Six alternate nicknames for 'Chinaman'

By Tim Miller / Editor

I recently read a column from Fairfax cricket correspondent Andrew Wu calling for an end to the nickname ‘Chinaman’.

As any cricket fan would know, a chinaman bowler is a left-armer who bowls wrist spin, a rare bowling art most recently pulled off in Test cricket by young Indian debutant Kuldeep Yadav.

The story of where the nickname came from, as with much of cricket folklore, is disputed – but whether the story is real or not doesn’t really matter.

As a middle class white male aged between 18 and 49, I’m basically excluded from any discussion about what can or cannot be construed as offensive by anyone on Earth. Just for the record, though, without going into any discussion about whether or not the term is used in a derogatory sense or if it can be construed as offensive, if even one person finds the term offensive towards Chinese people, then I believe we have a duty to rename it.

The term doesn’t even really make sense. It has nothing to do with cricket. The closest connection China has to the noble sport is the fact that it invented tea and we honour that invention with a twenty-minute break after 60 overs devoted to it.

It isn’t even an accurate description of the delivery. As a left-arm wrist-spinner/wicketkeeper myself, a more accurate picture would be ‘Quasimodo giving birth to a frog in a blender’.

So here are six alternative nicknames to the chinaman that I reckon are much more appropriate for the cricketing phrasebooks.

1. The Southpaw
Pretty stock-standard for lefties. It’s used in boxing and baseball and some other sports as well. But it’s also pretty bland and uninspiring, which is the exact opposite of the bowling we’re renaming.

It’s a perfect nickname for what Stephen O’Keefe bowls, however. So let’s call left-arm finger-spinning ‘left-arm Southpaw’ and move on.

2. The Chuck
Leslie O’Brien Fleetwood-Smith was a left-arm unorthodox bowler for Australia during the 1930s, but of course we all know him by his nickname of ‘Chuck’. So why not honour him by naming the bowling style he made famous, the Chuck?

Yes, he only played ten Tests and yes, he holds the record for the most expensive figures in Test history (1/298 from 87 overs in case you were wondering), but read about the delivery he bowled to dismiss Wally Hammond in the Melbourne Test of the 1936-37 Ashes and then tell me he doesn’t deserve the honour.

And then if Kuldeep Yadav and Ravi Ashwin ever bowl in tandem, commentators can say there are ‘Chucks’ at both ends! (I’m kidding, I’m kidding.)

3. The Hoggy
Never heard of “Chuck” Fleetwood-Smith? Well then, surely you’ve heard of George Bradley Hogg, more commonly known as Brad Hogg. What is it with these left-arm unorthodox bowlers and their refusal to accept their given names?

You can’t hate Hoggy. Whether it’s the fact that he’s always smiling, or that tongue wave he does in the BBL when he gets a wicket, or just that he played in almost as many World Cup Final victories as he did Tests for Australia, he’s just a loveable guy.

Give his autobiography a read and remember him fondly every time you hear someone say ‘This guy’s a Hoggy’.

4. The Enraw
This one might not make any sense whatsoever, so I’ll clarify: it’s ‘Warne’ spelt backwards.

Reverse-Warne. The most famous right-arm leg-spinner of all time as seen through a mirror. Which is basically what a left-arm wrist-spinner is. Logic.

And plus, there’s no way anyone in Australia will ever pronounce something like this without an ‘ee’ on the end, and ‘Enrawie’ is a bit of a mouthful. Calling it a ‘Roarie’ would definitely increase traffic on this website from confused batsmen googling what the umpire said the bowler was.

Either that, or it would just really irritate everyone named Rory.

5. The Flanders
Cricket is disappointingly short of Simpsons-inspired terminology, but I reckon renaming this delivery after Springfield’s most famous leftie would be “okily-dokily-doo!” I’ll stop now.

6. The Achong
Andrew Wu actually came up with this one himself in his column, so I’ll give it a fair run here.

It’s named in honour of West Indian left-arm wrist-spinner Ellis ‘Puss’ Achong, who allegedly was the inspiration for the term in 1933 after dismissing English batsman Walter Robbins.

Robbins muttered as he was walking off ‘Fancy being done by a bloody Chinaman’, which has been attributed as the birth of the nickname – although as we said, this is disputed.

I’m sceptical, though. Yes, it’s historically and even racially significant, as Achong was the first Chinese-born Test cricketer. But thanks to my knowledge of Aussie vernacular, as I mentioned up above with the addition of the ‘ee’ on the end of every word, then I have a distinct feeling an ‘Achong’ will, among some people, become a ‘Chongie’, which is somehow even worse than the current name.

And do I even need to go over why calling it a ‘Puss’ isn’t a whole lot better?

So there you have it. Six alternate names to the ‘Chinaman’ which make much more sense and, importantly, can’t be construed as racially insensitive to anyone with any remote connection to the country that we owe billions in debt to and who we really can’t afford to antagonise.

I like the Chuck or the Hoggy, myself, but if you readers prefer one of the other four, or you think I missed a goodie, then let me know in the comments.

The Crowd Says:

2017-04-02T11:48:16+00:00

Steve

Guest


I can't believe I read all of that garbage. I want those three minutes back. My neighbour Henri, however, would like the term "French cut" banned as well.

2017-03-30T21:23:59+00:00

Beauty of a geek Brains of a bimbo

Guest


No need to change it.it isn't used in a racist sense.context is important! The term grammar nazi is used for grammatical pedants and many people who are offended by this term probably use it too.

2017-03-30T17:36:58+00:00

Mitcher

Guest


Broken has two syllables.

2017-03-29T22:25:33+00:00

Chris Kettlewell

Roar Guru


Why do all the options have to be named after someone. And yeah right, call it a chuck, then all left-arm wrist spinners are automatically chuckers!

2017-03-29T21:32:04+00:00

AdrianK

Guest


Definitely offensive and in need of changing. And while we are at it, let's do something about: Danish pastries American hot dogs English pasties French kisses Liverpool kisses Scotch eggs and.....

2017-03-29T21:07:03+00:00

Ben

Guest


Note that the people who call it PC Bs or think others shouldnt be offended etc etc are never of the same race as the term that it stigmatises. Of course they are not offended so why should anyone else be!! Reminds me of a hill in the Sth Island of NZ which used to be called N#$$er Hill until the name was changed for obvious reasons. The number of people jumping up and down with the exact same arguments was amazing. Of course every single one of them was white....

2017-03-29T20:35:07+00:00

bigbaz

Roar Guru


I'm offended that a certain type of swimming is called the Aussie crawl. Were will it all end.

2017-03-29T11:45:15+00:00

Rob na Champassak

Roar Guru


– does not explain at all the type of bowling that is on display to a novice – requires a lengthy explanation of the backstory that doesn’t make a great deal of sense
Wait, are you still talking about the term 'Chinaman bowler' or just cricket terminology in general?

2017-03-29T10:53:06+00:00

Linphoma

Guest


I am Chinese and would wish to retain the term for a left arm wrist spinner purely as a term that reflects the colour of the ancient game.

2017-03-29T10:25:20+00:00

Linphoma

Guest


You wouldn't say cute and cuddly if you saw me and my brothers, Your Eminence!

2017-03-29T10:21:34+00:00

Linphoma

Guest


I do remember Paul Adams was an unorthodox unorthodox left arm wrist spinner, if such a tautology exists. His grip was a two fingered thing withe the thumb and forefinger, and his stock ball was a leg break to the right hander - the left arm (traditional) Chinaman bowler's wrong 'un. He was classified "coloured" under apartheid classification, as were the Asian community at large in the old South Africa, so calling him a Chinaman bowler could be stretched that way.

2017-03-29T10:14:13+00:00

Linphoma

Guest


He was some bowler, David Hourn. On his day he was unpickable. I remeber a day I attended a Shield game and the stands echoed with "Give 'em a stiff one Hourn!"

2017-03-29T09:29:52+00:00

Professor Rosseforp

Guest


Surely the ring would have to be removed so as not to provide an unfair advantage by giving extra purchase on the ball?

2017-03-29T09:28:20+00:00

Professor Rosseforp

Guest


Also a derogatory comment on those who suffer from kyphosis, as Quasimodo was known for his spinal problems ; certainly Quasimodo, as a male, could not give birth, so we don't want to extend the patriarchal hegemony even further ; I would also be wary of upsetting the carillonists, as Quasimodo was known to play with his bells in his spare time. David Hourn was a great practitioner of the art, and I recall some matches where he was unplayable.

2017-03-29T09:01:21+00:00

Howzat

Guest


Yeah I think it's this funny thing called empathy

2017-03-29T08:27:38+00:00

Peebo

Guest


Mate, I love that. Left arm wristy has a ring to it.

2017-03-29T07:14:37+00:00

Nudge

Guest


They were talking about this on the back page last night. Ryan Fitzgerald was saying that it would have to be the most difficult art to master in the game of cricket. He then went on to say, why not just call it "left arm wristy" because all males know how difficult that is to master. Cracked me up.

2017-03-29T06:05:25+00:00

Hutchoman

Roar Pro


Is that allowed? Shouldn't it be China-they?

2017-03-29T06:03:31+00:00

Paul D

Roar Guru


So now I'm being lectured on substance from a guy who made two monosyllabic responses and a nonsensical verbose pile of rubbish. Righto then. I'll make it really simple for you. My argument is that the term Chinaman - is based on an outdated view of racial stereotypes - does not explain at all the type of bowling that is on display to a novice - requires a lengthy explanation of the backstory that doesn't make a great deal of sense - could easily be replaced by a better term without any loss to the fabric of the game. There you go. That's my argument - I'm more than happy to listen to you if you want to make an argument for why the term 'Chinaman' should be kept, and what would be lost from the game if it was replaced. In your own time.

2017-03-29T05:58:36+00:00

Gareth Kidd

Roar Guru


Well realistically if Warnie delivered a legbreak, this should be an offbreak. The other two should be called slow left/right arm orthodox. Simplified.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar