Selection for Game 1 is key to winning State of Origin

By Michael Keeffe / Roar Guru

In the lead up to this year’s State of Origin series there will be plenty of passionate discussion about who should be picked for the 2016 NSW and Queensland Origin teams.

Should NSW clean the deck after last year’s Game 3 embarrassment? If injury hits Queensland should they backflip on their ban of Anthony Milford, Dylan Napa, Cameron Munster and co?

Analysis of the last 25 Origin series back to 1991 (when interchange was introduced at Origin level) show that overwhelmingly the team that use the least number of players in an Origin series emerges the victor.

In fact only on six occasions has the team using more players lifted the shield at the end of a series. If you use 25 players or more you are virtually guaranteed to lose the series.

Only in 2004 – on the back of a Brad Fittler comeback – has a team won the series, with NSW using 27 players in that year.

More State of Origin:
» State of Origin news
» State of Origin fixtures and kickoff time
» State of Origin teams
» James Tedesco should be Australia’s fullback
» Hey Laurie, don’t commit the same mistakes as those before you

In 2002 Queensland retained the trophy with a drawn series by using 26 players. Queensland has never used more than 26 players and the two years (2009 and 2010) that NSW used more than 30 players, represent probably the darkest period in Blues Origin history.

On the other hand if your state uses 20 players or less you are almost guaranteed to emerge victorious. There have been 11 series victories when using 20 players or less. The only loss was NSW in 2015 when both teams used 20 players for the series.

There are two major factors in how many players are used in a series. Injury and selection policy. Injuries can’t be controlled, but selection policy can.

The team that picks and sticks throughout a series is far more likely to be lifting the shield. If the selectors are to wield the axe on incumbent players the best time to do that is before Game 1. Mid-series selection changes particularly in key positions such as the halves, hooker and fullback are almost certainly a death knell to your states hopes of winning.

So this raises the stakes for making the right decisions for the opening origin on first June.

Aside from a few injuries causing openings in the outside backs, the Queensland team essentially picks itself.

For Laurie Daley and the NSW selectors, getting it right for Game 1 is huge. There is no room to try and change mid-series particularly in key positions. Daley needs to make the decision upfront who he wants in key positions and barring injury he needs to stick with it to be any hope of upsetting Queensland.

When Laurie Daley only used 20 players across last year’s series he had the right idea. However it was definitely proven that while he had the right idea he had the wrong troops – particularly in the halves.

The last time NSW used only 20 players in a series was in 2003 when an Andrew Johns led team took a 2–0 lead in the series before taking the foot off the pedal in the decider.

Mal Meninga and Phil Gould are the two most successful Origin coaches and they both had the hallmark of using fewer players in Origin series than their opposition coaches at the time.

So Daley should be encourage to stick and pick, but the key for him will be picking the right players in the first place.

As a Queenslander I hope he picks all the players from last year – but that’s a discussion for another time.

The Crowd Says:

2016-04-25T02:08:22+00:00

Jackson Henry

Roar Guru


This sounds really interesting. Serious question - any chance of an article on the subject?

2016-04-24T22:23:45+00:00

up in the north

Roar Rookie


It looks like the menace should be picked not only because of his encumbancy but he's playing pretty well. I like the idea of Peats as a utility and bringing him along a bit slower.

2016-04-24T13:27:58+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


I agree with this. I wrote an article a couple of weeks ago selecting four forwards in the bench. But in retrospect I don't think there's too much difference between picking three or four forwards - as long as the selections are right. If use the fourth bench spot for Peats. He's as good as any young NSW hooker around and can play in the back row if required. Most importantly he gets a taste of origin footy in a graduated way before taking over in 2017, rather than thrown in at the deep end.

2016-04-24T10:41:52+00:00

Sleiman Azizi

Roar Guru


This.

2016-04-24T10:41:03+00:00

Sleiman Azizi

Roar Guru


I'd go with Ennis and bring in an up and comer as part of the squad for Ennis to mentor.

2016-04-24T10:13:32+00:00

Footy Fan

Guest


For sure. Losses mean more team change, but very unclear that team changes mean more losses. Quoted results follow from 2 inputs: past result + team changes, jumbling up the effects of both. Can't tell what's causing what, so conclusions are invalid. Split data into 2 cases, which 'lock' first input, but not second one: a) Games after loss: record number of team changes & frequency of win. Plot trend / find optimum changes. b) Games after win: Ditto. Set a) will have a fair more team changes, but can compare low v high. Can do same for set b). Need plenty of game samples to ensure a good coverage of results against number of team changes. Not saying conclusions are wrong, but invalid (asserted without any backup).

2016-04-24T03:52:13+00:00

Gus Paella

Guest


So Daley needs to pick the right team for origin 1. Stunning.

AUTHOR

2016-04-24T02:48:54+00:00

Michael Keeffe

Roar Guru


No, I think he needs to make changes, but he needs to do so before the start of the series like I said in the article...

2016-04-24T00:48:50+00:00

up in the north

Roar Rookie


It will take a huge amount of courage for NSW selectors to pick a different hooker, they are very thin on the ground unfortunately.

2016-04-23T23:39:52+00:00

turbodewd

Guest


I want to know how Daley can pick Farah considering the Raider's Hodgson utterly schooled him last night. Where was Farah?! Jason Taylor may be the coach of the Tigers..but Farah runs them. HE is the reason for their crapness. He was nowhere last night. This year the Blues should be able to wipe away the aging Maroons...but if Daley picks Farah and Woods again we are doomed.

2016-04-23T21:55:18+00:00

Gus Paella

Guest


So Daley picking the bulk of a non successful side is his best chance of success?

2016-04-23T18:19:44+00:00

Peeeko

Guest


We have a test match against kiwis in 2 weeks, I believe they beat us last year

2016-04-23T17:18:21+00:00

Craig

Guest


I think this get the causal logic backwards. Teams don't lose because they use too many players. They use more players because they are not doing well.

Read more at The Roar