Bias in officiating in 2016? No way

By Dan Eastwood / Expert

A second-half blitz with four tries in the final 20 minutes saw the Canberra Raiders prevail over the Canterbury Bulldogs on Sunday.

Yet it wasn’t any of the tries that got people talking after the game – it was the senior match review official in the Bunker.

How so? Blake Austin beat two tackles to break through the Bulldogs’ defence and accelerated for the goal-line. The cover tacklers were good enough to prevent him from streaking away under the posts, but they couldn’t stop him from getting to the line.

Or did they? Referee Ashley Klein, positioned behind the tackle, was obliged to give an on-field verdict on the try’s validity, and after considering the opinions of his fellow match officials he ruled a try, while requesting a review of the decision from the Bunker.

The review officials considered the evidence they had. After viewing the replays a decision was reached: Austin had grounded the ball just short of the line and then lost control. In the opinion of the officials they had sufficient evidence to overturn the live decision of try, so hit the red button and a ‘no try’ was the result.

There’s nothing that occurred in that sequence of events that we haven’t seen a dozen times this season. In this case, the system worked the way it is designed: the live decision was proffered, that decision was reviewed with all available camera angles, and a final decision was reached.

It doesn’t matter what any of the fans or viewers think of the decision (indeed, there have been arguments on either side) because it was so close I’m not even interested in whether it was wrong or right. I have to trust that the people with more information, more video and more close-ups than I do to come up with the right judgment.

Which brings us to the crux of the story – Luke Patten was the senior review official – yes, the former Bulldogs player.

Patten ruled against a Canberra try, who by coincidence happened to be playing against one of his former clubs.

That is not enough for social media.

Patten was pilloried by fans, claiming that he was biased in his decision because it went the way of the Bulldogs.

What an insult.

‘The General’ is one of a handful of senior review officials used in the Bunker. He didn’t just land there by falling off a tank in Normandy – he applied for an advertised position and was given the job ahead of other applicants. His experience as a former player and as a video referee over the previous three seasons got him across the line.

Seeing some of those comments about being biased demands a response, and since Luke can’t make public comments about the game then I’ll do it for him.

I worked with Luke during his first two years as a video referee in 2013 and 2014. While these days the review officials are in a bunker in Sydney’s Technology Park, for those years the video refs would travel with the on-field officials to all NRL games.

For games in North Queensland and New Zealand (as well as one-off destinations like Darwin and Perth) we were typically away for three days. We officials would spend most of that time together, in airport lounges, travelling, in coffee shops and – if I had the casting vote – bars after the game.

It gave me an opportunity to find out a bit about people I would perhaps never come across, such as Justin Morgan, Ben Galea, Steve Folkes and Luke Patten. From that group Morgan and Folkes now have coaching roles, while Gale and Patten work as review officials in the Bunker.

I can tell you that none of those men are biased towards any club or player when it comes to refereeing. They are all genuine league people, looking to do the best job they can, and in all the time I dealt with them I saw nothing but professionalism.

I was disappointed to see the reaction on Sunday. Sure, Luke Patten played for the Bulldogs and made his name there. He also played for Illawarra, St George-Illawarra and the Salford City Reds in the UK. He’s doesn’t pull on a club shirt when he walks into the Bunker. He walks in there knowing the responsibility of representing every match official in the game. It should not be underestimated.

I hope as a game we are mature enough to understand that match officials will simply get out there and do the job, regardless of their background or heritage. I feel we’ve taken steps that way with using the best referee for the May Anzac Test in Gerry Sutton, even thought we had an English referee out here relegated to controlling a Pacific Test.

Sutton (a New South Welshman) will control the first State of Origin game tonight. Ben Cummins, who learned his trade in the ACT, will assist. The touch judges, Jeff Younis and Nick Beashel, are from NSW, with the Bunker consisting of Bernard Sutton, Patten and Klein. Another Sydney boy is stand-by referee Gavin Badger.

In fact, you need to scroll down to the stand-by touch judge, Michael Wise, to find a Queenslander in the group.

In the modern era of professional refereeing it doesn’t matter one iota. They will get out there (and just like when I was officiating) in their minds the colours of the jerseys might as well be black and white as maroon and blue. It’s simply not a consideration when getting the job done comes first.

***

As a footnote to the Austin ‘no try’, I want to give a rap to Bulldogs interchange forward Adam Elliot who pulled off the try-saving tackle. Sometimes the tough, good stuff needs to be acknowledged. Bravo!

The Crowd Says:

2016-06-01T05:57:53+00:00

Baz

Guest


Lots of ppl have a problem with perenara dont rate him as a ref.

2016-06-01T05:48:53+00:00

pete bloor

Guest


But the perception only exists because the fan base projects their own absence of character on Patten

2016-06-01T05:46:39+00:00

pete bloor

Guest


How do you know the inherent bias from playing for a team is more influential to living in the state form an inherent bias perspective when you say you Dan can't prove anything. It could be that the fact it is more overt makes it easier to mitigate? Also where do you draw the line on that, either you trust their professionalism or you don't employ them because every game impacts every team by way of the ladder right, if you genuinely think he is incapable of separating his desire for the dogs to win from the decision then he can't really officiate any game with finals implications. At least he can do a roosters v knights game I suppose? Getting caught up in team spirit seems unlikely to be the quality of someone that could hold down a job in that field. Cricket is also effectively run by a group of countries that sit below Nigeria on the corruption index so it's got circuit breakers built out of distrust of their own.

2016-06-01T05:30:00+00:00

GTW

Guest


Yeah, it's easier to handle a very bad call when there's no perceived or possible bias. The Croker forward pass went backwards about 6 inches, when many if not most passes move forward towards the try-line with momentum, which is fine - how the hell did Klein make that ruling? I think he felt guilty for pulling up Eastwood's pass which did go forward 3-5 metres, but in past years was sort of ok if the Doggies did it.

2016-06-01T05:22:28+00:00

GTW

Guest


you sound like a supporter of a team that gets plenty of 50/50 calls, has TPA's coming out of their bottoms and the media is all over themselves printing nice stories. Patten has made 2 incorrect calls against Canberra in the past month (the first being the "wall" ruling in extra time against the Drag-queens). The Austin try probably wasn't a try, but since the on field ref put it up as a TRY, in 99.9% of cases the Video Ref cop out and just back them up. Had the try been scored by a Rooster or a Bronco, I doubt they'd have looked at it. Having made one error within the month against the raiders, the NRL should have kept him away from the Raiders games. He hasn't got a ref ticket, so doesn't know the rules. In an odd situation, all Channel 9 and Fox agreed that the Austin try should have been awarded given the process that applies to other games. I repeat it probably wasn't a try, but that is irrelevant, usually.

2016-06-01T05:13:55+00:00

Alex L

Roar Rookie


Morris was standing at the drop of the ball and Ferguson pushed him off... doesn't matter where his eyes were.

2016-06-01T05:01:53+00:00

Red Dog

Guest


What about the Ferguson obstruction on Morris in the Roosters V Dawgs game . That was a joke , don't even bother trying to defend the indefensible .

2016-06-01T04:58:23+00:00

steve b

Roar Guru


Agree Dan but it happens every weekend somewhere.The NRL does not need to leave it to doubt they have plenty of refs that arnt assocated with any team and yes it shouldnt be like that but it is.

2016-06-01T04:41:22+00:00

Edward Kelly

Roar Guru


But it was a try! I'm with the Foxsports commentators who were flabbergasted by that decision.

2016-06-01T04:07:49+00:00

Marvel

Guest


Craig Exactly - refs are banned from games with clubs they are associated to stop this imputation. Speaking of which Andrew Webster in the SMH today State of Origin 2016: The future of Origin is in your hands, NSW ... no pressure, though http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/state-of-origin/state-of-origin-2016-the-future-of-origin-is-in-your-hands-nsw--no-pressure-though-20160531-gp8a6o.html#ixzz4AIUDUU8P He was allegedly talking to fans but could have been talking to the refs....

AUTHOR

2016-06-01T03:47:00+00:00

Dan Eastwood

Expert


I'm trying to get the fans there one column at a time!

2016-06-01T03:31:36+00:00

Craig

Guest


Pretty common sense to exclude Patten from bulldogs games. He doesn't need to officiate every single game and its easy to accommodate it. Like you said, its for his protection as much as others. It's more about a perception of bias, than any actual bias.

2016-06-01T03:08:39+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


I think any move to have Patten excluded from Bulldogs club games is more about protecting Patten from any appearance or accusation of bias. But where does it stop? Does a Queenslander not ref Queensland games, a kiwi not ref any Warriors games? I have my own bias - but I thought it was a good call. I thought the head on shot in particular showed that Austin grounded the ball short of the line, lost it and then the ball fell short of the line again. The VR zoomed in and I thought it was pretty clear. What I think this also shows though is that referees decisions don't solely determine the outcome of games. The Raiders had plenty of chances to win the game - which they took. If they didn't and the Bulldogs had won by two points, no doubt we'd be hearing about how the ref decided the outcome.

2016-06-01T03:06:23+00:00

Scott Pryde

Expert


Oh no Dan - Dragons fans have huge problems with Perenara.

2016-06-01T02:57:13+00:00

Christov

Guest


Wouldnt worry about it, everyone knows canberra fans have chips on their shoulders

AUTHOR

2016-06-01T02:52:38+00:00

Dan Eastwood

Expert


Nobody seems to have a problem with Henry Perenara who played for Dragons, Sharks, Eels, Storm, Warriors - am I missing any?

AUTHOR

2016-06-01T02:50:52+00:00

Dan Eastwood

Expert


Nobody should put you in that position - what's so important about a footy game that makes it ok to abuse someone?

2016-06-01T02:41:51+00:00

Cadfael

Roar Guru


It was a close decision and I would have been happy whichever way it went. This was a classic bunker/video ref request. I thought Perrara's decision on the no obstruction was poor. Yes, he can't become invisible but a player in that position is penalised. We'll never know because it was not referred to the bunker. Like the Austin try, this one should have gone upstairs.

AUTHOR

2016-06-01T02:06:17+00:00

Dan Eastwood

Expert


Baz you have to remember that there were two other guys in the bunker with him and if they strongly disagreed with Luke he would not have pressed the red button. So in some ways that is a circuit-breaker for anything totally out of order.

2016-06-01T01:48:16+00:00

Cugel

Roar Rookie


"Patten was pilloried by fans" Fans.. the gold standard for nuanced, judicious and impartial decision-making.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar