This is a time for Aussie heroes

By Peter Hunt / Roar Guru

When Australia’s troupe of wandering cricketers left for England in the winter of 1989 it was mercilessly mocked as the worst Australian team to leave our shores.

That a team boasting – in addition to Alan Border – the likes of Mark Taylor, David Boon, Steve Waugh, Dean Jones, Ian Healy, Terry Alderman, Geoff Lawson and Merv Hughes would be described thus seems improbable now. But at the time, without the benefit perfect hindsight, there were nagging and niggling doubts over whether these guys had the goods.

In the five years since the Aussies defeated Pakistan in the home series of 1983-1984 the national team won only one Test series – against the Kiwis – and even then the series would have been squared had a gallantly defiant Mike Whitney not been able to survive six exacting balls from Richard Hadlee at the zenith of his unbridled brilliance to avoid a loss in the third Test.

In that five-year period leading up to 1989 – surely the bleakest of times – Australia lost three series to the Windies, two Ashes series to the Poms, one series to Pakistan and, most gut-wrenchingly galling of all, two series to the Kiwis. That we celebrated two drawn series against India – both home and away – is the saddest indictment on our performance during that era.

As the Aussies famously drank themselves silly on the flight to England they could look back, with blurred vision, across a five-year period when they had played 46 Tests and won just seven. During the same period the Aussies lost a staggering 18 times.

So when David Gower won the toss in the first Ashes Test at Headingly in early June 1989 and, with a cheeky grin spreading across his boyish face, sent the Aussies in to bat, Border’s men harboured no culture of winning, let alone an ethos of winning without counting the cost; many in the team had rarely even celebrated a Test victory.

And though many in the batting ranks might now smugly peruse their career stats with justifiable pride, their places in history were far from assured on that cold morning in Leeds.

Mark Taylor was playing only his third Test match. His career tally stood at 67 runs at an average of just 16.75.

Taylor’s opening partner, Geoff Marsh – father of Shaun and Mitchell – had been in the Test team since December 1985. Much like his sons, Marsh had promised much but delivered rarely. He had 1670 runs to show for his 49 visits to the batting crease at a middling average of 35.53.

At No.3 David Boon was a solid performer but not yet firmly established. His average was just 38.46, compared to his career-high of 46.83.

After Border – already a great of the game with almost 8000 runs and an average north of 53 – came Dean Jones. Despite his obvious talent, two epic double tons and an average of 45.47, Deano had been in and out of the Test team since 1984. Few other than himself foretold the legend of the man.

(Adrian Murrell/Getty Images)

Then came Steve Waugh. It’s easy to forget how much Waugh struggled to perform in the murky dawn of his stellar career. Like Marsh, he made his debut in December 1985 but had scored only 1099 runs at a mere 30.52 per dismissal. Unlike the maligned Marsh, however, Waugh was yet to score a Test century.

And the bowling talent was just as questionable.

Though Terry Alderman had starred in the 1981 Ashes series, he had played only 24 Tests by 1989 and, at 32.16, his average was elevated.

Similarly, Geoff Lawson had been around the Aussie team since 1980. Yet he was about to enter only his 29th Test with an average of 30.52. He had played a mere two Tests in the past four years.

Then there was Big Merv. The first Ashes Test in 1989 was only his 12th. Like Marsh and Waugh, he debuted in December 1985. With a dismal average of 37.00, he was hardly a mainstay in the team.

That this team of assorted could-have-beens and might-have-beens dominated England four Tests to nil – and would almost certainly have won all six Tests had it not been for the partisan English rain – was simply extraordinary.

I remember staying up all night and watching in awed wonder as session after glorious session the Aussies steamrolled the Pommy batting and pulverised the Limey bowling. Not even the threat of my law school exams lurking in the imminent morning would stop me cheering the boys throughout the night.

Unlike the funereal vigils of 1981 and 1985, these were nights of passion and inspiration. For a devoted nation of cricket tragics, starved of success for so long, the turnaround was stunning. A heavy cloud of depression was lifted.

Suddenly our team was playing with zest and with verve, with poetry and with joy. It was a revelation, a sight to behold.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

Captain Grump, taking the game to an opposition of mates to whom he refused to talk. Mark Taylor driving through the covers and clipping the ball off his pads through mid-wicket with a fluency and grace that mocked both his plodding step and his circumference. Steve Waugh crouching aggressively, like a pugnacious pugilist, before stepping deep into his crease and unleashing a square cut past gully to the boundary. Terry Alderman trotting into the crease, bowling wicket-to-wicket and trapping batsmen LBW again and again.

And it was the start of something. The Aussies would dominate world cricket for the next 15 to 20 years. And it all started – against all the odds – with a team described as the worst Australian side to tour England.

This week a fresh generation of maligned Aussies cricketers will face a new challenge. While the underlying causes of our malaise are different, it is time for those maligned to stand up and take their chance. Will they define the moment or will the moment define them?

Like 1989, this is a time for Aussie heroes.

Who will it be? Will Usman Khawaja repeat his heroics in Dubai? Will the Marsh brothers finally fulfil their promise? Will a new hero, like Marcus Harris, emerge to guide us home? Which of our bowlers will run in, upon tired feet, and deliver the decisive blow when the cause seems lost?

Who will step up and meet the challenge?

This is a time for Aussie heroes, and I’ll cheer them all the way.

The Crowd Says:

2018-12-05T10:43:25+00:00

JOHN ALLAN

Guest


Apparently Graham Gooch's phone message was "Graham Gooch is not in. He's LBW Alderman".

AUTHOR

2018-12-05T00:22:21+00:00

Peter Hunt

Roar Guru


I think that story is true. It's a great one! There was also some graffiti on a wall saying "Thatcher Out!" and somebody wrote below it "LBW bowled Alderman". I love stories like that. Enriches the cricket folklore.

2018-12-05T00:04:59+00:00

Ouch

Roar Rookie


I remember that series. Not sure if its urban legend but the story goes that Graham Gooch changed his answering machine message during that series to; "Hi you've reached Graham Gooch. I'm out. Probably LBW to Terry Alderman"

AUTHOR

2018-12-04T10:03:53+00:00

Peter Hunt

Roar Guru


Those are some pretty chilling words, Phil. I'm scare you are right. We have to preserve gripping Test Cricket, without counting the cost.

AUTHOR

2018-12-04T09:53:10+00:00

Peter Hunt

Roar Guru


I just watched it again on YouTube. It's worth watching! Here is the full transcript: Border: "Hey, hey, hey!" McDermott: "What did I do?" Border: "I'm fkn taking to you, come here! Come here...come here...come here." McDermott: [Inaudible] Border: "You...you do that again mate and you'll be on the next plane home." McDermott: [Inaudible] Border: "What!" McDermott: "Nothing. I didn't say a thing." Border: "You fkn test me; we'll see!" Border does the tea-pot, the finger point and the death stare. I'm not sure what the dispute was about, but I think it may been something to do with which end Billy was bowling from.

2018-12-04T09:45:28+00:00

Phil

Roar Rookie


Well said Peter. The Marsh brothers have shown they can score but are too inconistant on the big stage. Usman could be put there too. I think the trouble is not enough importance put on Shield Cricket. I saw recently a couple of teenagers hit some big scores and at least one media scribe was talking them up as test bolters. Fair dinkum, I remember the time players had to score mountains of runs to be considered. Too much short course cricket is depleting the talent for tests. I must admit though, if I was a talented cricketer, I too would chase the big money in the pop gun tournaments around the world.

2018-12-04T09:30:00+00:00

Phil

Roar Rookie


Fair comment and I accept your explanation along with Peter's but I still hold to my view.

2018-12-04T09:25:24+00:00

Phil

Roar Rookie


.............1993, struth I am getting old. I thought it was before that. I didn't realise the exchange was recorded but glad to hear it was. I've been following cricket since Bob Simpson took over from Richie Benaud and firmly believe Alan Border is the gutsiest, toughest skipper we have ever put forward. Not necessarily the best tactical captain but the type you need when pushing $hit uphill.

AUTHOR

2018-12-04T03:55:17+00:00

Peter Hunt

Roar Guru


Has the current administration not given the Marsh brothers time? And Usman for that matter? That said, Renshaw and Handscomb were touted as our saviours not so long ago...

AUTHOR

2018-12-04T02:54:17+00:00

Peter Hunt

Roar Guru


Thanks Matt. I agree that the circumstances are far from identical. I particularly agree that there were some signs of better things to come in the years leading up to 89. We unexpectedly won the 87 World Cup. Despite NZ having a chance to square the series on that dramatic last day at the MCG in 1987, we actually dominated most of that series with a decisive win in Brisbane and the better of a draw in Adelaide. During that era, having the better of a series against the Kiwis was a real step forward. And I thought we competed well in the 88/89 series against the Windies; it wasn't quite the mauling of 84/85. The similarity between 89 and now is that the circumstances allow for somebody to stand up and make history; to perform when many didn't think they could. Things are set up for somebody - or the team as a whole - to make a name for themselves.

2018-12-04T02:28:32+00:00

1st&10

Guest


News Tip - Any info about Usman’s brother getting arrested for terrorism offences ? Just a legitimate query

2018-12-04T02:27:01+00:00

1st&10

Guest


Aussies in the mid/late 80s stuck with some rookies and gave them time. A perfect example being Steve Waugh, it took him until the 89 Ashes to score a century. McDermott, Warne, Merv all got carted at first

2018-12-04T02:16:09+00:00

Matt H

Roar Guru


There are a few key differences to 1989, some positive some negative: Positive: this current side has a bowling attack that is settled and already proven to be the equal of any. Negative: In 1989 the Australian's had been quietly building. They had invested in project players for a period of time and the results were starting to come. This time around we have a much more unsettled side, with the project players only a couple of tests into their careers (Head, Finch, Harris) and other project players used and dropped (Renshaw, Handscomb, Labuschagne, Burns). And we don;t have a Border to pull it all together with a 50 plus career average. We are hoping rather than expecting that Khawaja or S Marsh can be that person.

AUTHOR

2018-12-04T01:59:40+00:00

Peter Hunt

Roar Guru


Thanks John. I have no problem with that approach. Good, hard, uncompromising Test cricket!

AUTHOR

2018-12-04T01:57:54+00:00

Peter Hunt

Roar Guru


That is pretty simple when you strip it all back, Paul. Just play your best!

2018-12-04T01:45:58+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


You're 100% right about the two issues that need to be sorted out, but I don't think either is that huge an issue. The guys need to dial back the verballing but not stop it - we're talking about Test cricket after all. The team also needs to acknowledge we have 6 guys who are recognised as the best Bats we have in Test cricket so bat like it. Don't worry about Warner & Smith not being there, just play as best you can. Seems pretty simple to me.

2018-12-04T01:01:59+00:00

john goerge

Guest


Carlin Werth, I do hope you are correct. Finch to either go cheap or big. Like Warner. Thanks John

2018-12-04T00:25:56+00:00

john goerge

Guest


IF AUS want to win this series they have to take a bulldog approach: bowl bouncers all day at the indian batsmen. aim to get the ball up under their chins. strike them when they are down. aim to get the ball low and scream for LBW. if they pepper kohli will bouncers he will hole out or get a nick to the slipsmen. the harder they can bowl the better, bouncers will rattle them. dont be afraid to graze some skin. aim for the gullet. go AUS!

AUTHOR

2018-12-04T00:15:44+00:00

Peter Hunt

Roar Guru


Thanks John. The Aussies demonstrated they could play with grit in Dubai. Finch, Khawaja, Head, Paine and Lyon all dug in and played their part. But I agree with the general point that we need to develop TEST BATSMAN like the ones you have mentioned, and Border, Ponting, Langer etc etc.

AUTHOR

2018-12-04T00:13:05+00:00

Peter Hunt

Roar Guru


I agree that getting the balance right between "playing nice" and winning is going to be a tough needle to thread. That said, you can still play hard, uncompromising cricket without sledging or being overly aggressive in everything from they way you celebrate a dismissal to the way you walk. When I was reminiscing about 89, I remembered the day Taylor and Marsh batted all day and Australia was none of just of 300 at Stumps. As the openers walked off, AB sent Steve Waugh onto the field to face some throw-downs. The Poms had to walk past him to leave the field. And this was a guy batting at number 6 who the English could not get out during that series. The Poms must have been shattered. I guess it's a very specific set of circumstances, but it's a great example of how you can achieve "mental disintegration" without exchanging a single word. Re Finch, I thought he batted with great maturity and poise against Pakistan. It will be interesting to see how he goes.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar