Wade has added nothing to the Australian Test team

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

Australian Test rookie Nic Maddinson continues to cop flak and ridicule from cricket followers after failing again yesterday. Meanwhile, his far more experienced teammate Matthew Wade has added no value to the line-up.

Somehow Wade has flown under the radar in comparison to Maddinson, despite missing three chances behind the stumps in three Tests and flopping with the blade, making just 21 runs in four innings.

Along with Maddinson, Matt Renshaw, Peter Handscomb and Jackson Bird, Wade was one of five players brought into the Test team in the wake of their horrific losses to South Africa at Perth and Hobart.

Few cricket followers disagreed with the selections of Renshaw, Handscomb and Bird, who all were in fine form in the Sheffield Shield.

There was widespread disagreement, however, with the ascension of Maddinson and Wade. Neither player’s Shield performances over the past two seasons justified Test selection.

In that time Maddinson averaged just 32 with the bat for NSW. Wade, meanwhile, averaged 28 this summer and the same number last Shield season.

If Wade were an outstanding keeper then those ordinary batting returns for Victoria wouldn’t be so relevant. But the selectors told the public a key reason Wade was picked ahead of Nevill was because he would boost Australia’s batting.

That has not eventuated. Granted, Wade has had limited opportunities in his three Tests this summer.

Then again so has Maddinson and every man and his pooch seems happy to jettison the 25-year-old batsman. At 29 years of age, with 102 first class matches and 15 Tests to his name, Wade is a veteran. It is fair to expect he should pull his weight quickly, especially in home conditions which favour both his batting and his glovework.

There is a much greater challenge looming on the upcoming tour of India, where both batting and keeping will be far more difficult than what Wade has encountered the past three Tests. He played three of the four Tests during Australia’s shambolic visit to India in 2013, when they were pummelled 4-0.

Wade’s keeping in that series was a liability, particularly to the spinners, and he averaged just 19 with the bat from six knocks. It was Wade’s shoddy glovework in that series which cost him his Test place. He then spent more than three-and-a-half years out of the Test line-up.

During that time I frequently saw reports from pundits and fans that Wade had sharpened his glovework. From what I saw of him in domestic and ODI cricket that rang true. But he still was far from being a quality international keeper and that has been exposed during his Test comeback.

In the first Test against Pakistan at Brisbane Wade fluffed two chances. He missed a stumping off the bowling of spinner Nathan Lyon and turfed an edge earned by quick Mitchell Starc.

At Adelaide Wade stood and watched as an edge from the bat of Hashim Amla flew between he and first slip Matt Renshaw. It was Wade’s catch to take.

If Wade continues to cough up one chance per Test he will need to start scoring a lot of runs to even the ledger. Right now Australia have three glaring weaknesses.

Firstly, they haven’t had consistent output from a No.6 batsman for years. Secondly, Lyon is in a deep form trough. Thirdly, the wicketkeeper position has plagued them for almost three years.

Brad Haddin’s glovework and batting faded in the last 18 months of his career before he was usurped by Nevill during the last Ashes in England.

Nevill was given a very generous 17-Test run in the side. While his glovework was generally very good Nevill contributed little with the blade, averaging just 22.

Looking ahead to the tour of India the keeper position again looms as an Achilles heel for Australia. Wade does not bat confidently against spin and his glovework to slow bowlers is roundly considered poor.

Nevill, meanwhile, kept well to Lyon in Tests but was woeful with the bat in Sri Lanka, making just 51 runs from six innings.

Neither man is an attractive option for India. But Australia have few other keeping choices, apart from Sam Whiteman. The 24-year-old from Western Australia is a fine technician behind the stumps and a generously gifted batsman, averaging 35 with the blade from 50 first-class matches.

But India is a hellish place for an Australian player to make their Test debut. Right now Australia is stuck with Wade. They have to hope he starts cashing the many cheques he writes with his mouth.

The Crowd Says:

2017-01-08T04:14:54+00:00

John M

Guest


Hear hear Ronan - let's just hope that this will be Wade's farewell series keeping for Australia. Bring Sam Whiteman in for heaven's sake, young and can actually bat!

2017-01-01T19:54:20+00:00

qwetzen

Guest


"Don’t take anything away from Gilly’s keeping, he was a very good keeper" Only compared to his successors...

2016-12-31T08:22:02+00:00

John Erichsen

Roar Guru


Thank you Peter. Nice to see someone who has a brain regarding batting selection processes.

2016-12-31T08:20:01+00:00

John Erichsen

Roar Guru


Is Wade's mouth an asset? He was extremely vocal in the South African one day series, sledging all and sundry while we limped to a 5 nil series loss. Mouthing off when getting flogged is just plain dumb. Then again, we are speaking about Wade.

2016-12-31T08:17:04+00:00

John Erichsen

Roar Guru


Averaging 23 with the bat suggests that your "can at times be brilliant with the bat" view is just plain incorrect when test cricket is the format and Mitch Marsh is the player. .

2016-12-31T08:14:02+00:00

John Erichsen

Roar Guru


A serious factor would be his lack of runs in red/pink ball format in recent seasons. His overall FC average is poor, significantly lower than Nevill's. and in fact Tim hasn't made decent runs since 2009.

2016-12-31T03:00:29+00:00

John Erichsen

Roar Guru


Ronan, you have completely ignored the one area in which Wade shines. His 'over the top' praise for any ball Lyon can land on the pitch puts Nevill to shame. I can only assume that is what selectors are wanting from him in the test wicket-keeping role because the only thing more shite than his glove-work is his current batting.

2016-12-30T18:33:03+00:00

Broken-hearted Toy

Guest


It's absurd that Mitch Marsh was better than any number six we've picked since dropping him. And letting Maddinson bowl! I see no reason to give him any overs other than they are used to the number six bowling. Might as well let Warner throw down his rubbish.

2016-12-30T15:56:30+00:00

Mike Dugg

Guest


Unfortunately the days of keepers not being needed to score many runs are over. Our often fragile top order requires a keeper who can make consistent runs

2016-12-30T12:10:58+00:00

Robbie

Guest


Is anyone else intrigued by the suggestion from Marcus North? If Australia were to drop Wade and Maddinson they could put the gloves on Handscomb and bring in a second spinner and another batsman for India. With the series won it could be worth a try

2016-12-30T11:00:30+00:00

Roth

Guest


Sam Whiteman's test debut is long overdue. He is a superior batsman to both Nevill and Wade and he is far superior to Wade in terms of keeping. The selectors need to give him his chance, and they won't be disappointed

2016-12-30T09:50:52+00:00

Tony

Guest


If the selectors are now trying a youth policy then I would throw in young Pierson for the 3rd test and then the ODI series,if it doesn't work out then find a new keeper for the series in India.

2016-12-30T08:33:24+00:00

Mr Bean

Guest


Did you see him bat in Perth?

2016-12-30T07:53:07+00:00

dan ced

Guest


Hartley isn't too old to take to India, then get a fresh face in on home soil. You can't take risks in India with youth, I don't think, the experience of Hartley with Gloves and Bat would be a godsend. IF not.. Whiteman or Alex Carey are the standout alternatives.

2016-12-30T07:22:06+00:00

Cadfael

Roar Guru


That's why I would pick Whiteman for the third test. A chance to be in the team before we play a test in India.

2016-12-30T07:19:20+00:00

Cadfael

Roar Guru


Agree about the "team spirit" aspect but nothing sees team spirit nosedive like some missed chances.

2016-12-30T06:59:17+00:00

matthew_gently

Guest


An LOL question you've posed there, and I completely agree with your answer!

2016-12-30T05:38:45+00:00

steve

Guest


Picking on merit hasn't helped Chris Hartley at all. Been the best keeper in Australia for a long time but that hasn't helped him either.

2016-12-30T04:32:11+00:00

Cadfael

Roar Guru


He's there as a wicket keeper. If he scores runs, great. If you only want a keeper to score runs and keep poorly, keep Wade. That has been a problem with CA for too long. They can't seem to realise that Gilchist was an exception, keeper/batsmen like him come across once in a lifetime.

2016-12-30T03:39:33+00:00

AREH

Roar Guru


Yep great point, Hartley has dug Queensland out of many a hole in recent years - his batting is nothing glamorous but is all grit, I think he's far more solid than some of his numbers show. I'm not necessarily advocating his selection, even though he deserves it, as his age is the most obvious barrier, however.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar