What went wrong at Port Adelaide in 2015?

By Lachlan Harper / Roar Rookie

Sitting 12th on the ladder with 32 points it’s near impossible for the Power to reach the finals.

It’s undeniable that this season has been a definite failure for a side expected to play deep into the finals. So with such a talented squad at Ken Hinkley’s disposal where did it all go wrong?

There’s a distinct feel that Port’s game plan has been figured out well and truly by opposition sides as their run and carry out of the backline, led by Jasper Pittard, hasn’t worked as well as it has in previous seasons. Chief Executive Keith Thomas emphasised this by stating to The Age,

“Port is not being allowed to play the style of footy it was playing. What really good teams do is they adjust and find a way through it. We haven’t done that.”

With their game plan salvaged the focus in certain forums has shifted to the tactical prowess of Ken Hinkley, questioning where his Plan B is.

For Hinkley, this is only a blemish in his successful coaching career to date, only highlighting the areas of inexperience that is exist in his coaching plans and responses to adversity which has improved over the season in which he hasn’t shied away from making the hard decisions, dropping regular team members over the season, such as Tom Jonas and Angus Monfries in more recent times.

The recruitment drive of the club is also a possible area to discuss as a explanation behind the teams on-field demise. In recent years, the club’s main focus within the draft and free agency market alike has been the attacking aspect of their game, with players like Karl Amon, Angus Monfries, Matt White, Ollie Wines, Paddy Ryder, Jared Polec and Mitch Harvey joining the club.

All players are attack-orientated, and while they have contributed to the success of the club in some aspects, they also highlight the team’s lack of focus for the defensive side of the game with Jarman Impey (Pick 21) being the only defensive player picked up in the past couple of years, forcing his way into the 22.

The majority of Port’s gameplan revolves around the half-back run of players such as Pittard, Broadbent, Hartlett, Impey and O’Shea, based in part upon the way Ken Hinkley played the game. As mentioned, the effectiveness of this has worn thin with not enough big bodies in and around the defensive fifty contests.

While Jack Hombsch, who is in All-Australian contention, has become a real find along with Tom Clurey, players such as Trengove and Jonas haven’t been able to reach the form of previous years, in particular Jonas who was dropped early in July to the Magpies and has failed to warrant his spot back.

The form of Jonas is therefore a real concern for Port who have struggled to overcome the loss of another tall key defender Alipate Carlile to injury, aggravating the defensive concerns within the side.

The progress of Paddy Ryder into the squad has also advanced slower then expected with Matt Broadbent even stating to The Age,

“Since Paddy has come in, it has been a work in progress for him to fit into the team and how the structures work. He is certainly building his own form and confidence.”

Ryder’s been used more as a tall forward then a ruckman with some pundits indicating that Ryder’s previous reputation as an eighty per cent ruckman has caused concern with him and Lobbe struggling to rotate effectively.

Furthermore, there has been a worrying lack of depth within the squad compared to last year. The Magpies, their SANFL team, has failed to reach the standards of last year.

This has found its way into the Port squad with players such as Sam Gray, Sam Colquhoun and Kane Mitchell failing to reach the heights they did last year. In 2014 they continually played a role in their impact upon the game, whether that be in the green vest or in the forward pocket line, particularly Mitchell, who was well known for hovering around the contests, crumbing with pace and easily identifiable with the signature locks reminiscent of Jesus.

Therefore, a lack of depth and defensive height and pressure can be assessed as the main reason behind Port’s demise from premiership contenders to 12th place.

The Crowd Says:

2015-08-10T12:48:09+00:00

Ian Montgomery

Roar Pro


Port lack real depth in their midfield and with injuries to Wines, Polec and White, plus the retirement of Cornes, they have been left with a midfield lacking real quality. Polec and Wines should be back fitter and better next year but perhaps they should focus on adding to their midfield stocks rather than chasing another key forward. Keep Schultz and chase Aish.

AUTHOR

2015-08-10T09:31:06+00:00

Lachlan Harper

Roar Rookie


Apologies. Should've singled out Colquhoun for his debut year.

2015-08-09T23:02:50+00:00

Harry Krebs

Roar Pro


Where will Schultz be next year? hmm...

2015-08-09T13:20:03+00:00

Tricky

Guest


At least your'e not Collingwood.

2015-08-09T08:48:42+00:00

Gecko

Guest


That's a good analysis, Tom. I think Port's impressive rebounding last year was not due to good rebounding defenders but due to a midfield that had a fitness advantage. Pittard was the only creative defender. The rest were work horses, and that's still the case in 2015. Port's midfield last year would simply swarm the ball from half back to half forward. This year they don't seem to have a fitness advantage so they're not swarming as consistently. So the best solution for 2016 is to get some classier rebounders, and Suckling could fit that bill. They also need to analyse how to give Gray more possessions and more space, especially in the forward half. His creative brilliance was a key in 2014. If Lachlan is right about Port being hamstrung by a tight salary cap, that's worrying. Normally sides that have been top 4 in recent years are the ones with the tight salary caps.

2015-08-09T05:14:20+00:00

paulywalnuts

Guest


The year after an improvement spike is often the toughest- draw, expectations etc- and they may well rebound, but it won't be easy and I think the trip back to contenders will be a climb rather than a bounce. Some structural problems with their list and depth a concern. Lots of hard work ahead at Alberton.

2015-08-09T02:54:08+00:00

Liam Sheedy

Roar Guru


Awful year but from a development point of view I think it is the year they needed to have.

2015-08-09T02:43:51+00:00

TomC

Roar Guru


If you remember where Port were this time three years ago, even their modest performances now are a dramatic improvement. Maybe they're getting 'figured out', but for me I think they still have the balance of their midfield a bit wrong; too many honest workers, not enough damaging attackers. Or perhaps more accurately it's the honest workers that are getting too much of the ball. They're missing Polec, and Gray isn't getting the space nor having the impact that he was last year. White is barely noticeable in most games. Although I'm not really a fan of his, I reckon Matt Suckling from Hawthorn would be a good pickup, provided he's not too expensive. It'd just give them another weapon on the outside.

2015-08-09T01:32:31+00:00

MFairPlay

Roar Guru


1. All football teams don't have a "plan B", coaches teach their players a style of play and it's just a matter of adapting to the opposition who you are playing. As Keith Thomas said "they adjust" not switch to another game plan. 2. "This has found its way into the Port squad with players such as Sam Gray, Sam Colquhoun and Kane Mitchell failing to reach the heights they did last year." Colquhoun did not play a game of AFL last year as he did a knee injury early in the SANFL season which ruled him out for the year.

2015-08-09T00:25:11+00:00

Doc Disnick

Roar Guru


Defence - simple as that. Hinkley will restructure next year and I expect them back at the top of the ladder.

2015-08-08T21:30:06+00:00

Tim Holt

Roar Guru


I really rate Port and see them similar to us ( Hawthorn ) in 2009 with them getting ahead of themselves coupled with them being hunted , rather than being the hunter. I think they will re-jig, and hit back hard next year

2015-08-08T17:55:18+00:00

jax

Guest


Hinkley lost Phil Walsh and Alan Richardson in quick succession. Assistants spend more time with the players than the head coach. Walsh was strong strategically and would have helped them adapt quicker. Those are big shoes to fill and their departure is a key reason for their drop-off.

2015-08-08T16:34:53+00:00

WhereIsGene

Guest


Hinkley was exposed as a one-trick pony with no plan B Young team struggling to handle the pressure of being the hunted Difficult fixture in the early rounds and lost crucial early games This season's the most congested in history so they have less room to run & carry Other clubs caught up to Port's "sports science" department Probably got ahead of themselves and expected to coast to another prelim or GF

Read more at The Roar