What the new NRL deal means for Foxtel and Channel Nine

By Stuart Thomas / Expert

I can still remember watching the inaugural years of Super Saturday on Foxtel with Warren Smith in commentary and loving the product it conveyed.

A 5.30pm game fed straight into a 7.30pm game and the late game seemed to usually feature a talented young North Queensland Cowboys team or the powerhouse Melbourne Storm who were showing signs of the dominance they would attain in the coming years.

Watching a young Matt Bowen and Billy Slater were two particular highlights, their speed and agility as young men was amazing and they lit up the screen.

Smith did a terrific job in commentary despite his annoying signature, “and the Storm will play from in front tonight”.

Other commentators were also competent and experts such as Wally Lewis and Greg Alexander added to the professional and slick production that has morphed into the multifaceted beast that we now see.

The massive television deal has reshaped the game and the early signs are that Foxtel may be a winner in terms of ratings and fan loyalty.

I have continued to subscribe to Foxtel to this very day and have loved the broad coverage, ad-free game time and the absence of shameless cross-promotion that Channel Nine have bombarded its customers with for the last decade.

For the first time in rugby league’s history, games are being shown on both channels at the same time. While many have complained about less football to watch, some have also finally been alerted to the quality product that Fox generally produces.

Foxtel has promoted heavily in recent times to battle two things. A subscription mark of only 30 per cent of the wider viewing audiences poses an obvious challenge. Yet the stigma of paying for television coverage has also seemingly fuelled some comments made in recent weeks as the season explodes onto our screens.

A few weeks back I heard a gentleman call into a Sydney talk-back sports radio program complaining of the lack of football for him to watch now that the media coverage of the game has all been reworked. He was the archetypal voice of fury at both the league and cable television.

He claimed he “couldn’t afford Foxtel” yet in the subsequent discussion on the lateness of the second game on Channel Nine that many people have never ever see through to the finish, he stated that he was “too pissed” to stay awake.

The following day numerous follow-up callers expressed a similar feeling that I held.

Foxtel offer a $50 per month no contract sports combo pack. How many schooners do you have to give up for a $50 saving? These days, sad to say, not many. A friend of mine uses the same argument and gets insanely frustrated when I tell him to cut his cigarette intake by a measly three packs a month and he too could be a Foxtel subscriber.

It irks me that some people seem to be rejecting the cable option, not based on reality but based on a prehistoric argument anchored by a refusal to pay for television.

It saddens me that some friends of mine with children, a mortgage and financial stresses can’t actually validate the cost of cable. Of course there are real people out there who are in this situation yet they don’t seem to be the ones expressing vitriolic opinion about cable providers.

This vitriol, in turn, supports and perpetuates the poor standard of coverage that the Nine Network has been able to get away with for years.

Channel Nine’s unwillingness to show games in high definition until this year seemed absolutely mindless. The poor quality of picture shocked many visitors to my lounge room when I compared the game viewed in HD to the non-HD alternative.

Internationally, the judgement was heightened as foreign visitors were astounded that the flagship sport in the Sydney market could be so far behind the times in free-to-air coverage.

The stretching of start times for Friday night matches until almost 8pm made the game almost unviable for me to attend with my young children. Both the league and the television provider are to blame here.

The absurdity in the commentary team and the unprofessional antics of Brad Fittler and Andrew Johns are an insult to everyone watching. Only last week the panel lauded the demolition the Roosters were about to do on the Rabbitohs with Peter Sterling being the only discerning voice.

Late in the game, one commentator jumped ships and said, “I could see this coming”. More deserved players and commentators on radio networks are far more knowledgeable and enjoyable to listen to.

No wonder Sterling broadened his horizons in search of a more credible platform in which to express his immense knowledge of the game.

The human ‘conflict of interest’ Phil Gould is undoubtedly one of the most astute thinkers in the game, yet he will always suffer from the same sorts of barbs thrown at Eddie McGuire in Melbourne due to close affinity with one club or another.

Gould’s early commentary was outstanding, the 1995 grand final was a perfect example as he dissected the game early in the second half and accurately predicted the downfall of the Eagles to a rampaging Dogs unit.

The brilliant prediction of Jason Smith, Jim Dymock and Dean Pay eventually getting their hands free to offload was prophetic. Sure the game had its controversies but Gould read the play like a children’s picture book.

Now Gould has frequently slumped to cries of ‘Dear oh dear oh dear’ that grind on the brain and remind me of my grandmother whining over someone not using cutlery correctly at the dinner table.

It will be interesting to note if the impending departure of the great Ray Warren might reinvigorate Channel Nine’s stocks.

Foxtel are far from perfect, of course. The antics of Bryan Fletcher and Nathan Hindmarsh are as embarrassing as The Footy Show, but serve a certain audience, and surely the host of feature matches across the weekend should have some football cred. Matt Shirvington seems to struggle weekly and fumbles his way through as Gordon Tallis and co offer some genuine insight into the game.

The initial trend seems to be people choosing the ad-free cable over the Channel Nine coverage. Whether this continues remains to be seen. The healthy challenge of the cable option might even make Channel Nine sharpen up its coverage.

The most important result should be increased viewing audiences and customer satisfaction at the product on display. Let’s hope the NRL keep this as a priority as the AFL and A-League continue to grow.

For the greatest game of all to continue to make that claim, the new deal needs to iron out some past flaws and move aggressively into the more congested and competitive media age.

The Crowd Says:

2016-03-12T02:41:17+00:00

up in the north

Roar Rookie


I get the Digital Pass as a supposed freebie with my mobile plan, I was paying $2 last year and didn't begrudge it for the very infrequent times I just had to watch on my wee smartphone. If I could figure out how to make my phone show on my tv I'd be sorted. I have had a few chats with telstra about the crap way they offer a fox subscription ie: $25 for basic package plus $25 for the sports. All I want is the sport but there's no other option, as much as I can't stomach paying Murdoch, I would pay for the sport content alone. As an aside, last night during nines broadcast the signal just disappeared before half time and didn't come back until just before full time. Every channel stopped working and all the others were fine, so the digital pass became my best friend. Not good enough. Did anyone else have this issue or was it a North Queensland thing or just my house? Interested to know.

2016-03-11T18:33:39+00:00

Chris

Guest


i can only watch no more then 2 Rugby games ( both codes) a week at most but find the TV deals for both NRL/S16 a joke and think both codes will suffer. Nothing worse seeing a really good game on TV played at empty/half empty stadiums...not a good look on the sport.

2016-03-10T21:59:33+00:00

Koach

Guest


Get Foxtel Play for $50 & split the cost between 3 mates.. I have myself in the SE suburbs of Melbourne, my mate in tye northern suburbs & my brother who lives in Sydney on mine. Makes it cheap as & seriously, the coverage is soo much better! But, up to you dude...

2016-03-10T21:53:18+00:00

Koach

Guest


Have been fed up with 9's Gus Gould involvement for years.. That & no live NRL Footy Show in Victoria has converted me to Foxtel every game! Such better coverage.. Ch 9 did this to themselves... The inclusion of a dedicated NRL channel in years to come is exciting & the fact it's only $50 for Foxtel Play streaming flawlessly to my projector makes Fox Sports a no brainer!

2016-03-10T07:24:57+00:00

Lovey

Guest


Sure, definitely Friday was the 9 broadcast (with about a 4 second delay). Same for Sunday. The rest from Fox. I am very happy with it. Try the free package.

2016-03-10T07:21:36+00:00

Squidward

Roar Rookie


I wasn't being sarcastic. I genuinely don't know. Do they take the 9 commenters or foxtels?

2016-03-10T07:19:16+00:00

Lovey

Guest


Yes, I know, that is why I said "as much as possible". I mean the Thursday game, as well as all the non- free to air ones are via Fox. But the Friday game is from 9 I believe.

2016-03-10T06:29:48+00:00

Epiquin

Roar Guru


Bit of hyperbole there. I know it has way less content than US, but I would still struggle to watch the good stuff on there without quitting my job and having no friends.

2016-03-10T05:16:00+00:00

Kaks

Roar Guru


Netflix Australia? You would be better of streaming for free than pay for that I personally love Foxtel as almost all sports I love are in one place and are properly presented. It will be a shame if they dont have the EPL next season.

2016-03-10T05:02:52+00:00

MAX

Guest


Being retired with all the time in the world and a RL tragic to boot Foxtel Sports package is a necessity of life. We have recently moved to this area and neighbours warned me that the digital pass did not work for them. At <$2 per game + replays on tap we consider it value for money. My wife reads the game well. 8 from 8 and leader in the clubhouse.

2016-03-10T04:57:13+00:00

Epiquin

Roar Guru


It's not just about whether or not you can afford it, it's about whether it's good value. I could afford to spend $50 a month on a slice of pizza, but it wouldn't be a sensible spend of money would it?

2016-03-10T04:55:27+00:00

Epiquin

Roar Guru


Nope. literally not a single one. They all download content so can't justify the cost of Foxtel.

2016-03-10T04:30:53+00:00

fiddlesticks

Guest


the amount of people that cant afford foxtel amazes me. $50 a month

2016-03-10T03:35:17+00:00

baldie

Guest


You got any mates with Foxtel? A few of mine just register their devices with the account for Foxtel go as your allowed to register 3 devices. Its a great product.

2016-03-10T03:33:26+00:00

Dean - Surry Hills

Guest


With you 100% baldie - I paid $2.99 for the trial to watch The Auckland Nines, and it was completely shite. I'm on the fastest NBN plan - so it's not a connectivity issue. The money you save will be spent on a trip to the optometrist by years end.

2016-03-10T03:05:34+00:00

Epiquin

Roar Guru


Still ridiculously cheaper than foxtel. I barely seem to have time to watch every NRL game let alone other sport so really can't justofy the cost of foxtel. digital pass product may be crap but at least it is on demand and I can watch when I'm away from home.

2016-03-10T02:46:45+00:00

Adam Hallinan

Guest


Being in Melbourne we got the Friday night games in HD - unless the Storm play or it's the finals then we got it in terrible SD. Not sure what it will on free-to-air in Melbourne this year. Hopefully this year NRL will be always in HD! Seven is the same with AFL coverage in Melbourne as NRL in Sydney - it's only SD. When they regained the AFL rights exclusively they said they would show the finals in HD - then didn't. It looks terrible. And they have Bruce McAvaney. Foxtel have Dwayne Russell. Even Channel 10 have their main channel in HD now - and they have no money! I can't justify paying $60 a month for Foxtel. If it was $30 then I'd get it - but I have to pay for all the channels I don't want first. The business model is stupid!

2016-03-10T02:07:01+00:00

baldie

Guest


Foxtel is a must, the digital pass is an insult to Rugby League. I have NBN and can stream the NFL and NBA in pure HD without ever buffering but I cant get 10 seconds out of the steaming pile of crap that is the digital pass. Oh and how about this beauty taken from their terms and conditions: "Telstra's agreement with the NRL restricts the display of live match videos to the current screen size. Match highlights and match replays are available for viewing in full screen size. " So it does not even fill the entire screen on an Ipad, what a joke. Also the screen quality is worst than watching youtube in 2009. Absolutely pathetic product.

2016-03-10T01:58:14+00:00

Chris Meister

Roar Guru


Warren Smith would have said "the Storm will play from in front" through gritted teeth, he hates us with a passion

2016-03-10T01:34:05+00:00

Bulldog

Guest


Fair enough but you probably live somewhere with a decent internet connection....

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar