England vs India: Who starred and who didn't for England?

By Beardan / Roar Guru

After a mid-series scare England bounced back to win the fourth test before sealing the series at the Oval for a 4-1 series win. We take a look at the English team for their end of series report card:

Alastair Cook
His struggles over the last 18 months continued this series, and he was unable to counter Ishant Sharma coming around the wicket and moving the ball away when the series was on. After Ashwin bowled him a couple of times early in the series, he found himself edging into the cordon a lot.

Calling stumps on his career looks to be good timing because the consistency has not been there for some time and he is no longer the reliable opener for England he once was. He did have one of cricket’s all-time great farewells– maybe the greatest – with runs in both innings, catches and a Test match win.

He’s been a wonderful servant for his country and will hold the record of England’s leading Test run-scorer for many years to come, though Joe Root is a chance to chase him down in time.

Rating: 4

Keaton Jennings
He just looks out of his depth at this level. Even when the pressure was off somewhat at the Oval he struggled on a flat wicket. Chris Vince, who was overlooked in this series, looks to be a better option at the top of the order. His highlight was a fighting 36 at Southhampton. He didn’t make a 50 and is unlikely to be seen at this level again.

Rating: 2

(AP Photo/Rafiq Maqbool)

Moeen Ali
Ali played only the two tests but his contribution, especially in the fourth test, was significant. The 81-run partnership in the first innings at Southhampton with Sam Curran, with England in deep trouble at 6/86, was crucial in posting a competitive score. He then took five first-innings wickets before being pivotal in the second innings there, taking a further four wickets, including the big wickets of Virat Kohli and Ajinkya Rahane.

He backed it up with a 50 at the Oval and a couple more wickets, and then went on to endear himself to everyone in the cricket world by saying how much he dislikes Australia, which seems to be common ground for everyone not from the land Down Under.

Rating: 8

Joe Root
Like a salad sandwich on homemade pita bread– nice on the outside but no meat in the middle. Root started the series with an 80 and ended it with a 125, but in between that were a lot of low scores, often under 20.

Root could go down as Test crickets greatest ever coin-tosser after winning four out of five tosses in Australia, one out of two against Pakistan and five out of five against India – handy stats to know if ever in Las Vegas.

Rating: 5

Jonny Bairstow
He started the series in great style, making important runs in the first two tests, but he fell away faster than Serena Williams’s patience. He made three ducks in the final three Tests and settled for an average in the mid-20s. His keeping was good even after the fractured finger.

Rating: 6

(AAP Image/Darren England)

Ben Stokes
A wonderful spell of bowling in the first Test deserved far better than the 2/73 return, but he got his rewards in the second innings with four wickets, including the crucial wicket of Virat Kohli. His 62 in a losing run chase showed important backbone for England. Instead of falling over and going meekly, he and Jos Buttler showed some fight in a losing cause.

He missed the second Test due to being in court, which thankfully you don’t see every Test series. He’ll never quite be the next Ian Botham, but he delivered handy contributions throughout.

Rating: 6

Jos Buttler
He’s now completed one full cycle as a Test cricketer, having debuted against India in the corresponding series four years ago, despite excelling at the shorter formats of the sport. He may be finally coming to age as a Test cricketer, with handy to significant contributions in the final three Tests.

He made his first Test match century in the third Test and scored 50s later on to be England’s best-recognised batsman. His first goal will be to cement his spot in this team, and then an effort to convert 50s to centuries will be his next aim.

Rating: 7.5

(AFP)

Sam Curran
Curran made an impact by taking key top-order wickets in the first Test, but his real contribution was his ability to get his team out of big trouble twice. With England 7/87 in the first Test, his 62 gave them a score to defend. His 78 in the fourth Test, with his team at 6/86, again turned the match.

Without his contributions England would have been hard-pressed to win both Tests. He was one of the more bizarre dropped players for the third Test, though he returned for the last couple of Tests. He looks like more of a bowler suited to home conditions, so keeping an eye on his development on flatter tracks and Kookaburra balls will be needed.

Rating: 8

Adil Rashid
He’s more a traditional leg spinner, with the odd loose ball thrown in amongst the good ones. He did bowl Kannanur Lokesh Rahul with an absolute beauty that got plenty of deserved attention. Ten wickets at 30.90 was a handy contribution, but he had some handy runs every now and then.

Rating: 6.5

Stuart Broad
He went through the series a little under the radar and just happened to pop in every now and then with a wicket before going back under the radar. His 16 wickets at 29 were handy enough. It’ll be interesting to see how long he and James Anderson lead this attack, as they seem to have some very good batteries in them.

Rating: 7

Jimmy Anderson
His battle with Virat Kohli in the first test will go down as one of the great Test match battles. After dismissing Kohli four times four years ago, he had lined him up perfectly in Birmingham, and with Kohli trapped at one end, 42 of the 54 balls Kohli faced were all from Anderson.

Anderson had bowled his last 25 balls to Kohli when he took the edge, only for Dawid Malan to drop a sitter at second slip. Although he would not dismiss the Indian captain in the series, he would still have a big impact throughout, taking exactly the 24 wickets required to go past Glenn McGrath as Test cricket’s leading wicket-taker for a paceman. The tears for his retiring mate Alastair Cook were a nice touch.

Rating: 8

(Philip Brown/Getty Images)

Dawid Malan
He dropped Kohli in the first Test, which got India going, but then he wasn’t seen for the rest of the summer.

Rating: -2

Chris Woakes
A man-of-the-match performance, with four wickets and 137 not out at Lords while replacing Ben Stokes. He was dropped after the third test for Sam Curran, which was a good move by the selectors.

Rating: 7

Ollie Pope
He’s not quite ready for Test cricket, but he will be seen again down the track.

Rating: 4

The Crowd Says:

2018-09-24T02:26:21+00:00

George

Guest


So he wasn't carrying an injury?

2018-09-18T06:40:55+00:00

Cadfael

Roar Guru


In England, you do not drop Anderson.

2018-09-18T04:08:19+00:00

Ouch

Roar Rookie


No, he was just rubbish.

2018-09-17T21:39:32+00:00

George

Guest


Moenn was carrying an injury on that tour and struggled. It happens.

AUTHOR

2018-09-17T12:48:01+00:00

Beardan

Roar Guru


The Moeen Ali that came to Australia should never have played 5 tests and took 5 wickets. In his first innings in this series he took a 5 for.

2018-09-17T02:22:21+00:00

Ouch

Roar Rookie


Are there 2 people with the name Moeen Ali that play for England? The one that was here a few months ago was barely a grade level cricketer. He was absolute rubbish. Can't be the same bloke......surely. Cook should've rated higher purely for his last test innings. I happened to wake up on the couch and see it. A really great sporting moment.

2018-09-16T08:02:47+00:00

JimmyB

Guest


No way are they dropping Anderson, Broad on the other hand... Woakes was world class, he would have played if he was fit. Curran, Broad or Rashid would have made way.

AUTHOR

2018-09-16T04:11:58+00:00

Beardan

Roar Guru


I didnt expect that reaction from anyone. Just stating what everyone pretty much knows...

AUTHOR

2018-09-16T04:10:46+00:00

Beardan

Roar Guru


The 8 was purely for the cricket.

AUTHOR

2018-09-16T04:10:20+00:00

Beardan

Roar Guru


I cant imagine them dropping Broad or Anderson if fit. I think Woakes would have missed out.

AUTHOR

2018-09-16T04:09:44+00:00

Beardan

Roar Guru


Cheers mate. I held back on Curran cause his bowling may not have deserved an 9 or higher, but with the bat he was huge! Thanks for your feedback!

2018-09-16T03:17:43+00:00

JimmyB

Guest


Whilst I would argue that Beardan’s assertion is probably correct, it’s probably not worth worrying about too much either (was the point I was trying to make.)

2018-09-16T01:55:19+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


These are Bearden's comments, "then went on to endear himself to everyone in the cricket world by saying how much he dislikes Australia, which seems to be common ground for everyone not from the land Down Under." Ali was talking about a series that happened 3 years ago (see attachment), yet the author managed to make that into a slur against Australia, then decided all who don't live here, feel the same way. The comments Ali made deserve discussion on their own, in a separate article as you suggest. I have issues where a person's bias comes through in an article which has NOTHING to do with Australia or Australian cricket. The author is being crass, there's no other way to put it https://www.cricket.com.au/news/moeen-ali-racial-abuse-australia-ashes-2015-osama-cricket-investigation/2018-09-15

2018-09-16T01:19:46+00:00

JimmyB

Guest


Yes, it would have been interesting to see who would have been left out had Woakes been fit, my money was on Broad, he appears to need a kick up the backside every now and again.

2018-09-16T01:17:48+00:00

JimmyB

Guest


Steady on Paul, you’re dangerously close to appearing thin skinned mate. I’m a little surprised that there hasn’t at least been an AAP article about the Moeen comments on the Roar yet. Just the kind of thing to get us all frothing at the mouth.

2018-09-16T00:04:55+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


So you rated Ali an 8 because of disparaging remarks he made after the Test series about Australia? It clearly shows you have zero respect for a Test playing nation and the game, if that's the way you think. I look forward to seeing more of your inane comments as the cricket season progresses.

2018-09-15T21:28:26+00:00

George

Guest


Woakes wasn't dropped - he got injured.

2018-09-15T13:58:34+00:00

Savage

Roar Rookie


Surely Curran deserves a 9 atleast.He was also the MOS and easily the most impactful player of the series.Curran also looks like a left handed bowling version of Chris Woakes with similar speed(Woakes is quicker) and action.So as mentioned in the article,He might struggle in flatter pitches in Tests just like Woakes. Rest of the ratings are pretty much spot on.

AUTHOR

2018-09-15T13:37:20+00:00

Beardan

Roar Guru


Still work for him to do, but was a huge player for England in the series!

AUTHOR

2018-09-15T13:36:48+00:00

Beardan

Roar Guru


Haha... For some reason I always call him Chris! Bairstow scored runs in the first couple of tests, and his keeping was good. Root, made runs at the end when the series was done and dusted, before that an 80 was all he contributed. Woakes didnt fit into the team with Stokes and Curran in the team, so he was the obvious one to leave out. Nice to hear from you Jimmy!

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar