You booze, you lose: Why the NRL must ban alcohol ads

By Penrith Punter / Roar Guru

The NRL has a problem. And it is afraid to admit it.

Earlier last week, a report released by La Trobe University found that on State of Origin nights there was a 40 per cent increase in domestic assault incidents and approximately a 70 per cent rise in non-domestic assaults.

Anabelle Daniels, CEO of Women’s Community Shelters, said: “I think there is such a strong sporting culture around the combination of alcohol and gambling and winning that can potentially be quite toxic in certain situations.”

The majority of reactions from the rugby league community were defensive, claiming it was inappropriate to target Origin specifically as contributing to the rise in violence.

They were right. State of Origin, and more generally rugby league, is not solely to blame. It is only a microcosm of what is a national issue. That does not mean, however, that nothing should be done about it.

Many people have dismissed the statistics because they unfairly portray rugby league as a breeding ground for violence and misbehaviour.

We know that, on the playing field, this could not be further from the truth. For every Matt Lodge, there is Trent Merrin, who dedicates his time to mentoring a program called Building Young Men, which helps troubled teenage boys find their way. Even Jackson Hastings, who has been condemned as the outcast at the Sea Eagles, is an active contributor to ‘Pass it on Clothing’, a charity which serves as a wardrobe station for the homeless.

However, the recent statistics should not be viewed as a criticism of our players. Nor should they be interpreted as an attack solely on rugby league. Rather, they should be seen by Greenberg as a call to action. A call to reduce alcohol advertising at rugby league games.

(Photo by Matt King/Getty Images)

Back in 2013, then Canterbury fullback Ben Barba was the poster boy for rugby league after carrying the Bulldogs to the 2012 Grand Final. The following year, he had fallen apart following a break-up with his long-time partner, with Greenberg admitting the star fullback was “ill and needs helps.”

The root of his problems, according to Greenberg, were alcohol and gambling.

Barba received counselling and the full support of the NRL. It is one of the things our game is good at – looking after those who go astray.

The Daily Telegraph’s Jessica Halloran recently wrote that players who assault their partners should be given life bans and forgotten by the NRL. Fortunately, Greenberg does recognise that these situations are far more fragile and should be handled with more care.

I certainly do not condone the behaviour of such players yet we should not exile them. Although Barba was never convicted, he was still given the time and professional help necessary so he would come back to the game a better and happier person.

I commend the NRL for support they offered players such as Barba in overcoming his issues with alcohol and gambling. Now it is time they do the same for both current and future fans of the game.

On Friday night, we witnessed a significant step in the progression of women’s rugby league. The women’s State of Origin match promoted equal opportunity and it should see the NRL’s fan base grow as a result. At the same time, studies such as the one conducted by La Trobe University will also leave women wondering whether rugby league is the supportive and welcoming sport it claims to be.

(Photo by Matt King/Getty Images)

Young families too may be cautious to embrace the game. According to a national poll commissioned by the Foundation for Alcohol Research and Education, nine in every 10 Australian parents oppose the high volume of alcohol advertising their children are exposed to during sports games.

This is not a problem facing just rugby league. However, if we are going to promote ourselves as a code, surely it makes more sense to change.

France, Russia and Denmark are just a few examples of countries who have successfully removed alcohol sponsorship from sport without any significant impact. Even here in Australia, leading sporting organisations such as the Football Federation of Australia, Basketball Australia and Netball Australia have agreed to end all alcohol sponsorship agreements. In return, they shared $25 million in replacement funds from the Government.

The NRL’s largest current sponsor is Telstra, with its most recent contract estimated to be worth $6.5 million. This is almost four times greater than their largest alcohol sponsor, Carlton United Brewery, which is worth $1.5 million.

If the NRL was able to find such significant economic profit from sponsoring a company such as Telstra, surely there are several other alternatives to alcohol and betting companies that can have a less destructive impact on our culture.

I doubt that many rugby league fans would abandon the game if such restrictions were put in place. On the flipside, it would send a clear message to potential supporters that the league is serious about addressing the toxic sporting culture Ms. Daniels referred to earlier.

The social aspect of rugby league is always going to involve alcohol and gambling. That will not change. It is unrealistic to think that it will and people do need to enjoy themselves.

The NRL is fantastic at supporting players and putting programs in place to educate them about the dangers of both alcohol and betting.

However, their approach must be more holistic. It needs to incorporate the entire rugby league community. They have no control over whether we choose to drink or gamble. That is our choice. They do, however, have the power to make this choice a harder one rather than profiting from it.

Only earlier this year, the government announced a $120 million ban of gambling advertisements during live sports between 5.00 am and 8.30 pm on commercial free-to-air TV, radio and pay TV.

The real problem with gambling commercials is how they unrealistically portray betting as a fun game, conveniently leaving out the detrimental impact it can have. It will not completely solve the issue, but at least it was a solid first step towards fixing the problem.

Australian sport still has a problem with alcohol. Australia as a society still has a problem in domestic and non-domestic violence.

The NRL also still has a problem with not admitting that, although not being directly responsible, it can at least make a positive change to both issues.

The least they can do is send a message that it recognises the role sport can play in combating Australia’s potentially toxic drinking culture.

That starts with banning the ads.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2018-06-29T05:41:02+00:00

Penrith Punter

Roar Guru


I didn't say anywhere that alcohol consumption was out of control? I simply said it was a factor in contributing to violence specifically that could be managed. Also, you need to consider the difference between the consumption of alcohol in normal circumstances versus at sporting games where it is more culturally accepted. This is from a 2017 study by the Australian Drug Foundation and Good Sports: "In another study of community level AFL, Australian Rugby Union, Australian Rugby League, cricket, tennis and surf life saving clubs, 34% of club members reported consuming five or more standard drinks on each club visit – markedly higher than what people in the general community would consume." And this is at a community, grass-roots level. While what you said above is correct, the issue I am looking at is the drinking culture in sport specifically and the bigger organisations such as the NRL need to lead the way.

AUTHOR

2018-06-29T05:34:45+00:00

Penrith Punter

Roar Guru


As I have said before Fred, I am not stopping you having a bet and reductions on ads won't do so either. Removing the ads won't demonise alcohol/betting too, it is more about harm minimisation not shoving down people's throats that either are wrong. Even if that is the message you think it sends, surely people being more aware of the harms of betting and alcohol is a positive and if they still choose to participate in either that's their choice!

2018-06-29T05:03:28+00:00

Fred

Guest


Who cares if someone wants to have a bet?! Since when did The Roar become the Seventh Day Adventist Forum?

2018-06-29T05:02:28+00:00

Fred

Guest


Correlation is not causation. As a rule, societies that have banned or heavily restricted alcohol are more violent than permissive societies. The point I'm making is this whole media beatup about "out of control alcohol-fuelled violence" is a myth with no basis in realtiy. Statistically Australia has never been more sober, and Australia has never been less violent. Australia has also cut down on the use of casette tapes, but I don't think that has a causative link with the reduction in violence. The wowsers should be ecstatic that more Australians than ever are lonely, boring, depressed teetotallers, but instead they're pretending alcohol consumption is "out of control". It's not true.

2018-06-29T01:25:08+00:00

clipper

Guest


You're arguing against your own case. By saying alcohol consumption and violence have been dropping for many years, you're actually supporting the case MrX has put forward. You're correlating the two and therefore by banning sponsorship you would be lowering sales and therefore consumption and therefore lower violence levels.

2018-06-29T00:45:28+00:00

JimboJones

Guest


Yup change the world because one person doesn't like it .

2018-06-29T00:43:10+00:00

JimboJones

Guest


One step closer to Sharia law.

AUTHOR

2018-06-28T14:25:09+00:00

Penrith Punter

Roar Guru


Sorry to be clear - I meant alcohol and gambling but in particular alcohol. Alcohol was involved in 65% of family violence incidents in 2015. Advertising and promoting it at sporting games doesn't help the issue, it takes advantage of it.

2018-06-28T12:15:34+00:00

HarryT

Guest


You're just assuming it is alcohol and gambling promotion. The same violence spike appears in the US with NFL and yet they prohibit alcohol and gambling advertising. We don't know. It could just be the violence associated and promoted as part and parcel of the SOO. The one thing that is certain is that the powerful gambling and alcohol lobbies won't be too keen to find out, nor will those receiving their sponsorship.

AUTHOR

2018-06-28T08:06:21+00:00

Penrith Punter

Roar Guru


And I didn't say player behaviour influenced it. However, why do you think SOO is linked with domestic and non domestic violence according to the study? The logical answer - the excessive promotion and accessibility to alcohol and gambling.

2018-06-28T07:27:05+00:00

HarryT

Guest


The study uses crime data to say there is a link between SOO and domestic and non domestic violence. It says nothing about alcohol, gambling or player behaviour. Domestic violence. 264,000 reported cases each year. 520 reported cases so far today.

2018-06-28T07:12:48+00:00

Simon SS

Roar Rookie


Fred how do you feel about other substances? Personally I don't drink. I think it's probably the worst drug. Try watching footy on lsd it's amazing. Mdma is ok but it makes you assume your team will come back from 40 down with 10 to go.

2018-06-28T07:10:00+00:00

Simon SS

Roar Rookie


What country do you live in Fred? Seems we've got a study that says when SOO is on people get violent. I think it's because of booze. Why do you think people hit each other?

AUTHOR

2018-06-28T06:53:52+00:00

Penrith Punter

Roar Guru


When I read Halloran's article the contradiction of it was definitely evident given the hush money issue in the AFL. I was actually originally going to write a different piece, but I still included it briefly in this, about how the majority of NRL players themselves are great guys and it is the media's overemphasis on the few players who make mistakes that contributes to the NRL's problems with its image,

2018-06-28T06:49:52+00:00

Crosscoder

Roar Guru


The Report did mention ,although some media outlets omitted conveniently perhaps or otherwise, that spikes occurred in AFL G/Fs ,and oversea big events such as Super Bowl.Throw in Christmas ,New Year celebrations.Bledisloe Cups in NZ. This was brought up in the past.,La Trobe an AFL club sponsor brought it in whether by design or opportunism. It''s very responsible naturally for Jessica Halloran Daily Telegraph (an AFL fan whose father played that code) to continually bring up these incidents and the fact alcohol is a major issue.Her deafening silence with incidents within her code and the charging of Shannon Grant a former Swans players with DV,shows where her obvious loyalties lie ,and one can throw in the likes of Proud.I doubt they were watching SOO. I await her comments in theTelegraph, in the interests off balance.I'll naturally be waiting till hell freezes over. Citing Jessica about rugby league with due respect,is akin to citing Shorten about the benefits of Capitalism. These are the same media outlets print and electronic that have no qualms in flogging alcohol day after day, year after year, when no SOO is on the horizon.Where in the social pages we see people holding glasses of champagne and wine some events if it's cool.We have a former PM chugging down a beer for the cameras.The hypocrisy and tutt tutting is mind boggling. And just to show where i sit ,I abhor domestic violence ,in fact violence perpetrated on anyone.And alcohol is a major factor.Whether it be by a league player or whoever.Lodge IMO should never have been let back in.Hence the clamping down on late night clubs in the Cross. The NSW SOO team has Brydens Lawyers as their major sponsors that is a move away from alcohol ,small though it may be. Whilst ever alcohol is legal,and it is flogged day in day out regardless of SOO,the effects on households will remain.Russia has an alcohol issue.BTW no mention of the impact of other drugs such as ice etc

2018-06-28T06:29:17+00:00

Fred

Guest


We're in agreeance on that one!

AUTHOR

2018-06-28T06:14:27+00:00

Penrith Punter

Roar Guru


If you want to see a real example of PC gone too far look here: https://www.smh.com.au/national/boys-will-be-boys-pyjama-top-pulled-after-parent-complaint-20180627-p4zo5l.html

2018-06-28T06:08:08+00:00

Big daddy

Guest


First it was the coffin nails, now it's the grog. Next thing we will have the temperance league protesting outside the Claxton in a couple of weeks. Good luck with that. Some one mentioned Carlton f.c. Wasn't John Elliot the CEO of Carlton brewery tied up with them.

AUTHOR

2018-06-28T06:01:24+00:00

Penrith Punter

Roar Guru


Look that's a fair call but I'm sure if the NRL came out and said they were opposed to them they would be able to convince their networks to not show them during games. As I said, several other sporting organisations in Australia have supported and implemented this. The Government pull a bill last year to try get rid of alcohol ads during sports coverage but the NRL among others opposed it.

2018-06-28T05:24:41+00:00

no one in particular

Roar Guru


There are already restrictions on alcohol advertising. Also, the NRL has no say on what ads networks show. The major sponsor (telstra or harvey norman) may have a clause about ads being shown, but the NRL cannot tell Nine or Fox they can;t show a VB or Tooheys ad

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar