Eels fans need to refocus their hatred

By Oliver Matthews / Expert

So the Hayne Plane has landed slightly further north than many thought it would. The Titans have locked down another superstar and this time it looks like it will stick.

As the rumours began to circulate on Wednesday morning that the Gold Coast side were about to make an incredible announcement, some of the strongest opinions were coming, unsurprisingly, from the fans of the Eels. And when I say “strongest opinions” that phrase covers everything from mature wishes of luck to vitriolic anger and hatred.

Throughout Wednesday social media, radio call in shows and TV interviews gave more and more Eels fans the chance to tell the world how hurt they felt by what they saw as gross dishonesty from their former hero. These fans are absolutely right to be angry and feel hurt and let down. But they are focusing on absolutely the wrong target.

They really need to adjust their sights on the former occupants of the board room of their club and unleash their emotions in that direction – because that’s where the blame really belongs.

We’ve heard and read Hayne’s quote about how he’s got a lifelong agreement with the Eels. For sure he’s regretting ever saying that, but why are Eels fans really angry at Jarryd for not rejoining the Club when the management have turned the place into a radioactive zone the likes of Chernobyl?

Fans keep commenting on how Hayne owed them some relief at the end of the most crippling season in their history. But they don’t seem to focus on why 2016 has been such a hellish year. Glossing over the unforgivable manner in which the club’s management has run the Eels into the ground, they instead start setting fire to Hayne memorabilia.

It is ridiculous and bizarrely shows the same lack of awareness that has got the club into this state in the first place.

Is Hayne guilt free? Not at all. The way he and/or his management have handled the past few weeks has not been very impressive. Alerting the media to their self-scheduled meeting with the ARU and Tahs was a bad decision and the way that they have allowed speculation to grow has not helped Hayne’s brand reputation – something he seems to care a lot about.

Ironically he really should have taken some lessons from Kieran Foran – the man many Eels fans assumed he was going to be replacing in blue and gold next season. While DCE was flip flopping between the Gold Coast and Brookvale, Foran was calmly and professionally going about his negotiations with the Eels.

Australians love winners but they hate individuals getting above their station. Hayne’s adventure to the NFL was applauded by most as someone following an ambition.

He seemed to go about achieving that ambition with a good deal of humility and we all shouted with support when he took the field in the real NFL season. But then this same humble Hayne seemed to take on a different approach. What he called a dream of playing for Fiji at the Olympics seemed to others as arrogant and disrespectful to those who had struggled and strived for years for the same opportunity.

And then his parading around Australian rugby union and league as well as French rugby has frustrated and annoyed many.

So yes, Hayne hasn’t done himself any favours. But does that mean that he deserves the level of hate and abuse that he’s received? Not in my book.

The Paramatta fans have spoken of broken promises and betrayal. But as the Eels have shown – their style of rugby league is not at all about loyalty or honour. They showed their fans and the rest of the world that they were willing to do whatever they could to get an advantage and willingly and persistently broke the laws of the game (and potentially the laws of the land too).

For the clubs’ fans to now turn around and scream at Hayne because he has decided that he doesn’t want to be part of that type of organisation, doesn’t make sense.

Imagine you are thinking of returning to one of your previous employers having left them amicably about a year or so ago. Now imagine that since you left it has become clear that that same employer has broken several regulations and potentially has committed criminal offences.

Imagine as well that the leadership within that employer, having been found guilty, then refuse to leave until the regulator comes along and forces them out. Imagine that one of the key staff members of that employer was also stripped of their role within the company while they were trying to deal with a serious mental health condition.

Imagine that that employer keeps hinting that they really want you back and that they’ll make it worth your while but can’t actually table an offer because the regulator hasn’t finished their investigation. And then when they do finally make a formal offer, imagine it is hundreds of thousands of dollars less than another company from the same sector.

A company that is willing to pay you significantly more to work at a place that is up and coming, has a strong team spirit and high quality leadership both in the board room and on the shop floor. Which one would you take?

We heap a level of expectation on our sports heroes that we don’t expect from others in our day to day lives. We assume that because they seem superhuman in physical terms that they are superhuman in all other areas too. Yes fans pay money to see these players and wear the jerseys but does that really mean we should also expect them to put our emotional needs ahead of their own well being?

The Eels fans have every right to be angry and hurt – but they should focus that anger on their club and demand better.

The Crowd Says:

2016-08-04T11:47:37+00:00

steve b

Roar Guru


Mate as Bad said they offered he said not enough. BUT in saying that Jayne should not have made a promise he was never going to keep should he. Then their wouldn't be such a social media meltdown by Parra fans.

AUTHOR

2016-08-04T09:41:39+00:00

Oliver Matthews

Expert


So are you saying Steve that he should have said yes to an informal offer of significantly less money and said no to a more concrete formal offer for more money? If Parra were serious about wanting him back then surely they would have locked this down a long time ago - accept they couldn't because they were busy defending their persistent breaking of the salary cap, infighting and refusing to accept that they'd screwed up.

2016-08-04T03:38:15+00:00

Will Sinclair

Roar Guru


I can't disagree with you Steve! Regardless of everything else, Parra were very good to let him go when they did, and it must be disappointing to see that not being repaid.

2016-08-04T02:00:04+00:00

steve b

Roar Guru


It was a low blow for Parra fans social media has gone into meltdown but you can't beat the gold coast offer plus a travel agent is going to cough up 300grand per season hard to beat that.But he backstabbed Parra and thatd the truth no matter what way you want time spin it.

2016-08-04T01:27:24+00:00

S T Ruggling

Roar Pro


Happy club, happy players, easier to recruit. Should keep an eye on South Sydney as the grumblings are getting louder and at the moment everyone except Macguire is getting shown the door on the coaching side. However that will do nothing as long as rusty gives preferential treatment to the Burgess brothers

2016-08-04T01:20:29+00:00

Remo Shankar

Roar Pro


Hahaha, guess you need a recap: Parra as a club, administratively, are well and truly broken. They did, however, let Hayne out of his contract and supported him in his 'dream' to play NFL. They've also been carrying his NFL merchandise in their supporters shop (up until yesterday)....

2016-08-04T00:14:14+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Hahaha...paying back the club. That's the funniest thing I've read for a while.

2016-08-04T00:13:15+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


As you don't mind reminding me Will !! The dogs were the only team that would give Thurston a shot. Without the Dogs he wouldn't be where he is now. I take some satisfaction in that. Unfortunately the NRL didn't and don't have concessions for players that have been in a clubs system for a long time. Couldn't stop the old Cowboys poaching the talent we'd identified and developed - even though they'd knocked him back years earlier. Thurston was faced with being a back up half for another couple of seasons on low money or getting a pay rise and running the Cowboys team. Hindsights a wonderful thing but at the time it was the right call.

2016-08-04T00:06:22+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Mate - I think it will work in Parras favour. They need to move forward. Paying 1.2 mill to Hayne doesn't allow that.

2016-08-03T23:46:04+00:00

Remo Shankar

Roar Pro


Hayne benefited from some of the Parramatta salary cap misdeeds to the tune of $400,000 plus. Parra also let him out of his contract early to let him pursue his NFL dream. Imagine if Hayne decided to play for Parra next year for the $700,00 -$800,000 they offered as a way of paying back the club, the fans and honouring the promise he made. Imagine that. But maybe God made it clear to Jarryd that the right thing to do was to accept the Titan's offer. Maybe...

2016-08-03T23:17:43+00:00

Will Sinclair

Roar Guru


Ah yeah, you can only judge these things in hindsight. But, in hindsight, choosing Brent Sherwin over Jonathan Thurston is a shocker!

2016-08-03T23:16:35+00:00

Parrafan

Guest


I think Hayne not signing is a symptom that the Eels are slowly turning the ship around. To bow to his demands again and pay that sort of money for a fullback would have been to repeat the mistakes of the past.

2016-08-03T22:36:36+00:00

Don

Roar Rookie


In hindsight, probably right. But the Dogs had Brent Sherwin (who was very good for 5 years) and Braith Anasta playing halves at the time. Its a bit like the Ash Taylor scenario at the Titans. I reckon Taylor is, and will be, a better player than Ben Hunt but the Broncos can't keep him on their books in the face of bigger offers. Someone has to go and back then it was usually the guy who is off contract. Today you would see the club try a player trade but they were almost non existent back then.

2016-08-03T22:11:00+00:00

Will Sinclair

Roar Guru


Letting Thurston leave was surely the worst recruitment decision in the modern history of rugby league...

2016-08-03T21:37:08+00:00

Parrafan

Guest


I think the Eels fans are more disappointed that Hayne flat out lied about not receiving an offer from the Eels and the interim CEO being on "holiday" when that clearly wasn't the case. If he had been honest that he went to the Titans for a pay day everyone can accept that. Players have short careers, need to earn top dollar, etc... He tried to save the aura of only doing things because it's a dream rather than just business and it's damaged his brand in a big way. In all honesty Eels are better off without spending that amount of money on one player. We need a solid half and hooker to replace Peats and Foran, and a decent prop to replace Junior Paulo.

2016-08-03T21:13:40+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


The circumstances are different but in some ways there's a parallel with SBW. As a Dogs fan I was filthy when he walked out but after a few months I realised that SBW was a symptom of how badly the club was being run not the cause. The Dogs were a shambles at the time. They'd lost close to a full team of rep quality players over the preceding couple of years, the club couldn't attract sponsors, there was no direction and seemingly no ambition. They got their back office sorted out and turned things around. Hopefully for the sake of Eels fans Parra can do the same. Sonny-Bill still went the wrong way about doing things and maybe Hayne has too. I'm still disappointed with how SBW left and I'm sure that won't change for Parra fans any time soon. I left the anger behind a long time ago. But hopefully before long Parra fans can accept that Hayne not signing is a(nother) symptom of what's wrong with the club at the moment and celebrate what he's done for the club rather than blame him.

Read more at The Roar