The Wrap: All Blacks and Wallabies pull off three-card trick

By Geoff Parkes / Expert

If Dane Coles was frustrated or angry at being hooked early in last week’s Test match in Hamilton, he responded in the best possible manner; by keeping his trap shut and pulling off an amazing three-card trick against the Springboks.

It was one thing for Coles to deliver the final ball for three of the All Blacks’ six tries – surely something that no other hooker has done in a Test between top tier nations – but another thing altogether to play a different card each time.

The first, a quick flick on, off the left hand, the second an incisive run into a half-gap, a push through the tackle and a right-handed hook pass, and the third, a long, flat spiral to the loitering Sam Whitelock, enjoying licence to roam free, in his new role as a fledgling loose forward.

This was stunning work; although nothing new for Coles who broke Irish hearts in 2014 when he put Ryan Crotty in at the corner, well beyond the 80th minute. He was in such rare form one imagines that had he been allowed to convert the tries he would have done it with ease – off either foot. Blindfolded.

In truth, Springbok hooker Adriaan Strauss was enjoying a fine match himself, but everything is relative, and Test rugby is all about influencing the match where it really counts – on the scoreboard.

For that matter, the Christchurch scoreboard got a fair work out. A gap of 41 points is an uncommon occurrence in New Zealand versus South Africa rugby history, but is probably a fair indicator of where these sides are right now.

South Africa was by no means poor, but aside from a period of direct play that culminated in Bryan Habana’s well-taken 66th Test try, they were impotent. Their best feature is their line-out, but against this All Blacks side, that only meant parity, and their scrum was a mere shadow of what is expected of a Springboks’ scrum.

Further, the more Test matches they play, the halves pairing of Faf du Plessis and Elton Jantjies are exposed as being shy of Test standard. These Lions cubs that so audaciously lit up Super Rugby, now prone to hesitancy and fumbles that – as everyone knows – are ruthlessly capitalised on by the All Blacks.

If anything, the home side started the match too conservatively, not wanting to make errors which might gift the Springboks a head start and allow them to get their confidence up. But once again we saw how the All Blacks can muddle through periods of the match just like a ‘normal’ rugby side, only to stamp their difference by the ruthlessness in which they sense scoring opportunities and execute them.

Speed, urgency, confidence, precision all combining to deliver a clinical outcome, where oppositions sides who might glance at the scoreboard and feel like they’re still in the game, suddenly find this to be a cruel lie. So while Coles rightly takes accolades for his performance, it was the superb continuity and interplay leading to Ben Smith’s try which was the highlight of the evening, and which summed up what this side is about.

The Wallabies three-card trick was a team affair – bang, bang, bang – three tries within the first 13 minutes, which effectively killed off the contest in Perth.

There was more than a hint of a forward pass in the first; referee Wayne Barnes momentarily hesitating on Michael Hooper’s final delivery to Samu Kerevi, before remembering that he was Wayne Barnes and waving play on.

Dayne Haylett-Petty’s try was a sweet set-piece effort, and then Will Genia, close to Australia’s best for the fourth consecutive match, conjured a great solo effort, disrupting in the midfield, showing great pace on the chase and precision in the finish.

The prevailing wisdom among fans and commentators is that, for all the improvements the Pumas have made in fitness, ball skills and approach to the game, it is the mental aspects which still require attention if they are to cement themselves as a top four power.

And here, once again, there was naivety and fragility; a lack of composure from players in key positions and a failure in decision-making that took the game away from them. Indeed this match was a replica of the world cup semi-final, where Australia scored early, and Argentina went straight into chase mode, only to dig themselves into a deeper hole.

They dominated possession by over two to one, which proved to be a curse rather than a blessing, given their lack of organisation to provide, for the most part, attacks which consisted of nothing more than individuals trying to step themselves through heavy traffic.

Credit here to Australia who came up with the right defensive plan for the night; essentially to come up quickly out wide, while flooding the middle of the field with bodies. Flyhalf Nicolas Sanchez, refusing to kick, became increasingly confused. He was cut off from his outside backs, or else having to take the ball so deep any threat was nullified, while finding his forward runners chopped off at the knees by assertive Wallabies tacklers.

This type of unstructured midfield suited a roving Hooper to a tee, while freshman lock Adam Coleman was at the forefront of the defensive effort, once again enjoying a strong match. He will be glad for the two-week break to allow his cut mouth to properly repair itself.

Wallabies flyhalf, Quade Cooper, had a strange night; two beautiful inside balls for tries but, due to the paucity of possession, mixed with a lot of drifting around the extremities of NIB Stadium, banished from front-line defensive duties, before he copped a yellow card for an untidy tackle with a “yeah, whatever” attitude.

He was however the runaway winner of the night’s ‘irony award’, noting in his halftime interview how the Wallabies were “defending their rings off”, then straight after the break, missing two tackles himself in the lead-up to Santiago Cordero’s try.

The Wallabies got great value from replacement Sean McMahon, who provided the direct, no-nonsense approach so many fans are clamouring for. It was interesting to note how Lopeti Timani, when finally introduced for his debut late in the game, packed down in the scrum at No.6, with McMahon at No.8. but then again, Michael Cheika seems hell-bent on treating his loose forwards as a unit, taking scant notice of jersey numbers or traditional role distinctions.

With David Pocock now to sit out the rest of the Rugby Championship with a broken hand, more will be revealed shortly.

So then, a second win on the trot for the Wallabies; which isn’t far off being called a ‘streak’, although it was another poor night for the ARU bean counters with only 16,000 punters rolling up on what was a pleasant evening for rugby.

Nothing that extending this streak by another eight or ten matches won’t fix.

Both Test matches raised a couple of interesting matters of law to ponder and discuss in the comments section. During the first half in Perth, Nicolas Sanchez kicked for goal from a penalty, with the ball striking the upright and bounding away, going into touch without being touched by any player from either side.

Barnes ruled a throw-in to Australia, however, seeing as the ball was kicked from a penalty, and it went into touch, shouldn’t the throw go to the attacking or non-offending team, just as it would if Sanchez had aimed his kick to touch in the first place?

The second question relates to what constitutes a maul. In Christchurch, referee Angus Gardner was very quick to call any upright contact a maul, just as he and other Australian referees had done during the Super Rugby season.

In Perth however, with one exception, Barnes called these situations as tackles, thus giving the ball carrier time to get to the ground and for the side in possession to recycle and continue playing.

The difference in interpretation was stark. Who is correct here, Gardner or Barnes?

To the NRC and a sunny day in Melbourne which saw the home side take full advantage to beat Brisbane City 46-28. Captain Nic Stirzaker was delighted that, for the first time this season, his side delivered at both ends of the match, and while I was keen afterwards to draw out of him how he saw his one-on-one match-up with Nick Frisby, he was modest and diplomatic enough to suggest that they both played well.

I made it a comfortable points victory for Stirzaker, who is passing cleanly and running with confidence. Meanwhile, in the battle of the young locks, Sam Jeffries, save for dropping off Brisbane No.8 Isreli Naisarani once, again played well, but he was shaded by Lukhan Tui, who looks to have excellent athleticism, ball skills and a hearty motor.

Pleasingly, there were plenty of kids in attendance, courtesy of a sevens tournament running alongside, and it was great to see Stirzaker and others take time after the match to genuinely engage with them, and for Jack Debreczini to take one lucky boy aside for some kick to kick.

The squadron of ball-boys provided great entertainment on the sideline, a kind of ‘Lord of the Flies’ re-enactment as various personalities and power blocs came to the fore. For the lads to whom I promised I would write about them, well here it is, but as the sharpest one observed to his mate, “he didn’t ask us for our names so it won’t be worth reading.” Indeed.

In other matches, NSW Country became the only unbeaten side, too strong for the Rays in Sydney, 36-16, with flanker Sam Figg surely running himself into a Super rugby contract somewhere with another compelling performance.

Amy Perrett showed she is no Super Rugby novelty act, handling the ACT Vikings 24-16 win over the Western Sydney Rams in Canberra with poise and accuracy. The round ended with an exotic 66-36 scoreline, Perth over Queensland Country, who weren’t nearly as bad as the numbers suggest.

Finally, news from Hamilton that the Chiefs stripper scandal still hasn’t gone away, despite a press conference featuring New Zealand Rugby Union boss Steve Tew, designed to draw it to a close. Why all the fuss you might ask? It’s not as if Scarlette, the lady at the centre of events, was a vertically challenged person tossed against a wall for cheap laughs, or the Chiefs’ bus driver got among the action. Oh, hang on…

Perhaps licking someone who “ended up with her legs around my neck” is de rigueur for your average 70 year-old, Hamilton, bus driving, fall-guy? “How was your day at work, love?” “Oh, you know… driven one bus, driven ‘em all.”

One thing is for certain. Mad Monday, or to use the technical term favoured in New Zealand, the end of season p*ss up, is deader than Lady Di; now one of those things parents dare not expose their children to, like Whittaker’s chocolate, or the smalls on the clothes-line of the widower next door, or Rolf Harris.

Now there’s a three-card trick that didn’t work out so well.

The Crowd Says:

2016-09-21T05:53:58+00:00

CUW

Guest


i shud have said South Asian . Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal, Maldives, Pakistan and Sri Lanka.

2016-09-21T05:49:27+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


ah CUW. There are 4.3 billion of us Asians on this planet. Including me. And a few more on the roar Scallop is IN the menu, for some of us :D http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcBDUh_tYFg

2016-09-21T04:05:35+00:00

CUW

Guest


i am asian , we are not into scallop :) even then the kitchen is one place i rarely frequent :P

2016-09-20T18:49:49+00:00

Carlos the Argie

Roar Guru


I agree with you PeterK! Hard to read....

2016-09-20T09:46:57+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


:lol: I thought you may also have a PhD in Cullinary Science The scallop (one of my fave dishes) are cooked quickly a few minutes. Wood fired oven cooks something over a long period of time Boks have great ingredients. But fubared by the Chef, which makes the ingredients look bad.

2016-09-20T09:36:30+00:00

CUW

Guest


cooking Scallop Mornay using wood fired oven. LOL i have no effin idea what ur on about. :)

2016-09-20T07:11:01+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


I'm afraid I don't buy into this direction of the hands business. I like to keep it simple. Did the ball go forward from the hands. Yes or no. You say yes. I say I'm not sure.

2016-09-20T04:41:32+00:00

PeterK

Roar Guru


CUW - Then it makes it even more frustrating that most of your posts give a headache due to the prevalent use of SMS English. It is obvious you are educated and can pen a reasonable sentence together, I wish you did it most of the time, instead when you use SMS english in most cases I can't be bothered to read it.

2016-09-20T04:36:19+00:00

CUW

Guest


imoff, bosch carrizza ayersa lobbe 5 names i can think of that will add a hell of a lot (there may be more ) to this team.

2016-09-20T04:34:35+00:00

CUW

Guest


cant argue with that :) but i still dont get , wtf he did with Houston. DUH

2016-09-20T04:28:57+00:00

CUW

Guest


@ Carlos the Argie just for the record ; my graduate degree is in computer science . my masters degrees are in business administration (finance special) and arts (economics special). i am also a member of Australian Computer Society (ACS) and Fellow of the Chartered institute of Management Accountants (CIMA - UK) :)

2016-09-20T04:23:49+00:00

CUW

Guest


dont want to argue , but i see his hands are going forwards. reminds me of a try that was scored in super rugger ( i think tamanivalu) froma simillar pass. my belief is that a guy running forwards getting tackled from behind finds it hard to pass the ball backwards , unless his body is already turned sideways. else it has to be the backhand flip - a la sbw. if u stop the play at the moment hooper lets the ball go , the hands dont go backwards ; the advantage he had was it was a a very short pass. had coles done same for whiitelock try , the ball would have gone 3m forward :)

AUTHOR

2016-09-20T03:56:30+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


My apologies Porkie. I don't know what came over me.

2016-09-20T01:16:42+00:00

Porkie

Guest


Hey Geoff , please refrain from using the name of the Allblacks in the same sentence as the wallabys, humility and all that, remember

2016-09-19T23:01:08+00:00

JohnB

Guest


Geoff, it's kicking for touch from a penalty that is the exception to the usual rule that that the team who didn't put the ball out throws into the lineout - kicking for goal is not listed as an exception to that and it follows that the usual rule applies in that situation. You don't need to manufacture something from the unrelated prohibition on place kicks to touch. If a team does opts to kick for goal and genuinely tries to but the ball somehow still goes out (very high wind, horribly mis-cued kick, freak bounce off the posts) the normal rule applies, because a kick at goal is not an exception to the normal rule.

2016-09-19T22:44:18+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


Good post, PeterK

2016-09-19T15:15:29+00:00

Carlos the Argie

Roar Guru


Hey CUW! One more thing that stings my bonnet about Argie rugby. The local regulations state that players playing abroad cannot play fro the Pumas. Thus, Imhoff, Ayerza and others are banned from the Pumas. But, miraculously, Imhoff made an appearance in Rio for the Pumas 7. Yeah, yeah, not he Pumas. But try not to sell me this yuuuuge hypocrisy! It is "fumier de vache". Look it up.

2016-09-19T15:11:16+00:00

Carlos the Argie

Roar Guru


CUW, My undergraduate degree is in economics. My graduate degree though, is an MBA from Wharton (the infamous school that did not educate the Donald) where I took many courses in economics, including monetary policy with the chief economist of the Philadelphia FED. I am quite familiar with Lord Keynes literature. I used it tongue in cheek. I meant to state that Pumas needs some changes NOW, or Argentine rugby needs to change NOW, because if we keep waiting or the long term, it may be too late for Argentine rugby's sake. Just saying that they have improved a bit is nice. Bt nice is not enough. There were some structure decisions that even though they appeared visionary, they were incorrect. For example, having the Jaguares and Pumas share the exact (almost)same team. Having other pro's in Argentina that can't play for them and do nothing (or leave the country). Not allowing those pro's to play in local tournaments.... It is a long list.

2016-09-19T13:40:42+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


Agreed Jerry.

2016-09-19T13:01:31+00:00

Fin

Guest


It's an interesting question. In the old days when you kicked for touch off the penalty you lost the opportunity to throw into the lineout. Now when you kick for touch from penalties you get to throw it in so maybe the officials got it wrong. I don't know.... I am happy for the decision. Would have been a bit much to get given a penalty kick as well as a 5 metre lineout throw in.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar