Deans will force players to own Samoa loss

By Andrew Logan / Expert

Australia’s Rod Davies, left, is knocked out of bounds by Samoa’s Alesana Tuilagi during their rugby union test match in Sydney, Sunday, July 17, 2011. Samoa won the match 32-23. (AP Photo/Rick Rycroft)

Amongst the smoking debris and bomb craters left on ANZ Stadium after the Wallabies were lambasted by Samoa yesterday, the comment was made that “coach Robbie Deans will be shattered in the dressing sheds after that”.

I’ve been something of a student of the Deans School of Psychology since he was appointed to the Wallabies top job in 2008 and while it’s hard to argue that Deans won’t be disappointed with the loss to Samoa, there is plenty to suggest that he’ll use it as an opportunity to reflect the responsibility back to the players, just as he has since day one.

A Deans University degree in rugby has plenty of free ranging electives, combined with a few core subjects, and these core subjects all point to one thing – that your standing in the game is always temporary, and you have to front up and earn every result.

This central tenet to the Deans philosophy was underlined by his comments post-Samoa, where he said plainly “We were beaten by a side which came here with a real intent, and got the result that they wanted”. The implication being plainly that the Wallabies didn’t bring a real intent, and consequently got a result that will make them squirm for some time yet.

Only those in on the half-time talk will really know what coach Deans said to his players, but I am certain that the vibe would have been “OK boys, you got yourselves into it, now get yourselves out of it”.

Certainly that line of thought was supported by his reluctance to use his reserves bench. Will Genia and Kurtley Beale didn’t join the play until the 55th minute, despite Mark Gerrard being largely absent, and halfback Nick Phipps being unable to organise the rabble.

Sitaleki Timani remained on the field when Dan Vickerman joined, with the experienced and effective Nathan Sharpe given the early shower. Rod Davies stayed on for the whole game, despite an ordinary display where his lack of raw strength was evident.

It all pointed to Deans wanting to see whether any of his fringe starters could step up and take some control in the face of huge pressure from a buoyant and aggressive Samoan outfit. Unfortunately as the game went on, the answer to that question became clear.

To say that Robbie Deans wasn’t interested in winning the Test would be plainly wrong. He’s a proud man, and a winner at heart. But he knows that the big prize on offer is the World Cup, and that perhaps the best thing for his young group is to get themselves into a tough situation and then own the experience of getting out of it. Or not, as the case may be.

Sometimes the learning can be as valuable as the winning.

Robbie Deans is big on responsibility and he’s big on learning. He’s also big on competition within the squad, and giving as many players as possible a chance to show their wares and press for a spot.

As he said recently “Only a certain number get that opportunity on the weekend to run out in the cauldron, but the wheel turns, and opportunity always presents itself. It is up to how individuals grasp those opportunities.”

Not many grasped the opportunity yesterday.

By way of illustration, when the 40 man Wallaby squad was named recently, it was an intriguing experience to feel uncertain for once about the naming of the returning Dan Vickerman and the recently injured Rocky Elsom, two players who normally inspire a huge amount of confidence.

Out on the field, Elsom looked sullen and out-of-sorts and appeared to be a yard behind for a lot of the match. I once wrote that he ran and fought for ground as though he was being paid by the metre. If that was the case against Samoa, he might be wondering about next week’s rent.

As for Vickerman, his hands were rusty and his lack of pace after an extended period of time out of top line rugby was obvious. Does Australia really need him at the World Cup?

Despite Timani’s lapses with his hands, he is much fitter and harder on the ball than Vickerman, and James Horwill is better than both of them by a country mile. Perhaps at 32 and after 3 years out, the big lock has left his run too late.

Speaking of grasping the opportunity, we have to look hard at the experienced Wallaby Matt Giteau, who was given the chance to show that he is a viable alternative to Quade Cooper, particularly in the nightmare scenario where Cooper is injured during the World Cup.

It wasn’t to be.

Although Giteau was the glue that held the faltering Brumbies together this year, he was unable to turn the tide against a physically rampant Samoa. To be fair, he was given no help from Phipps early, but it’s hard to imagine a Genia/Cooper pairing failing as much to change tactics when things started to go badly wrong.

Giteau appeared to not want to kick for position, but as Scott Higginbotham showed during his cameo, a judicious grubber or two went a long way to turning the Samoans around and rebalancing the pressure. Playing wide and cross-field against a rushing Samoan defence doesn’t really work – just ask Rod Davies who was on the end of a couple of bellringers. Indeed Giteau himself was t-boned a couple of times for his one-dimensional tactics.

To paraphrase Deans, the Wallabies didn’t so much show “the depth of their resolve” so much as the “depth of their presumption”.

And the Samoans played tutor to Deans’ professor, driving home Deans’ lesson to the Wallabies that “Nothing is forever and you have to earn it every time”.

Where to from here? It’s ugly, but not a total horror movie.

The Samoans played with some real structure and intelligence, unlike the unjust stereotype of Islander teams. Their defensive patterns were for the most part tight, fast off the line and very physical – a gift to the Wallabies really, in the sense that we got a good look at what we are likely to confront from the better sides come World Cup time.

Not everyone was poor either.

Adam Ashley-Cooper and Pat McCabe were strong in defence and McCabe took the ball forward with heart, despite the certain knowledge that he was going to get bashed.

Ashley-Cooper made a heavy try saving tackle about 3 metres out from the Wallaby line. Ben McCalman also managed to wrestle his shoulders through the defensive line to give the Wallabies some go-forward ball – the fact that it was mostly squandered was not his fault.

Digby Ioane didn’t see anything like the space he enjoyed with the Reds, but ran hard, and was physical in his work.

There were good signs there and nothing should detract from the Samoan victory. On this performance, they were as good or better than all the Six Nations teams, except probably England and France. The Wallabies, by contrast, were no better than any of the 6 Nations teams, except probably Italy and maybe Scotland.

But they didn’t get there on their own. The Samoans pressured them into mistakes, beat them at the tackle and breakdown contest, and won the physical battle generally. They deserve all the plaudits.

Robbie Deans will be disappointed that some of his players didn’t front up on this occasion. But he has learnt the hard way that this Wallaby side always needs a reminder early in the season. “Nothing is forever and you have to earn every result”.

He’ll be disappointed, but in the hands of Robbie Deans, the Samoan result could be just the mirror which reflects the Wallabies’ lack of resolve back at them, and forces the players to take responsibility for their World Cup fate.

If that happens, look out world.

Of course, that’s just my own outlook. As Deans quite rightly says about the words of critics and selectors, “It’s just one man’s opinion”.

The Crowd Says:

2011-07-21T11:48:27+00:00

Grandma

Guest


AGL - good to see you are writing again - I have missed you on The Roar! Can't help but agree with OJ - a Test match loss is never good - no matter how you like to rationalise it!

2011-07-20T04:01:35+00:00

johnny-boy

Guest


And here his OJ's beloved Graeme Henry's take on Deans ... "But Henry today labelled criticism of Deans as wide of the mark and backed the former All Black's call not to throw key members of the Super Rugby-winning Queensland Reds side straight back into the test arena. "Robbie has got a bit of stick by the media which I think is questionable stick," said Henry when questioned on the match's repercussions for international rugby. "Like, how does he play those Reds players? Throw them out there again, kill them? Or be pragmatic? He was hoping he'd do the business without those Reds players, and it didn't happen that way. "So he gets a lot of stick for making the right decision. It's easy to sit back here and criticise him. We don't have to do the job. So I've got some sympathy for him. "

2011-07-19T15:53:24+00:00

vaguely

Roar Pro


I know, statistically he is the worst, but it'll be a cold day in hell before I base anything important solely on stats. You know what they say about stats being like bikinis...

2011-07-18T22:22:52+00:00

stillmissit

Roar Guru


Very true coodabeenawesome: It has been always so even back in the 70's when I started playing in Australia. All they wanted from a prop was to be able to hold his side up and run. The scrum has always had daylight running through it. We must also educate the media, Greg Growden has no idea about the value of tight 5 play and if the others had the nouse they would not be applauding so loudly every time some drop kick prop runs 30m to score an intercept try. This is the reason we have props like Alexander hanging around. The media expect rugby props to be like league props and they shouldn't be.

2011-07-18T21:50:29+00:00

Hopperdoggy

Guest


Agree strongly on all points GB. This game certainly achieved the outcome of sifting out the boys from the men!

2011-07-18T13:23:26+00:00

coodabeenawesome

Guest


Australia have no respect for tight 5 play.This has been historically a weak point for us and it was again on show against Samoa. It must be the oldest cliche in rugby, It ALL starts up front with the Tight 5. If you go back and look at all of Australia's successful periods WC's etc. guess what? We had a competitive tight 5 who allowed our natural strength, backline play, to dominate. So since Eddie the eagle dismantled the tight 5 from the 99 WC onwards we are now at a point where we have national scrum camps, obviously a positive but we are still not quite there. What is still missing is attitude. By that I mean Vickerman type attitude not Sharpe type attitude. For all of those who think Notso is ace please have a rethink. I for one do not want the biggest bloke in my team standing at outside 'ken centre relying on 2 backs and the flanker to secure quick ball for my scrum half. I want to see him hit the ruck and get up and hit it again and again. I dont want to see his head unless its at lineout time. The two second rowers are the heart of the team. When they are beating well the team beats well. On Sun Vick's may have looked a bit off the pace at times but he stole a lineout, he was under the bloke who scored a try and he hit every ruck he could. Not flashy but head down bum up stuff. This is what's required. not numbers 1-5 wanting to score trys and be seen in the centres every 'ken play. Also the tight head prop should be so stuffed from anchoring the scrum properly any try he scores is a massive fluke but tell that to who ever coaches Alexander...

2011-07-18T13:16:36+00:00

Ben S

Roar Guru


Fair enough they have proven themselves as players at the Reds, but I'd be very wary of chucking them into the Test cauldron for another season or two. Somebody like Slipper has the build to cope physically, whereas IMHO Daley and Simmons are too callow just yet.

2011-07-18T13:04:36+00:00

Stonethecrows

Guest


I don't see how the loss of Benny Robinson is such a tragedy and that the Wallaby scrum without him will be poor, I don't think he was going to be the difference. I acknowledge that he is a good scrummager but he may have been living on reputation rather than results. I make reference to the most recent tour of Europe where the Wallabies scrum got destroyed by Wales and then by England and Robinson was subsequently dropped. If the same thing happens without him everyone will declare it was the loss of Robinson that was the difference for the Wallaby scrum but I beg to differ.

2011-07-18T13:01:39+00:00

Denby

Guest


Technically Deans is actually the worst Wallaby coach ever. He has the worst win/loss ratio of any Wallaby coach, he was in charge for the longest run of AB defeats and 2 of the worst losses of all time Samoa and Scotland. Not bashing Dean's just pointing out the facts.

2011-07-18T12:58:54+00:00

Jiggles

Roar Guru


I'm not sold about Faainga but the other two have it I think. Daley will get there in the next couple of years and is probably a bit to green at present. Simmons is already taking on a lot of Responsibility at the reds, we have to remember he is only 22. I'm not saying they are world 15 standard but they have shown they are above mist the other options in Australia right now.

2011-07-18T11:06:34+00:00

jeznez

Guest


Terry, you'd be better swapping Kepu and Holmes there mate. Holmes is a much better LHP than he is a THP and Kepu mostly played THP this year and did it pretty well. Otherwise I'm pretty much in agreement.

2011-07-18T10:33:17+00:00

Keith

Guest


HA-ha!

2011-07-18T09:38:17+00:00

Derm

Roar Guru


"The Wallabies face Samoa potentialy in the quarters, England and Ireland. All teams not noted for their backs (not a dig) but more for the forward confrontation... " Ireland are known more for their forward confrontation? News to me. Ask SH fans to name Irish players and you get: " Brian O'Driscoll, eh, Ronan O'Gara, Darcy, eh, eh, O'Connell and eh, eh, eh.....Heaslip!. "The Irish finished strongly in the Six Nations. They are a very dangerous side because they have players in the back-line who can create. I think they'll be strong." G. Henry 5 July 2011.

2011-07-18T08:53:51+00:00

Canon

Guest


Well I watched the game and I have to say I agree with Ben. The Samaon kicking wasn't great nor were their set pieces. The point is that they overcame the weaknesses in their game whilst the Wallabies were unable to. As Ben says, and has been clearly apparent for a number of years, the Wallaby forwards and especially the tight five cannot cut it at international level. They've been getting outmuscled for quite a while now and it's hard to see why. They are just as big and strong as any around and yet they keep getting beaten and I can only assume it's because their attitude isn't right. Defence comes down to attitude and if you aren't prepared to do the hard work then you are going to get beaten every single time.

2011-07-18T08:49:08+00:00

Ben S

Roar Guru


Jiggles, call me cynical, but I couldn't see Daley, Faingaa and SImmons dominating at the highest level. I fancy that Slipper and Horwill would add more bite, however.

2011-07-18T08:38:23+00:00

Ben S

Roar Guru


A lot of the Samoan kicking was reactionary, because the Samoans turned over ball, rather than any great concerted effort to put the Wallabies back in their own 22. The Samoans didn't disrupt the Australian set piece either. Their scrummage was very weak, with Taulafo constantly disengaging and they could only really work off of a short lineout.

2011-07-18T08:34:35+00:00

Capital

Guest


Welcome back GR

2011-07-18T08:27:27+00:00

Red Rooster

Guest


I would be interested to know why we have 3rd string Wallabies? Bring back the A team for the 3rd string. The Bench players should have been starters and the rookies play the end of the game - common sense

2011-07-18T08:01:53+00:00

cinematic

Guest


Not a bad bunch huh?

2011-07-18T07:55:41+00:00

GrecoRoman

Roar Guru


Thanks Sam. Had an extremely busy and exhausting day at work today. Barely had time to read the article on Le Tour de France on this site as it was.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar