Some rugby positions have evolved

By Elisha Pearce / Expert

Which rugby positions are being changed by the people playing the game currently?

One of the fascinating things about watching sport is the way it changes over time. This can be due to of the talent in the game at any time.

Throughout the last seven or eight years LeBron James helped basketball evolve due to the way he could adapt his skill set to almost any position on the court depending on the opponent’s strength or weaknesses. Last year and this year the likes of Steph Curry, Klay Thompson at Golden State, as well as the San Antonio Spurs have confirmed the game’s next evolution – one that emphasises ball movement above individual strengths and finding space to take three point shots.

In the shorter forms of cricket you could sense while Adam Gilchrist played that the expectations on a wicket keeper would never be the same. Now, especially in the shorter forms of the game, they are expected to be a seventh batsman, and maybe an opener.

In previous generations whatever effort the keeper managed with the bat was a bonus, not a prerequisite. Gilly changed all that.

Triangles, sweet beautiful triangles, have overtaken the game of football at the highest levels. To the point where the viability of an old fashioned striker at the very top level is in question. Gone are the days where you could devote a position on the pitch solely to poaching goals inside the box, pressing on the last man and trying to get his head on the long ball.

Now all 10 outfield players must be at home all over the pitch as the team compresses, expand, shift and adapt on the fly. False nines are the new black.

Those who follow the NFL will be able to wax lyrical about the running quarterbacks, the tight ends that might be a wide receiver and the hybrid outside linebackers and defensive end players showing great dexterity that have all emerged in recent years.

So what positions are evolving and have evolved on the rugby field in recent years. I’m going to put forward two position groups that have changed significantly and continue to change. Let me know if you can see it too, and nominate ones you think I’ve overlooked.

Back row
I group all of the backrow positions together because I think this is the place on the field increased athleticism, partly due to two decades of professionalism probably, has shown up the most in rugby.

The way rugby union is played now the back row positions are blending together and might be predominantly determined based on size, rather than skill set or tactical deployment alone. The player to watch in this regard is Richie McCaw. Sure, years and age may have slowed him down, but his move to spend more time at eight or even blindside flanker in recent years is partly down to the way the game is played.

A Crusaders backrow of Richie McCaw, Matt Todd and Keiran Read is a less partitioned skill set than you’d have found 10 years ago.

In 2015 a number eight’s defining trait is they expected to play with such ferocity and physicality it borders on a psychotic position to consider playing. Even just a few years ago the eightman was usually just big – think Owen Finegan, or even Pierre Spies more recently. Now you have to not only be big you have to play like Duane Vermuelen.

Seriously, the way he played against the Hurricanes on the weekend was manic. He is large, yes, but he throws himself, rams himself, jams himself and throttles himself until the opposition submit. The eightman must become a battering ram. Vermuelen has set a new high-water mark this year in my opinion and Jerome Kaino is the man who keeps lifting it higher with him.

I genuinely enjoy watching Keiran Read play but he is not the normal number eight anymore. His cerebral, athletic play needs to be balanced out by battering rams across the park. The same goes for Scott Higginbotham, who is a less-refined and (gulp) less-skilled Read.

Outright poachers at the openside flanker position are rarer because fitter teams in general mean everyone is expected to arrive at rucks sooner. Sevens have retained some of their freelancer role but I think the position is rugby’s x-factor one now.

You have the likes of Michael Hooper who is an all round athletic freak, Schalk Burger who is the new George Smith in the backline ball runner, Liam Gill who focuses on poaching but behaves like a modern version of John Eales with his lineout jumping and underrated dexterity and the Matt Todd/David Pocock types who still poach but act like powerful boulders around the park in rucks and tackles.

The opensider flanker is the position to experiment with pure athletes.

The blindside flanker position is a powerful blend of both the seven and eight. These players are usually such a good athlete they can combine the diesel engine of a second row with the power of a number eight. Playing back row positions in rugby has never been for the faint hearted, but in 2015 it’s at a new level.

Wing
Jonah Lomu’s playing weight was 119 kilograms and he was over 1.9 metres tall. He is still a benchmark for rugby wingers, but his dimensions are less and less of an outlier now.

Taqele Naiyaravoro is 125kg and 1.9 metres tall. Julian Savea is ‘only’ 108kg but is 1.93 metres tall and his 100 metre time can’t be too far off Lomu’s 10.8 seconds at his fastest. Nemani Nadolo is meant to be around 130kgs (I think he’s probably lighter now) and 1.95 metres tall. Frank Halai is 105 kilos and 1.95 metres. Patrick Osborne is 1.89 metres tall and 108 kilos.

The wing position in rugby has been changed forever, with a much more superhuman blend of size and speed becoming more normal. The professional game is rewarding physical freaks for their ability to both finish tries in space as well as bowl people over in traffic. One aspect of game-wide improvements in physical fitness and team organisation has been defence. To combat this, teams need attacking weapons that can run around teams and through them – not just one or the other.

If you’re willing to expand the position to include some fullbacks Israel Folau (1.93m/102kg) and Charles Piutau (1.86m/94kg), then you’d realise that the men at the back are hardly shrinking violets either.

The wing position is no longer a place to stick the skinny quicker guy. Those guys will get drilled in a tackle or run over by a flying Nadolo.

There is room for a few skill-focused wing players, such as James O’Connor, Willie Le Roux or Ben Smith. But having two wings with that skill set is now rare, and a good team will probably never have three of them in the back three ever again.

Pace and power on the edges – now the norm in rugby union.

The Crowd Says:

2015-04-10T14:44:08+00:00

Crazy Horse

Roar Pro


Spot on, a great article highlighting the growing divide between real rugby and rugbytainment. The great thing about our game has always been that there is a position for everyone regardless of build speed etc. However at the professional level there is increasingly no place for both the big slow guy and the lightweight flyer.

2015-04-09T21:41:21+00:00

Mike

Guest


And, when one of those selected players is more talented than the rest, we will write on blogs how HE was the one who transformed the position! ;)

2015-04-09T21:39:14+00:00

Mike

Guest


V good point. These things are often rules or interpretation driven.

2015-04-09T08:58:40+00:00

44bottles

Roar Guru


Brits is a fullback disguised as a hooker, not a loosie ;)

2015-04-08T23:41:10+00:00

bryan

Guest


Same in league... NSW, QLD, NZ and Australia all play fullbacks as wingers. I think its more towards getting your best players having the ball the most, and that means putting them in fullback. Then, at rep level, playing full back or wing isn't really much of a difference, so club full backs, their best player, gets shoved into wing spots. Hell, in the world cup, Australia had upwards of 5 fullbacks on the pitch, from center outwards. It's why I doubt Folou will ever permanently move to 13. He has much more license to roam and get into mis-matches as fullback.

2015-04-08T23:06:23+00:00

AliasAlias

Guest


I don't think Pierre Spies can be compared to Owen Finegan. Spies was an athlete who was almost impossible to run down once he got into his stride. Finegan was no athlete and top end speed was not his forte. His was a classic bruising blindside enforcer (gosh we could do with one of those). When Gareth Delve was at the Rebels we saw him play a classic 8 role. He'd track back when the fullback came into the line, run the ball up in attack, do a lot of the in close defence around rucks (often winning turnovers). Cliff Plau plays a different game again. I agree that all players are expected to be more athletic and do more (forwards passing and backs hitting rucks). But each position carriers core responsibilities which a player must fulfil no matter how good his other attributes are. So props have to be able to scrummage regardless of their abilities in open play. Scrum halves need quick accurate service no matter how good their tackling is. Flankers need to hit rucks and put pressure on the ball and poach now and then. Having a 7 in the backline is pointless because you presumably have backs and you still need someone to do the work of a 7. In the current WB set up, the props can't scrummage, the scrum half can't pass, the 7 can't ruck.

2015-04-08T22:44:13+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


What goes around eventually comes back around. When the Ella brothers began using the 'flatline attack' at provincial & test level in the early 80s, it was called a "Randwick" innovation, or "Australian" innovation. Yet dig a bit deeper & Otago Province apparently used something similar either side of WW2. Dig further yet, & the Scots reckon they invented the flatline theory in the Borders region all the way back to the 1870s. Considering the Scots have been at the forefront of many modern inventions of the past 300 years, it wouldn't surprise to believe this. I expect it won't be long before some smart coach comes up with the idea of selecting smaller, more compact centres & wingers, with speed to burn but more importantly, twinkle toes to beat a larger, bulkier, comparatively slower opponent off either foot. We'll be calling that coach a genius!

2015-04-08T18:15:37+00:00

Aussie Bokkie

Guest


Nice article Elisha. Back rowers and the back three are definitely the position areas that have evolved far beyond the others. You could also argue Bismark Du Plessis started a trend of mobile, poaching hookers. -- Comment from The Roar's iPhone app.

2015-04-08T16:44:08+00:00

Carlos the Argie in the USA

Guest


The difference between Creevy and Coles is that Coles has exceptional ball handling skills, is very fast and can sidestep, not only run into the opposition. When I spoke with Coles last year, I asked him if his weight gain would affect his running skills. He was very aware of that situation and stated that he "managed" his weight gain as requested by the coaches with measurements of speed and reaction time. Creevy is more of a grunt hooker/6 while Coles is more of a 7/8 hybrid with hooker.

2015-04-08T16:40:30+00:00

Carlos the Argie in the USA

Guest


True, true. But Creevy has the face of a hooker. Too ugly to be a glamorous flanker.

2015-04-08T13:35:05+00:00

D Socks

Roar Rookie


I would suggest since the ELV's the back row has had to change. The strategies of the first hit up in midfield means the flankers can't get there in time - so they wait for the poaching opportunity post tackle or even head to the other side for the less structured second breakdown. Hookers haven't changed, they trained with the back row when i was playing, they were in our group for the Hennie Muller runs !!!

2015-04-08T13:12:56+00:00

Sam

Guest


I'd have to echo the sentiments of others re Hooker. The likes of Faingaa and Leafa are more mobile creatures. Adam Freier wasn't a chubby Hooker either. For me. The player that re-defined his position was John Eales simply for being so mobile for a lock and for his goal kicking kicking.

2015-04-08T12:23:53+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


NB, Meyer wants it all. He wants all three loosies to be big ball carriers, lineout jumpers, with good hands, comfortable in the open field and over the ball, and mongrel in the contact zone. So, the prototypes are Louw, Thør, Alberts, Burger.

2015-04-08T12:13:10+00:00

Brian USA

Guest


I would say the number 12 position has evolved into two separate positions, 2nd 5/8 or Inside Center. A 2nd 5/8 is someone like Toomua, CLL, Giteau, or Carter (when he plays 12). These guys are essentially 10s, who play 12 and allow for a different attacking structure. Inside Centers are more like the Jamie Roberts, SBW, or JDV. They are the Hulks who smash the ball into the defense, or crush the opposition ball carrier. Then there are a few freaks like Nonu or F Steyn who can do both...

2015-04-08T12:09:13+00:00

Not Bothered

Guest


Meyer is not slimming his forward pack down.

2015-04-08T11:40:52+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


NOS Deon Fourie and Schalk Brits both loosies in hooker disguise

2015-04-08T11:27:56+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


Still happens nos. Creevy was a flanker, moved to hooker a little over five years ago

2015-04-08T11:22:31+00:00

Lindsay Amner

Roar Guru


Interesting that none of them was actually a wing. Dagg and Jane were both fullbacks and Kahui a centre. The All Blacks decided that they had to play fullbacks as wings after getting hammered by South African highballs in 08. True wings in the All Black line up have become rare. Savea and Gear in recent years but otherwise they like converted fullbacks.

2015-04-08T11:12:32+00:00

nickoldschool

Roar Guru


The funny thing Sam is that in France our hookers were often former flankers in the late 80s and 90s. Jeff tordo and Marc de rougemont come to mind, both played at international level in both positions. Not saying we were avant-gardistes but yes we were hahaha! Glad to see the Anglo world finally catching up a mere 25 years later!

2015-04-08T10:54:38+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


Hahaha!

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar