Are the Wallabies on the rise as the All Blacks decline?

By Spiro Zavos / Expert

Michael Cheika was thoughtful and considered when he summed up the Wallabies’ splendid 23–18 victory against an uncharacteristically niggly, error-prone All Blacks side at Brisbane’s Suncorp Stadium on Saturday night.

“I am happy for the players,” he told reporters, “because they have been working very hard.”

This was the right response from the Wallabies coach. It is the players, after all, who have to actually play the Test. In this Test, the Wallabies played with an intensity, especially on defence, and a rugby nous that was superior to that of the All Blacks.

They had the resilience and courage, too, to hold off the traditional All Blacks surge in the final minutes of the Test when the visitors were pressing for another of their trademark Perils-Of-Pauline escape from the oblivion of defeat.

In the crucial middle section of the second half, the All Blacks gave away seven successive penalties. And towards the end of the Test, when they needed a penalty and then later a converted try to win, they continued with some stupid off-the-ball play that gave away penalties and stopped two promising attacks in their tracks.

The Test ended when Sam Cane knocked-on during a pick and drive attack just inside the Wallabies 22 that had the potential for a winning try under the posts.

What does not destroy a team can make it stronger. This seems to be the message the Wallabies gave to the All Blacks in those crucial final minutes of the Test.

Teams playing Test rugby perform at the level their opposition allows them to. The Wallabies, on attack and defence, did not allow the All Blacks to play their usual all-skills, high-tempo ensemble game. For once, they won the battle of the advantage line. And they built this advantage into a famous ‘Pure Gold’ (according to a Sun-Herald headline) victory.

The All Blacks became increasingly rattled. Some of the players, especially Dane Coles, totally lost the plot and resorted to cheap obstruction tactics and verballing of Wallabies who had got under their skin.

One of the golden rules of sport is that you lose the game when you lose your composure. When this loss of composure leads to a run of penalties against your side, it is difficult to win a Test. This is what happened to the All Blacks. They lost the mind game and, as a consequence, lost the game.

The Wallabies won the battle of composure and this victory enabled them to score the last three points (a long-range penalty by my man of the match Reece Hodge) in the 78th minute that entrenched the win.

Cheika also made another important point during his impressive media conference: “But the end game is to bring home the Bledisloe Cup and we came short there this year. So as enjoyable as the win was, not winning the Cup resonates with me.”

This is a smart assessment. It is generally hard for any dominant sports team to win a one-off Test when it has already won the series. Motivation to win trophies is the engine that drives successful teams. It is hard in sport (think of Steve Waugh’s dominant Australian Test sides) to invariably play with a winning intensity when the series victory has already been recorded.

The All Blacks had won the Bledisloe Cup. Moreover, the team was without Beauden Barrett, Brodie Retallick (a critical loss), Ben Smith, Owen Franks, Joe Moody and Nehe Milner-Skudder, all players who would be expected to be in the starting line-up. As Paul Cully pointed out in the Sydney Morning Herald, Israel Folau had twice the number of caps of the All Blacks back three combined.

But even with the inexperience of the All Blacks side being conceded, it is difficult not to enthuse about the quality of the Wallabies’ victory, their first against the All Blacks since 2015.

It seems to me that this win has resonances of the third Test victory against the All Blacks in 1990, after losses in the first two Tests, a win that foreshadowed the triumph in the 1991 Rugby World Cup victory.

I say “resonances” because the All Blacks, at this stage in the Rugby World Cup 2019 cycle, remain the favourites to win the tournament.

But, and this is the crucial points in my view, the Wallabies have turned the corner after a dismal run earlier this season and throughout last year. They are in their best position now to make a successful run to the finishing line since their defeat in the final of Rugby World Cup 2015.

The first point to make in an assessment of the meaning of the Brisbane victory for the Wallabies is that the difficult conditions did not favour their ball-in-hand game. The team now has the has given belief that they can beat the All Blacks.

You could see the relief and enthusiasm for what they had achieved in the celebrations of the players when the final whistle had sounded.

Paul Cully had an interesting article in the Sydney Morning Herald, ‘Australian rugby has been traumatised by the All Blacks’, where he suggests that losing to the All Blacks has become a habit, and a bad habit at that:

“Every Wallabies player who puts on the jersey get compared not just with his peers but with an All Black from an era of unusual dominance … I think it has broken some players. They think they wouldn’t get into that team. I also think they are under-selling themselves, but it’s what they think that counts.”

Interestingly, Cully used Jack Dempsey as an example of a player not rated by Wallabies supporters as being a match for Jerome Kaino or Liam Squire.

Guess what happened in the Test? Dempsey was awarded the man of the match for his sterling performance in a pack that more than matched the All Blacks in physicality and skills.

Cully also suggested that the three-Test system, in place for Bledisloe Cup Tests until 2021, should be reduced to two Tests.

I can’t agree with this. The three-Test system gives the Wallabies their best chance of winning back the Bledisloe Cup as it gives them three chances rather than two of winning two Bledisloe Cup Tests in a single year.

You have to go back to the 20th century to find examples of the Wallabies winning back-to-back Tests against the All Blacks.

The second point is that Michael Cheika has finally settled on a squad that can play the Cheika game of ball-in-hand on attack and aggressiveness on defence. The team that took the field at Brisbane was essentially the same side he has selected for the last three Tests.

Importantly, when Rob Simmons was injured, Lukhan Tui replaced him and showed that he is ready for a starting role in the pack.

Continuity of selection is crucial for a successful side. All the key positions are now nailed in place for the Wallabies. This means that when someone is injured a new player is more easily fitted into the side.

With the selection of Marika Koroibete, the Wallabies finally (after Israel Folau was shifted from wing to fullback) have a winger who is a genuine finisher. The Folau–Koroibete combination, in fact, gives the Wallabies two finishers who are about as good as anyone in world rugby.

Having finishers like this is the equivalent of a power serve in tennis. You get easy points from time to time with one-serve aces instead of having to grind out all your points and risk making a mistake, as the All Blacks did several times close to the Wallabies line.

I came across an interesting article by William van Rensberg, a South African who has lived in New Zealand and now lives in Australia, titled ‘The number that’s against the All Blacks’.

Van Rensberg noted that the bookmakers were picking a 14-point margin for the All Blacks which, in his opinion, was wrong. “I would not be surprised,” he wrote, “if the Wallabies bag this one.”

His reasoning was that the All Blacks’ performances have deteriorated in 2017 over what they achieved in 2016: “The All Blacks are currently scoring fewer tries for every try conceded, or to put it differently, they are letting more and more tries in for every try they score themselves.”

By way of contrast, “the Wallabies have been able to improve their tries scored to conceded from 2016 to 2017. They clearly have improved both their attacking and defensive abilities.”

Wayne Smith in the Australian on Saturday pointed out, reinforcing the argument made by van Rensburg, that the Wallabies have scored as many tries in nine Tests in 2017, 39, as they scored in 15 Tests last year.

On Saturday night it Brisbane, this ratio of an improving Wallabies scoring pattern and a deteriorating All Blacks one played itself out as the home side scored three tries to the two scored by the visitors.

So what we now have is a Wallabies side on the rise and an All Blacks side on the decline.

The real issue is whether the low base the Wallabies are rising from will bring them anywhere near the high point the All Blacks are seemingly declining towards.

The Crowd Says:

2017-10-26T10:18:11+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


was there a problem with the food at the hotel ? serious?

2017-10-26T09:27:58+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


Connor - if nothing else you are entertaining. I'm torn between reading your stuff and Coronation St on the tele. Less time reading the Wall St journal perhaps will allow the time for the research Terry suggested.

2017-10-26T09:06:58+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


3 respected NZ commentators...you mean TV commentators? really? surely not Justin?

2017-10-25T20:51:24+00:00

klee gluckman

Guest


Wallabies won both games 2001. It wasn't back to back but it was two in a row. Actually 2000-2001 they won three in a row.

2017-10-25T17:52:03+00:00

P2R2

Roar Rookie


hip hip hooray Fionn - I totally agree, but the win does put some wind in the sails of the WBs, I dont really care about other Teams...SA and ENG and FRANCE or NH Teams in general....a good ANZAC fight is much better for both countries....long may it continue...

2017-10-25T17:49:37+00:00

P2R2

Roar Rookie


oh yes there is....come a fully fit team with all their players....daylight will be second - BUT - the WBs are getting better...

2017-10-25T13:03:24+00:00

steve McColl

Roar Rookie


I hope that this comment is not seen as trolling- as my full comment says many fans , players and coaches enjoy both games and it just seems that for whatever reason RL is getting blacklisted on this when more than ever in Australia, NZ and UK people are training ,watching and participating in both codes

2017-10-25T12:24:26+00:00

steve McColl

Roar Rookie


Hi All  , As the biggest Rugby Union competition in the world it would be great to get all your support on this https://www.thepetitionsite.com/en-gb/takeaction/440/651/644/ Sign the Petition: Rugby League is a sport www.thepetitionsite.com Sport accord have denied Rugby League is a sport in its own right. Please voice your objection to this by signing the petition. Many players and fans enjoy

2017-10-25T08:30:12+00:00

Timbo (L)

Roar Guru


The difference is that Pocock didn't go into the clean out with the sole intent to attack the opposition players head, it was just poor timing. Big difference when you go out of your way to do it. We will have to agree to disagree on this one. I don't think you actually respond to the question: Do you cheat at cards or board games? After all it is your kids/mates fault for not catching you doing it.

2017-10-25T03:50:54+00:00

Suzy Poison

Guest


Fionn and Twas. Comparing games, up to the same point this year, the stats show the Boks of 2017 are much improved on the 2016 version. This despite the worst loss in Boks history 57-0. 2016 Bok record: 4 wins, 5 losses (after last AB tour game) Boks tries for 15. tries against 27. 2017 Bok record: 5 wins, 2 draws, 2 losses (after last AB tour game) Boks tries for 29. tries against 24 The Boks have actually only lost twice this year, both times against the AB's. One was a massacre, the other well you only need to watch the second game to see the improvement. I think both the Wallabies and Boks have improved this year. The Boks were starting from a low base though.

2017-10-24T09:49:14+00:00

SAVAGE

Guest


I'm not convinced. I am still waiting for both the Wallaby's and Springboks to win convincingly away from home. Put it this way, if the Wallaby's go through Europe undefeated this year, then yes, next year against the ABs, will be the most anticipated Bledisloe series in years, ditto for the Springboks and the rugby championship. But if neither the Wallaby's or Bokke come out of Europe this year with any wins......then nothing has changed.

2017-10-24T03:08:26+00:00

piru

Roar Rookie


Perth spirit ran up a bunch of penalties for these infringements last weekend, so I suspect that they may have pushed the boundaries a bit too hard and got caught. Astute players (like Richie) calibrate the ref early to see what will be allowed, and then play to that. Less astute players get pinged repeatedly.

2017-10-24T03:06:12+00:00

piru

Roar Rookie


I wondered how long before you decided to drag Richie into this. If the referee blows his whistle, it's an infringement, if not, play on. That's the end of the discussion and I don't know how many other ways to say it. There is no grey area, he was ch3@ting to gain advantage You're right, there is no grey area, if the whistle didn't go, he didn't infringe, black and white. Now foul play is the domain of more than just the ref these days, the TMO and Assistant Refs are asked to weigh in as well - all to the good I believe. Put it this way - Pocock neck rolled an opponent and it was later seen as illegal. Should he have walked himself over to the bin and sat out ten minutes of his own volition? I mean the ref didn't see it, but to avoid cheating surely he should have sanctioned himself.

2017-10-24T03:03:34+00:00

Timbo (L)

Roar Guru


Paulo, I don't want to see Ch3@ting in any game, by any side. And no side is squeaky clean. Neither G.Smith nor Fardy wear Halo's. But watch a Saders, Chiefs or Canes game and the incidences seem to be a lot more frequent. The Highlanders and Blues seem a bit more civilized. Perth spirit ran up a bunch of penalties for these infringements last weekend, so I suspect that they may have pushed the boundaries a bit too hard and got caught. The Kiwis got Caught doing it in Chicago, by an astute ref, and they lost the game because of it. They cleaned up their game for the second half and were fantastic, but it was too late by then, the damage had been done.

2017-10-24T02:51:59+00:00

Timbo (L)

Roar Guru


Piru I am not sure that's true, Pocock got 4 weeks for a neck roll that the ref didn't see. Did he infringe? I say yes, but I can foresee a semantics debate emerging. Language aside, he did something on the field that was against the rules, unseen by the ref, that a punishment was handed out for. As to your "gate" argument, Ritche was the master of coming through the side and quickly re-positioning his body in a way that made it look like he came in from the back. This is the fine art of deception. The famous footage where he got cleaned up by a Bok, he was sitting on his backside with both hands in the ruck, slowing the ball down, the ref was unlighted. There is no grey area, he was ch3@ting to gain advantage, and in my opinion, deserved a forearm to the head for his troubles. But that was seen by the ref, making it an infringement The logic is flawed, The morals are Bankrupt.

2017-10-24T01:35:35+00:00

piru

Roar Rookie


i think nz tried to play the conditions too much and oz took advantage of it not being the wettest of wet nights and suncorp being good drainsage and played close to their normal game I'd agree with that soapit, it was only Aussie rain, not NZ rain!

2017-10-24T01:22:52+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


The Force didn't beat an NZ team. How did they do well? They won 6 games. 5 were against Aus teams.

2017-10-24T01:20:46+00:00

taylorman

Guest


Yes exactly Funbus and Piru, its those who adopt a general stance of chea?t'ing as a matter of fact on a consistent basis that I have issue with, one in particular. Came from the same motivation of being repetitive with another point with hanigan being Mumm 2.0 until that was finally drilled home that that sort of talk was innappropriate. Only now does he no longer use it. Takes a while to see the light it seems...

2017-10-24T01:08:24+00:00

piru

Roar Rookie


Timbo So how about you compile of laws that you are happy to infringe on if you can get away with it? Unless the ref blows it up there has been no infringement, it's not about what I or anyone else thinks is legal or illegal.

2017-10-24T01:07:42+00:00

Fionn

Guest


Cubelli was injured pre-season, TWAS, as you know from your comment. And no, again, you're looking at result in isolation rather than how they played out. The Brumbies lost almost all of their games by margins that allowed them winning bonus points. They were a try away from winning against the Crusaders in NZ, the Blues in Canberra and the Highlanders in Canberra. Pushed the Lions also. Hawera was poor, Powell had like one cap and was really inexperienced, Godwin had one cap and was rubbish or injured the whole season, Carter and Speight are good SR players, but the only really good players the Brumbies had were Sio, Alaalatoa, Arnold and TK. After the Brumbies had the conference wrapped up they took their foot off the peddle after the June Tests which ended the momentum. They had good wins over the Jaguares in Argentina and the Kings in SA. The Brumbies played really good traditional rugby for the most part—set piece, line out and scrum were fantastic, they just suffered from the fact that their 10, 12 and 15 weren't doing a good job. That changed somewhat when Banks replaced Toua (took Larkham a fair while to make that change). A lot of the Force players, like the Brumbies, were ones who had 1-2 caps and really weren't great players. Peter Grant got less than 10 caps about a decade ago. The Force, like the Brumbies, did well against most of the NZ teams and beat the Jags in Argentina.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar