beast. There are fewer matches being played between ICC full member nations, but an increase in matches being played between associate nations now that these matches have been granted full ODI status.
To be sure, someone from the Netherlands is not going to have a 300 match career, but whereas in the past perhaps 40-50 per cent of their matches would count as ODI status, they now all do.
But we need to be realistic. While we talk about the crisis plaguing Tests, I think it’s fair to say ODIs are in a far greater existential crisis. People at least want Test cricket to survive, while no one would seem to care if ODI’s became extinct.
Personally, I think ODIs have about 10 years left. It means that the records set or being set in ODI cricket now stand a stronger chance of never being beaten. Longevity records will certainly last the test of time now, but there are a couple of other individual records that could still be beaten.
Let’s take a look.
Muttiah Muralitharan’s 534 will last forever. Firstly, taking nearly 1.5 wickets per match is mighty impressive, but he played 350 matches across 18 years. The closest current player to this record is Shakib Al Hasan, who is quite close to retirement and is over 200 wickets behind. He’s also played 100 fewer matches in a similar time span – Murali rarely missed a game.
Mitchell Starc is presently the closest fast bowler on the list, and he’s “only” taken 236 wickets in 121 matches. Think about that. Think about how little ODI cricket Starc actually plays, and he’s probably the best ODI bowler Australia ever had and will has played half the matches of Lee or McGrath.
Over a seemingly ridiculous 23 years, Sachin Tendulkar played 463 matches and he didn’t miss many either. One of the remarkable aspects about his career was that he was fit and healthy for so much of it and played, and played, and played. In a three format era, this is a record that is unbreakable.
The closest current player is Virat Kohli on 292. He would need to play for another 7 years to break this record, but he’s already played for 15 years, and started when he was 20 (compared to Tendulkar starting at 16). Unbreakable. There is, however, a record Kohli might break and then own for eternity. We’ll discuss that later.
Much like how Shane Warne holds this unwanted record in tests, Misbah Ul-Haq is the unfortunate standard bearer for this one. But unlike Warne’s hold on the Test record which looks slightly shaky, this one Ul-Haq is likely to hold forever.
What hurts Ul-Haq, besides few matches being played by the current crop, is that he’s one of just two full time batsman in the top 20, and he is nearly 1400 runs higher than second (Wasim Akram). No one current is anywhere near this list. Unbreakable. And what of the great irony that Ul-Haq briefly shared the record for the fastest century in in Test cricket…
Sachin Tendulkar, gulp, played 185 consecutive ODIs at one stage. By point of comparison, that’s more ODIs than all but THREE English cricket players have for their entire career (Eoin Morgan, James Anderson and Paul Collingwood).
This is not just a testament to his skill and fitness, but also his gracious obligation to fans who would often spend their days’ wages to come to see just him. In an era where players are now rested and rotated out of teams, this is an unbreakable record.
Time for a little fun. While it’s eminently possible someone might score runs than this man, no one will score more without wearing a helmet than Sir Isaac Vivian Alexander ‘Viv’ Richards. All of his 6721 runs were scored sans helmet. I know there is no stat list that exists recording this, but I think it’s fair to say no one is coming near this record. Unbreakable.
AB de Villiers’ 31 ball century is currently the record. And, while I personally think this one will last the test of time, I do concede that the current conditions of the game do make it possible for the record to be broken if about 5 things all happen simultaneously:
a) a pitch an aeroplane could land on
b) a postage stamp sized ground
c) a highly favourable match situation (for example, ABdV came in when the score was 1 for 247)
d) tripe bowling, and
e) a very good batsman
And it’s ‘e’ that makes me feel like this record might not be broken. There are few in the game past or present that were as gifted as AB. He didn’t just break the record, he shattered it by 5 balls. The reason why this is not unbreakable though is that in the domestic cup in Australia we saw Jake Fraser-McGuirk hit a 29 ball century. Unlikely, now that 30 balls has been broken, but it could happen in the international form. You never know.
It was expected when Tendulkar retired, this record was outlast the lot. There was recognition that no one was going to be playing 450 matches, let alone 400 matches in a career with such a cluttered international and domestic calendar. But the other assumption was that there wouldn’t be a batsman who would average near 60 for the near entirety of his career.
Enter Virat Kohli.
Kohli is about 4500 runs behind. Which is a gigantic number for sure. And Kohli is 35. But Tendulkar played cricket into his early 40s. And Kohli is still whacking the ball at 58 per knock. If he maintained that average, he will pass the record in 78 matches. Even if he dipped to “just” 50, he would pass the record in 91. What helps is that India still do play enough ODIs a year to give Kohli a chance, but he would probably need to stop skipping series and start playing all of them to do it. Time, not talent, is his enemy.
And yes, if he broke that record, then he will own that for all time. Along with his 50+ ODI century record too.
This will eventually go. Much in the same way that you need the right conditions to break the fastest century, the 500 runs in an innings barrier will eventually be broken. You just need a team firstly prepared to give it a go (and it’s fair to say there’s the odd meaningless ODIs being played these days), probably lined up against a poor team on a tiny field on a batting friendly deck. England gave it a red hot crack against the Dutch a few years back with 498 and with more full v associate member cricket taking place, it’s on the cards.
I was under the impression Mick Lewis’ 0/113 would hold this record even after the sun swallows up the earth, but then it got beaten in the world cup by the unfortunate Bas de Leede who ‘improved’ the mark by 2 runs and now I believe anything is possible.
I’m confident de Leede would think so too. This is a record you do not want to be at the top of the pile for when ODIs are eventually pulled from the calendar. It took 17 years for Lewis’ record to go and as I said, I don’t think ODIs will be around in 10 years time. The clock is ticking… There is surely another bowler out there who will have a worse day than when Tom Hanks boarded a particular Fedex flight one night and told Helen Hunt he’ll “be right back”.
West Indian Phil Simmons holds this record. His 1992 match card read 10-8-3-4. That’s 0.3 runs an over. Ridiculous. I would say unbreakable, but these are the kinds of ridiculous records that just might get randomly broken on a lucky date.
Why? Look no further than Australia’s Sean Abbott, who after 5 overs was once on track to break the record against New Zealand, but the Black Caps were bowled out before he could finish his allocation. Interestingly, of the front line bowlers he bowled the fewest overs which makes you wonder why Josh Hazlewood who NZ plundered 11 runs from his 6 wicketless overs was given more! So it could happen… But imagine breaking this record in the modern ODI era.
What you got? What records will remain unbroken, and what ones (and be as obscure as possible) might just get beaten?
Tufanooo
Roar Rookie
You'd have to think it was deliberate. ODI fields are spread out. He would surely have been able to hit it into some space if he wanted to. Or, the odds are that at least once in 31 balls he would have edges, miscued a ball to some space if he was trying to score. To still be on 0 indicates a conscious attempt to not score.
Tim Carter
Roar Pro
Low scoring, certainly, but surely not 0(31)-low!
Tufanooo
Roar Rookie
Agreed.
All day Roseville all day
Roar Guru
https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/dlf-cup-2006-07-256596/australia-vs-west-indies-final-256615/full-scorecard Aus 6/240 (50) def WI 113 (34.2). Morton 0(31) dismissed at 3/20 (9.6). McGrath 6/2/6/0, Bracken 7/0/16/3, Lee 8.2/1/24/4.
Tim Carter
Roar Pro
If I recall correctly, everyone else scored at a standard rate in that game, which makes you wonder if he was just having a nightmare at the crease and wasn't fortunate enough to be put of his misery faster, if it was a misguided tactic, or even some sort of protest.
Tim Carter
Roar Pro
Just like tests, lowest team score has to be a possibility. 35 is the current mark.
All day Roseville all day
Roar Guru
Runako Morton, with thanks to Cricinfo- "A batsman who played 15 Tests and 56 ODIs for West Indies, Runako Morton died in a car crash when just 33. His international career with West Indies spanned eight years, but he unable to win a regular place in the side, largely because of the controversies he was embroiled in. His run-ins with authority started early, when he was expelled from the West Indian Academy in July 2001, for a series of regulation breaches. He refused to be bowed, however, and continued to accumulate runs for Leeward Islands in the Busta Cup. In February 2002, he was called into an injury-plagued West Indian squad as a replacement for Marlon Samuels, and was tipped to become one of the few Test cricketers from tiny island of Nevis. But he threw away his opportunity when he pulled out of the ICC Champions Trophy in September 2002, after lying about the death of his grandmother. His career slipped further down the pan when he was arrested (though released without charge) in January 2004, following a stabbing incident, but in May 2005, he was given a third chance at redemption when he was recalled to the one-day squad to face South Africa although he didn't get a game. He got his chance later that month against Pakistan at home, and was then picked for the 2005-06 tour to New Zealand, where he proved his worth with a fighting century - his maiden one-day hundred - in a losing cause. He followed it up with another ton, in the away series against Zimbabwe, but soon made it into the record books for his painstaking 31-ball duck in the final of the DLF Cup against Australia in Malaysia. It was the slowest ODI duck, beating Phil Simmons's earlier record that had consumed 23 balls."
All day Roseville all day
Roar Guru
I think that we can safely disregard the integrity of any slow innings played in Sharjah during the 1980s and '90s ? On Gavaskar, he also didn't exactly cover himself in glor,y with his comments regarding West Indian spectators during India's tour of 1975/76.
Tim Carter
Roar Pro
There was a West Indies cricketer, Morton (?), who scored a 30-something ball duck in the early 2000's... batting in the middle order!
Tufanooo
Roar Rookie
Thanks I looked at that, but wasn't sure how to qualify it? Should it be a minimum 100 ball innings or a 50 ball innings? Or a percentage of the innings balls? Either way, whatever metric, Gavaskar comes up on top, so I should have just put it in! What an extraordinarily entitled player he was. It seeps into his commentary too.
All day Roseville all day
Roar Guru
Thanks Tufanooo, The record for slowest innings will never, ever be broken. It was made in the first-ever men's World Cup match, played at Lord's in 1975, between England and India. India replied to England's 4/334, with just 3/132 from 60 overs. Sunil Gavaskar's share was a staggeringly-slow 36 not out from 174 balls.