The Wrap: Super final demonstrates all that is right with rugby

By Geoff Parkes / Expert

The reports of the death of rugby have been greatly exaggerated. The most telling outcome of the Highlanders’ historic Super Rugby final win was that, despite apprehension and concern in a number of areas, nothing is wrong with the rules of rugby.

This assumes that the objective of both sides is to win by doing things faster and better, which is exactly what the Highlanders and Hurricanes endeavoured to do in Wellington.

No other sport compares to rugby when it’s played in this exhilarating manner.

The promise of a smorgasbord of speed, power and strength, deft touch, teamwork and continuity is what draws us back every time, and when it actually happens, all we can do is draw breath and feel warm and fuzzy inside.

Warm and fuzzy aptly describes Jamie Joseph’s post-match demeanour, proud as punch that his unfashionable side had travelled to Sydney and Wellington in successive weeks and scored two convincing victories.

For everyone not wearing yellow, this is a popular result. The Highlanders have become many people’s second team mostly because they are a good, honest side devoid of prima donnas.

They play an entertaining brand of rugby and they haven’t looked like spoiling anyone’s party by actually winning the thing.

It’s fair to say that they carried a ‘nobody respects us’ underdog mentality into the finals, but if this did actually help galvanise them to win, it clearly no longer applies. They are worthy, and classy winners.

Not that Hurricanes supporters should feel down on their side. Favoured as they were to win, they still bought plenty to the table in the final and can rightly reflect on an excellent season with pride.

This outcome simply reflects that they were beaten on the day by a better side who simply were not going to let themselves lose.

There were turning points in the match and key moments which could have swung momentum to the Canes.

Julian Savea’s failure to finish in the left corner in the second half and Beauden Barrett’s early goal kicking misfires were the most obvious.

However, there were none bigger than Elliot Dixon’s try on the stroke of halftime, a wonderful individual effort which enabled his Highlanders to go to the sheds with the momentum and self-belief to finish the job in the second half.

Perhaps if the match had involved an Australian or South African side, or a television match official from one of the participating countries, Dixon’s wobbly put down might have been a more controversial moment.

But it was classic 50/50 call, TMO Ben Skeen was going to be half right and half wrong whichever way he ruled, and credit to the Hurricanes for making nothing of it even though they came out on the wrong side of the decision.

I’ll own up at this point to writing in positive terms about Dixon a couple of seasons back, marking him for higher honours down the track.

But despite his man of the match performance fulfilling this promise, calls for his instant elevation into Steve Hansen’s new All Black squad are a misguided, knee-jerk reaction. He still has some outstanding players in the queue ahead of him.

Dixon could always try the Bernard Tomic approach, by announcing that he will, out of respect to his teammates, agree to play for the All Blacks.

Except that he seems, unlike Tomic, to be a well grounded, humble individual who understands that a place in a national representative team is earned by selection nad not decided on a self-appointed whim.

The other significant moment came a week earlier, with Ardie Savea’s knee injury ruling him unfit for the final.

If the Hurricanes lacked anything on the night it was Savea’s dynamic thrust with the ball in hand, particularly his ability to get in behind the ruck and penetrate the Highlanders’ backfield.

There were good players all across the park, but the halfback battle is worth highlighting, with both Aaron Smith and TJ Perenara right on top of their game, as they have been all season.

In such a high paced, breathtaking game with multiple phases at all corners of the ground, it was incredible to see each of them busting a gut to be stationed behind ruck after ruck then firing off quality passes time after time.

Referee Jaco Peyper played an important role, fittingly proving that an invisible referee is a good referee.

However, the pleasure would have been all his, assisted as he was enormously by the positive intent of all the players.

This is not the time or place to open up yet another tiresome debate about the relative merits of New Zealand versus Australian rugby, but it is worth noting the comments of the Fox Sports panel post-match, who indeed went searching for reasons to describe the quality of the final in such context.

Rod Kafer pointed to an emphasis on skills development in New Zealand as the key point of difference, however my feeling is that it is not so much a skills disparity but the license provided to New Zealand players to use their skills, which illustrates the key difference.

It didn’t seem to matter that there were a total of 35 turnovers in the match. South African and Australian coaches would almost certainly be appalled if their sides were party to that number, and every cliché about working harder on minimising mistakes would be trotted out.

But New Zealand sides recognize that it is okay to give something up to get something back in return.

There is a risk and reward mentality which pervades New Zealand rugby at all levels. This in itself doesn’t guarantee winning at will, but it almost certainly provides an environment ensuring many more wins than losses.

It also hints at a difference in conditioning.

It was apparent that for most of the Graham Henry and Steve Hansen era, the All Blacks had a competitive advantage in this area allowing them to eventually run their opposition ragged.

But it also seemed obvious that this was a gap that could be easily closed, as players from other parts of the world matched them for fitness. But has this actually happened?

It is hard to remember any major match being played at such a ferocious tempo as the first half in this final.

Despite a handful of players ending up with cramps late in the second half, I never once saw a tight forward in this final go down with a manufactured injury, or waddle across late to a set piece like some of the Waratahs pack the week before.

Just as the aftermath of Phil Hughes’ death cast a pall over cricket and all sport earlier this year, the recent tragic loss of Hurricanes legend Jerry Collins and the shocking death of Adelaide Crows coach Phil Walsh ensured that this was another exceedingly tough weekend for sport in our corner of the world.

For what it’s worth, this superb final, and indeed the dignified and heartfelt response of the AFL sides this weekend, helped square the ledger a wee bit.

They reminded us all that whatever adversities each of us face along the way, we are all bound together by our common love of the contest and a mutual respect for all participants.

The Crowd Says:

2015-07-07T18:15:50+00:00

chris

Guest


I like to add that it was nice to see the Caketine get big crowds for the last 2 games and reminder of what was a regular thing 12 years ago.

2015-07-07T14:26:33+00:00

Bobbo7

Guest


Agree Kia, a great result that shows anyone can win if they get the team environment right. You don't need a team of internationals to win, though a couple of good ones is handy!

2015-07-07T02:56:52+00:00

Old Bugger

Guest


Once again, an excellent summary and read. Look forward to similar accounts in the RC and RWC. Well done mate.

2015-07-07T01:08:06+00:00

Handles

Roar Guru


But I didn't see much of that at all. And neither did other posters, the comment below is from Cynical Play on another thread: "What I found remarkable about this game, besides the skill and commitment of both sides, was the lack of cynical play (not me!). Both teams played at pace. Both tried NOT to concede ruck penalties in their own quarter, instead trusting their defense of the line. That’s how it’s done. As a Tahs supporter (as well as other Aussie franchises), I respect the way theses sides play, and feel the game is the better for seeing that final." This is much closer to what I saw. Shooting straight from the hip, I would guess that (as much as I like them) the most cynical team in the competition is the Brumbies, followed probably by the Stormers. I reckon it is sour grapes to watch a final like that and talk about cynical penalties.

2015-07-07T00:58:53+00:00

Ryanno

Guest


What that they are passionate and personally invested in the game. Yeah lets get rid of all those people and see what you have left. Be areful what you wish for, you might end up with Ray Hadlee commentating rugby again like last RWC. I don't get why people get so wound up about the commentary from these blokes. With Marto, Kearns and Kafe we all know who they played for and that they are passionate about their old teams. Who cares if they are a little over the top, why would you take personally if you don't agree with their thoughts, commentary can challenge you the same as article on ROAR does. Kearns is on Australian TV speaking to Australian viewers, can you really blame him for firing up when the Wallabies play. He was the captain for god's sake and I love it when he gets up the nose of Kiwis, same as when he was playing.

2015-07-07T00:48:33+00:00

Rob Doyle

Guest


Yes please , let's get rid of Kearns and Martin and Clarke as well . They stand for all that is bad about Rugby in Australia .

2015-07-06T22:04:35+00:00

RoyBaty

Guest


how about "the cold brutal fact" that the two best attacking teams all year attacked each other to a stand still in an awesome display of power, skill, speed and conditioning in the final? if it had been 9-6 to the chiefs over the brumbies (or stormers or tahs) then yes, negative rugby would be winning over positive intent. but it wasn't, there for it is not, and so I believe you are wrong.

2015-07-06T14:09:22+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


Yes, Digger, I think there's an "amiability" about the top refs (Nigel included) that helps the game flow.

2015-07-06T14:06:47+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


Haha! Good one

2015-07-06T10:42:07+00:00

Qwad

Guest


I want to second the motion banning Kearns from commentating on tahs and wallabies games. His passion is great but his one eyed commentary is a blight on the game when he commentates on 'his' teams. Can we start a petition?

2015-07-06T10:41:42+00:00

Shane D

Roar Rookie


Peter K - the defence efforts of both teams contributed to it being a fantastic game. There has to be a balance between the two & the way both teams counter attacked from defensive positions was huge. I didn't see many penalties conceded from an intention to play in a cynical manner but rather from players getting offside due to timing or the speed of the attack.

2015-07-06T09:53:53+00:00

Waru

Guest


Freezing here too mate. Fires lit watching Rugby nation with Tony Johnstone. Cheers

2015-07-06T09:48:52+00:00

Magic Sponge

Guest


Lets see how many turn up to the rwc games, not many.

2015-07-06T09:39:00+00:00

Die hard

Roar Rookie


I get your point Peter and it is a fair one. I just don't think that this game reflected that at all. Any of the penalties given on Saturday weren't for spoiling, more for just getting it wrong. The teams that try to score more tries will more often do so, but not all the time. Sometimes it just doesn't work out.

2015-07-06T09:29:57+00:00

Sammy

Guest


Changing the laws is not the solution. What is needed is a change in the attitude of the coaches in the way they view or approach the way a game should played (game plan). Currently our Australian teams all seem to be playing some variation of Jakeball. The value of the try was increased to provide incentives for teams to score tries. But an opposing team knows that giving away a penalty worth 3 points is more advantageous than allowing the scoring of a try. Perhaps the value of a penalty should have been increased to 5 instead of the value of a try. This would act as a deterrent for players purposely giving away penalties to stop a try being scored.

2015-07-06T09:05:04+00:00

Jake

Guest


PeterK I know what you are trying to say. The game between the Waratahs vs Cheetahs (58 - 33) in which there were 9 to 5 tries scored is a better reflection and reward for the skills shown than the game on Saturday. In other words the Waratahs and Cheetahs are more skillful because they scored more tries.

2015-07-06T08:57:54+00:00

DT

Guest


Of course The Tour de France doubles as a travel documentary...maybe under the heading "Research for our next European vacation". My sister in Sydney, who cares little for the bikes, watches every year and buys the SBS guide for a bit more history on the towns and villages the peloton passes thru.

2015-07-06T08:31:31+00:00

Digby

Roar Guru


:lol:

AUTHOR

2015-07-06T08:24:25+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


Well there's a bit of self interest in that one too...

2015-07-06T08:15:13+00:00

Rugby Tragic

Guest


*shakes head*

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar