Why first-class Cricket is stuffed

By Garry White / Roar Pro

Back in those hard-hitting and intoxicated days before Christmas and the New Year, a mere stitch back in time when the elastic on my trousers was relaxed and my liver chipper and fighting fit, I wrote a morose piece on ‘why red cards have no place in cricket.’

I promised or threatened, depending on how you look at it, to write a follow up on why day-night Ashes Test matches are akin to the Anti-Christ. Well, with the New Year unwinding and my belly reminiscent of a furiously pumped beach ball, now is that time.

I should apologise in advance for the stream of consciousness that I am going to unload upon you. The problem is that day-night Ashes Tests cannot be discussed in isolation but only as part of a much wider issue that is slowly casting a shroud-like presence over our game.

An individual examination of day-nighters would be like a doctor diagnosing the last symptoms of a critically-ill patient, when what we actually need to do is to go back further through the patient’s history.

Right the way back to all the booze, fags and fry-ups. Through all those bad lifestyle decisions that brought us into this imaginary emergency room.

So, sit back and put your Leonard Cohen record on. Dearly lamented and seemingly appropriate for the tone. There was a man that surely would have seen the art and beauty in a grim fifth-day rear-guard action.

I worry about the recent glut of sudden and ill-considered changes to the game. Not in a “disgusted of Tunbridge Wells” type way, although I do often struggle to supress Luddite-type sensibilities. It has now travelled far beyond that into a form of grim acceptance.

The ICC, ECB and other national governing boards seem determined to lock Test and first-class cricket into a box and bury it deep in the back of the cupboard. A treasured artefact but one that has reached the point of anachronism and now merely damned with insincere reverence.

Brought out, dusted off and indulged now and again to remind the deluded faithful that it still matters and that it is carefully cherished by its keepers.

I am reminded of the poet Robert Frost. I name-drop him only to cultivate a thin veneer of intelligence and am certain that it has probably achieved the exact opposite. Anyway, over the past few years, cricket has arrived at Frost’s metaphoric two divergent roads in the yellow wood.

Rather than taking a thoughtful and considered view on Test and first-class cricket’s future direction, the administrators instead zipped up their hoodies, cranked up their gangster rap and sprinted up the undiscovered path to profit and shallow modernity. Probably kicking a dog walker and happy-slapping a pensioner along the way.

They have come to the deliberate conclusion that the pure-form of the game is terminally uncool, impossible to sell to a modern T20-obsessed audience and most importantly not lucrative. This is the only value system that counts in the sporting corporate world. When that view exists at the very top, then what hope does the long form of the game have?

Clinging on to the last fading remnants of seasonal licence let us for a moment wheel out the ghost of Christmas, or should it be cricket, past. If, like me, you happen to be on or around the unfortunate age of 39, English (it’s worth a punt…) and reading this, then you can only possibly be a diehard.

Throughout our youth everything possible was set in place to make us hate the game. I myself made the catastrophic mistake to get into the game in a big way in the summer of 1989. This was the summer when England meekly surrendered The Ashes to Allan Border’s Australians and the tone was set for 16 years of ritual humiliation. I was 12 then and endured this cycle of indignity and purgatory until that wondrous day at The Oval in 2005.

Liking cricket at school was to mark yourself out as seriously uncool and England were denounced by everyone, much to my frustration, as totally rubbish. Cricket to the uninitiated was a boring and soft game played by nerds, chewing on limp cucumber sandwiches and drinking tea probably with an extended pinkie out of China cups.

There were a few high spots, the 1991 World Cup being one, but not many. Despite this conspicuous lack of success the grounds were always full for Test matches and one-dayers.

I can remember relatively healthy crowds also down in Bournemouth for Hampshire’s out-ground matches. Time was called on these in 1992. I saw the last ever championship game there versus Middlesex. The teams included David Gower, Malcolm Marshall, Robin Smith, Mike Gatting, Desmond Haynes, Angus Fraser, Phil Tuffnell and John Emburey. When was the last time we saw eight proper Internationals playing in a run-of-the-mill Championship game? Probably all down to central contracts.

It helped having only four TV channels and nothing much to do in summer holidays. Tony Lewis and Richie Benaud would be a regular fixture on the BBC as the Soul-Limbo theme tune faded out. Solid and reliable coverage. No fanfare or razzamatazz because it was the crusty BBC, but also because they had faith in the product, despite the routine incompetence on the field.

The nadir was reached in 1999 with the humbling home series defeat to New Zealand that ushered in the Duncan Fletcher era and happier times. A year earlier Channel 4 had taken over the TV rights and in doing so upgraded the BBC’s solid family saloon to a flashy sports car.

The game was on the up. The ECB brought in T20 in 2003 as a bit of fun to get the crowds in and fund the serious stuff. Mainly aimed at families as a mechanism to grow the game but also to lure lads out on the lash. Once a year punters who were good for five or six rounds to swell the coffers.

It is entertaining now to remember that many of the star names had little truck with it. They preferred to sit it out and stay fresh for real cricket. That changed of course with the IPL and its thick wads of cash.

In 2004 the ECB took the money and farmed the game out to SKY. Live cricket was no longer reachable on terrestrial television after 70 uninterrupted years. They told us the money would be invested in grass roots and we tried to believe them.

The following year England regained The Ashes. I remember running into a pub after work to catch the conclusion of the Old Trafford Test. It was full to the rafters with every single person watching the game intently. I had never seen that before.

Earlier the crowds had queued in their thousands pre-war style to try and gain entry to the ground. No longer the nerd, my game had found its way back into the mainstream.

The terrific opportunity existed to latch onto this success and new-found popularity. Players like Kevin Pietersen and Andrew Flintoff were recognisable and bona-fide 21st century superstars. But the chance was squandered. The ECB cut open the belly of the domestic T20 golden goose via market saturation.

However, they still see it as the panacea for all of cricket’s ills. Meanwhile the County Championship gets squeezed into ever more contorted shapes. Truncated into the least attractive ends of the summer when the weather is at its most inclement.

They have concluded that no one is interested and the decline in County cricket and by natural consequence Test cricket is terminal. That the paying consumer no longer has any interest. Save for a few anoraks with their thermos flasks and Play Fair cricket annuals.

The reality is that the demand is probably still there or is at least no worse than it was 30 years ago, but the access to the supply has been removed. The product has now been made so undesirable and inaccessible to make it redundant. The prophecy is a self-fulfilling one.

Likewise England has opted to prioritise white-ball cricket over red. I always held the belief that England would be the last defenders of the long game. Maybe they have been, but that hope is now at last forlorn.

Day-night Tests are just a gimmick and will do little to arrest the perceived decline in interest in the long term. Instead it will just chip away at the purity and integrity of the game and further devalue the product.

Only a bovine board like the ECB would book a day-nighter this summer at fortress Edgbaston and as a consequence give a weak West Indies team a fighting chance in the dark. Do they think no one will come otherwise? I think they will. If it is marketed properly and with conviction and at a fair price.

Most worryingly the amateur game is receding year by year. It is easy to blame that on schools but it was relatively non-existent at my school back in the 80s and early 90s. Yet, the local senior and youth leagues were then in rude health. In the late 90s my old local Sunday league had 80 teams. This has now fallen to barely 25.

The reasons for all of this are complex. But I trace most of this back to mismanagement, greed and avarice at the very top of the sport, and the proliferation of plastic and faceless T20 franchise tournaments around the world that compresses international schedules and lure the big names away. That and the ECB’s fateful decision back in 2004 to deny the free availability of televised cricket to all.

Compared to where we are now, the seismic change that was World Series cricket was merely just kids’ stuff.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2017-01-14T17:34:02+00:00

Garry White

Roar Pro


Thanks for all the comments and the healthy debate. The future of first class / test cricket is an interesting one. To really properly explore the themes I would have needed about 50,000 words rather than 1500. So, there were many loose threads. Regarding day / nighters I can see a case for them outside of the countries that no longer have a core fan base that is interested in tests.. Basically everywhere but England and Australia. It is sad to see test matches played in front of empty stadiums. I prefer NZ's solution though of switching tests to smaller venues. It hides the gaps but also offers something a bit different I.e. A family day out with a picnic etc. I don't think The Ashes needs day night matches though. I also don't think they are needed in England. Our stadiums are much smaller than in Aus and we can usually fill them. If we cant then it is due to extortionate ticket prices or the other reasons that I laid out e.g. Not on terrestrial tv, not played in schools etc, general lack of access to the game amongst non-private school educated kids or those whose parents are not connected to clubs etc. I could have gone much further into those last points but didn't want to drone on too long. Thanks all!!!

AUTHOR

2017-01-14T17:21:58+00:00

Garry White

Roar Pro


Jeremy, I agree. It is the same in England, probably worse. Rural clubs are really struggling to put out sides and are folding in reasonably large numbers. The bigger clubs seem to be getting bigger and fielding 5 or 6 sides on a Saturday. The little clubs that just one team are gradually going under. The reasons are complex and not all to do with Cricket. When little Cricket is played in state schools and not available on terrestrial TV either... Access and interest to the game will ultimately be damaging.

2017-01-14T05:49:08+00:00

anon

Roar Pro


Yes England trialed the new formats, but they never did anything with them. World Series cricket revolutionised one day cricket and franchise based competitions like the IPL revolutionised T20. England treated T20 like a gimmick. India turned it into a serious sport. The IPL is at a bad hour, people in Australia have no connection with the teams. I guarantee the IPL got better ratings than German/Spanish/Italian soccer.

2017-01-13T23:47:03+00:00

BrainsTrust

Guest


Actually England were the ones to introduce both one day and T20 before other nations. !960s Country cricket started playing one dayers, they had a 40 over format as well pretty early as well. Test matches occupy so much time, each is equivalent to 10 big bash matches. People want to watch the top level 120 big bash matches a year in test cricket and then you want people to watch sheffield shield on top of that. If T20 is so desired why does no one watch the IPL, it was the worst ratings disaster and cost channel 10 a fortune.

2017-01-13T16:23:22+00:00

anon

Roar Pro


First class cricket was on the nose 45 years ago, hence the introduction of 50-over and then World Series cricket. And now one day cricket has been "solved" almost. The match tonight at the Gabba between Australia and Pakistan was about the worst advertisement for the 50-over game possible. Why would you bother investing a day of your life and your money to watch what you saw tonight?? First class cricket is as accessible as ever before. You can attend Shield games for virtually free and have the best seats in the house. It's the best domestic first class competition in the world. What a bargain!! Except no-one turns up. Only 30 people in the crowd because it is really boring. And I'm a cricket fan saying it's boring. Imagine how people new to the game feel about first class cricket. The English controlled the game for a long time, and we know how much the English love holding onto tradition. Grass courts at Wimbledon, making players wear white, ridiculous monarch as head of state. It's all rather bizarre. A forward thinking and progressive governing body would have brought in 50 over cricket a century ago, and 20 over cricket 50 years ago.

2017-01-13T14:45:10+00:00

Martyn50

Roar Rookie


On a tour of Lords in 2012 we were told that all test match grounds world wide will be able to have day/night test fixtures. That came from the ICC. OK in warm countries and where it gets dark by 8pm but in the UK it can be cold for spectators in the evening and not dark untill 10pm

2017-01-13T14:40:30+00:00

Martyn50

Roar Rookie


WACA is pay

AUTHOR

2017-01-13T12:13:36+00:00

Garry White

Roar Pro


Cheers Peter! Glad you liked it. I haven't been to a Championship 4-dayer in a while. That probably makes my piece a little bit hypocritical. The last game I saw in the flesh was actually a domestic T20. It was to introduce a German friend of mine to the game. Should have started him with a 4-dayer for the full religious / empty cathedral experience... Loved Championship Cricket. Great chance to get away and get some piece and get some proper beer on. No queues at the bar either..

2017-01-13T10:26:30+00:00

davSA

Guest


The English have historically valued tradition highly. The first class game still appears alive and well there . Test matches are generally very well supported if not sell outs. In South Africa T20 has clearly had a dramatic effect on the support of first class cricket . I cant answer for the other major playing nations but day night tests will become a reality here . The cricket board is already looking at it. Problem seems to be the economics of upgrading lighting systems in all our major cricket stadiums. May happen that only the Wanderers and Newlands may in future host pink ball tests. This will have a very negative effect on the game here.

2017-01-13T06:52:00+00:00

Paul D

Roar Guru


Honestly if they played shield cricket and offered free entry at Allan Border field instead of the Gabba I would go a lot more often Allan Border field has a great atmosphere with a couple thousand people. With the same amount in the Gabba it's a god awful desolate concrete hole.

2017-01-13T06:42:49+00:00

Peter Z

Guest


Gee, I'll be checking if the Vics have the same promotion. We play at the Junction oval next year with grassy banks. I'll be going more often.

2017-01-13T05:10:59+00:00

rock

Guest


I agree with your 4 day idea Sheek (see my comment above) and think it'll eventually happen. But, not all D/N test matches. Boxing Day & New Years tests are still pretty well supported in crowd numbers (and the TV ratings are always very very strong) so I don't think they need to go D/N

2017-01-13T03:48:54+00:00

Paul D

Roar Guru


The game in early Feb at the Gabba is totally free entry for the full four days Not sure if it is the same at other venues interstate but I think this is a good initiative from CA. http://www.thegabba.com.au/What-s-On/Event.aspx?EventId=52219

2017-01-13T03:45:54+00:00

Hayden

Guest


Jeremy with Optus Sport being a New playing can't find a reason why they can't add Sheffield Shield coverage on the similar lines of WBBL coverage.

2017-01-13T03:32:13+00:00

Jeremy

Guest


Would love to see an hour of televised shield cricket in the afternoons, perhaps on one of Channel Nine's auxiliary channels. A rule change, which enforces, say, ODI fielding restrictions during the televised hour, could be implemented to encourage action. Though, an hour of shield, left unmodified, would be just as groovy. They could show a different game each day, or show the closest, or best, game.

2017-01-13T03:20:13+00:00

Jeremy

Guest


I also like the idea of 4 day day-night test matches. Ensure the pitches are nice and lively too! The circumstances that could occur in a test running to this format are almost endless.

2017-01-13T03:16:36+00:00

Jeremy

Guest


However, in rural and regional Australia, many local youth and adult leagues are diminishing in size. Less children are playing cricket and even fewer transfer to more senior comps. Rural and regional areas feed first class cricket; with less kids playing the quality of the top grade can only suffer.

2017-01-13T02:42:27+00:00

Peter Z

Guest


I still go to the Sheffield Shield once or twice every year, and have been going since the late 70's. I can't recommend it high enough. It is a great day at the cricket. Loved your piece mate.

2017-01-13T02:21:50+00:00

Hayden

Guest


My Ideas for cricket schedules in Australia; * Matador Cup in it’s Current Time Slot. * Sheffield Shield starts Monday Week 8 days after Matador Cup Final. * International ODI’s start in the last weekend in October and finish on 2nd Weekend in November consisting of 5 ODI’s v 1 opponent and 3 Annual Chappell Hadlee ODI’s. * Sheffield Shield Round 2 starts following Tuesday. * Sheffield Shield Round 3 starts following Wednesday including ” ALL ” International Players. * 1st Test Starts at the 4th Thursday in November. * Sheffield Shield Round including “ALL” International Players. * 2nd and 3rd Test played in December. * BBL in it’s Current Time Slot “NOT” Negotiable * 4th and 5th Test Boxing Day and New Years. * 6th Test starts approx 17th January. * BBL All Finals including “ALL” International Players. * Sheffield Shield Resumes approx 14 days after BBL Final. * Sheffield Shield Final Must be Retained. * Grade / Premier Grand Finals “ALL” Sheffield Shield Players.

2017-01-13T01:54:48+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


Gary, I believe day/night tests & day/night Sheffield Shield will be the saviour of those formats. perhaps the only remaining saviour. I miss the 3.30pm afternoon kickoffs for rugby union & league tests. But I have accepted rather than embraced the night-time tests. Cricket has to go day/night, if for the only reason it better tailors the apparently rushed lives of people today. But I would go further, lopping a full day of both tests (five own to four) & Sheffield Shield (four down to three) with only a minimal loss in overall hours. I would change test cricket from 5 x 6 hour days (30 hours) to 4 x 7 hour day/nights (28 hours). I would change Sheffield Shield from 4 x 6 hour days (24 hours) to 3 x 7 hour day/nights (21 hours). Strike rates today are far superior to yesteryear so the marginal loss of several hours wouldn't be noticed, as batting tends to be more efficient these days. The big advantage of day/night matches is how it is better suited to lifestyles. On Friday & Monday arvo city workers can arrive at the ground in time for the 2nd & 3rd sessions. But the big advantage is on weekends. Saturday mornings, outside of holidays, are sports mornings, while Sunday mornings are family mornings - go for brekkie & a swim, some house cleaning. This then leaves the arvo free for the family to attend a full day/night of cricket. it makes sense. At present there is resistance to full scale day/night matches. but i believe it must become commonplace. It may be the only thing left to help the longer formats survive. Otherwise, test cricket & first class cricket is doomed. As for T20, it is here to stay. But how popular it will continue to be remains to be seen. At present I put the BBL in a fad cycle. Let's see if it's still pulling the same attendances after 10 years.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar