Manly have come to the unlikely defence of the NRL following widespread criticism that Melbourne centre Curtis Scott’s two-match ban for striking was too lenient.
The NSW State of Origin hopeful on Monday pleaded guilty, accepting the match review committee’s suspension for punching Sea Eagles centre Dylan Walker on Saturday night.
Walker has been ruled out for six weeks with a fractured eye socket when Scott connected with one of his punches.
Some critics argued Scott should be sidelined for a similar time period.
After engaging in a running verbal battle with Walker all night, Scott lashed out at the Sea Eagles’ serial niggler and was sent off.
He copped a grade-three striking charge, but the angst over what was regarded as an inadequate ban was heightened because it was whittled down from three weeks to two weeks due to NRL rules.
Under the laws of the game, the number of fine points a player incurs is reduced for every minute off the field.
Because Scott was sent off with 28 minutes to go, his penalty dropped from three weeks to two.
However, Manly refused to join the pile-on and censure NRL CEO Todd Greenberg.
“There are rules and we’ve all signed up for those and we understand where they are,” Manly CEO Lyall Gorman told AAP.
“With these things there’s an appropriate protocol and process to go through.
“At the end of each year there’s a review of the structure and regulations and that’s the appropriate forum for it.”
Many pointed to the fact that Scott’s ban is the same length as the suspension which Canberra forward Joseph Tapine is facing, accusing the MRC of inconsistency.
Tapine was cited for a shoulder charge during the Raiders’ 25-18 loss to St George Illawarra.
Tapine collected Dragons fullback Matt Dufty in the 40th minute on Sunday and was issued with a grade-one charge, with an early guilty plea to reduce the penalty from 280 points to 210.
The NRL came in for widespread condemnation after Dylan Napa was not charged for a tackle which resulted in Brisbane’s Korbin Sims suffering a broken jaw.
Broncos coach Wayne Bennett accused the MRC of failing to exercise their duty of care and accused the game of having an anti-Brisbane bias.
Some also considered Manly hooker Api Koroisau got off lightly after he ran in to punch Scott from the side in the same melee.
Koroisau was given 10 minutes in the sin-bin and suspended for one week, with many considering his offence more serious than Scott’s.
Storm prop Nelson Asofa-Solomona accepted the $1,500 fine offered to him for a careless high tackle on Sea Eagles forward Jake Trbojevic.
Tapine’s Raiders teammate Josh Papalii has been offered a $1350 fine, if he pleads guilty to a careless high tackle charge, also on Dufty, in Sunday’s game
Joel Erickson
Roar Guru
No one deserves a broken eye socket.
steveng
Roar Rookie
All these disciplinary issues are just useless, sin bin here, 2 weeks there etc etc. The NRL has let our game become a jungle and a joke! Mouthing, mocking and back chatting, should all be treated as bad if not worst than a head high or any other infringement of the NRL laws,. The NRL laws should be changed, that no player(s) misbehave and/or do the following especially: 1) Backchat, swear or humiliate and intimidate a referee and/or another player. 2) Clap, jump up and down, when an opposing player/team makes a mistake (like its always seen and its very annoying) and humiliating to watch, it gives a very bad example of sportsmanship to our youngsters All these things make our game look bad, hasn't the NRL learned from the 'Australian Cricket' side, with Warner, Smith and Bancroft taught us anything? If all these things are stopped then what happened in the Manly vs Storm game wouldn't happen. Its been treated wrongly and Scott should have gotten more as should Dylan Walker for his continual 'niggling' on the field in most games! Simple solution!
Paul
Roar Guru
As the Manly officials said, the rules are what all Clubs agreed to play under this season and they will be reviewed come the end of the year. It doesn't make any difference whether a punch attracts 2 weeks and a shoulder charge attracts the same, them's the rules, at least for now!
Forty Twenty
Guest
Manly and the Storm have handled the fallout from the game with level heads and maturity. The same can't be said for plenty of others with their immature and incorrect law of the jungle mentality. The most important thing for me as a fan is that they send more players off for brutal illegal actions so the victim of the crime gets some recourse on the day. Great work by the ref for marching Scott and lets hope it happens more often from now.
The Barry
Roar Guru
It’s a bit of a lucky dip. Scott gets two weeks for a series of punches which left his opponent with a fractured eye socket. Napa gets zero weeks for a careless/reckless tackle that leaves an opponent with a fractured jaw. Tapine gets two weeks for a shoulder to shoulder contact that while illegal was done to stop Dufty regathering the ball not to injure him like the other two incidents. By all means make the shoulder charge illegal and rub anyone out who makes head contact but to put Tapine out for two weeks when there’s no head contact is ridiculous compared to these other two incidents.
Duncan Smith
Roar Guru
Yeah, cos even his team mates don't mind seeing Dylan's trash-talk rewarded like it should be.