The Wrap: Wallabies go missing in the championship quarter

By Geoff Parkes / Expert

For Olympic 200m swimmers it’s the third lap that counts, the gut busting push back up the pool before pure adrenaline commandeers the body for the final sprint home. For 400m runners it’s on the final bend where the race is invariably won or lost.

Racing people too, know that Australia’s championship event, the Cox Plate, is decided not at the starting gate or the finishing post, but when the pressure is applied at the school, 800m from home.

The championship third quarter. Where the Wallabies, after a first half full of endeavour and cohesive 15-man play, went missing at Twickenham. And where a formidable England, not by accident, claimed the match like they always knew it was their right to do so.

With both Michael Cheika and Eddie Jones now immortalised in print as clowns, it is Jones who ends 2016 as Krusty, and Cheika, the glum, morose Pagliacci; although to be fair, there was composure and acknowledgement in defeat this time which has not always been a hallmark of Cheika’s tenure.

In an entertaining match, worthy of far more than the vapid nonsense disingenuously dressed up as ‘mind games’ in the lead up, England fumbled and bumbled early. But once they found their rhythm in the third quarter and choked Australia out of the game, there was only ever going to be one result.

Australia made good use early of the second man play in the backline, exposing Marlon Yarde to Sefanaia Naivalu’s willingness to run hard and fast. It was a sign that the Wallabies had their rapid recycle game working although, unlike Wales, who were unable to lay a finger on them for the first half, England gradually worked out how to slow matters down.

Australia’s tactical naivety and unwillingness to vary their play with precise kicking was once again exposed. The idea that this type of high-octane, recycle game can be kept up, mistake free, for 80 minutes against quality opposition is a fallacy; even more so when it has already been tried three times this year against the same opponent and been found wanting each time.

In that respect halfback Nick Phipps was taught a lesson in game management by his opposite Ben Youngs; in tandem with the ascendancy of the England pack after halftime, the telling difference between the sides.

Phipps was a little unlucky in the lead-up to England’s opening try. Prevented from passing from the ground by a lingering Mako Vunipola, he chose the worst of three options available to him. He passed to a slow man in a worse position than him instead of tucking the ball under this wing and taking the tackle or choosing the George Gregan option of ‘accidentally’ passing into the prone English prop.

Perhaps more concerning for Cheika though, was Israel Folau’s reluctance to put his body on the line and dive onto the loose ball, opening a window for Jonathan Joseph to toe through and ultimately score.

Phipps was also at fault for England’s third try, buying an outrageous dummy from Youngs; although to be fair, at least he had his face to the play, not his back, like some of his colleagues.

Wallabies fans crying foul over England’s second try, Yarde beating Folau to the touch from a Joseph grubber, are merely straw clutching. Anyone able to recall when they ran and dived onto a bouncing ball for a try should understand (front rowers feel free to ask others what it is like).

The notion that this always happens without some minuscule degree of separation, which might get picked up in a frame-by-frame dissection, is nonsense. Yes there was separation from Yarde’s left hand, but in any event it was only a minute shift of the ball into his right hand, which simultaneously forced it down.

At normal speed, even in regular slow motion, this is a try every day of the week. I’d suggest that those who would have the game adjudicated from freeze frame to freeze frame are either looking for excuses or else would have rugby taken down a path it simply doesn’t need to go down.

The Wallabies scrum was solid enough and they showed clever innovation at line-out; Rob Simmons largely avoiding England’s defensive focus on himself and calling in David Pocock, Michael Hooper, Kane Douglas and Sean McMahon for clean takes.

But the wheels started to fall off in the third quarter; Moore throwing to nobody, as well as other all too familiar symptoms such as panic kicking from turnovers, basic handling errors, and ill discipline.

As England rose to their task, confidence visibly drained from the Wallabies.

Indeed, after the break, it took the Wallabies until the 66th minute to once again retain possession through multiple phases, which sure enough resulted in a nice break from Folau and a ‘wow’ finish by Sekope Kepu.

A lame conversion attempt by Bernard Foley and a breakdown penalty from the kick-off however quickly snuffed out any thoughts of a comeback.

Whatever the Wallabies’ failings this was a mightily impressive effort from England; Courtney Lawes in particular a commanding presence. At No.8, Lopeti Timani may have outshone Nathan Hughes in the first half through superior work-rate, but Hughes grew taller and stronger with each play, obliterating his opposite in the second half.

Indeed, with Billy Vunipola watching from the stands, and Maru Itoje going around for Saracens at the Bath Rec Ground, Jones must be delighted with how quickly and deeply his side has come together in the so-called post World Cup development year.

Wry observers will point out that departing the World Cup 2-3 weeks early provided him with a nice head start, while others know that Stuart Lancaster left Jones with a far more solid foundation than he was given credit for at the time.

For all the emergence of some new Wallabies players this year – Adam Coleman and Dane Haylett-Petty in particular – and Cheika’s talk about ‘finishers’, one area where Jones has it all over his adversary, as indeed does Steve Hansen, is a true 23-man strategy.

Jones’ replacements all felt like they were part of a cohesive game plan whereas, by comparison, the injection of players from the Australian bench felt more like reactive substitutions made after the match was already lost.

Post-match, Cheika lamented his side’s failure to stem England’s momentum. Which was true enough, although his observation will be worthless if he keeps playing the same losing hand.

His backline needs finessing but this is easy enough to remedy; he knows that he has the strike power to score tries. What is essential is more power from the forward pack and a more nuanced tactical kicking game.

One sure-fire way to halt England’s momentum would surely be to pin them into their own 22. Rugby has changed considerably over the years but, as a viable winning strategy, playing for field position is still as relevant as ever.

Meanwhile, there was a much needed boost for South African rugby, albeit in sevens form at the world season opening Dubai tournament. From little things, big things grow.

It was certainly a thrill a minute for fans, World Rugby referee of the year Rasta Rasivhenge disappearing backwards over an advertising hoarding in the act of signalling the winning try for Wales over Australia.

And there was an astonishing end to another quarter-final when Scotland, in a massive upset, found themselves ahead of England, and awarded a penalty with the full-time siren already sounded. Amid hooting, hollering and back-slapping, in his haste to join celebrating teammates, Scotland’s Scott Wight kicked the ball directly into touch, instead of tapping it to himself first.

The referee duly ordered play-on, Scotland lost the lineout on their own throw and, several phases later, England scored one of the cruelest tries you could ever wish to see.

From the women’s draw, New Zealand got some mild form of revenge for their Olympic Games loss to Australia; but really, nothing more satisfying than discovering who it is that’s been sleeping with your partner and meekly letting their tyres down.

One headline from the Fairfax coverage by Georgina Robinson caught the eye, Australian sevens women perform emergency physiotherapy treatment on teammate. Foolishly expecting a dramatic account of limb saving heroics, I soon discovered I had clicked on a classic case of oversell/under-deliver; “Two qualified physiotherapists tape a teammate’s leg during a break in play” a more accurate description of a nothing story.

At least the sub-editor responsible can’t be accused of falling victim to understatement, unlike the person who this week came up with a headline describing the Chapecoense football team as “unlucky”.

In other news from London, Princess Beatrice, her mind obviously on matters other than rugby, sliced Ed Sheeran’s cheek in the act of pretending to knight James Blunt. For connoisseurs of credible music this incident – a hormone charged, cocktail swilling, in-bred wielding a sharp sword in the vicinity of Sheeran and Blunt – can only be described as a missed opportunity.

It is only be a matter of time before Richie McCaw gets the call up for his knighthood; no doubt a condition of his acceptance will be that Beatrice isn’t rostered on for blade duty that day.

Meanwhile, to fill in time, Australian rugby fans can look forward to a Xmas holiday arguing the toss over the worth of Nick Phipps, James Slipper and Dean Mumm, and embolden themselves to face a new year with no ‘Pooper’.

Personally I’d like to see Bill Pulver and Brett Papworth go head to head over a Xmas bon-bon. I can forsee the cracker tearing apart, Bill reacting first to claim the little plastic toy.

To which Brett would quip “That’s worth about as much as your NRC, Bill.”

To which Bill would respond by reading out the joke, “Did you hear the one about how some naughty kids signed up for an expensive TV but didn’t have the money to pay for it so dad bailed them out… but then they complained anyway that they had the meanest dad in the world who wouldn’t give them any money…?”

Here’s to 2017! Interesting times lie ahead.

The Crowd Says:

2016-12-10T02:57:51+00:00

double agent

Guest


If you don't want tries dissected in slo-mo then get rid of the TMO. I'm happy with that. But if we do have a TMO and we do have slo-mo then can we at least get it right.

2016-12-06T05:03:33+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


tsuru - No - there was clear and obvious evidence from the replay that in the Kuridrani try Pocock knocked the ball forward. In the Yarde try - he clearly grounded the ball but it was not clear and obvious he knocked it on before doing so. Two quite different scenarios.

2016-12-05T15:28:06+00:00

tsuru

Roar Rookie


A disappointing thing about the good argument here is that, using this logic, Kuridrani's effort would have been given as try. I certainly didn't pick up Pocock's knock on in real time or in replay at normal speed. And what of the 2 Wallaby "tries" that were inconclusive for lack of view of the ball? We obviously needed to try and see them in slo-mo.

2016-12-05T14:19:53+00:00

Chris

Guest


While making obvious allowances for national affiliations, I think everyone would love to see it come down to that match. It'd be a fantastic spectacle. But the Six Nations being what it is, assumptions about any of the prior games are dangerous. Which is why we love it so.

2016-12-05T14:05:23+00:00

Chris

Guest


Nothing is ever clear cut. For example it sometimes doesn't matter who the coach is or what they say, teams can sometimes just go out and play abysmally. Jones wouldn't have told England to play how they did first 20 minutes on Saturday, and I rather doubt England were told to be so shambolic against Wales in the World Cup. We have a tendency to both over praise and unreasonably blame coaches in all sports, but any player will tell you that things sometimes go unaccountably pear shaped. That doesn't mean that Jones isn't a good coach, because he definitely is. But while Lancaster may not have got quite these results, he may have also been hit by the bad luck of having his team simply make a mess of things on the day.

2016-12-05T13:49:46+00:00

DaniE

Roar Guru


Merry Christmas to youse all too! ??

AUTHOR

2016-12-05T10:31:27+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


Do you have an opinion on Te'o Nick? Most of the damage had been done by the time he came on, but he looked quite impressive to me.

2016-12-05T10:23:58+00:00

CUW

Guest


" I can’t help but think that Lancaster would do wonders as a coach in this team under Eddie Jones, but ultimately he wasn’t quite ready to take England on to the next level. Still, we can and we should be grateful to him for building the foundations. " IMO it is not that clear cut. TBH, these players spend more time at their clubs and learn a lot at academies and "B" teams and such. the national coach has them for a little time. If the players are good , then more credit shud go to the clubs and schools and youth setups. Maro itoje did not learn anything from Lancaster - he was taught by a Sarries academy. infact Lancaster dropped him ! Haskell is playing well for Jones but was dropped by Lancaster. i am not saying Lancaster did zilch ; just that the players or the foundation for the national team comes from the clubs. the national coach take them and mould them into a winning outfit. it is the same with NZ or Auzzy or Fiji. if NZ are very good , its becoz the players who come to all blacks are highly skilled, so that the coaches engage in strategy and motivtion and fitness. the only difference between tier one and the smaller nations is , the powerful nations have beter access to the national - level players. so they have more time to train and more time to gel - comapred to team like Samoa or Fiji. i say again , England have a lot of players , despite the influx of foreigners. they just need the gy with the eye to get the best into the national setup. atm , Jones is the one.

2016-12-05T10:13:12+00:00

Chris

Guest


I guess you could say that for the first couple of years of Lancaster's reign he was figuring out who was good enough and who wasn't. Where the concerns were arising in the run up to the World Cup was that he still didn't seem to know what the best team was - though not because of a genuine fear it would go so badly wrong as it did. That's probably the biggest change with Jones - a certainty about how he wants to play and telling the players they need to fit into that rather than the other way around. I can't help but think that Lancaster would do wonders as a coach in this team under Eddie Jones, but ultimately he wasn't quite ready to take England on to the next level. Still, we can and we should be grateful to him for building the foundations.

2016-12-05T09:49:03+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


Kaka played his last tournament for NZ at the Olympics. Apparently he is playing rugby some where overeseas

2016-12-05T08:57:45+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Don't mind the running rugby Chook (the W's were superb in that first 20), it's just the 'doing the same thing again and again' that makes me wonder.... which brings me to my next article :)

2016-12-05T08:54:29+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


The only real addition has been Maro Itoje Harry, who was just taking his first steps in senior rugby when Stuart stepped down. Eddie has changed the number on Robshaw's shirt (otherwise it's the same B/R), slotted Kruis in above Launchbury etc al, and he's had the chance to bed in the Ford-Farrell combo - which was always the plan from late 2014 onwards! But there have been no major selection changes outside Itoje, which proves that Stuart knew the qualities of the players very well and selected accurately. Sadly there was not the experience in that coaching group at the time to make it all coutn when it mattered!

2016-12-05T08:01:25+00:00

Machooka

Roar Guru


Hats off DaniE... as I thought exactly the same when that forward pass happened. I went like yep that's it... and there's no coming back from here as the gods ain't going for it. Funnily enough I think Cheika thought the same and anyone who knows anything about rugby knows these things happen. A lot! Merry Christmas y'all :)

2016-12-05T07:27:04+00:00

JimmyB

Guest


Cheers gents. I'd say that they're heading in the right direction, but al long way from where they need or would like to be. Regarding the depth, I'd agree that there's now a good number of players who are capable of slotting into the team when required. There's definitely some players who've stepped up (Daly) and a few that haven't (Harrison immediately springs to mind). EJ will have learnt a fair bit about some of these players on the periphery which is a good thing moving forward.

2016-12-05T07:15:56+00:00

CUW

Guest


actually what Jones has brought in in clear thinking and stability. he was clear how he wanted to play and who he wanted to play with. before the world cup there was an article by SCW that previos coach had used something like 12 different combinations in centers AND that his starting centers at world cup had never played together. then there was the case of SB , whose coach thought of playing as a 6 and national coach put him in centers. also guys like Ford and Farrell , Hartley , Robshaw and Haskell. Jones said Robshaw was a 6.5 and put Haskell at 7. it worked. Jones put Ford at 10 and shifted Farrell to 12 ; it worked. He made Hartley captain and it worked. brought in a much younger 2nd row pair and it worked. Lancaster at the end of the day did not have sufficient experience to spot talent and define a game plan. England do have a lot of good players. They have been winning at under 20 level and their clubs are doing well at Euro level. when u have an abundance of riches , clarity of thought is the most important thing. if ur not sure of the strategy even with NZ u will fail. some say even their mother can coach NZ , but when u come to test level there is little coaching. its more about being clear about the strategy and communication and also motivation. it becomes harder when ur choosing from meager resources ; Jones did tht with Japan and learnt well.

2016-12-05T06:53:23+00:00

CUW

Guest


she looked pissed off that they gave best player award to auzzy. :) went for every hit like a woman scorned and then burnt Caslick on the outside for over 50m. but the auzzy team did have a very quick girl, name i forget. the ones to look out for are the Ruskies. the pace and power they showed was really surprising and i wont be surprised if noise about the drugs hit at some point.

2016-12-05T06:50:00+00:00

CUW

Guest


DJF now has the record for most capped 7S player . i think it is 80 caps and has topped Uale mai (Samoa). NZ have no power+speed . They need Lam on a wing but he will be playing Super rugger if he has recovered from injury. Reiko shud play 7s untill super starts - at least he will get fitter and more experience. NZ lost Waka in the first match. I dont know what happened to kaka but Khan is not the same playmaker. NZ kept on going back than forwards with the press - defense. somehow they are not the same since 2015....

2016-12-05T06:37:55+00:00

CUW

Guest


there are two paths to take. one is to select a leader first and then go about with building a team around. becoz when u pick a leader first , it will surely have some deficiencies - like Moore who aint a good player atm. this is true for England and Saffers , but at least England have worked around it. the other is to select a team and then find a skipper. am not infavor of using NZ as an example , simply becoz they posses some of the best on earth. I would rather look at Ireland or Argentina or Fiji. all of them have the best player in the position and the best leader , despite poor results :) ur spot on with auzzy team not having leaders. if u look at the saffers, they picked Warren Whitely mainly becoz of his leadership. simillarly i think venter the center is a very good leader despite being a limited player. i think of Folau as in ben smith . am sure given the chance not only will he play better but also get more involved. also i like him becoz he very rarely gets in the girly stuff. auzzy could have a leader in the short term in Higginbotham. but then ur coach isnt a fan so.... i think in the long term Mcmohan can become a leader , one who may be on par with Hooper. another issue is Genia is not around. else he will be my captain in front of all. but for sure, Moore is no captain - he just is not a natural .

AUTHOR

2016-12-05T06:29:29+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


Hi Dani, yes it was a disappointing end to the Wallabies' season - you were probably better off sleeping through the final bit! Re the Pearls, I wasn't having a go at the two players. It was perfectly sensible what they did. But I reckon the headline kind of oversold it by around a thousand percent... :)

AUTHOR

2016-12-05T06:24:53+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


Spot on Clarke, that's the common sense approach. Playing on from a penalty to a lineout was brought in so to deter teams from offending just to end a match. But, you're right, it shouldn't be compulsory. Nor should they be required to tap the ball first. Yes, it was always going to happen, I'm kind of glad i got to see it, but I felt so sorry for the Scottish boys.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar