In rugby league, contenders aren't offloaders

By Tim Gore / Expert

There is a perception in rugby league that getting an offload away is great – and in some cases that is true. However, in some cases it isn’t good, and in other cases it’s just awful.

One thing the stats clearly show is that sides who have won the premiership in recent seasons have not been prolific offloaders. Just have a look at the last two seasons:

2013 offloads:

Rank for offloads made Team Average offloads per game Errors made ranking Tries scored ranking Final position
1 ST GEORGE ILLAWARRA 14.2 9 14 14th
2 GOLD COAST 11.6 5 7 9th
3 WARRIORS 11.5 12 8 11th
4 PENRITH 11.3 13 9 10th
5 CRONULLA 11.1 2 13 6th
6 CANTERBURY-BANKSTOWN 10.7 14 5 7th
7 MANLY 10.0 7 (10.3) 2 Runners up
8 BRISBANE 9.8 16 11 12th
9 MELBOURNE 9.5 6 3 5th
10 NORTH QUEENSLAND 9.4 8 10 8th
11 SYDNEY ROOSTERS 8.6 3 (10.8) 1 Premiers
12 CANBERRA 8.5 4 12 13th
13 WESTS TIGERS 7.9 1 15 15th
14 SOUTH SYDNEY 7.1 11 4 3rd
15 PARRAMATTA 6.7 10 16 Wooden Spoon
16 NEWCASTLE 5.9 15 6 4th
Average offloads per game: 9.6 Average errors per game: 10.2

Most off the sides that made the finals in 2013 – including the grand finalists – are not the big offloaders.

You will note that the premiers – the Roosters – had just less than the average offloads per game, but they made the third most errors. The runners up – Manly – were just above the average offloads and almost spot-on the average errors.

Just as offloads are often misinterpreted, errors are often misunderstood.

On the one hand they show a side has poor ball control, which is symptomatic of a struggling side – a la Wests Tigers in 2013, who made the most errors and scored the least tries. Too many of their errors were dropping the ball in their own red zone, or from poor play the balls.

Manly and the Roosters surely also had a number of that sort of error in 2013. However, they also had a load of errors where the last pass was dropped trying to score, or the ball was knocked on when a try was attempted.

These are errors that demonstrate ambitious attack. Nothing ventured, nothing gained. As you can see, the Eels barely offloaded in 2013 and only had average errors in winning the wooden spoon.

Also note that Michael Maguire had already stopped his Bunnies offloading in 2013. Only Newcastle and Parramatta made fewer.

Lastly, look at the Dragons. Their 2013 season is the case in point of the often meaninglessness of offloads. They led the way with an average of 14.2 offloads yet they scored the third fewest tries.

Sometimes offloads just highlight that a side has little structure in attack and they just try and get the ball out in the hope that the next bloke might do something.

In 2013 there was a world of difference between Ben Creagh hurling a ball out the back in hope and Sonny Bill Williams getting his arms free to put James Maloney through the line.

2014 Offloads:

Rank for offloads made Team Average offloads per game Errors made ranking Tries scored ranking Final position
1 GOLD COAST 13.4 2 15 14
2 CRONULLA 12.7 11 16 16
3 PENRITH 11.2 6 8 4
4 CANTERBURY-BANKSTOWN 11.0 3 (11.4) 10 Runners up
5 MANLY 10.9 8 7 5
6 MELBOURNE 10.9 14 6 7
7 WESTS TIGERS 10.8 5 14 13
8 ST GEORGE ILLAWARRA 10.8 15 11 11
9 CANBERRA 10.3 7 13 15
10 BRISBANE 10.2 12 5 8
11 NEWCASTLE 10.1 16 12 12
12 WARRIORS 9.7 13 4 9
13 SYDNEY ROOSTERS 8.8 1 2 3
14 SOUTH SYDNEY 8.6 4 (11.3) 1 Premiers
15 NORTH QUEENSLAND 8.6 9 3 6
16 PARRAMATTA 8.4 10 9 10
  Average offloads per game: 10.4 Average errors per game: 10.7    

So there is a big variation happening from 2013 to 2014. All off a sudden most of the also-rans are the average offloaders. The Wests Tigers, Dragons, Raiders and Knights were all around the season average of 10.4.

Again, the two grand finalists have higher-than-average errors. And once more the top offloading side – the Gold Coast this time – was miles off the pace at the business end of the season, and second-worst at scoring tries.

What stayed the same was that the eventual premiers had very few offloads, above average errors, and was the best at scoring tries.

So we’ve seen a pattern emerging. What does this season look like? Is anyone following that pattern?

2015 offloads:

Rank for offloads made Team Average offloads per game Errors made ranking Tries scored ranking current position
1 PENRITH 15.9 2 15 15
2 GOLD COAST 11.5 1 14 13
3 CANTERBURY-BANKSTOWN 11.4 9 5 6
4 CRONULLA 11.4 7 13 4
5 SYDNEY ROOSTERS 11.2 4 (11.2) 2 1
6 WARRIORS 11.0 3 12 12
7 CANBERRA 10.7 13 4 10
8 NEWCASTLE 10.4 5 11 16
9 PARRAMATTA 10.1 6 9 11
10 ST GEORGE ILLAWARRA 9.5 12 16 8
11 MELBOURNE 9.2 16 10 5
12 BRISBANE 9.0 10 (9.7) 1 2
13 WESTS TIGERS 8.8 11 7 14
14 MANLY 8.2 14 6 9
15 NORTH QUEENSLAND 7.8 15 (9.3) 3 3
16 SOUTH SYDNEY 6.7 8 8 7
  Average offloads per game: 10.2 Average errors per game: 10.2    

 

Again in 2015, the two biggest offloading sides aren’t in contention and are at the bottom of the try-scoring lists.

In regards to seeing if the previous two seasons patterns can help point out the premiership frontrunners, this season there are two sides that have below-average offloads and score lots of tries: the Broncos and Cowboys. However, both have below-average errors.

The Roosters have above-average errors and score lots of tries, while their offloads are above average.

However, the season isn’t done yet. It’ll be interesting to see if the eventual premier follows the pattern from 2013 and 2014. I reckon it’s going to be one of those three sides (or possibly the Dogs – I refuse to write them off).

And I hope I’ve made my point that, while a good offload is a very handy weapon in your arsenal, most offloads shouldn’t actually be included as a good stat at all.

This season’s wooden spooners will equal the record
Now let’s look at the other end of the competition. In the 17 completed seasons of the NRL era 11 of the 16 clubs – in one way or another – have claimed the wooden spoon.

Whoever gets the spoon this year will be equalling the record for the highest number of wins for the season in coming last. Whether it is the Wests Tigers, Knights or Panthers who come last, they’ll do so having won eight games during the season. Both the Knights in 2005 and the Panthers in 2007 won eight games each, yet finished stone motherless last. The average wins for a spoon-winning season since the NRL began in 1998 is just five.

Poor old Penrith have been crippled by injuries this season. By my count this weekend they’ll have 12 genuine first-grade players out injured, including stars like Jamie Soward and Matt Moylan. It is the chief reason they are in contention to claim their third spoon since the NRL began in 1998. If they do, they’ll equal the Rabbitohs’ three spoons over the same period.

It should be noted that Ivan Cleary’s squad keeps producing gems. On Monday night Will Smith made 166 metres from fullback. His game included a try, a try assist and three tackle breaks.

So who are the five clubs that haven’t won the spoon during the NRL era? The Warriors, Sea Eagles, Dragons, Raiders and Brisbane. In fact, those clubs combined only have four wooden spoons ever – the Raiders’ spoon in their inaugural season and the Dragons’ three from pre-WWII.

That’s impressive considering those five sides have played a combined total of 243 seasons.

The Crowd Says:

2015-09-03T10:55:39+00:00

Rellum

Roar Guru


Jason Smith in his pomp was up there.

2015-09-03T10:54:45+00:00

Rellum

Roar Guru


I think you will find the Broncos already have implemented some of the Jets tactics into the NRl, especially in defense. They let teams get quick roll ons in the middle of the park, are more than happy to defend on their own try line, they tend to get off the tackled player very quickly and all that does let them limit the time the opposition has with the ball.

2015-09-03T10:45:35+00:00

Ozzie Bob

Guest


The Wests Tigers have never won the wooden spoon in their 15 years of being!

AUTHOR

2015-09-03T09:29:22+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


what a nose. the flatest i've ever seen.

AUTHOR

2015-09-03T09:22:47+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


We don't recruit Queenslanders anymore. 40 roster spots lost to the state.

AUTHOR

2015-09-03T09:21:37+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


Annoyed. I tipped the Broncs and Mary K is out to beat me!

2015-09-03T08:31:32+00:00

Muzz

Guest


What happened to Gavin Miller? He use to contribute to these discussions. I enjoyed reading his posts.

2015-09-03T07:56:38+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Gavin Miller could stand and off load or play before the line....

2015-09-03T07:55:30+00:00

no one in particular

Roar Guru


Tackle breaks and line breaks would be better off with metres gained and put it all under the umbrella of metres after contact. How much is a tackle break worth? Reflecting the impact of the tackle break is better than just recording a tackle break. A line break that makes 5 metres is currently reflected the same way as a line break that makes 30 metres I think missed tackles should be compared to the tackles made stat. If you are first man in 30 times in a tackle and miss 4 then that is a better reflection then being the flopper and missing 3. It also makes no sense that a team can have the ball for 180 plays in a game, yet the opposition makes 300 tackles. Putting a value on the stat would be a better representation of the impact that stat has on the game

AUTHOR

2015-09-03T07:32:40+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


oh, Bronson Harrison. He was very good.

AUTHOR

2015-09-03T07:31:41+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


Tackle breaks? Line Breaks? Try assists? missed tackles? all pretty useful stats id argue.

AUTHOR

2015-09-03T07:30:05+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


Thank heavens!

AUTHOR

2015-09-03T07:29:17+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


nuh, passing while being tackled.

AUTHOR

2015-09-03T07:28:40+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


Steve Roach was very good. So was his mate Paul Sironen. Brad Clyde and Laurie Daley. Glen Stewart as Spruce says. Corey Parker is a special. Glenn Lazarus in his latter days. Gordie occasionally did a beaut. oh! SBW. and of course JT.

2015-09-03T06:51:46+00:00

Jay C

Roar Guru


I'm make an effort just for you mate

2015-09-03T06:49:58+00:00

PNG Bronco fan#88

Guest


Wow, this kills the article!

2015-09-03T05:52:33+00:00

no one in particular

Roar Guru


Most rugby league stats are pointless. Metres gained is pointless. Tackle counts are pointless. I would like to see metres gained after first contact with a defender. Tackle counts shared, so first man gets the bulk of the credit and others get a share. Completion rates mean nothing if you just go one out and kick

2015-09-03T05:42:45+00:00

Lord Funkington

Guest


I don't have anything to add to this

2015-09-03T05:02:10+00:00

Jay C

Roar Guru


I would prefer a metres gained from the point of the offload. Sometimes a ball on the ground ends up very effective.

2015-09-03T04:52:07+00:00

Jamieson Murphy

Roar Guru


It would be good if offloads were broken down into effective offloads (finds a man) and ineffective offloads (finds the ground). That would make it easier to determine if teams are just throwing and hoping.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar