He’s one of the most fearless and courageous leaders modern football has ever seen, and the media rightfully acknowledges this on a regular basis.
Joel Selwood is a superstar, there’s no question. But there’s a darker side to the six-time All Australian.
We can all thank Joel Selwood for introducing, and mastering, a shameful practise widely used throughout todays AFL.
Umpires can easily tell the difference between a genuine high tackle, and a tackle where a player has ducked his head to draw the high contact. But the line becomes blurred when it comes to Selwood and his copycats.
Lowering his knees to reduce his body height, Selwood knows when the tackle is coming, and as soon as the tacklers arms wrap around his own arms, he raises his shoulder, subsequently causing the tackling players arm to slide down and wrap around Selwood’s neck rather than his torso.
Given he hasn’t blatantly ducked his head into the tackler’s body, umpires are forced to rule this a high tackle.
It is technically not cheating, but it is certainly not in the spirit of the game.
Players such as Rhys Mathieson, Toby McLean and Luke Shuey have all followed suits, and the technique is now common.
Mathieson, a young Lion who only debuted in 2016, immediately copped a bad reputation for using the high contact technique almost every time he was tackled. Paul Puopolo was also guilty, before making an effort to reduce his reliance on this element of his game, in order to avoid the bad reputation.
So why is Selwood held in such regard within the media despite being the pioneer of a widely disliked technique?
Jon Ralph was quick to pounce on Toby McLean on the weekend via Twitter, claiming he “has to get the duck and raised-arm out of his game,” adding that it is “milking free kicks” and that it labels players “with a perception that is hard to get rid of even when you stop it.”
Ralph didn’t quite target Selwood in the same way after Easter Monday’s game, merely decalaring the obvious – that it is very hard to tackle him.
Selwood is in the highest tier of elite midfielders in the competition. Yet other players who are brilliant at evading tackles and disposing of the ball prior to contact, make Selwood’s tactics look like a cop out. He can’t be that good in traffic if he has to draw free kicks to save himself.
A prime Gary Ablett or Sam Mitchell would have the skill to get off a clean disposal to a teammate, in a high-pressure situation with opposition tacklers a bearing down on them.
Dustin Martin prefers to use his brute strength to fend off his opponents, a stunning (and legal) move. Whereas Joel Selwood prefers to use his strength to raise his shoulders and force his tacklers arms around his neck. The Dusty method is a brilliant and famous part of our game. The Selwood method needs to go.
During the recent Easter Monday classic between the Cats and the Hawks, Ryan Burton attempted to lay a tackle on Selwood midway through the opening quarter. Selwood, clearly unaware of his surroundings, quickly realised he was in hot water, and resorted to his usual method. As always, free kick Selwood.
In his usual, fiery state, James Sicily let Joel know that he was not happy with his behaviour, shoving him to the ground and conceding a fifty-metre penalty. Ironically, Sicily has been known to use this free kick drawing method himself, though far less frequently, preferring to use his precision kicking to escape danger.
Later, Sicily does what not many men can do, and lays a legal, perfect tackle on Selwood. Clearly upset that he couldn’t milk a free kick for himself out of it, Selwood decides to grab Sicily’s legs and not allow him to pursue the ball.
Unable to break free, Sicily drops his knee in Selwood’s face and cops a week off for it from Michael Christian, the MRP officer.
Mark Robinson, chief AFL reporter for the Herald Sun, voiced his outrage, underwhelmed by the ban. He called for it to be longer, and disregarded the fact that Selwood had it coming for not letting go of Sicily as “rubbish.”
Well, Selwood did have it coming. Sicily didn’t need to drop his knee into Selwood’s head, and the-week ban he received for it is fair. But it certainly should not be any longer than a week. It was graded as intentional, and low impact. Both are correct judgements.
He did not drive his knee into Selwood’s head. He just dropped it. That’s what happens when someone is holding onto your legs and impeding your balance. Sicily will sit out against Richmond, an important clash for Hawthorn. But he does not deserve to miss any more football than that.
And the tension all stemmed from the original incident after Ryan Burton’s legal tackle against Selwood was milked into an illegal one.
Sicily overreacted, but he clearly shares the frustration of thousands of fans.
Joel Selwood’s method of drawing high contact has had a negative impact on our game. It shows a lack of ability to prevail in high-pressure situations, and it is exploiting a grey area in the rules.
For the sake of his reputation, Joel Selwood should put an end to this practise.
Jack
Guest
Most of this is on the umpires He still flops and bends, the rules are clarified now - it should never be a free kick, but they still pay it. For me, as soon as the flop or bend fails - whistle, Holding the Ball. The attempt to milk the free is his prior opportunity - a decision he made instead of disposing of the ball
Jack
Guest
I'd have no problem with Selwood flopping if he was penalised for holding the ball when the flop fails to win him a free kick. Raising your arm, dropping your knees, throwing your head back are all decisions made instead of disposing of the ball - prior opportunity. My frustration rises when he attempts to milk a free, the ump doesn't fall for it, and he gets tackled to ground or the ball spills out - it MUST be holding the ball but rarely is paid
spud-953
Guest
Smart player no in the first five to ten minutes what is allowed or not
Barb
Guest
The amount of free kicks paid that are questionable throughout each game played each and every round are frustrating to say the least. The rules are complicated, inconsistent and Umpires are clearly confused at times. I see game after game players from all teams test the boundaries to claim an advantage and many are exceptional at mastering these techniques. Surely it is up to the AFL and Umpires Association to clarify where the boundaries lay. Some players gain metres over the mark, some hold, some throw the ball (and frequently) and are also very good at disguising these traits. Until our Umpires are told to ping all of these ongoing tactics (all players ... not just target some) in this precious world of AFL the more clever thinkers will gain an advantage. Also remember Umpires are not perfect. However to be singling out Joel Selwood and labelling him as a Cheat because he is smarter than the average tackler is incorrect. If his technique is wrong then he would be penalised by the Umpires of this game. Players are playing the game to the Umpires whistle so stop the finger pointing because your pointing the wrong way.
Pelican
Guest
You are right there. He carries on like a pork chop if he doesn't get his way.
dave
Guest
When the Aussie cricket team went the underarm delivery they weren't breaking any rules and good on them. If there is a loophole in the laws of your sport take it.
Bangkokpussey
Roar Rookie
The tall poppy syndrome is alive and well. Geelong has been quite successful for a long period of time,despite the lowest number of home games, the least number of high draft picks they have managed to stay one of the top teams for many years.Their success has unfortunately been the source of envy which seems to manifest itself into almost hatred from some supporters. Some comments are really bordering on juvenile" I dont like watching Geelong because Selwood ducks". If Selwood is doing something wrong he should be penalised. Apparently this is a blight on the game but back punching, jumper holding, kneeing players on the ground, 2 players "roughing up" a mid or forward to put him off his game and a myriad of other nasty little tactics is OK. It probably wouldn't be an issue if Selwood wasn't the champion player he is. The standard opposition retort,"he is only good because the umpire protects him", is wishful thinking borne of prejudice and envy. If Clarko is so worried about fairness he should tell the AFL the Hawks will play all their home games against Geelong at Kardinia park for the next 10 years, including finals. If free kicks are the issue and if my memory is correct, Geelong had the most free kicks against in 2016 and the second most frees against in 2017. Hardly the umpires friend.
dave
Guest
Making a good lamb curry is harder work and there is a risk it won't turn out the way you wanted. Chicken parmy is easy and delivers results every time,its almost like cheating.
User
Roar Rookie
Not if you pin the wrist
Don Freo
Guest
But people who remember Selwood for that obviously don't understand what a footballer he was. In short, they don't understand footy and therefore, their opinion is of little consequence.
Sam Staunton
Roar Rookie
Thanks Aransan! I agree, superstar, so no need for a cop out tactic.
Sam Staunton
Roar Rookie
If players go for his waist, then his arms are free and he can easily dispose of it?
Sam Staunton
Roar Rookie
100% agree. He's such a classy footballer, he shouldn't have to need to do this. But he'll always be remembered for it. So many people who I watch the footy with see another player doing it, and say "he's done a Selwood."
Sam Staunton
Roar Rookie
Good point, it also a responsibility of the AFL to do their bit to remove this from our game.
Sam Staunton
Roar Rookie
I acknowledged that Selwood is a superstar, a brilliant leader, and in the highest tier of midfielders in the competition. I also acknowledged that what Selwood does is not cheating, and thus permitted under the rules of the game. And finally, I acknowledged that Sicily deserved punishment for what he did. However, to argue that just because what Selwood does is technically legal that it is completely innocent is incorrect. Like I've said, it shows a lack of skill to be able to escape a high pressure situation.
DB
Guest
There were over 20 frees missed that day. What's that got to do with anything
Thatsashame
Guest
Spot on mike! People have commented on poppy etc and for good reason. Selwood simply gets more free kicks because he goes in for the ball more than the others. The guy is a champ and everyone else looks stupid because as pendles said....tackle him properly then! So many haters. And for the record....im a bombers man, not cats. But I know a champ when I see one.
Mattthew White
Roar Rookie
Way to stop Selwood & the other 'duckers' would be to stop them getting the ball first?? Anyone addressed that issue...?
Paul D
Roar Guru
The first 8 are Dangerfield and Josh Kennedy from various seasons, then Martin and Priddis to round out 9 and 10.
DB
Guest
How is it cheating when he isn't breaking any rule?