In psychology, learned helplessness is a depressive mental state in which an organism forced to bear aversive stimuli, or stimuli that are painful or otherwise unpleasant, becomes unable or unwilling to avoid subsequent encounters with said stimuli.
This is the case even if the stimuli are ‘escapable’, presumably because the organism has learned that it cannot control the situation.
Does this sound familiar, Roarers?
Basically, it means an animal, person or organisation assumes through previous experience it is helpless and cannot control the negative situations around it, so does little to avoid them in the present or future.
The term was notably used by former Australian Defence Department head Allan Hawke to describe the prevailing mindset in his department’s bureaucracy around the excruciating bungles that kept happening in major defence capability acquisitions that cost taxpayers billions of dollars.
I watched Raelene Castle’s Kick and Chase interview, in which she represented herself very well.
The questions from the panel covered the hot topics of Israel Folau, Quade Cooper, the 38-0 statistic against New Zealand teams, Andrew Forrest and the future of SANZAAR. While most parts of Castle’s responses were well weighted and considered, she did little to convince me that RA or its board had any answers to their challenges – or any sense of urgency to develop solutions.
In fact, it struck me that RA was, and has been for a long time, still locked in its own iron grip of learned helplessness. That includes the other state union members and nominated individuals who make up the RA board.
[latest_videos_strip category=”rugby” name=”Rugby”]
RA’s positions on Izzy, Quade, Twiggy, overseas player drain, and SANZAAR all show symptoms of an organisation that seems to believe it is powerless to do anything in situations that they perceive are beyond their control. And they keep ending up in these situations, especially when it comes to SANZAAR, where it seems the prevailing attitude is ‘we’ll just stay flex and go with the flow because we’ve been here before and nothing we do can change the situation anyway’.
That kind of helpless approach does not favourably shape any sort of outcome, nor fix the underlying decision-making structures that have resulted in negative decisions to shrink Australian rugby, isolate the grassroots, and pay millions to poach league stars or to pay high-profile players to not play Super Rugby.
There is clearly a pattern to RA’s behaviour and decision-making processes as an organisation that reinforces a learned helpless mindset. Until this is addressed, no CEO can do what they need to do.
As a life-long supporter of rugby in Australia, I almost yearn for the early John O’Neill days, when at least the ARU and its board members weren’t determinedly helpless passengers, but rather driving the situation instead of passively accepting it as beyond their control.
RA’s massively bureaucratic reaction to Forrest’s offers of grassroots assistance and his new competition exemplify the glacial pace RA now moves at as part of its learned helplessness, and that contributes to its struggle to manage and adapt to change. Why move quickly, decisively, and with agility when we ain’t got a hope anyway because SANZAAR and Fox are driving this bus, right? Twiggy who?
Can anyone believe that the New Zealand Rugby Union would be this passive, docile and slow in meeting the same challenges or opportunities? Heck no – and they haven’t been, which is why they are where they are now.
If Castle really wants to make an impression, she can call out this culture of learned helplessness in RA’s bureaucracy and start herding the cats to fix the organisation’s decision-making apparatus so it avoids short-term fixes and Australian rugby is proactively on the front foot again based on a sound vision.
There is not the luxury of aeons of time that it seems RA need to even address the most basic of issues. It is supposedly a competitive sports business now as we kept getting told, so stop acting like a big government bureaucracy and get on with urgently tackling the systemic issues crippling the game in Australia as a professional, competitive and agile organisation.
Maintaining a helpless, ponderous and unresponsive mindset is not an option for RA if it seeks to revive the game in this country.
Timbo (L)
Roar Guru
You need strong fanbases You need Strong Junior competitions You need strong Senior competitions You need elite pathways You need elite competitions. You need good coaches. You need money to stop other franchises and unions from draining your talent. You need to select players on Merit, not commercial image.
Timbo (L)
Roar Guru
Does that mean wee need to start calling the RA offices the Fortress of solitude?
Timbo (L)
Roar Guru
Depends on your definition of bankrupt. They are sure to be making a loss year in year out, But they are being bankrolled by the Victorian taxpayers instead of the ARU. All losses are secured.
Bakkies
Guest
Apart from getting charged down.
Ex force fan
Guest
They went bankrupt twice in 6 years, do there may be another year left.
Steiner
Roar Pro
Pretty sure John is talking about the NZ structures that have delivered dominance in test and super rugby in the last 5-6 years.
Steiner
Roar Pro
Agree he can only work within the teams playing style and Foleys kicking out of hand shows some improvement
Steiner
Roar Pro
Spot on CH!
Steiner
Roar Pro
Hi Hog didn’t mean to laud JON just that this bunch make him look good?
Steiner
Roar Pro
Cheers PK. As they say some birds prefer the safety of the cage to freedom?
Steiner
Roar Pro
I think you’ve completely missed the point Noodles but thanks for the feedback. And no I am not an RA board member.
Tooly
Roar Rookie
Byrne was a catching and kicking adviser with the ABs nothing more and Kafer is a commentator with a few ideas that emerge in constpated long winded dialogues . There’s nothing to be gleaned there . Rugby needs leadership in all areas of the game and my money would be on Andrew Forrest . Then let him fill the spaces created by a huge clean out .
richard
Guest
What issues did NZ have going into the 2007 RWC? They were easily the best team in the world at that time - it was solely down to Henry over-thinking it and going with the "rest and rotation" bs. NZR has been in a good place since Henry took over in 2004.
The Neutral View From Sweden
Roar Guru
+1
The Neutral View From Sweden
Roar Guru
Pretty sure it more or less looks the same in SA and NZ also. SR by itself is poor business and is only there as trial out for the Test teams. Problem is that RA, NZR, and SARU don't really want to give the SR teams a chance to be profitable. They think it is more important they are in control than actually make some money and give some power to the "people". It is like a story from feudal Europe in the 15th century. Rugby has over 150 years of history with an amazing international game, culture, brotherhood over the borders, passion. Instead of building on that, SANZAAR has only managed to back themselves into a corner and distanced themselves from regular fans and rugby people.
The Neutral View From Sweden
Roar Guru
No nation is bigger than the game in itself either.
Malo
Guest
You need a strong domestic comps . End of story, we have rued Mick the flick, Nathan greys ludicrous defence patterns. Gym academies. We need players to play strong rugby. Employ me ra, before Kafer, I’m a genius.
Jameswm
Guest
And footwork
Malo
Guest
Agree jokes, getting paid millions
PeterK
Roar Guru
yes that was very telling