Selectors must get over their captaincy bias

By Stephen Vagg / Roar Guru

Many prejudices run through Australian cricket. Leg spin’s better than off spin, real men bowl 140-plus, older players can’t field, sledging works, the best batsman should be at three and, most of all, that captains should be batsmen.

The theory, I think, runs something like this: it’s really hard to bowl in the hot sun all day. You can’t think. You overbowl and underbowl yourself. And most bowlers are supposed to be dumb anyway, according to the theory, especially if they’re fast.

You need the cool, calm analysis that only comes from a batsman observing at first slip. Donald Bradman. Ian Chappell. Mark Taylor.

I get the theory. I’ve heard it enough. But does it hold up in practice?

The three geniuses behind sandpapergate were all batsmen – Steve Smith (captain), Dave Warner (vice-captain) and Cam Bancroft (top bloke) – who, despite their lack of bowling, managed to forget things like ‘don’t put sandpaper on a ball’ and ‘don’t lie at a press conference.

Steve Smith was and is an okay captain tactically who seemed allergic to using part-time bowlers and who commanded leadership respect mostly by sheer weight of runs and the fact he doesn’t do anything but play and think about cricket.

Dave Warner was and is a decent T20 captain who has now been banned from ever captaining Australia again.

Before them was batsman Michael Clarke, a superb captain tactically but a poor manager of people. If he had a strong vice-captain who supported him (Ricky Ponting, Brad Haddin) he was fine, but if he didn’t (Shane Watson), he struggled.

(AP Photo/Rui Vieira)

Let’s look at our Test captains back to World War II, ignoring caretakers. Batsman Ricky Ponting was a decent captain, and he seems better now than he did at the time. All-rounder at first then only bastman Steve Waugh and batsman Mark Taylor were superb captains.

Batsman Alan Border started terribly – his handling of bowlers on the 1985 Ashes is a primer on how not to do it – but graduated to ‘okay’. Batsman Kim Hughes was a poor captain prone to frequent brain snaps (Brisbane 1984, Trinidad 1984, Headingly 1981, India 1979). Batsman Graham Yallop was worse.

Batsman and part-time bowlers Greg Chappell and Bob Simpson and batsman Bill Lawry were tough, shrewd campaigners and uninspired captains who tended to be disliked by their teammates and prone to the odd brain snap – for example, Chappell with the underarm, Lawry in India in 1969 – but demanded respect due to their playing ability.

Batsman Ian Chappell and all-rounder-turned-mostly-bowler Richie Benaud were superb captains.

Batsman Ian Craig was a good captain but didn’t deserve to be in the team. Bowler and handy tailender Ian Johnson wasn’t a good captain and didn’t deserve to be in the team. Batsman Lindsay Hassett was great. Bradman was Bradman.

It’s a mixed bunch and very batsman-centric. The two spinners were very handy with the bat. No fast bowlers. No wicketkeepers.

Were there any other options?

(AAP Image/Dave Hunt)

Most agree all-rounder Keith Miller was a superb captain who should’ve replaced Hassett instead of Johnson but the authorities, especially Bradman, were worried about Miller causing some sort of scandal. It’s the same thinking that kept Shane Warne, another highly regarded captain, away from higher honours. Instead we were rewarded with Ian Johnson (bad) and Ricky Ponting (not bad).

Either Richie Benaud or batsman Neil Harvey should have been appointed captain over Ian Craig, but Benaud was a bowler and Harvey did something to annoy the powers that be – too working class maybe? – so they picked Craig, who was a chosen one. He was a very good captain, by the way, but not up to it as a player.

Wicketkeeper Rod Marsh was potentially a very good captain of Australia who was foolishly ignored in favour of Kim Hughes because of (a) anti-wicketkeeper captain bias, (b) wanting to punish Marsh for World Series Cricket and (c) Hughes was a chosen one who just looked so pretty.

The tragedy of this decision is that Cricket Australia had numerous chances to recognise their mistake and correct it (1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983) but they didn’t. Sometimes doing this takes too much courage.

Batsman bias saw Graham Yallop appointed Australian captain in 1978-79 over tougher, more experienced, and smarter wicketkeeper John Maclean. Yallop led Australia to a 5-1 defeat. The person who should’ve had the job – the all-rounder and brilliant captain John Inverarity – wasn’t even in the team, because of the selector’s age bias. Batsmen with worse averages than Inverarity were picked over him during World Series Cricket simply because they were younger.

(Philip Brown/Getty Images)

Wicketkeeper Adam Gilchrist led Australia to a series victory in India, and led very well, but he was relegated to the vice-captaincy for most of his career. Would he have been better than Ponting? I would’ve liked to have found out – it would’ve meant Ponting’s reign wasn’t so long and he maybe wouldn’t have gotten so tired towards the end. Gilchrist likes to say it was too much work for him, but was it? Does he really mean that?

An aside: I think any Australian captain and coach can ask for is one Ashes tour and one World Cup in charge. Any more than that and energy levels seem to drop. Short tenures, please.

Clarke was a good captain but do you know who would’ve done as well if not better? Simon Katich, who had an excellent record captaining New South Wales but who was prematurely turfed from the Australian side due to ageism. Instead they picked Clarke, a chosen one – he had some great times and some poor times and left things in the same messy state he found it.

It seems there have been some, if not many, wicketkeeping, spin bowling and all-rounder captains of Australia. What about fast bowlers?

Geoff Lawson never seems to have been seriously considered an Australian captain despite a superb record captaining New South Wales.

Jason Gillespie was ignored as captain but has turned into a great coach – you can’t tell me he wouldn’t have been a good captain too.

Listen to former fast bowlers like Brendon Julian, Damien Fleming and Stu Clark talk about cricket – as if they wouldn’t have been good captains. Listen to Michael Slater – as if he wouldn’t have been dreadful.

(AFP Photo/ Farjana K. Godhuly)

Some of the best captains of all time have been fast bowlers. Imran Khan, Ray Illingworth, Mike Procter, Keith Miller – yes, absolutely, some of them batted as well, but so what? Did that make them less tired? Smarter?

I agree some bowlers are temperamentally unsuited to captaincy. But you know what? So are some batsmen, including some who do get appointed captain.

Could James Anderson be a worse captain than Joe Root? Would Nathan Lyon or Mitchell Starc have done what Dave Warner and Steve Smith did in South Africa?

Tim Paine struggled as a player in the one-day series, but I think that was just a good old-fashioned struggle with form. People seem very keen to emphasise he’ll be only a temporary Test captain, but if he does well, why not keep him on?

After the efforts of the firm of Smith-Warner-Bancroft I don’t think people should be so quick to poo-poo the leadership aspirations, if they exist, of people like Mitchell Starc, Nathan Lyon, Pat Cummins and Josh Hazlewood. I would have liked one of them to be appointed captain of NSW instead of Peter Nevill just to see how they did, but they weren’t, in part because of this bias.

[latest_videos_strip category=”cricket” name=”Cricket”]

There’s a leadership vacuum at the top of Australian cricket. It hasn’t helped that the Australian selectors have had a habit of discarding players who could be alternative captains – Peter Handscomb and Peter Nevill for instance – or not given extended runs to players who were superb captains at domestic level (Cameron White, Andrew McDonald, George Bailey) or got rid of potential captains prematurely (Simon Katich).

And they still have a thing for ‘chosen one’ players, so you get scenarios like Mitch Marsh, averaging 27.85 with the bat after 28 Tests – Ian Craig-like numbers – being discussed as a possible captain.

I also get the feeling that Australian coaches sometimes like an inexperienced team because they have more control over them.

I’m actually not proposing that Cummins, Starc, Lyon et cetera be promoted to captain or vice-captain. In times of crisis I think you need experience, so for the Test side I’d go Tim Paine as captain and Usman Khawaja as vice captain on the basis of the latter’s now quite lengthy leadership of Queensland.

I would also actively encourage Lyon-Starc-Hazlewood-Cummins to captain the team. I’d also bring George Bailey into the ODI and Test team set-ups, if only as a squad member – his form actually isn’t too bad. Teams win with George Bailey in them.

Australian cricket needs to stop thinking of its biases and one of them is this obsession with batting captains, especially when they’re young.

Next time someone says that bowlers don’t make good captains, they should be also required to answer: “What? Unlike Smith, Warner and Bancroft?”.

The Crowd Says:

2018-07-05T03:20:04+00:00

BrainsTrust

Roar Rookie


Make someone like mitch marsh skipper for tests and ODIs and guys like khawaja and lyon can provide the senior support

AUTHOR

2018-07-05T01:24:43+00:00

Stephen Vagg

Roar Guru


Every captain absolutely needs strong support on the field - not from the coach, because there's only so much a coach can do, but on the field. I remember how much Border would rely on Geoff Marsh. And then later Mark Taylor and his other senior players like Ian Healey. Part of the problem with Smith is that a lot of the time he only had Warner to consistently rely on - and then Warner had a melt down. In the past decade Australia has had trouble retaining its senior players who could've helped the captain - whether due to off field stuff (Symonds), form (Voges, North) or the selectors just got sick of them (Neville, Bailey). So there wasn't that nucleus of experienced players he could rely on.

2018-07-04T03:24:24+00:00

Patrick

Roar Pro


Since a captain's role focusses heavily on field placements, it makes perfect sense for a bowler to be captain. They'll probably have a better understanding of how to get a wicket than the batsmen will, and would therefore set better fields. That said, the worry is that a bowler becomes so consumed in his plan that he lets the game drift, unable to recognise that his tactics aren't working. For this reason, I think any bowling captain must be supported by a voice of reason from a non-bowling member of the team, to provide a rational view when a bowler gets too consumed in what he's doing. So long as a bowler-captain is willing to listen to his vice-captain, then I think it's a leadership dynamic that could work. It really depends on the individuals involved, and their relationship. In the Australian Test team's case, the bowling lineup appears settled, whilst the batting lineup appears anything but. In that sense, its completely logical to have a bowler as a captain. That said, I think Paine is a good choice. I'd probably have one of the bowlers as Vice-Captain, as they'll have better tactical knowledge than Khawaja in relation to field placements. Incidentally, it would be interesting to see Khawaja in a leadership position for Australia. It wasn't long ago that he was viewed as a batsman, with no interest in fielding. I remember Shane Warne saying he viewed it as 'a chore'. It would be quite a transformation seeing him setting fields and being actively involved, after previously appearing relatively bored when not batting.

AUTHOR

2018-07-04T02:46:25+00:00

Stephen Vagg

Roar Guru


Completely right about Illingworth - my mistake. Great captain. Interestingly, a terrible manager of England in the 90s though.

2018-07-03T14:55:21+00:00

Stuckbetweenindopak

Roar Rookie


Looking at stanlake, australia can choose to go to the next world cup thinking as a bowling-strong team, and trying to win matches on the back of attacking with bowlers or going with a mentality of taking wickets in all matches rather than containing sides. Imran khan ‘s 1992 world cup pakistan team is a classical example. This is possible if they can include all of starc, cummins, hazlewood, stanlake and lyon in all their important games and going with 1 batsman short while starc and cummmins are almost all rounders. If it cannot afford this team, they can still go with same attack minded team and replace lyon with agar to further stregthen their batting.

2018-07-03T08:50:55+00:00

Greg

Guest


Stephen, interesting article, I suppose some of us are born to lead, some are not, problem is knowing who has it and who hasn't. For your information Ray Illingworth was indeed a great captain, but he was not a fast bowler. A right arm finger spinner who is one of only a handfull of cricketers to take 2,000 wickets and to make 20,000 runs in first class cricket. He has just turned 86.

2018-07-03T07:05:10+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


I wonder about current Test players who have played, say 20 Tests, being automatically made Shield captains, assuming they fit a series of criteria, eg they want to do it, they show potential to lead a side as assessed by a panel of ex Shield/Test captains and they have support, either through a strong support captain or from a coach. If you had something like that, guys who are bowlers should get a run as there can be no reason NOT to give them a chance. I also wonder why we only have one vice captain? It seems to be more about tradition than any factual reason. There are plenty of guys offering advice throughout a game, so why not make it formal and have a couple?

AUTHOR

2018-07-03T06:49:38+00:00

Stephen Vagg

Roar Guru


Other states captain players who might not be available during the summer - Victoria with Handscomb (they didn't know he'd be dropped), Qld with Khawaja, WA with M Marsh. If the states want a more regular captain that's great just would love to see them as a vice captain or something like that.

2018-07-03T05:07:03+00:00

dangertroy

Roar Rookie


Starc, cummins and Hazlewood also wouldn't have been considered for captaining new south wales because if they are fit, they will be playing for Australia. Why appoint a captain that will be there for 2 games at the start of the season? Cricket Australia is hoping that Paine will hang in there for the next two years until Smith can return to the captaincy. Mitch marsh is probably the backup plan, especially with Langer in charge. I'd imagine that finch will be leading the ODI team in our next series, although I'd love to see Bailey drafted back in.

2018-07-03T04:53:10+00:00

Noah Barling

Roar Pro


Surely a bowler would work in Tests if he were able to give up ODI's and T20's, as they are very different formats compared to Tests. It would reduce injury and the bowler-captain would be more relaxed to plan for Tests only.

2018-07-03T04:18:54+00:00

KenoathCarnt

Guest


2019 Ashes team Renshaw Warner Doran Smith Khawaja Head Paine Pattinson Cummins Starc Lyon Bancroft as backup or in first team but I dont know where to put him given the order.

AUTHOR

2018-07-03T01:46:48+00:00

Stephen Vagg

Roar Guru


Interesting point about letting the players pick the captains. A radical theory... (though in a way, as you point out, very old fashioned too)... I wonder who they'd go for? Certainly I feel the feelings of the players should be broached. It has been a strength of Australian cricket that generally the team has been picked then the captain. Often England would go captain, then team. There have been necessary exceptions eg in 1977-78 during WSC Simpson was appointed captain - and that's what should have happened in 1978-79. And now, because the captain and vice captain are removed, it feels like a different situation. The appointment of vice captain is especially interesting because that person could be in line to take over very soon - if say Paine gets injured or whatever. And I feel they're pushing for Mitch Marsh by making him Australia A captain over Khawaja and Head, who both have more captaincy experience than him. And I feel - I stress this is only guessing - that Langer is pushing that because he feels comfortable with Marsh due to the WA connection. But really, based on experience, it should be Khawaja, who has led Queensland reasonably well for a few years. And I would love to see the bowlers - Starc, Lyon, etc - be given some captaincy chance, whether it's of an A team, a shield match, whatever. Bowlers aren't given the chance to captain so their inability to captain becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.

AUTHOR

2018-07-03T00:47:41+00:00

Stephen Vagg

Roar Guru


Injury worry fair enough but Lyon doesn’t get that injured - and batsmen get injured too Feel should be separate captains in separate formats in part bc of that reason

2018-07-02T23:37:34+00:00

Wayne

Roar Guru


Bowlers have a lot to think about when they are applying their craft (see, actually bowling). The wicket keeper is often the Vice Captain or leadership group anyway. The modern day bowlers are also prone to the "rested" "rotations" problem. You do NOT give your Captain a week off because the sports scientist says so.

2018-07-02T23:30:30+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


Stephen, Australia used to have a simple policy of selecting a team of players then the players would decide who would be captain. This then evolved into the Cricket Boards deciding on a captain. based on no real measure at all - as you've quite rightly pointed out. Is it time we go back a pace and select our best team first, then chose a captain after that. Case in point - the recent ODI series with England. There was no way Paine should have played in this series because there was nowhere to bat him. There were plenty of guys better at the top of the order and he didn't score quickly enough lower down. That's when the selectors should have chosen the best XI and sorted out a captain from there. The same principle can be applied to the Test side. Paine had a great series against England and was very good in SA. He fits into the team, therefore play him along with 10 other guys and pick a captain. Arguments about playing bowling captains who are getting injured, should be offset by batsmen who play who aren't good enough or who are out of form. It makes no difference, as long as the right captain/vice captain is chosen. It must be remembered too, that a bowling captain might be a better option in two forms of the game, simply because a bowler is limited to a set number of overs. Australia cannot afford to be precious about who leads the sides. We are hurting our various teams by trying to fit a round peg into a square hole. Better to let the side pick itself and go from there. I wonder what sides like Pakistan would have done without captains like Imran Khan, Wakhar Younis and Wasim Akram? Certainly didn't seem to hurt them too much.

2018-07-02T21:43:31+00:00

JayG

Guest


One of the problems with selecting Starc/Cummins/Hazelwood as captain is that they are injured so often, they miss many, many matches - how to get continuity in leadership if you captain is not playing half the matches due to injuries? Also, if the "genius" of sandpapergate is your basis for discounting the trio of Smith/Warner/Bancroft from leadership roles, I am loathe to believe CA's sanitised version of events that none of the fast bowlers had any knowledge that the ball was being fiddled with. Except these 5-6 players, nobody is holding their position in the team which is what makes the problem of selecting a captain a much more difficult problem for the selectors - hence they are forced to consider Mitch March etc. Tim Paine is probably a good option but I wonder if batting, keeping wicket and captaining the Aus Test side is too much of a workload for any 1 person - Smith has already spoken about the mental fatigue as result of being the side's main run-scorer as well as captain. I do not know if it is wise to burn out another captain with an over-the-top work load.

Read more at The Roar