TELL US: What's the most important indicator of success for a sport?

By Riordan Lee / Editor

Ratings? Crowds? Grassroots participation? Financial stability?

These four metrics are the ones pundits and fans constantly point to as indicators of success for a sport – but which one do you value the most?

Against our better judgment, we’re going to be diving headlong into the code wars for the second episode of The Roar Podcast, and trying to determine what Australia’s most successful game is.

Crowd figures have been the hot-topic throughout this year’s finals series and remain one of the most visible metrics we look at.

Television ratings too, play a major role in the discussions – because not only do they show how many people are actually interested enough to watch it, they also dictate how healthy a league’s bottom line looks.

But while the AFL, NRL and cricket dominate these, other sports hold sway elsewhere.

Relatively speaking, football and golf in Australia don’t draw the huge crowds, ratings or broadcast deals – yet they’re convincingly winning the battle of participation.

1,086,986 Australians play football every year, and 685,732 tee-off with some golf.

Rugby league however, only attracts 247,883 players and rugby union doesn’t even make the top ten list.

So today we’re asking you – if you were an administrator of your favourite sport, what one metric would you want to win?

In other words, what is the single most important factor in determining a sport’s success?

Chuck your answers in the comments and we’ll get to the best answers on the podcast.

The Roar Podcast will be dropping in early November, keep your eyes peeled on the site for more information in the coming weeks!

The Crowd Says:

2017-10-20T22:12:24+00:00

PiratesRugby

Guest


It's got to be more than merely numbers. It's got to be the strength/quality of that domestic competition. Otherwise basketball would be considered a success in Australia because it has so much grassroots support. It's not because it is such a relatively poor standard. Rugby in the US has more participants than NZ. Soccer in the US has more participation than the entire population of Iceland. Meanwhile, in NZ..,

2017-10-19T17:05:58+00:00

Mitcher

Guest


You’re talking about the success of the top tier competition, not the sport. No surprises this definition fits snugly with one particular competition.

2017-10-19T05:35:35+00:00

Jarryd Hayne

Guest


The sole true measure - whether it's on my list of lifelong dreams.

2017-10-18T23:48:31+00:00

clipper

Guest


I would put another angle on this. An important measure of success is whether a sport is growing or declining across the metrics. Rugby and league are declining attendance wise, participation wise and viewing wise. AFL increased in attendance last year, not sure about participation, viewing figures increased. Soccer is increasing in participation.

2017-10-18T23:25:31+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


No. Attacks anybody who states speculation as fact, to criticize people who are doing a job. Do you not see the irony in what you say, in that my comments are in contrast to the people that proclaim to know better how to run these industries?

2017-10-18T22:55:21+00:00

Midfielder

Guest


Sheek Some folk seem to think they have knowledge and understandings well beyond the rest of us and proclaim there ideas as facts not predictions .... then attack anyone who dares doubt what they proclaim as absolute wisdom .... they can see the future and fully understand the past... Sheek tis sad .... but I guess thats just who he is...

2017-10-18T21:11:20+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


No. 700k players play it because it's a popular sport. The AFL is full of leagues and teams with no actual connections to AFL level teams. If I play in the VAFA for a team like the Albert Park Falcons what team am I connected to through this? Likewise Powerhouse, etc? Rugby's professionalism has much greater connection to the amateur game - but nobody cares about that. It's really not a huge appeal.

2017-10-18T14:47:27+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


Competitiveness

2017-10-18T13:16:15+00:00

Bakkies

Guest


A honest governing body that knows where their finances are going and doesn't make poor decisions.

2017-10-18T12:56:14+00:00

Cynical Play

Roar Rookie


bums on seats on game day, fan loyalty and belief in the national team, a sense that those at the top appreciate the fans, inclusion of young people and women as players and fans, community standards modelled by those in charge.....winning is down the list but still very imprtant

2017-10-18T11:48:32+00:00

Chris

Guest


Very true! As previous comment, strong participation in Australia has not strengthened our mediocre national team or driven larger attendances. Football at the moment is in a delicate state, lets stop the old defense " oh but it is the most played sport so therefore all is rosy across the board".

2017-10-18T11:37:39+00:00

Sam

Guest


Excellent comment Stirling.

2017-10-18T11:32:55+00:00

Sam

Guest


TWAS........your comment shows no understanding of the AFL system, it's pathways and the connections with grassroots participants. It is extremely structured such that it aligns with every stage of development. That's why almost 700k players play it. Rugby had this and blew it!

2017-10-18T10:49:25+00:00

Stirling Coates

Editor


Grassroots participation is incredibly overrated as a measure of a sport's success or popularity, for the simple reason that ease of participation is completely overlooked in this assessment. While it is true football/soccer has the greatest junior participation rate of any sport in Australia, the argument that this will somehow, someday turn into supreme popularity at the professional level falls apart when you realise soccer is also the most participated-in junior sport in other countries where it is not the most popular professional sport - and has been for some time. Soccer has more junior participants than rugby in New Zealand, more junior participants than both American football and baseball in the USA, while in Canada soccer has almost double the junior participation of ice hockey. In all of those countries, soccer is a simpler, safer and more adaptable sport than their premier sport of choice yet, in almost all of those countries, there is very little to suggest any dominant sport or code is under threat from the round ball game.

2017-10-18T10:36:50+00:00

cuw

Guest


i think the culture and preferences of the masses is what matters. take India for eg. despite the numbers , it has been very hard to introduce rugger , becoz everyone just loves cricket - although only a minuscule go onto play for country. take USA for eg. NFL NBA and MLB just dominate everything else. those who look at other games or sport are those who fail at BB Baseball and american footy. take Brazil for eg. its footy or nothing. a good example is China , where despite the money pumped in , it is said that their footy league is failing to grow or improve. i think the television has played a major role in what game / sport is preferred by nations - with economics a close second. becoz of tv a lot of people are able to see superstars they want to emulate. and economic reasons dictate what game most likely takeup seriosly at one point. for eg. it is said most West Indian boys are now turning to basketball and hope for better money and better lives.

2017-10-18T10:17:07+00:00

AussieIrish

Guest


No, IB, we played the Grand Finals and other minor rep games at the old Sports Ground, which is where the carpark for Allianz Stadium is now located.

2017-10-18T09:58:16+00:00

Train Without A Station

Guest


The AFL is a complete closed shop with no connection to the amateur game. Rugby for all its flaws has one of the greatest connections (similar to NRL) where levels feed into each other, represent each other and offer progression along the ranks.

2017-10-18T09:36:17+00:00

winston

Guest


Gambling sponsorship and advertising revenue

2017-10-18T09:30:29+00:00

Grobbelaar

Roar Guru


You really have two different sides to the coin, which are not necessarily connected: professionalism and grassroots. Moving away from the code wars, it's worth looking at a traditional Olympic sport like Athletics. At grassroots level, LA is absolutely thriving by whatever measure you care to use. As you creep up the pyramid towards the professional level, it all falls in a heap. There are very few sports completely dependent on government funding as Athletics is (at the elite level that is).

2017-10-18T09:15:23+00:00

Chris

Guest


Exactly. And unfortunately I don't see this happening with football. Domestic league attendances? Quality of the national team? More participants is yet to help this cause!

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar