ICC say McKay is our second-best ODI bowler, so where is he?

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

Clint McKay is ranked by the ICC as the 11th best bowler in ODI cricket – that’s Australia’s second best, behind only Mitchell Johnson.

Yet the paceman’s international career has evaporated in a matter of months, to the point where he will be left out of Australia’s squad for the upcoming World Cup.

Just 12 months ago, McKay was the world’s in-form ODI quick, having snared 87 wickets at the remarkable average of 21 in his first 49 ODIs.

The Victorian had been very impressive both in home conditions and on foreign soil. He was unerringly accurate, admirably frugal, gained consistent away swing with the new ball, and extracted disconcerting bounce due to his 194cm frame and lofty action.

Above all, he was dependable. That last attribute was crucial given that Australia’s two other favoured quicks at the time, Mitchell Johnson and Mitchell Starc, could be unpredictable and, at times, expensive.

Johnson and Starc are natural strike bowlers who seek wickets as a priority. Their ability to dislodge top-order batsmen was a key element of Australia’s rise to number one in the ODI rankings – a title they gave up during the recent tour of Zimbabwe.

Mckay’s reliability gave that pair greater freedom to attack in such a manner. Skipper Michael Clarke knew McKay could be relied upon to stem the run rate if one of the Mitches lost their radar.

During Australia’s lacklustre series in Zimbabwe, it was patently clear that Australia missed such a bowler. When the South African batsmen got a roll on there was no one capable of halting their momentum.

An in-form McKay would also have been a godsend for the Aussies. The decision to drop him from the ODI side appeared to be a harsh one considering he had looked in good nick in his last outing when he took 3-36 from 10 overs against England in Adelaide in January.

He had labored though in his previous 10 matches, during which he took 10 wickets at the inflated average of 49. Those awful figures were largely the result of being caned during the phenomenally high-scoring ODI series in India in October and November last year.

McKay returned four wickets at 74 from six matches in India. But pacemen from both sides were mauled during that series, which was played on wickets which were outlandishly friendly to batsmen – the 10 fast bowlers who played combined to average 52 for the series.

Regardless, McKay was jettisoned for the tour of Zimbabwe, which was the first squad chosen by Australia’s new selection panel chaired by Rod Marsh and including Mark Waugh, Trevor Hohns and coach Darren Lehmann.

He was then overlooked for Australia’s squads for their ODI matches against Pakistan in the UAE and for the current five-match series against South Africa.

McKay’s demise became so exaggerated that he was even turfed from Victoria’s 50-over side in the second half of the recent one day cup and overlooked for the opening round of the Sheffield Shield.

The 31-year-old would have started the Australian summer confident he could force his way into the World Cup squad. He does, of course, boast an astounding ODI record in Australian conditions, with 60 wickets at 19 in home games.

McKay earned a recall to Victoria’s side in the second round of the Shield, taking 2-85 in their eight-wicket loss to Tasmania. But he was dropped again for the most recent round of the Shield.

It would take a torrential downpour of Shield wickets over the coming month for McKay to come into World Cup calculations. First he needs to get a game for Victoria.

The likes of Kane Richardson, Josh Hazlewood and Nathan Coulter-Nile have stolen a march on the veteran and, unfortunately, may have ended his international career.

The Crowd Says:

2014-11-21T13:40:48+00:00

Broken-hearted Toy

Guest


Yes, he was gone as soon as Boof became coach.

AUTHOR

2014-11-21T05:42:37+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


No jameswm, Lehmann mentioned that McKay's pace wasn't up to scratch when, as far as I know, his speed hadn't dropped he just went through a lean spell in ODIs. It's not like he was 140kmh before and is only 130kmh now - he has always been a medium pacer pretty much, even when he was dominating in ODIs. Lehmann's 140kmh rule definitely seems to be in effect in ODIs too.

2014-11-21T05:26:17+00:00

spruce moose

Guest


Why would it apply for tests only? Though...a ridiculous policy would have ridiculous applications.

2014-11-21T02:23:07+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Imagine picking all four of them. Warner and Finch would have to bowl within 5 overs of the game starting...that four would be off injured again. How about some sustained cricket in match conditions from them first...like a season at least. Harris, I'd accept 2 or 3 games. I suspect his word to the selectors the other day wasn't really about match fitness but a niggle that's not right. Cutting could only get a game as a batsman alone...and his batting is worse than his bowling. His Qld position must be at risk soon. Feldman, Hopes and Steketee seem to be ahead of him so he is competing with McDermott and Gannon...and any other young fella on his way.

2014-11-21T02:14:23+00:00

Chris Kettlewell

Roar Guru


I think Pattinson, Bird and Harris could be ODI bowlers. Probably the main reason Harris hasn't been has simply been to his body and the selectors wanting him for test cricket and willing to sacrifice him in ODI's if it increases his chance of being available for tests. Cummins definitely seems to be a good ODI bowler. Though, I'd still prefer him to be playing Shield games at the moment rather than being in the ODI squad. The selectors like Cutting in shorter games because of his hitting more than his bowling. I don't think he's a great ODI or T20 bowler.

2014-11-21T02:13:12+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


No...he had lost form for about 10 games before he drifted out. Should have been dropped way earlier.

2014-11-21T02:10:58+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Jameswm,"...I think only Hazlewood has done well..." Really? NCN was the dominant bowler in the Matador and MOM in one of his 2 ODIs against South Africa. Why do you think that?

2014-11-21T02:08:48+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


McKay has not bowled well, even in ODI for 3 seasons. He just goes for runs now when economy was his only strength.

2014-11-21T02:07:06+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


The ICC thinks India is the hub of cricket too. The ICC lets bowlers throw and gamblers play. Not sure there is much worth quoting coming out of the ICC.

2014-11-21T01:30:02+00:00

Shortfineleg

Guest


Hazlewood, Cummins, NCN and Starc et al are younger, more handsome and much more marketable. Plus they perform better. McKay is gawn.

2014-11-21T01:23:59+00:00

Paul D

Roar Guru


I think Hazelwood has moved past Bollinger as the "bang-it-in" type bowler.

2014-11-21T01:13:25+00:00

jameswm

Guest


I think the 140kmh thing is more for tests.

2014-11-21T00:51:41+00:00

spruce moose

Guest


He was in good touch for Australia until they dropped him. It may now have become a confidence issue

2014-11-21T00:37:29+00:00

Joel

Roar Rookie


Not sure about excellent form when he's not even getting a game for Victoria.

2014-11-21T00:34:59+00:00

Paul D

Roar Guru


Sorry, the "where is he?" part implied to me you thought he should be in the squad. Apologies!

2014-11-20T23:56:32+00:00

spruce moose

Guest


Ronan, I would have thought the answer to be clear: Clint McKay doesn't bowl at 140km/h and thus falls below the speed expected of Darren Lehmann. Excellent form and stats be dammed! If you can't bowl express, you have no business in Lehmann's flawed coaching philosophy.

AUTHOR

2014-11-20T23:40:55+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


I like NCN more than Richardson as an ODI player, particularly given his superior batting and incredible fielding. Bollinger looked really good in the recent T20s and would do a good job in ODIs I reckon, but as far as 50-over and Test cricket goes he seems to have had his cards marked.

AUTHOR

2014-11-20T23:36:09+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


I didn't say McKay was Australia's second-best ODI bowler, the headline did. My piece is reflecting on McKay's extremely swift demise not suggesting he should be in the ODI team.

2014-11-20T23:28:23+00:00

Nudge

Guest


I think one of the big problems for McKay is that he is a very very slow in the field. Can add Bollinger to that as well. When you have Clarke, Watson who can hardly move in the field and Doherty for that matter McKay has to be a fair bit better bowler than your Starc's Cummins Coulternile's and Richardson who are all pretty exceptional in the field. Everytime the ball goes a meter either side of McKay when he's at 3rd man the batsmen are going to go for 2. That's not going to happen with say a Cummins, so therefor could easily save you 10 runs an innings in saving ones and fours

2014-11-20T23:25:48+00:00

Larney

Guest


I guess it's all in the eyes of the beholder then.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar