Yesterday on Facebook, we posed the following question:
We have read your responses and collated the top five most mentioned players with your arguments supporting their inclusion. Here they are:
The most obvious choice on this list, Viv Richards would dominate the modern-day Twenty20 game. Through 121 Test matches, Richards scored more than 8500 runs for an incredible batting average of 50.23.
Richards would be perfectly suited to the modern-day Twenty20 game, with his powerful, attacking style of batting.
His aggressive fearlessness would translate perfectly to Twenty20, producing a high-risk, high-reward style.
The Master Blaster’s ability to drive the ball and his use of the hook shot would both benefit from the shorter boundaries of Twenty20.
24 centuries and 45 fifties in Test cricket prove (if there was any doubt) that Richards would be devastating in the shortest format.
His incredible fielding ability adds the cherry on top.
Teupoko Autupuna: “The master blaster Viv Richards all day long.”
Darren McKeon: “He would would dominate T20 cricket.”
Ben Conkey: “He’s the obvious choice. Just imagine what damage he could do with a modern bat and shorter boundaries!”
It simply wouldn’t be a list without the greatest batsman of all-time.
The Don boasted a batting average of 99.94 across 52 test matches, with 29 centuries.
A modern bat, better protective equipment, and shorter boundaries would’ve ensured Bradman would acclimatise perfectly to Twenty20 cricket.
The idea of Bradman’s style adapting to Twenty20 is intriguing, as he rarely hit the ball in the air.
Chris Felice: “The Don didnt have to hit the ball in the air. 618 fours in 80 Test innings.
Made 100 six times in a session in Test cricket and made 309 in a day’s play.
Not to mention what he did in first class cricket and don’t forget the small feat of hitting 100 in three overs (8 ball overs)
He would have smashed it, give him a modern bat, a thigh pad , a helmet,covered pitches and rules which favour batsman, he would have destroyed it!”
Keith Miller was arguably Australia’s greatest all-rounder.
His Test statistics include a batting average of 36.97 across 55 Tests. Miller’s classy, yet big-hitting style would transfer perfectly to the Twenty20 game.
His front-foot game would prove devastating, as it did in Test cricket. Miller’s unpredictable style of play would also adapt perfectly to the shorter Twenty20 game, and his ability to switch things up would certainly frustrate opponents.
Miller was also a great bowler, and he would be likely to completely change the attack of the opposition, purely due to the uncertainty and unpredictability of Miller’s next move.
Miller was also a fine fielder, and all of these attributes would set him up as one of the best players in the Twenty20 game.
Dean Jones is an obvious choice for this list, not due to his successful Test career, but more due to his outstanding ODI career.
Jones had a Test batting average of 46.55 in 52 Test matches as well as an ODI batting average of 44.61 in 164 matches.
His sustained success as a batter in ODI cricket is proof that Jones would succeed in Twenty20 cricket.
Bruce Bailey: “Toss up between Dean Jones & Michael Bevan. They were ODI legends, and their style of play lends itself to the shorter version.”
Sir Ian Botham is one of the game’s greatest-ever all-rounders, and played a style which would’ve adapted perfectly to the Twenty20 style.
Beefy had a Test average of 33.54 with a top score of 208.
It would’ve been interesting to see how Botham’s aggressive style would’ve adapted to Twenty20 cricket.
Botham was also one of the game’s great swing-bowlers. He took 383 Test wickets for a bowling average of 28.40.
Botham’s fearlessness as a fielder would also adapt well to the Twenty20 game, where spectacular fielding displays are often lauded as much as big knocks and stunning wickets.
Jason King : “He was unorthodox but very effective in tests and one-dayers. Can only imagine what he would do now.”
Who would make your list? Let us know in the comments below.
Jeremy Brown
Roar Pro
Yes, I think they did have four. And there was a Max zone down the ground which doubled the runs scored to encourage hitting straight.
JohnB
Guest
The declaration was because bonus points were earned up to 65 overs - you got a bonus point for every 25 runs over 150 up to 65 overs. Your opponents got a bowling point for each 2 wickets taken in that period. Thus declaring at 7-250 after 64.7 overs was pretty much textbook captaincy at the time (especially given they'd lost the first day to rain)! Very common for teams to declare at 9 down (as Qld did) just to deny the other team a point if they thought they were unlikely to get another batting point themselves. It's between Chappell and Ponting for the best Australian batsman I've seen by the way.
Tim Carter
Roar Pro
Garfield Sobers, Jonty Rhodes, Mark Waugh, Imran Khan, Arjuna Ranatunga
Larry1950
Guest
Yep, there to see that & GC took nsw apart. In my side I'd like Malcolm Marshall & Graeme Pollock.
Wal
Roar Guru
Brian Lara Jonty Rhodes Kapil Dev Would love to have seen more of Gilly and Symonds
Wal
Roar Guru
Father and Son Lance and Chris Cairns would have been awesome to watch. Nathan Astle, if you have any doubts check out the second 100 runs in the fastest ever 200 he scored. It came off 39 balls that's only 4 balls more than the fastest 100 in T20 cricket. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE8q2l2gRAk
Big Bird
Guest
Shane Warne Mike Hussey Dean Jones Clive Loyd Adam Gilchrist Merv Hughes Sachin Tendulka Glen McGrath Nathan lyon Mark Taylor Steve Waugh Matty Haden
Qlder, qlder
Guest
Yep, Sobers was the player who popped straight into my mind. He would've been incredible at 20-20.
Qlder, qlder
Guest
Dougy Walters sure paid for the crappy declaration. I remember watching it on tv as a 9 year old kid. Unbelievable batting by Chappell who I still believe is the greatest Aussie batsman apart from Bradman.
El Loco
Roar Rookie
How awesome as well that there were near enough to 4000 people at the ground to see it.
Alex
Guest
Mark Waugh would have been a star
Bakkies
Guest
Dennis Lillee and let him bat with an aluminium bat.
Pilferer
Guest
Mark greatbatch
Gordon Smith
Guest
Hanse Cronje would also have been great despite the comments that may follow
The Barnes family.
Guest
Was that the one with four stumps? I loved that!
The Barnes family.
Guest
Saw the guy once a while ago, just as he left the cricket playing world. The sexiest man I ever saw, by a long way.
Arwin
Guest
"The" Navjot Singh Sidhu.. would add so much to the T20 game... Javed Miandad won't fare badly either
Rod
Guest
100% Sobers would be at the top of the list. He would have been a sensation at 20/20 crocket, fielding. batting and bowling the complete package. These guys did play at the back end of there Careers. But Gilly and Haydos would have been devastating in late 90's to mid 2000. M Waugh, Walters, G Shappell, . I reckon Michael Bevan would have killed it as well
Gordon Smith
Guest
Geoff Boycott - though you never know - Bancroft and Renshaw seem decent in 20/20
John Erichsen
Roar Guru
Actually, his batting partners suggest he was the best quick single taker of the last ball of an over they had ever seen. They would bat for 30 minutes without facing a ball, while GP hit multiple fours and then raced a single on the last ball of the over. I guess not needing to run earlier in the over, left him with energy for one explosive burst on the 8th ball of the over.