Seven talking points from South Sydney Rabbitohs vs St George Illawarra Dragons NRL semi-final

By Scott Pryde / Expert

In a battle which went right down to the wire, the South Sydney Rabbitohs have come away with a one-point win over the St George Illawarra Dragons in the second NRL semi-final. Here are my talking points from the match.

Full disclosure before we go any further – I’m a Dragons fan. I’m proud of the effort they put up last night, but that doesn’t make this article any easier to write of course.

Moving on.

Adam Reynolds is ice cool
Reynolds has had moments of brilliance and moments which make you scratch your head and wonder what is going on both this season and throughout his career, but when it counted, he rose to the fore last night.

What a performance he put in. Apart from scoring all of the Rabbitohs points and kicking not one, not two, but three field goals, he controlled their attack and stood up when he needed to.

To kick three field goals in a game – a finals game – and one of those with your team behind to tie it up just minutes from fulltime, it was a staggering performance.

While we all rave about the Rabbitohs left edge and the Burgess brothers, without Reynolds they weren’t getting close to the Dragons last night, and for the club to go close to the grand final or winning the competition, the half needs to be at his absolute best as he was against the Red V.

The Dragons were brave, but wouldn’t have won in golden point anyway
The Dragons were incredibly brave in getting to where they were last night. Coming back from the first Reynolds field goal to somehow find the lead with four minutes to go, they seemingly had the game wrapped up.

Of course, they fell apart in attack with two extremely poor sets and the rest is history, but they put in a strong display to get to where they were.

Most Dragons fans, had they been asked three weeks ago, would have laughed if you told them they were going to the semi-final and then were going to take Souths all the way to the finish line.

But even if they had gotten into golden point, they were busted.

With Paul Vaughan, Jason Nightingale and Gareth Widdop all on the sidelines, Tariq Sims didn’t finish the game, Jack de Belin hasn’t trained in a few weeks and both Tyson Frizell and Nene Macdonald were forced to finish the game injured because the Dragons didn’t have any interchanges left.

I’m not making excuses for the Red V’s capitulation at the end, but they did a bloody good job to get where they did in the first place.

Souths look a much better side when Damien Cook runs the ball
By his usual standards, Damien Cook had a reasonably quiet first half. He wasn’t getting involved in the attack all that much, which was particularly surprising during the first 20 minutes when the Rabbitohs were more or less dominating the contest.

After that, the Rabbitohs struggled for possession and so the excuse was there, but even when they did have the ball, Cook was still a supplier rather than a provider.

Come the second half though, and it was clear one of the main messages from Anthony Seibold was for Cook to rip in and take on the defensive line at every opportunity.

Souths went from looking beaten down and tired to playing with all the running of the contest, dictating the pace and tiring the Dragons defence.

The backpedalling defensive line was no match for Cook, who in turn was able to get his forwards moving, hitting the stomach, getting up quickly and launching into quick play the balls, which in turn made the Rabbitohs even more dangerous.

While the left edge wasn’t as potent as it normally is, they were deadly up the middle and the possession they were able to amass on the Dragons eventually wore down on them, leading to a victory.

It’s stunning the difference one player can have, but if the Bunnies learnt anything, it’s that Cook, alongside Reynolds, is their most important player.

That last tackle play shouldn’t be the focus
While Ben Hunt has well and truly proven on more than one occasion he cracks under pressure, and yes, the wrong play was called on that fateful final tackle last night, it shouldn’t be the focus of the game.

Instead, we should be celebrating what was an excellent, back-and-forth, got you on the edge of your seat from start to finish, game of rugby league.

In front of a huge crowd, there shouldn’t be too many knockers of the game.

You could say if the Dragons had Widdop, if the Dragons had held the ball with three minutes to go, if they hadn’t run it on the last.

If, if, if everything. At the end of the day, they didn’t and there has to be a loser. The Rabbitohs played well, hung with them and turned things around in the second half after being beaten to the line in the first half.

And honestly, Ben Hunt did more good than bad throughout the game. Let’s not let one play define his season, which, sure has had its rocks and diamonds, but has generally been better than poor.

(AAP Image/Craig Golding)

The way the game was played was a testament to rugby league, as the whole finals series has been.

Let’s hope there are three crackers left.

The Bunnies looked tired. Can they beat the Roosters?
As mentioned above, the Rabbitohs looked tired, particularly during the first half. Heading into the main break, it was unclear where they were going to score or get back into the contest.

While the game was a testament to the two sides’ defensive work given only two tries came out of 80 minutes of full-on, intense rugby league, South Sydney now need to somehow back up and try to beat the Roosters.

They will take plenty of lessons out of the Dragons game, but their ability to hang on with backs to the wall at times was admirable, as was their comeback in the dying minutes through those Reynolds field goals and a run of more possession.

Despite looking fresher during the second half, a lot of that came on the running of Cook and their outside backs, who got involved strongly.

The first half fatigue, especially heading into full-time may still be part of the hangover from playing away to Melbourne and losing, something which can take weeks to move on from and feel back at full fitness.

South Sydney rely on their forward pack so much, and next week’s game is likely to be a battle of the middle men. Whichever team comes out in front of that department are probably going to find themselves with a spot in the grand final.

If the Rabbitohs’ middle men are tired though – and tired is a relative term, because everyone is at this time of year – they are going to struggle to stick with the tri-colours for 80 minutes.

A full seven-day turnaround will help, but the Roosters have had 14.

(Photo by Mark Metcalfe/Getty Images)

It’s going to be a great match, you can just sense it, but the Bunnies are going to need to work miracles in recovery after such a physical contest to get back up for it.

Zac Lomax must get a starting spot in 2019
If Reynolds was ice cool, Dragons youngster Zac Lomax wasn’t too far behind him.

He had a superb game in just his third NRL outing. After making his debut at the end of the regular season against the Newcastle Knights, the 18-year-old handled every bit of pressure thrown at him all night.

Given the goal-kicking duties, he did them well and then slotted the penalty – the biggest kick of his life so far – to put the Dragons in front. He was solid in defence, purposely fell off the tackle to cause the one-on-one strip leading to the penalty and appeared dangerous in attack whenever he had any room to move – although those opportunities were few and far between.

Lomax, for a man who could still play in the Jersey Flegg competition for another five years, played well above his experience level and has done ever since he entered the NRL.

But the question remains, who does he replace next year?

Euan Aitken and Tim Lafai aren’t exactly dropable players. There is the nagging doubt about whether a 19-year-old could play a full season and stay in form, but he may not have a spot anyway.

Do the Dragons turn Euan Aitken into a second rower? Probably not. They don’t need any more of those.

Does Lafai get dropped on the virtue of a poor second half of the season? Again probably not.

It’s a good problem for coach McGregor, but one he needs to find an answer for.

Allianz Stadium won’t be big enough
A quick one to finish off, but this is a problem for the NRL.

Last night’s crowd between the Rabbitohs and Dragons was 48,118. That’s right on the limit of what Allianz Stadium can hold as it is, but with the stakes going up, the Roosters having a week off and Bunnies fans likely to travel, the Moore Park venue will lock people out next week.

While the Roosters deserve their home ground advantage, they don’t in the same breath. Every other Sydney based team, with the exception of the Rabbitohs and Bulldogs, have had to give it up since Week 1 of the finals.

While Roosters fans will say they would be no just giving up their home ground advantage, but playing at the opposition’s home ground, other teams have been forced to do it previously, so it’s not something new.

A battle between two of rugby league’s oldest rivals could challenge the preliminary final figure set in 2010 when the Dragons and Tigers played in front of 75,000 fans.

If the NRL are happy to stick to their own policies and not lock fans out by playing at big stadiums, they should act now and get the preliminary final over to Homebush where the number of fans could be accommodated.

Normally, I dislike the Olympic venue as a ground, but it was rocking with 48,000 last night. It should be even more full next week and it’d be a crying shame to see fans locked out.

Roarers, what did you make of the second NRL semi-final between two old arch rivals? Drop a comment and let us know.

The Crowd Says:

2018-09-19T04:41:04+00:00

Tim Buck 3

Roar Rookie


They know the rules but they're just saying it's a stupid rule rewarding an off-side player for obstruction.

2018-09-19T04:12:47+00:00

Tim Buck 3

Roar Rookie


As you say "McInnes could have passed the ball over him" so you do know it was an obstruction and could've been penalised. The referee was just following a new interpretation that encourages obstruction. It's amazing that an off-side player is able to milk a penalty.

2018-09-19T03:56:22+00:00

Tim Buck 3

Roar Rookie


An off-side player is able to milk a penalty by blocking the dummy-half from making a pass. I wasn't blaming the refs although they could've penalised the off-side player and no-one would complain. It is just absurd that a player is penalised for exposing an off-side player.

2018-09-19T01:44:13+00:00

Tim Buck 3

Roar Rookie


No it was an obstruction not interfering with the play the ball

2018-09-18T06:52:16+00:00

dragons

Guest


Ok so I've dissected that last play from dragons. or as i like to call it "seconds from disaster." The option to run wasn't that bad as there was numbers which could have exploited a three on one overlap. (we know this) Jai field who is sweeping around the back comes from the inside hip of Kurt Mann. If Hunt passes it to him its an illegal play (shepherd) which maybe was in the back of his mind so this pass doesn't come. He cant go long to Lafai because Mann is in the passing line and would have only thrown it hard into Mann in any case. added to this was the inside pressure on Hunt from the Souths defender forcing a hasty decision The issue wasn't the play itself but the execution. The sweep runner needed to be there earlier and Mann tighter to hunt. I guess that's why kicking as a percentage play is the safer bet as a strategy as too many things may go wrong. But the play itself was a rather good tactic- just the wrong strategy

2018-09-18T03:39:41+00:00

DP Schaefer

Roar Rookie


RUBBISH, the rule was changed because of the obvious tosses, Milford & some parra player. Not for what McInnes did. Also, the rule atm states that the defender can still be penalised if in the way and makes no attempt to move. Regardless. Having been about the only guy penalised after the rule was changed McInnes just shouldn't passed it that way.

AUTHOR

2018-09-18T02:02:14+00:00

Scott Pryde

Expert


Oh how classy.

2018-09-18T02:01:43+00:00

Bernie Vinson

Roar Rookie


I'm a neutral but its amazing how many close games the bif regs get - the big S has an average winning margin of 7 points (incl SOO)

2018-09-17T17:13:40+00:00

3_Hats SSTID 2014

Roar Rookie


Plenty of Whinging St Merge fans on here! Face the facts, you just weren't good enough.

2018-09-17T17:12:08+00:00

3_Hats SSTID 2014

Roar Rookie


RUBBISH, it is the new rule that came in early in the year, correct decision!

2018-09-17T17:11:10+00:00

3_Hats SSTID 2014

Roar Rookie


Plenty of Dragons Players and Fafita for the Sharks also never got their foot on the ball but NO PENALTY. Decisions are NOT going both ways at all. The player in question was L. Ah Mau. In the Crichton one, he had the St Merge Marker all over him, hanging on and shoved Crichton to the Ground. Cook got the ball over the line, it should have been a try to Souths.

2018-09-17T08:01:40+00:00

DP Schaefer

Roar Rookie


ha ha ha ha ahaa

2018-09-17T07:57:10+00:00

DP Schaefer

Roar Rookie


I didn't think Inglis' tackle was in the same league. His feet leave the ground but it seemed more of a body slam to me. What interests me, and it may be my anti-Rooster bias, but Mitchell's tackle on Dugan was worse than Chambers IMO. But I seem to be the only one in the league world... Chambers actually positioned Hayne's head out of the way and went down more on the shoulder. Mitchell has Dugan's head trapped when he slammed down, I didn't see any evidence of him 'allowing' Dugan's head free as suggested to the judiciary.

2018-09-17T07:50:05+00:00

DP Schaefer

Roar Rookie


Thank you BA, First person I've seen hit the nail on the head. The worst and most telling play on the night by Dragon wasn't Hunt at the death, where he could have been hero or goat. (Has anyone actually considered that maybe Hunt knew the team was stuffed and extra time was no good for them, and went for a winning play?) It's not like they were in front or anything and there were players wide. Nor was it McInnes, though he should have known better. The loss happened when Leeson went to sleep and let a strip. Having just lost the ball to Tyson on the same play, Souths were after the ball. The tackles right before Leeson, South players were vigorously fighting for the ball. It was so obvious what they were after, I could see it from the lounge chair and was screaming at the tv. Leeson should have been aware and held the ball like it was a pot of gold. At the time there was only 3 minutes on the clock and Dragons were ahead. He holds the ball, they win and we aren't talking about McInnes or Hunt. End of story. BTW, Dragons should be proud of how they finished and how competitive they were with such an injury toll. South should be able to get past Roosters this weekend, that game was nowhere near as torrid or physical as the Storm game.

2018-09-17T02:28:00+00:00

Bernie Vinson

Roar Rookie


The one score game kept the fans on their toes and the usual Sutton trick of blowing an offside penalty for a kick at goal when Saints looked like scoring and making it a 10 point or 12 point game meant the 8 point difference was overridden moments later when a Souths forward pass gave them a catch up try. The Fox commentators underplayed it as always.

2018-09-17T01:44:52+00:00

steveng

Roar Rookie


Your excuse as a Dragons fan, that Murray was interfering with the play the ball is completely unfounded! Murray was not interfering with the ‘paly the ball’, it’s a fact and very simple, the correct penalty was awarded by the refs under the new rule! McInnes could have passed the ball over him Murry but, he decided to ‘milk a penalty’ and pass the ball ‘downward into Murry’ and he got penalised, simple, the rule was changed and the Dragons paid the price but, that wasn’t the deciding factor of why the Dragons lost, it was far from it and the Dragons fans are just making unfounded excuses of why they had the usual ‘slump in form’ like they have done for a few seasons now at the business end of the season. The Bunnies were far from convincing, the Dragons wouldn’t have won even if they would have been at full strength, get over it as the Bunnies are a better team and Reno is a genius at kicking, 3 FG’s and he was a s cold as ice, Reno is genius at pressure kicks that was the difference.

2018-09-17T01:19:12+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Brilliant! Is that how far we’ve sunk I’m defence of this...? It’s understandable that a fan doesn’t know the rules...not so much that your dummy half doesn’t know the rules for passing out of dummy half. Dmb play by McInnes.

2018-09-17T01:14:57+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Completely spurious But if that did happen, that just means they’ve made an incorrect decision there. The McInnes decision is still correct based on the rule as it stands.

2018-09-17T00:43:01+00:00

Lachlan

Guest


If Cameron Smith or the new hooker flavour of the month (Cook) threw that pass, then the bloke failing to make an effort to clear the ruck would have been penalised.

2018-09-17T00:12:24+00:00

Albo

Roar Rookie


Periera is a beauty ! He's much better than Mansour under the high ball ! Will have big 2019 season.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar