The Cowboys beat the Sharks, not the refs

By Matt Cleary / Expert

Referees are the parking inspectors of rugby league. If they weren’t around you wouldn’t get a park at the beach on a Saturday, your ten metres not be enforced and tries would not be sent upstairs to the video god-box in the sky.

It would be anarchy and nobody wants anarchy, even anarchists – if they’re honest with themselves. It would be silly, and bad.

So, something of a shout-out to the men in pink, the Pinkertons, even, at Allianz Stadium on Sunday afternoon, Ashley Klein and Gavin Badger, who, despite Paul Gallen and his team of mechanical up-and-down arm-bandits firing up the 16,000-strong pro-Shark Army continued to call it as they saw it.

That what they saw, in hindsight, was proved wrong, on occasion, doesn’t make their officiating less than fine reffing.

Now, that might sound counter-intuitive but there it is. For all refs can do, surely all we can ask of them, is to call each incident as they see it. Not to worry about the state of the game, or how their decisions will affect the game. But each individual incident, make a call on it best you can.

Easier said than done. And it’s a fact referees will call a strip at one end and a knock-on at the other end, depending who’s been getting the rougher end of the pineapple. That’s human, that’s what happens.

Tony Archer and the NRL HQ spin-meisters will tell you otherwise. But it’s true. And I know it’s true because an NRL ref told me it was true. Refs will blow 50-50 calls the ‘safe’ way. And by safe, I meant the way that they’ll be less criticised.

On Sunday the refs took the hard road and the Sharks didn’t like it.

Paul Gallen took a punt on something happening Sunday night that didn’t happen. His team tied 12-all at the death, Gallen stormed to the line. His halves were out back, waiting to have a shot at the match-winning point. Gallen stormed into the meat.

(Photo by Mark Kolbe/Getty Images)

And then he tried to play the ball fast. Had he wanted to ensure the play-the-ball wasn’t botched, he could have. But he tried a quick one. Worst case, quick play-the-ball. Best case, milk a penalty. But neither came off. And Gallen was incensed. And Flanagan in the box was incensed.

For had they not seen their team penalised when Matt Prior was adjudged to have ripped the ball from his opponents? Ethan Lowe had then banged over the two points, and a tied game it was. So the ball got down the other end. Gallen had a crack at the line. Tried a quick play-the-ball that went bad.

He took a punt that the referees would have it in their mind that Cronulla ‘deserved’ a penalty because the Cowboys got one the other end. Flanagan was expecting it thus. Alas for the hard-eyed Sharks stewards, referee Badger ruled knock-on. Dud play-the-ball. Sharks’ footy.

The refs, to their credit, didn’t play Gallen’s game. They were calling it as they saw it. May not have been ‘correct’ in Gallen’s mind given there’d been a penalty the other end for the same thing. But the stripping rule is a vexed beast and the refs make decisions on tackles and play-the-balls which could absolutely go either way.

Fifty-fifty. Toss a coin. Players know that. Gallen very definitely knows that.

But Sunday night at Allianz they called it as they saw it. All you can ask.

That said, what happened to the knock-back? Remember that? The Sharks were stiff when a couple of dropped balls clearly travelled backwards – Andrew Fifita’s through the legs on, Val Holmes’s kick return one. But that’s rugby league today – you drop the ball you’ve knocked it on.

The knock-back doesn’t exist, hardly. The refs call it as they see it, and what they see is the possibility, however remote, that they’ll be criticised for not calling knock-on.

The safe option is to call knock-on. For everything.

See the Andrew Fifita one, he bent down to catch a grubber that brushed his hands and went backwards through his legs like tunnel ball. Flanagan said later: “If anyone on this planet thinks Andrew Fifita knocked that ball on … it went through his legs.”

Then the refs leaked a match report to The Daily Telegraph, and one of the items said: “Fifita touches the ball with his both hands and attempts to pick it up and regather. The ball at this point is off the ground. The ball is then dropped back to the ground. This constitutes a knock on. Following that the ball is then knocked backward and comes off his left foot before Gallen regathers.”

Andrew Fifita (AAP Image/Action Photographics, Grant Trouville)

Have these people heard of physics? The laws of force and gravity? I mean, the knock-on rule says you have to propel the ball towards your opponent’s try-line. How could Fifita have done that? And then shot the ball out between his legs tunnel-ball style backwards in a split second?

Respect to the refs at the time ruling thus, because that’s what they do. But for Tony Archer to sign off on a report that said that was a knock-on is, well, bloody-mindedness is one thing. But he’s flat out wrong.

That’s not a knock-on. It’s not a knock-on. A knock-on? Not a knock-on.

Naturally, Sharks fans – like all fans – including the biggest Sharks fan of all, our Flanno, felt said calls were not fair. But if Flanno and Gal and the rest of their bashed-up defending premiers didn’t want to be penalised as much there was a quite simple way around it.

Stop being bad.

Every team sails close to the wind on penalties and expects to cop them. The Roosters were the most penalised team of 2013, won the comp.

But penalties weren’t why the Sharks lost. It was because they couldn’t score enough points. And they were playing against Cowboys who can’t be killed.

And they dropped the ball like it was a mucous membrane filled with poisonous soldier ants.

And so on.

The Crowd Says:

2017-09-15T12:48:55+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


I hear you. I don't pretend for one second that the referees or the way the game is refereed is perfect. I'm open to any suggestion in ways referees can improve. I just can't tolerate "refs cost us the game" attitude...

2017-09-15T09:58:59+00:00

Matt P

Roar Rookie


Fights you can't lose are the best kind though!

2017-09-15T09:49:08+00:00

Womblat

Guest


Sweet. Please don't think all of us are as antagonistic or obtuse as Bill, Wild, whatever. The fight is what matters to him, not the argument.

2017-09-15T09:43:53+00:00

Womblat

Guest


Don't pick fights you can't lose Matthew.

2017-09-15T09:23:15+00:00

Sharkattack

Guest


I differ on both your views. the Sharks beat the Sharks. The Cowboys were very good at hanging in there, and took the chances given to them by the Sharks. I thought it was an awful performance.

2017-09-15T09:04:26+00:00

Oingo Boingo

Guest


Not bad , I liked mine better though.

2017-09-15T07:54:52+00:00

Matt P

Roar Rookie


Spot on. Plenty of people won't let the truth get in the way of a good story when it comes to bashing Bennett though.

2017-09-15T07:15:48+00:00

Kurt S

Roar Pro


They could take the whole branch, The Barry!. Bennett would have excelled at anything he put his mind to. No matter what people say about the personality, his business acumen should not be underestimated. people say he doesn't give the media anything. He gives them plenty - by way of content to write about him. By saying little he keeps the sporting scribes in a regular and recurring news cycle where they comment about him not offering himself to the press. Meanwhile he shelters his team when they are feeling vulerable and lets them loose on the press when they need inflating. A cunning negotiator and strategist is Mr Bennett.

2017-09-15T07:06:13+00:00

Kurt S

Roar Pro


The Broncos didn't play well at all, yet they still nearly pulled something out of the bag. Marshall will really need to step up and co ordinate those boys tonight. He is the senior man on the field he needs to get talking. Cronulla didn't play all that well, either. That game was theirs and they threw it away on more than one occasion based on their own poor decision making plain and simple. I find Maloney refreshing. He said it about origin and about last week's game. He said they had their chances and they just didn't take them. I'm chomping at the bit to watch tonight and tomorrow night's game. Is there a better sport than rugby league at SOS or finals time?

2017-09-15T06:59:00+00:00

Matt

Guest


Most times Bennett says something in the press conference or media it is for a reason. After the 2015 Grand Final he stated that the game shouldn't be decided by Golden Point. Everyone jumped up and down claiming he was a sore loser. What he was actually trying to do was take the focus off Hunt and put it on himself. He was shielding him. Never mind the fact that Bennett has always been against golden point. A few months later what happens? Finals matches are now decided by extra time and not golden point.

2017-09-15T06:24:10+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Puts a completely different spin on it...

2017-09-15T06:22:52+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Lose the victim mentality. You keep arguing and sprouting the same thing over and over which is fine but whenever anyone responds you complain about censorship, mind reading and bullying.

2017-09-15T06:11:54+00:00

Dave_S

Guest


"puts the onus back on to proper ball security just that bit more" Good point Matthew. Given there is so little contest for the ball now - stripping rule, "scrums" etc - I'm happy to see possession turned over a bit through a harder line on knock ons

2017-09-15T05:50:56+00:00

Matt P

Roar Rookie


"In any event, I’ve always assumed (maybe wrongly) that it’s determined by the direction of the force applied to the ball, rather than the subsequent direction of the ball." Bingo. If it's not, then in my perspective this is how it should be. Making drop balls that aren't clear knock-backs very likely to be called knock-ons makes it consistent and puts the onus back on to proper ball security just that bit more. Everybody's happy. Right?

2017-09-15T05:45:14+00:00

Lovey

Guest


Yes, this where the rule needs clarification.

2017-09-15T05:39:28+00:00

Matt P

Roar Rookie


Is that why you keep commenting, because you're bored? Fair dinkum. I don't understand what you're trying to achieve. Your position is wishy-washy, you've backflipped on some claims, you start fights and then back off when you can't counter fairly, you insult first and debate second, and to top it off, you've made a second profile because that's the only substantial agreement you've found in this entire time. And speaking of the hypocrisy you've lamented so often, accusing others of doing what you're doing yourself (i.e. misquoting and "false mind reading") doesn't fit that bill? All this over a game of footy. Come on, just give it up and move on.

2017-09-15T05:18:08+00:00

AGordon

Guest


doesn't say much for the Roosters then, if they could only limp across the line by 2 points

2017-09-15T05:15:27+00:00

Tom

Guest


That may well be the same Peter Phelps (NSW MLC) who once claimed that traffic lights were a 'Bolshevist Menace'. Similar thought process...

2017-09-15T05:11:15+00:00

Matt P

Roar Rookie


I'm thinking it possibly could have been a confession. Makes much more sense that way.

2017-09-15T05:01:36+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Hi Kurt - I was lucky enough to hear Bennett speak at a corporate breakfast last year. He was speaking after a bad Brisbane loss (maybe to the Sharks?) One of the things he said that resonated with me was that after a loss he'd lock himself away and pour over the teams preparation and work out what he could do better. Then he'd work out what they needed to work on during the week and plan the preparation for the next game. Meanwhile his assistants and trainers would handle recovery and the first session. The team wouldn't see him until Tuesday when he'd be clear of thought and calm would have a clear, constructive message for the team, would know who he needed to speak to individually and what to say. Everything based on accountability. The younger coaches could take a leaf.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar