Lyon inspires Australia at Dharamsala

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

A remarkable spell from off-spinner Nathan Lyon helped Australia into a strong position at stumps on day two of the final Test in India yesterday.

After labouring on the dead deck at Ranchi, Lyon yesterday exploited the hardness of the Dharamsala surface, earning disconcerting bounce.

This lift troubled the Indian batsmen in the final session as Lyon bowled unchanged for 14 overs and grabbed 4-36, turning the Test on its head.

The hosts had cruised to 2-153 at tea in response to Australia’s total of 300 and looked well placed to earn a generous first innings lead. Up to that point, Lyon and his spin offsider Steve O’Keefe had bowled tightly but had posed no great threat to the Indian batsmen.

» Australia vs India 4th Test scorecard

Australia’s quicks Pat Cummins and Josh Hazlewood had looked most likely to break the game open in the first two sessions. The Dharamsala pitch was firmer than any Test deck I have seen in India for many years, offering great pace and carry.

It was not greatly dissimilar in nature to a typical wicket at the Gabba, the ground where Lyon has been most successful. With the heavy overspin he imparts on the ball, Lyon is best suited to hard pitches, which is why he has so often bowled well in home Tests.

This method is also why he has at times struggled on softer surfaces in Asia, where the local bowlers prosper from bowling with much more sidespin, which encourages natural variations of turn and bounce.

Fellow off-spinner Ravi Ashwin is such a bowler and so he was not able to extract the same life from this Dharamsala surface as Lyon. In the first over after tea, the Australian earned the enormous wicket of Cheteshwar Pujara, who had defied the Australians for more than 11 hours at Ranchi en route to a double ton.

The Indian first drop was entrenched at the crease, on 57 from 151 balls, when Lyon produced a lethal delivery. It looped tantalisingly and curved deceptively away from Pujara, drawing him out to defend, before exploding off the pitch to catch the glove and lob to short leg.

Four overs later Lyon repeated this trick, getting another delivery to rear up, take the glove and loop for a simple catch to dismiss Karun Nair. India managed to steady and then accelerate thanks to a brisk 49-run stand from Indian skipper Ajinkya Rahane and all-rounder Ravi Ashwin.

At 4-216, with Ranchi centurion Wriddhiman Saha still to come, India again were in control.

Then Lyon sent back both Rahane and Ashwin in quick succession with a pair of deliveries which landed on a perfect in-between length, which leaves batsmen in doubt as to whether to go forward or back.

Lyon troubled Saha all the way through to the end of his spell when Australia took the second new ball for a four-over burst of pace.

India could have ended the day in deep trouble if not for Saha being dropped off Cummins at slip by Matt Renshaw, who had earlier missed a chance off opener Lokesh Rahul.

Both of those turfed catches were from the bowling of Cummins, who was bereft of luck. His day was summed up by the 37th over of play. Three times in that one over he went agonisingly close to dismissing Rahul.

First, he earned an edge which fell just short of slip, then Rahul almost fed a catch to short cover, and finally a bouncer caught the batsman’s glove and lobbed slightly wide of short leg.

Cummins’ figures of 1-59 from 21 overs do not do justice to just how outstanding he was. He troubled every batsman who faced him and managed to be simultaneously frugal and hyper-attacking. He could have easily ended the day with four or five wickets.

India will be very wary of the danger posed by Cummins and Hazlewood with the new ball in the opening half hour tomorrow. Given this pitch looks set to be very difficult to bat last, India will need a first innings lead of about 40 to 50 runs to be on level terms in the Test.

If Australia bowl as well as they did yesterday, that extra 100 runs will be very hard earned by India.

The Crowd Says:

2017-03-27T20:54:52+00:00

qwetzen

Guest


Yesterday was appalling. I kept muttering; 'Kohli's NOT actually playing you know.' at the teev. But what we're getting is what was predicted. You're not going to get decent commentary when one lot of BCCI employees are 'commentating' another lot of BCCI employees are you?

2017-03-27T20:49:46+00:00

qwetzen

Guest


Chris K said: "Except Gilly was actually an excellent keeper also." Only compared to Haddin...

2017-03-27T20:37:56+00:00

qwetzen

Guest


Thanks for giving all those whiskery counterpoints a little gallop lads, but I'm happy with my pov. It gives no support or complicity to murderous loons.

2017-03-27T06:33:02+00:00

Basil

Guest


With one innings remaining both bowlers have taken 19 wickets with 2 5 wicket hauls each.

2017-03-27T06:19:50+00:00

dave

Guest


Can anyone remember an entire series to be as entertaining as this one? Every single session we start to think we know whats going to happen and then the tale twists again.

2017-03-27T06:18:55+00:00

Craig

Guest


Hayden is the worst commentator I have ever heard.

2017-03-27T05:25:36+00:00

Aransan

Guest


I am considering the sound after the ball has hit the bat and is in motion. It is the interaction of the spinning seam with the air that makes the noise. It would be interesting to do wind tunnel tests and measure the sound with different spin axes for a constant rate of spin. One could also measure the lift in the case of the spin axis being nearly vertical.

2017-03-27T05:19:37+00:00

Aransan

Guest


Lyon is Australia's best current spinner but McGill was a once in a generation bowler who had the misfortune to be around at the same time as the once in a lifetime bowler in Warne. I would also expect a good leg spin bowler to have a better strike rate than a good off spin bowler, although with less economy.

2017-03-27T04:58:48+00:00

Johnno

Guest


Is Lyon now considered a better Test-spinner than Stuart Magill ?

2017-03-27T04:34:17+00:00

boxingkoala

Roar Rookie


I need to get this off my chest. The commentary from India on the fox coverage is diabolical. Sunil Gavaskar is shocking, and the less i say about Clarke and Hayden and Lee......

2017-03-27T03:45:50+00:00

ViratKohli

Roar Rookie


There was no way the ball was going to spin in the second bounce and come back into the stump. However, I thought Wade was good coz he was looking for a freak stumping

2017-03-27T03:41:18+00:00

DingoGray

Roar Guru


Not to mention the inclusion of Kumar who bats a hell of lot better than both Ishand and Yadav.

2017-03-27T03:33:10+00:00

Sideline

Guest


Surely it depends more on how it's placed before hitting the bat. If the bat hits the seam or the leather, it would sound different through the air.

2017-03-27T02:51:59+00:00

Aransan

Guest


I don't believe the sound would be anything like the same if the spin axis was vertical.

2017-03-27T02:33:01+00:00

Ouch

Guest


I've been threatened that my victory dances will be posted on Youtube

2017-03-27T02:21:13+00:00

spruce moose

Guest


Unlikely to be that. 1. He couldn't possibly know how to measure such a stat. He can barely spell. 2. And yes, as you say, the figure would be much higher.

2017-03-27T02:07:17+00:00

The Bush

Roar Guru


Poor Smithy, always being caught out with the wrong TV angel aye...

2017-03-27T02:07:01+00:00

rock

Guest


I think what this series has taught us is that they're both good bowlers, and it's hard to comprehensively say one is better then the other. As it is with cricket, they both perform better then the other in certain types of conditions.

2017-03-27T02:06:04+00:00

The Bush

Roar Guru


You've more self control than me qwetzen - perhaps the Roar just needs to put on a few more cricket writers to quench my daily thirst?

2017-03-27T02:03:16+00:00

The Bush

Roar Guru


qwetzen, I'm with Paul here, I'm pretty sure that regardless of who should have boycotted Berlin '36, not much would have come with it. Regardless, these are decisions that the Government needs to take a la Apartheid. We either cease all interaction to express our displeasure or we don't. It shouldn't be up to sporting organisations to make moral stands. George makes a great point - what happened/s in Sri Lanka was/is very serious and as much a reason not to tour there as anything that goes on in Bangladesh. The final thought is about those in glass houses. Australia's government sponsored disregard for human rights might not be as immediately dangerous to visitors as what happens in Bangladesh, but is still unacceptable.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar