A wishlist for AFLW season 2019

By Joel Shepherd / Roar Guru

Here’s a list of things the AFLW needs to do differently next year.

More games
Seven rounds isn’t enough. For elite athletes who could be playing other sports, a 45-week offseason is pushing it, and a relatively minor three-week injury like Katie Brennan’s ankle ends up costing her (and the fans) half the season.

Whether the season expands backwards into summer, forwards into the men’s football season, or sideways into an alternative dimension, it must expand eventually and there’s no time like the present.

Next season the number of teams increases by two, so there’s the obvious place to start. And also, the competition desperately needs…

A semi-final round
A final two in a ten team competition would be silly, for obvious reasons. Already the final round this season felt like a lottery, with so many teams crammed so close together in the short season, teams were missing out by percentage and random events rather than because they were demonstrably ‘better’ or ‘worse’.

Sporting competitions are supposed to be about discovering who the best teams and players are. The Bulldogs were clearly the best, but however well the Lions played this season, an argument could be made (particularly by Giants and Demons fans) that they were not demonstrably the second best team in the comp.

Also, the AFLW desperately needs more high-profile games that feel like ‘events’ to whip up public interest and create those all-important emotional bonds between fans and clubs — there aren’t enough of them at the moment, so more finals ought to be a no-brainer.

But in order to fit in all these extra games, the AFLW also needs…

(Photo by Adam Trafford/AFL Media/Getty Images)

A new TV deal
The AFLW needs a television partner with an active interest in seeing the competition expand. At present, that partner is not Channel Seven, because seven has the tennis on earlier in summer, and the AFL later into autumn and winter, and wants as little competition as possible for both of them.

But Channel Nine has just bought the tennis for the next five years, starting in 2020, so Seven now has a gaping hole in its summer sports programming from that date. Thus it probably makes sense for the AFLW to stay with Seven for now, given that Seven ought to be properly receptive to the idea of a summer expansion, and might even show some interest in promoting the games.

But next season will probably be a squeeze if they do stay, because every team playing each other once, plus a semi-finals round, will add three weeks to the league, putting its starting date one week before the Australian Open.

In the same vein, the AFLW have to stop being scared of competition. Trying to find ‘clear air’ for the league’s early years was a good idea, but pretty soon the notion of clear air will disappear from the summer sporting landscape.

Channel Ten’s Big Bash is expanding into tennis and AFLW territory, Australian basketball is newly resurgent, and many others have no intention of letting women’s football rise unchallenged.

The AFLW lately has said the women’s game is drawing its own unique audience, many of whom don’t necessarily watch the AFL.

If so, there’s no reason the women’s game couldn’t eventually start expanding into the men’s season — something that a network other than Channel Seven would be more interested in accommodating.

But there’s two ways to watch footy — on TV or at the ground, and if the latter experience is to improve, some real movement will have to occur in…

Better football grounds
Next year, the Bulldogs, Carlton, Fremantle, Geelong, Adelaide and maybe GWS will all have home grounds adequate for the current AFLW competition (though some in serious need of renovation).

Collingwood, Melbourne, North Melbourne and Brisbane will not. Solving the problem is complicated, and will depend on state government funding for improving second-tier grounds suitable for AFLW and other below-AFL-level games.

Queensland’s government appear likely to support the Lions’ request for funding a second-tier football ground in Brisbane, and the Victorian government talks endlessly about rationalising the stadium situation in Melbourne, but nothing is concrete yet.

It’s nice that the AFLW plays matches in regional centres, too, but at some point the competition has to decide whether it’s an elite professional competition or a bush league. Hastening that decision, I think, will be the much-needed shift to…

Ticketed games
This isn’t just about revenue. Of course, if the Bulldogs (for example) were charging $10 a head with free entry for kids and concession to EJ Whitten Oval, they might make an extra $60,000 per home game — no small thing in a league where the average player only makes about $10,000.

But it’s also about getting the big crowds to places like Ikon Park, because counter-intuitively, free entry has resulted in disappointing crowds to a pair of Season Two matches that should have been bigger — the season opener, and the Grand Final.

No tickets meant that fans couldn’t reserve a seat, and memory of that infamous Season One lockout actually hurt attendance, because fans knew there was a chance they’d miss out.

To ensure they’d get in, they’d have to turn up hours early, and when it’s raining on Grand Final day, plenty decided not to bother, ruining Nicole Stevenson’s hopes of a ‘great atmosphere’.

If fans could get a ticket, they’d be guaranteed a seat in the spot they wanted (under cover on a rainy day), and ten bucks is a small price to pay for not wasting your afternoon, or getting soaked on the fence.

Plus, of course, there’s the revenue mentioned above. Those revenue concerns would increase pressure from clubs currently without decent home grounds, because if the Dogs are pulling in sixty grand for each home game while the Demons are struggling to get twenty from Casey Fields, the need to move somewhere better will gain prominence in the minds of the Demons’ board… to say nothing of the Collingwood board.

That will mean more urgent lobbying in the Victorian Parliament, and an increased chance that something might actually happen.

And lastly, I can’t finish the article without adding one final plea to the AFLW administration…

(AAP Image/Joe Castro)

Don’t do anything stupid
Like waiting until after Round 1 to decide the congestion rules need to be changed, and to ensure it hits the media with all the calm and grace of a drunken Captain screaming that his ship is sinking.

If you have a problem with congestion, and want to introduce new rules to deal with it, do it sometime between now and the beginning of Season Three, and then leave it the hell alone.

Whether such rules are a good idea or not, we’ll have to wait and see — I doubt it, the league’s more aggressive teams this year finished higher up the ladder and the overly defensive ones finished lower, indicating that the women’s game may be evolving of its own accord and should be left alone to evolve some more.

But whatever — rules and gamestyle are the AFLW’s prerogative, and they can change them if they want. Just do it with a modicum of common sense this time, and that will be an improvement.

In addition to his interest in sport, Joel Shepherd is a professional Science Fiction author. You can read more by him here.

The Crowd Says:

2018-04-13T19:51:11+00:00

Matto

Guest


What crowd number would have had your tick of aproval? Afl games get less people when it's raining as well. Comparing afl grand final and aflw grandfinal is just dumb.

2018-04-13T19:47:57+00:00

Matto

Guest


Rubbish. The Australian womens soccer team got a total of over 30k to two friendly games last september, just days apart, one a midweek game.

2018-04-12T08:55:42+00:00

anon

Roar Pro


There was plenty of undercover seating at Princes Park as well. They're really clutching at straws. Early in the season they blame the weather for being too warm...

2018-04-12T04:49:31+00:00

I ate pies

Guest


Apparently that's different Anon. People want to watch women's footy; they just aren't willing to be uncomfortable to do it. It really shows the passion for the game...

2018-04-12T04:47:57+00:00

I ate pies

Guest


If we were really interested in women's footy they would have gone anyway. Rain certainly never stopped anyone from going to the AFL grand final, but don't harsh truths get in the way of excuses.

2018-04-12T03:39:32+00:00

anon

Roar Pro


The 2009 Grand Final was the last wet Grand Final and that had 99,000 people turn up with people spending hundreds sometimes thousands of dollars on tickets.

2018-04-12T02:13:50+00:00

Martin

Roar Rookie


Ideally the second season of the AFLW should have been ticketed to see what the crowd numbers were, only after this do you then consider whether the cake is big enough for expansion. Actually, if the trend line continues to slide then I wouldn't be surprised that in a few years time there might be only five teams, that is one team in each state.

2018-04-12T00:29:59+00:00

Wayne

Roar Guru


It was bucketing down rain on Grand Final day. Even mens attendance is way down when it is pouring rain.

2018-04-12T00:29:07+00:00

Wayne

Roar Guru


It was also bucketing down rain for the Grand Final, but don't let facts get in the way of a good narrative.

2018-04-11T21:37:43+00:00

I ate pies

Guest


"And so if there were more Victorian teams, it is thought that they would bring new supporters who’ve never watched live, any AFLW match."..I don't understand this thinking. People don't go to women's sports. It's a harsh but true reality that we've seen time and again across Australia. They might get a bit of a sugar hit when the teams first start, because people want to see their club jumpers running around, but then it'll be back to where it is now.

2018-04-11T21:27:10+00:00

I ate pies

Guest


I assume this comment is tongue in cheek. The cricket should always have right of way over the football at the MCG, the SCG and the Adelaide oval. They are, of course, cricket grounds that are used for footy.

2018-04-11T18:09:02+00:00

anon

Roar Pro


7,000 people to a Grand Final with free entry is a reality check for the AFL. At the moment the AFL is trying to market and promote AFLW as elite sport when it's anything but. You just have to watch women's soccer, basketball, netball, female gymnasts/track athletes/swimmers/etc at the Commonwealth Games to realise that the AFL is trying to insult our intelligence with the way they promote AFLW. It does the game and the players themselves a disservice in the longer term to promote AFLW as an elite competition worthy of national media coverage.

2018-04-11T13:27:43+00:00

Martin

Roar Rookie


Ben, you're right with regard to not expanding the number of teams. It's a worry for states that presently just have the one side, this is because their team is considered to be a proxy for a state team which is likely to split the crowd numbers in half. But Victorians have a different mind set, like for example at the AFLW Grand Final there were mostly only Bulldog supporters there. And so if there were more Victorian teams, it is thought that they would bring new supporters who've never watched live, any AFLW match. The Queensland government needs to give the Brisbane side a venue to play in the cooler evening, with lights. That's why they only receive three home games in their fixture.

2018-04-11T11:08:39+00:00

Ben

Roar Guru


It really blows my mind when I read stuff like this, where people seemingly have not the slightest concept of the business side of things like this. - Expanding the competition will make the already dwindling crowds thin out even more. - They are already winning with the tv deal they've got. Maybe the ABC or SBS might pick them up... - Are the QLD government really going to spend taxpayer money on a new ground just for the AFLW, when the AFLW will take 1387 years to earned back the $$$ the government invested. - Asking people to pay for something they will only watch for free will be another crowd killer. The reality is that the AFLW is a business that has already been handed more $$$, time and advertising than it's brand deserves. The AFL, sponsors and tv networks are all businesses that have a right to make $$$. Yes, by virtue signalling, they were willing to lose that $$$. But how long do you think these businesses will be prepared to throw their $$$ away? Who do you think is going to foot the bills for all the things you've mentioned here?

2018-04-11T10:53:26+00:00

Ben

Roar Guru


haha Look up the history of Australian Rules Football please? I will say no more...

2018-04-11T10:50:55+00:00

Ben

Roar Guru


Finally, some common sense!

2018-04-11T07:28:04+00:00

Martin

Guest


Why is it that cricket has been historically always piggybacking off the AFL? Is isn't about time that cricket developed their own venues. And how is it that cricket gets the naming rights for the MCG and the SCG, surely some historical naming error by our forebears. These acronyms should be changed to the MAFLG and the SAFLG to be more accurate.

2018-04-11T07:02:30+00:00

Cat

Roar Guru


You can eliminate the preseason 'competition' but it won't change the need for players to actually play real games before the season starts. Every year we go into the season with players underdone, blowing gales by halftime and rusty skills. Eliminate the practice games and that will only get worse and stretch beyond the first game or two and degrade the entire first month of footy. Only so much can be learned from intrasquad games where neither side wants to hurt their teammates and both sides know exactly how the other side will set up and play. Teams and coaches need that practice against 'outsiders'. Teams also need to get a look at first year players, just take a look at how many earned debuts already.

2018-04-11T06:22:21+00:00

AD

Guest


Some goals would be nice, too.

2018-04-11T06:12:11+00:00

I ate pies

Guest


Of course they want more for less. It's just not true about shortened careers; more players are playing longer than they ever have. The AFL would never go for cutting a month of revenue out of the comp. If anything, they'd tweak the byes to placate the AFLPA. They wouldn't shorten the season.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar