The stats don’t lie, Finch is one of the world’s best

By Hugh McDonald / Roar Rookie

August 29th 2013. Aaron Finch belts a phenomenal 156 in a Twenty20 against England.

Exactly one year on and Finch has cemented his spot as one of the world’s best short form cricketers. I don’t say that lightly, my stats below back this up!

Aaron Finch has experienced a meteoric rise in the past 12 months. His international cricketing career was fledgling, in and out of both national Twenty20 and ODI sides following his Twenty20 debut against England in 2011.

Given the 2012-13 home summer to prove himself in both formats, the lad from country Colac couldn’t muster up anything more than 38 in 10 innings across the two formats. The Grinch, as he’s known to his teammates, would be dropped for the upcoming Champions Trophy in England, and it seemed once again he was destined for the international cricketing abyss.

That was until Darren Lehmann, a man of a similar mould and character, entered the national set up. Finch was recalled to the 2013 Twenty20and ODI sides that would tour England following the Ashes. To say Finch grasped this opportunity with both hands is a gross understatement.

The meteoric rise begun with a record-breaking 156 against England in a T20 at the Rose Bowl, and five days later the Grinch would follow this up with 148 in an ODI against Scotland.

To put into perspective how successful his last 12 months have been, you have to compare his statistics during this period to other international stars.

• During this 12 month period, across both Twenty20 and ODI cricket, only Virat Kohli has scored more runs than him;
• He has scored the most Twenty20 runs and the 10th most ODI runs during the 12-month period;
• Of the twelve players that have scored 1000+ runs across the two formats in this period, his combined average is bettered only by George Bailey, AB De Villiers, Quinton de Kock and Virat Kohli;
• He’s scored five hundreds across the two forms in this period, and that is matched only by Quinton de Kock.

Along with these brilliant performances at international level was Finch’s 181* in Lords’ 200th Anniversary exhibition match played earlier this year. The match involved legends of the game including Brian Lara, Sachin Tendulkar, Shane Warne, Adam Gilchrist, Muttiah Muralitharan and a host of others.

But it was the Grinch who stole cricket fan’s Christmas, with a swashbuckling knock that left even Tendulkar in awe. The little master reportedly told Finch throughout the innings how it was such a joy to watch him in full flight.

On top of an agglomeration of large scores, he has matured as an international batsman. The consistency that he lacked in the start of his international career is now a trademark of his game. Finch can now be confidently relied upon to manufacture the start of an innings for Australia.

An aggressive batsman by nature, gone are the days his of wild heaves. What’s been welcomed in is a much more controlled approach. Finch’s massive maximums lead to the spreading of the field and he’s now taking advantage of these gaps by dabbing the ball around the field to rotate the strike and build an innings.

His compact foot movement has allowed him to get on the front foot early and smother the swing from the new ball.

It’s with this newfound approach that Finch will arguably be Australia’s most important batsman at the upcoming world cup. Along with David Warner, the pair will hopefully get Australia off to fast starts.

It’s not only the damage they do on the scoreboard though, it’s the brutality with which they disarm opposition attacks that really grinds fielding teams in to the ground.

It’s not solely his batting that will be of use to Australia in the world cup, with his spot in the side now cemented his status as a leader grows. He’s now captained Victoria, the Renegades, Australia A and the Pune Warriors and this experience will be invaluable for the likes of Michael Clarke and George Bailey.

Aaron Finch’s status in the game has flourished over the last twelve months, he is indeed currently one of, if not, the premier opening batsman in International short form cricket. The statistics justify what an astounding period of cricket this has been for him.

His hundred against South Africa two days ago displayed how far he has come as he mixed adept control with his trademark brash blows out of the ground. And it’s with all of this that he will find himself labelled one of Australia’s most important cogs in its quest to win the upcoming world cup.

 

  ODI Statistics 29/8/2013-29/8/2014
  Innings Runs Strike Rate Average 50s 100s
Kohli 19 1059 107 62 6 4
Finch 17 836 95 49 3 4
De Kock 16 972 92 61 2 5
Sangakarra 25 1044 90 44 7 3
Shezhad 22 999 77 45 6 3
Hafeez 21 972 84 57 3 4
Mathews 26 965 88 54 7 0
Sharma 21 921 87 51 5 2
Amla 15 798 85 57 2 4
Bailey 16 849 106 65 7 1
De Villiers 17 884 111 63 3 4
Dilshan 20 779 81 41 7 0

 

  Twenty20 Statistics 29/8/2013-29/8/2014
  Innings Runs Strike Rate Average 50s 100s
Kohli 7 348 129 87 4 0
Finch 12 544 162 45 4 1
De Kock 11 293 123 33 0 0
Sangakarra 10 204 117 29 1 0
Shezhad 11 224 124 22 0 1
Hafeez 11 212 103 24 1 0
Mathews 8 176 134 25 1 0
Sharma 7 208 122 35 2 0
Amla 11 331 126 30 1 0
Bailey 12 196 154 25 1 0
De Villiers 8 158 153 23 1 0
Dilshan 12 263 113 26 2 0

 

  Combined ODI & T20I Batting Statistics
  For the Period of Aug 29 2013 – Aug 29 2014
  (Qualification: Minimum 1000 Runs across the two formats)
   
  Innings Runs Strike Rate Average 50s 100s
Kohli 26 1407 112 67 10 4
Finch 29 1380 113 48 7 5
De Kock 27 1265 98 51 2 5
Sangakarra 35 1248 93 40 8 3
Shezhad 33 1223 83 38 6 4
Hafeez 32 1184 87 46 4 4
Mathews 34 1141 93 46 8 0
Sharma 28 1129 92 47 7 2
Amla 26 1129 94 45 3 4
Bailey 28 1045 113 50 8 1
De Villiers 25 1042 116 50 4 4
Dilshan 32 1042 87 36 9 0

 

The Crowd Says:

2014-08-30T12:37:33+00:00

TheCunningLinguistic

Guest


Personally, I'd not have any of those three within cooee of the Test Team. SO many other players with exciting potential- Silk, Burns, Maddison etc. Hughes before anyone else though- I think he deserves it, and I'm expecting big things from his next stint.

2014-08-30T08:16:31+00:00

doubledutch

Roar Pro


agree also

2014-08-29T23:23:47+00:00

Armchair Expert

Guest


Finch's recent Yorkshire performances were certainly enigmatic, he made 291 1st class runs @48 from 5 matches and 256 20/20 runs @25.6 from 10 matches, his career 1st class strike rate is only 54 and his shield season averages in order are 37, 34,17,11 and 17, it'll be interesting to see if he can get back into the Victorian shield team next season.

2014-08-29T10:00:28+00:00

bearfax

Guest


You know Alan, for a batsman who has scored 8853 runs at 46.59 at first class level, 3524 runs at 48.27 at List A level and 1104 runs at 44.16 at T20 level, Hughes inability to play spin at all doesnt seem to have affected his performances, which overall places him in the top 3 batsmen in the country for all forms combined. No one is questioning that Hughes has had problems with various forms of bowling including spin. But if he is so successful in scoring runs in all forms of cricket against all forms of bowling, what does that mean about the rest of the players we have here in Australia. Point is that he has some problems with spin but to say he cant play it seems totally at odds with his performances

2014-08-29T09:19:10+00:00

Alan

Guest


Guys Hughes can't play spin, why is this so difficult to deal with

2014-08-29T08:50:46+00:00

Tom from Perth

Guest


Haha

2014-08-29T08:50:04+00:00

Tom from Perth

Guest


15??? That is abysmal... I hope you're wrong Rellum

2014-08-29T07:36:07+00:00

Rellum

Roar Guru


That's how you andI think Ronan, but the selectors put a high value on limited overs form. Finch will be next in line if Hughes and Doolan are cast aside.

2014-08-29T07:24:24+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Over the past three Shield seasons combined, Finch has averaged 15. FIFTEEN. While he has an enormous amount of work to do as an FC player, he is developing into a sensational limited overs batsman and is a serious weapon for Australia heading into the World Cup. He's still only 27 so has plenty of years ahead of him to improve his play in all three formats.

2014-08-29T06:11:55+00:00

jammel

Guest


Agreed Matthew Gently. Needs big runs + solid performances in Shield before he can be considered for Tests. I don't think Finch is close to the Test team at all - I'd rather Khawaja and Cowan back a thousand times more than Finch in the Test XI….

2014-08-29T05:31:46+00:00

matthew_gently

Guest


I was waiting for someone to bring up Bevan. There is no parallel because Bevan's first-class record was outstanding. Four- and 5-day cricket is my yardstick for judging the talent of an emerging batsman, and I'm yet to be impressed by Finch. What could change my mind? If Finch continues his current form and helps Australia win a high-stakes match at the coming World Cup, then I'll happily eat my words.

2014-08-29T05:02:19+00:00

JoM

Guest


And bat against who? The same bowlers as last season and the one or two before that? He is not the only one who hasn't had success against spin. Send him back to shield to get runs and yet he does that and dominates but it still isn't good enough for some.

AUTHOR

2014-08-29T03:20:51+00:00

Hugh McDonald

Roar Rookie


^ Hear hear, absolutely nailed it! I've never heard anyone label Chris Rogers a bad cricketer due to his lack of runs in T20 or 50 over cricket

2014-08-29T03:18:15+00:00

Tom from Perth

Guest


"There is no shame in being a One-day specialist (or 20/20 for that matter). Luck has nothing to do with it, some players games are suited to one or the other, he actually does build an innings in the One dayers…" Well said Steve.

2014-08-29T03:16:12+00:00

Tom from Perth

Guest


He's been playing well in the County as a number 6. So well, in fact, Jason Gillespie (his County coach) has called for him to be in test side. "The fact is he would need AT LEAST two full seasons of the shield averaging near to 50 for him to even be considered anyway." Absolutely agree. That's his plan, reckons he's a shot by the time he's 30.

2014-08-29T03:11:07+00:00

SteveW

Guest


Does it really matter that he doens't convert in Shield. Ultimately he is picked for the shorter forms of the game based on his state form in the shorter forms.... he may never have the game to become a test player... doesn't mean he is a poor cricketer... There is no shame in being a One-day specialist (or 20/20 for that matter). Luck has nothing to do with it, some players games are suited to one or the other, he actually does build an innings in the One dayers... Look at Michael Bevan he scored plenty of Shield runs and it never made him a successful test cricketer.... however he was arguably our best ever One day batsmen, didn't make me any less a fan of Bevan carving up attacks in the one-day format. I'm quite happy to see Finch pile on the runs in ODI's and 20/20 for years to come. Success as a player doesn't just come down to the longer formats.

2014-08-29T03:10:04+00:00

bearfax

Guest


I want some more.

2014-08-29T02:11:29+00:00

Ash

Guest


I wouldn't bring Hughes anywhere near the test side as he has to be one of the worst players of spin going around, he handles pace well but looks very vulenerable against good spin, this was evident against Swann last year as well and I think guys like Ajmal and Narine will do ever more damage against him, he needs to go back to shield to work on this weakness.

AUTHOR

2014-08-29T01:29:55+00:00

Hugh McDonald

Roar Rookie


Completely agree, his first class record is certainly not good enough to crack into the test side. Either way there's certainly not a spot for him in the XI at the moment, and there's people waiting who would be rated in front of him. Let's hope he can have a strong Shield with the Vic's and proves he can deal with the red ball

AUTHOR

2014-08-29T01:23:29+00:00

Hugh McDonald

Roar Rookie


I think his first class four-day form is completely different to that of his T20I and ODI form. I don't believe he should be in test calculations, far from it. His shield form is poor, and only once he proves himself there can he be considered for the test side. To say though that his outstanding international short form record is down to luck because he hasn't done well in the shield is clutching at straws, they're completely different formats. It's clear he's consistently performing at the international level, I don't think someone scores 5 international centuries in 12 months on the back of luck...

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar