He doesn't have to redeem himself. Has served his time. No further drawing of blood required. Anyway he is in The Test team only to score runs, not for his fielding.
I'll bet there's more than a few thousand out there who'd disagree with that heading - including me! A few runs in the series would certainly help, as did this catch.
Needs to build a solid innings (i.e. 50+) in Australia's first dig to truly 'redeem himself', at the moment it seems that he's only in the team for his fielding.
Ken
Roar Rookie
An excellent catch but he is still a cheat. Ridiculous headline.
Just Nuisance
Roar Rookie
He doesn't have to redeem himself. Has served his time. No further drawing of blood required. Anyway he is in The Test team only to score runs, not for his fielding.
Boomsong
Guest
Very strange headline hardly think a catch redeems something like that.
Peter Warrington
Guest
Maybe he is the keeper we are looking for. Because the actual keeper...
U
Roar Rookie
Let’s see him score some runs first
Paul
Roar Guru
I'll bet there's more than a few thousand out there who'd disagree with that heading - including me! A few runs in the series would certainly help, as did this catch.
Will Cuckson
Roar Rookie
Needs to build a solid innings (i.e. 50+) in Australia's first dig to truly 'redeem himself', at the moment it seems that he's only in the team for his fielding.
Jeff
Roar Rookie
Redeems himself for Sandpapergate? What an odd odd headline and statement.