Australia's World Cup qualification hopes in the balance after spirited draw with Denmark

By Daniel Jeffrey / Editor

Australia must win their final group stage game and hope other results go their way to progress to the knockout rounds of the World Cup after a 1-1 draw with Denmark.

It was a fine performance from the Socceroos, the side creating far more than in their last fixture, and while the result keeps their qualification hopes alive, it’s a case of an opportunity lost for Bert van Marwijk and his team.

That was clear in the manager’s post-match interview. “The disappointment is that out of two games we should have four points. We deserved it. We played very well,” van Marwijk said.

“They were afraid of us.”

Much like in Australia’s opening game against France, it was their opponents who started the game the stronger of the two sides, Denmark making the first forays into the Socceroos’ area.

Two early Christian Eriksen set-pieces were negotiated well enough, but the superstar Tottenham midfielder quickly showed he’s just as adept at finding the back of the net as he is delivering with a dead ball.

With seven minutes gone, a poor Aaron Mooy defensive header – perhaps the outstanding Mooy’s only mistake of the match – was unable to clear the Danish danger, and the bouncing ball soon found Eriksen following a savvy touch from striker Nicolai Jorgensen.

It was a tricky height, but the number ten made no mistake, rifling an immaculate volley past Mat Ryan before Australia’s keeper had the time to adequately react.

(Photo by Robert Cianflone/Getty Images)

But the early goal spurred Bert van Marwijk’s side into action. With Denmark more willing to drop back and defend the lead – although they were far from negative, with only a sharp save from Ryan preventing a Trent Sainsbury own-goal – the Socceroos made attacking in-roads.

Tom Rogic found himself on the ball far more frequently than against France, as did wingers Mathew Leckie and Robbie Kruse. The former of the two was immense throughout the match, putting in arguably his finest performance for the national side, while the latter faded as the game wore on.

But despite that, Kasper Schmeichel remained untested, and a goal never looked truly likely until the match’s moment of controversy.

Leckie rose highest to meet a Mooy corner, his header striking the raised arm of Yussef Poulsen. The contact was obvious but inadvertent and unintentional, the Danish winger having no time to pull his arm away. Despite initially waving play on, referee Antonio Mateu Lahoz took just seconds to point to the spot after VAR’s intervention.

Were it given against Australia, the uproar would be significant – it no doubt is in Denmark. Instead, it’s been seen as something of a much-deserved square-up following the decision which went against the side in the France match.

Mile Jedinak, ever reliable from the spot, made no mistake for the second game in a row, and the half-time scores were level.

(Photo by Maddie Meyer/Getty Images)

Having opened up as the first half, the game continued to do so in the second, the Socceroos enjoying the bulk of the chances – although the Danes had their fair share too.

But, forever a flaw of the side during the Ange Postecoglou era, Australia still lacks a lethal edge up front under van Marwijk. Mooy went close with a rasping long-range shot, Rogic forced a comfortable save from Schmeichel, and a rare positioning error from the keeper couldn’t be exploited thanks to a slightly errant Leckie cross.

Daniel Arzani’s early introduction added some life to the attack, the youngster doing superbly on one occasion to fight his way into the box when he had no right to, and forcing a sharp save from Schmeichel with minutes left on another. Any hype around Arzani’s potential – and whether he should be given a starting role – will only grow following his excellent performance off the bench tonight.

But Andrew Nabbout never really threatened, nor did his replacement, Tomi Juric, after Nabbout’s shoulder popped out and forced him from the field. Questions will be asked of van Marwijk’s preference for Juric over the unused Tim Cahill, who would have been more suited to capitalising on Australia’s plethora of crosses into the area.

Denmark too could not make the most of their attacks. A late volley from Eriksen – who was largely peripheral after opening the scoring – flashed wide, and minutes earlier Thomas Delaney wasted an excellent run with a horribly wayward cross.

They also had claims on a VAR-influenced penalty, or at the very least an inspection from the referee, after Andreas Cornelius was hauled down by Sainsbury on the corner of the box. Unlike in the first half, there was no intervention from the video assistants after play continued.

Perhaps, then, a draw was the oft-cliched ‘fair result’. But it does leave the Socceroos’ qualification hopes hanging by a thread, van Marwijk requiring a win against Peru and for France to defeat Denmark (assuming Les Blues defeat Peru later tonight) next week to get his side to the last 16.

The Crowd Says:

2018-06-22T06:10:23+00:00

chris

Guest


We hate it too. But we don't lecture people by saying "the reason I don't follow sokka"... Its like me saying "I don't like AFL because it lacks skill..."

2018-06-22T05:48:08+00:00

Cugel

Roar Rookie


Peruvians just need to keep their hands in their pockets and they have the game sewn up.

2018-06-22T02:33:31+00:00

Angela

Guest


Hello again sukkah fan AGO74 I noticed that too and noted that it can be done - if rarely - in men's sukkah, doesn't seem to happen in the women's game. But anyway...well done Aussies and Danes.

2018-06-21T23:35:55+00:00

The Phantom Commissioner

Roar Rookie


This talk of France and Denmark playing for a draw is very wide of the mark, France have an eye on winning the whole thing so they will want to go into the last 16 in top form. If we beat Peru the pressure on Denmark will be huge, they may want to play out a draw but that's a very dangerous game to play against France and the Danes have ridden their luck enough already at this World Cup.

2018-06-21T21:37:03+00:00

TwoLeftFeet

Guest


Gents, when Sisto went down clutching his face many would have gone close to turning it off if Australia hadn’t been playing. The referee awarded a free kick and replays showed no contact to the face at all. This is the sort of thing the casual observer hates.

2018-06-21T20:54:50+00:00

Ad-O

Guest


I wouldn't say that. I'd say we pressed and harried after they got over halfway and we won the ball back in midfield often. We also played fairly direct using the flanks and the keeper consistently kicked long from goal and out of hand. I can't remember us playing too many triangles in midfield or playing out from the back very much at all, but I only watched the game once so far.

2018-06-21T20:53:35+00:00

Waz

Roar Rookie


Kanga Just to disprove your theory, this from grazorblade over on 442: “dead rubbers from the last 3 world cups: 2006 Germany 3 Equador 0 England 2 Switzerland 2 Argentina 0 Netherlands 0 Portrugal 2 mexico 1 italy 2 czech 0 Japan 1 Brazil 4 spain 1 saudi 0 2010 Uruguay 1 mexico 0 Argentina 2 greece 0 Germany 1 Ghana 0 netherlands 2 cameroon 1 Brazil 0 Portrugal 0 2014 Brazil 4 cameroon 1 netherlands 2 chile 0 Columbia 4 japan 1 Costa rica 0 England 0 France 0 equador 0 Argentina 3 Nigeria 2 Germany 1 USA 0 Belgium 1 SK 0 So the group winner won 15 drew 5 when they were guaranteed progression. Top teams tend to improve as the tournament goes on and its easy to nick a result 1st or second game If we win we probably qualify” There’s a 3 to 1 chance the better side (France) will win ?

2018-06-21T20:48:01+00:00

Waz

Roar Rookie


It won’t be Maclaren. Juric was his preferred starter before injury so I’d say he’ll play safe and go with Juric. Should be Cahill imo, we need goals.

2018-06-21T20:44:06+00:00

Paul Nicholls

Guest


Who will start for Nabbout - Maclaren? Juric?

2018-06-21T20:38:49+00:00

chris

Guest


Clueless craig

2018-06-21T20:23:37+00:00

Waz

Roar Rookie


I hate to pick on one player but I’m going to pick on Kruse all the same. The legacy of Ange’s time (sadly for me anyway) is that certain players are picked on reputation not form and ability. Kruse is one of those. While Leckie was outstanding on one side and Arzani magnificent when he came on, Kruse was impotent .... again. Arzani has to start against Peru, he should have started v Denmark, as Australia have to find goals - two games suggests that’s not going to happen with Nabbout and injury at least forces a change there. Hopefully to Cahill, we need some predictability up front not more experimentation

2018-06-21T20:17:05+00:00

Waz

Roar Rookie


But we played possession based football v Denmark, and it was reasonably effective?

2018-06-21T20:13:41+00:00

Waz

Roar Rookie


I actually disagree with that. If Peru had of won they would have been really motivated for that last game, the fact they’re out is our best chance. France will be fearless as they’ve already qualifies and will want the win - they came here to win the tournament not limo out of the group.

2018-06-21T20:09:57+00:00

Waz

Roar Rookie


It’s head to head on the final group placing. As we lost to France we can’t finish above them on Goal Difference. Not that it matters now with frances win over Peru.

2018-06-21T17:12:13+00:00

Ad-O

Guest


Well done Socceroos! I have to say, this is vindication for those of us who have always been critical of Ange Postecoglou and his naive tactical set up. Australia doesn't have the right to play possession based football against world class opposition. We just don't have the talent on the pitch, and to believe anything else is dumb in the extreme. Van Marwyk has got this spot on and it's good to still be in with a chance at this stage if the competition.

2018-06-21T16:06:41+00:00

Dave Smith

Guest


Absolutely true. Just like Germany & Austria in 1978.

2018-06-21T15:22:59+00:00

Griffo

Roar Guru


Yep it's as simple as we need to beat Peru. Any other result doesn't matter for if we draw or lose.

2018-06-21T15:20:16+00:00

13th Man

Guest


Our best player was sitting on the pine when we desperately needed a goal but instead Van Marwijk brought on the spud Juric!

2018-06-21T14:56:18+00:00

Craig

Guest


Not a single dive? Hand over the crack pipe old son.

2018-06-21T14:54:04+00:00

AGO74

Guest


It has improved but it's still 44 years and 12 matches since our last clean sheet at a World Cup. This is a tough competition we are competing in.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar