What qualities do we want in our Australian athletes?

By Ryan O'Connell / Expert

In the wake of the ball-tampering fiasco involving the Australian cricket team, it’s become popular to talk about what type of athletes we want representing us on the national stage.

As a country that prides itself not just on its sporting accomplishments, but the manner in which our athletes conduct themselves, the fallout and shame from what happened in South Africa has been intense.

The much over-used term ‘un-Australian’ has been bandied about, as has the equally worn out ‘hard, but fair’ line, both indicating that there are a certain set of values that Australians like our athletes to exhibit, or indeed, that the athletes themselves want to exhibit.

Yet to be brutally honest, both those phrases – and these ‘values’ in general – are a little vague and ambiguous.

Though it’s become abundantly clear, if it wasn’t already, that ‘not cheating’ is a non-negotiable.

AP Photo/Halden Krog

I obviously can’t, nor should I, talk for the entire nation. What can I outline is the characteristics, qualities and behaviours that I like to see in the sportspeople that represent our great country.

As ever, it’s always best if you have actual examples, and for me, the (green and) gold standard when it comes to representing Australia is the 1999 World Cup-winning Wallabies.

Have a quick look at the squad that defeated France in the final at Cardiff:

Matt Burke
Ben Tune
Dan Herbert
Tim Horan
Joe Roff
Stephen Larkham
George Gregan
Toutai Kefu
David Wilson
Matt Cockbain
John Eales
David Giffin
Andrew Blades
Michael Foley
Richard Harry

Jeremy Paul
Dan Crowley
Mark Connors
Owen Finegan
Chris Whitaker
Jason Little
Nathan Grey

Now that’s a collection of players I’m proud to call Australian. What a line-up.

AAP photo Dean Lewins

As team, and as a bunch of individuals, I couldn’t ask for more when it comes to embodying our national spirit. Those 22 men provide everything I’m looking for.

Respectful, classy, hard, talented, and with a just little bit of cheek.

Respectful: I want individuals that show respect. Respect for the opposition, referees and officials, rules, traditions, history, fans, past players, the sport itself, and – above all – for the nation they’re representing.

Classy: I want individuals who exude some class. Those that behave as if they’re not above the game or the fans. Those that exhibit sportsmanship. And yes, ‘not cheating’ is certainly an attribute of those that are deemed ‘classy’.

Hard: I do enjoy when Australians show toughness, especially in the face of adversity. Playing through injury or fatigue – or overcoming some type of hardship – is not always all that smart in the long run, but it still impresses me. I like the opposition to know they’re in for a fight, no matter the circumstances or the score, and I especially love it when Aussies get called ‘scrappy’ or even ‘rough’. As long as it’s not ‘dirty’.

Talented: I don’t think there is a fan anywhere in the world, in any sport, that doesn’t want their athletes to be talented, so this isn’t a uniquely Australian thing. But yes, I do want to see skilful and gifted practitioners of their particular sport, who are ultra-competitive, and put themselves in the best place to actually win.

A little bit of cheek: Lastly, but no less important, I do want to see people that echo our national personality. Australians, by and large, enjoy a laugh, often at their own expense. They are larrikins. They are cheeky. They do enjoy a little bit of banter. Ensuring such ‘talk’ doesn’t cross the line into abuse, or isn’t incongruent with the previously mentioned values, is vital, but I also don’t want to see robots that lack personality.

On that last point, there is one classic example that highlights how you can have a little bit of cheek, without being a dickhead (although I freely admit these things can get a little subjective).

In the waning minutes of the 2003 World Cup semi-final against the All Blacks, with Australia in control of the scoreboard, halfback George Gregan reminded New Zealand that they would – once again – have to wait to taste World Cup glory, by uttering the now-famous words at rival halfback Byron Kelleher: “Four more years, boys! Four more years, boys!”

I loved it. I still love it. Yes, it is sledging, but I don’t think it’s abusive, and I don’t think it’s personal or crosses any ‘line’. It’s a well-aimed barb, it’s bloody cheeky, and it’s very much Australian.

Another Aussie who ticked all my boxes was basketballer Lauren Jackson.

Athletes certainly don’t come more talented, as evidenced by her recently being named by ESPN as the 13th most dominant athlete in the world over the last 20 years. That’s a truly incredible achievement, but it’s thoroughly deserved.

‘LJ’ was tough as nails, but always maintained a wonderful humility. She also certainly had some of that famous Aussie cheek.

An incident that perfectly encapsulated all of Jackson’s tremendous qualities occurred in the women’s basketball gold medal game at the Sydney 2000 Olympics between the Australian Opals and Team USA.

Proudly representing her country and squaring off against fierce rival Lisa Leslie, Jackson’s hand got caught in Leslie’s hair extensions, and she ‘yanked’ (boom tish) the American’s fake hair out.

The feud between the two lasted for years, and Leslie never forgave Jackson for the incident. Not that Jackson cared. Here is what she said in 2003:

“She needs to get over it… talk about girly. I still haven’t had a conversation (with her). I don’t think I would, as a normal person anyway. If you’re going to wear fake hair… it’s going to fall out at some stage.”

Legend.

There are many other examples, across many other sports, that epitomise everything I value in Aussie athletes, and I’m sure Roarers will have their own, but if everyone who donned Australian colours could be like the 1999 Wallabies and Lauren Jackson, I’d certainly be proud to have their represent this great country.

The Crowd Says:

2018-04-05T23:30:37+00:00

John R

Roar Guru


What did he do during the McKenzie saga?

2018-04-05T15:00:05+00:00

Zane

Guest


Good on ya Izzy

2018-04-05T10:32:27+00:00

Ex force fan

Guest


Enough motivation to throw the game...Clyne is definitely the weakest link and does not have the situational awareness to resign.

AUTHOR

2018-04-05T05:43:08+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


John, you're embarrassing yourself, and have now resorted to little pot shots, which are so lame, that they're actually quite amusing. It also shows your true colours: in the absence of being able to construct any semblance of a solid argument, you just start "throwing stones". Poor comprehension? Subjective opinion? No ability to confirm or deny from the source? Below are facts, which are easy to comprehend, not subjective, and confirmed as being from the source himself: – Folau said he would vote “No” to same sex marriage plebiscite, thereby attempting to deny gays the right to get married. – When asked what God’s plan was for gays, Folau replied “HELL”. Facts. Don't lazily blame "modern journalism" just because you have a different opinion; one based on extremely flimsy foundations. If any foundations at all.

2018-04-05T05:11:40+00:00

Markus

Guest


I have not had an opportunity to listen to the podcast where it is discussed further with the man, but Jeremy Paul was a heavy drinker throughout his playing career and wore his ability to get through training sessions severely hungover (and likely still drunk at times) as a badge of honour. I am assuming Sheriff was just using Tune as another example that came as a shock to the public when he opened up about it later in life, whereas nowadays his struggle may have played out in the media in a similar way to someone like Buddy Franklin.

2018-04-05T04:36:00+00:00

aussikiwi

Guest


PeterK, "PC" is just a meaningless pejorative label used by those who want to virtue signal in a right wing direction.

2018-04-05T04:24:45+00:00

Ouch

Guest


So, what does the young, gay, impressionable rugby player think when he hears Izzy say that? A 12 year old kid who is already bullied by his peers constantly because of his sexuality. He hears his Hero say he should go to hell because of who he is (through no fault of his own), he already gets constantly bullied for it...............where does that lead? Depression, self harm and eventually an attempt at suicide? Izzy should keep his trap shut, even if asked a loaded question like that. Who knows how many people could, or will be, affected by his statement. Everyone can have an opinion. Doesn't mean it should be expressed.

2018-04-05T04:22:38+00:00

aussikiwi

Guest


You dont think that telling young gay people they should not be allowed to marry, are living a life of sin, and will go to hell, is harmful? And no, the comparison is not invalid. If a muslim sportsperson tweeted that god would reward those who fought and killed the infidels, that would be no different to what Folau did. But no doubt there would be hell to pay from the anti virtue signallers.

AUTHOR

2018-04-05T04:00:38+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


Haha! So correcting a spelling mistake on a comment underneath an article proves your point on "modern journalism"? That's your "bedrock"? Sorry John, you made no point, and had no point to begin with.

2018-04-05T03:58:07+00:00

aussikiwi

Guest


PeterK it seems you have changed your position. You now define 'virtue signalling' as responding to those with whose views you disagree with labels rather than argument. Completely different to your original definition that related (surprisinglly enough) to the purpose of the signaller - ie demonstrating one's piety/virtue to others. Sometimes rational debate with racists or homophobes is possible and appropriate. Most of the time it is impossible. That doesn't mean calling them for what they are is wrong. In Folau's case, it is disingenuous to pretend he is not homophobic. Presumably he believes the teachings of his particular god? Therefore he believes gay people are morally deficient, sinful, and will go to hell unless they repent.

2018-04-05T03:00:20+00:00

John

Guest


You’re* just emphasises my point.

AUTHOR

2018-04-05T02:57:11+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


And I expect, respect and welcome the return barb!

AUTHOR

2018-04-05T02:54:43+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


John, you are clutching at straws, to put it mildly. Izzy made those comments. That is fact. You can't deny them. You're "modern journalism" comment just highlights that you have no bedrock to fall back on.

2018-04-05T02:38:43+00:00

Hoy

Roar Guru


Ha ha. Fair enough... I agree, the "4 more years" call is actually pretty good, and why would you say it at the start of the game? Of course he will say it when the game is beyond doubt. As for the send off from bowlers, there are some OTT versions getting around lately... but this is the issue with being a batsman... you can slog a bowler out of the ground all day, but the minute you get out to him for 300, he still got you out, and has the power over you in that instant. It's funny that people look at things in isolation, only one sided... The Aussie cricket team is always looked at in isolation. The dreadful, "sledging", cheating, Aussie cricket team, like no one else is sledging, no one else is ball tampering etc... People are looking at Gregan's comment in isolation. Things are happening in that game... If you look at Phil Kearns giving the forks in isolation, it looks dreadful. If you look at it as a rookie being verballed by a well known veteran captain (which isn't bad either), and the rookie finally gets a chance to have his response, then it in itself is fantastic! What do I want in my team? Or Aus athlete? Fairness, toughness, unrivalled dedication to the competition (think Webcke still hitting it up in the last minute in a losing team!), good blokeness (for either sex).

2018-04-05T02:27:18+00:00

P2R2

Roar Rookie


...It’s a well-aimed barb, it’s bloody cheeky, and it’s very much Australian.... maybe the reposte by the ABs is that the BC remains with NZ, and the WBs have only beaten the ABs twice in the past 5 years....a well aimed barb back matey

2018-04-05T02:25:26+00:00

Wal

Roar Guru


Sheek I think a lot of people saw it as a line in the sand moment. Both for ball tampering, i.e. all punishments going forward should be 6-12 months. And for the on-field behaviour that has never sat right with a lot of spectators and needed to change

2018-04-05T02:22:52+00:00

piru

Roar Rookie


Oh yes all the time, apparently empathy is for beta losers like myself

2018-04-05T02:22:22+00:00

Wal

Roar Guru


I think the written nature of the internet has a lot to contribute to this as well PK Nuance and subtly are often lost in a short post. Without writing a full-blown essay it can be very easy to misinterpret a point of view as hardlined. I copped this a fair bit on the Ball Tampering saga, firstly my opinion was derided as a Kiwi and secondly, I felt the punishment should be harsh to any offender going forward. Sometimes the important point of ANY offender was lost in the noise.

2018-04-05T02:17:37+00:00

piru

Roar Rookie


I have little time for people who cling to dogma and when challenged get emotional and then proceed to attack personally. In my experience this applies to both left and right extremes. Agree 100% - funnily enough I have made a similar statement in the past and been accused of virtue signalling

2018-04-05T02:15:32+00:00

Wal

Roar Guru


You missed snowflake as well Piru

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar