Australian selection riddles build first Test intrigue nicely

By Brett McKay / Expert

As big a fan as I was of Justin Langer the batsman, I didn’t imagine that cagey media operator would feature heavily in his debut Test on home soil as Australian coach.

Langer the batsman’s work ethic, attitude and desire to get the most out of whatever talent is available at the time is all there and present in every Australian team this summer. It’s been no different this week in Adelaide as the Australians have readied themselves for India.

For many Australian fans today will be the first time they’ve seen the Test team in action since the infamous South African tour for which Steve Smith and David Warner remain exiled for another few months. Cameron Bancroft probably isn’t much closer to a recall despite his ban ending before the new year.

» Australia vs India: Day 1 live scores, blog

For many Australian fans today will also be the first test of their resolve never to watch the Test team again.

This will be an interesting subplot. I was having a conversation at a barbecue last weekend in which one of the participants was adamant he’ll never watch another ball. “I’m just done with them, all of them,” he declared, seemingly oblivious to the fact that the team that steps onto the Adelaide Oval this morning is a very different beast to the one that lost control of its sanity in Cape Town last March.

Regardless of the extent of the rebuild – a necessary rebuild, make no mistake – this series against the No.1 side in Test cricket has been commonly written off. Though some of the bookies surprisingly have Australia as slight favourites for both the first Test and the four-Test series, it’s been difficult to find a huge amount of support for the home side anywhere, really.

But since skipper Tim Paine named the side in his press conference yesterday in Adelaide, I don’t might admitting that I’m feeling more confident about the Australians starting the series with a win than I might otherwise have felt. The XI as named just has a good feel about it, and reports of the Adelaide Oval wicket having more grass on it than in recent years is encouraging.

And maybe the fact Paine named the XI yesterday at all is the biggest surprise of all. The interpretation and guesswork over the last 48 hours of the likely make-up of the top order was quite humorous to watch.

It all started with the ‘mail’ that Victorian opener Marcus Harris was no certainty to debut and that Usman Khawaja or even Shaun Marsh could take on the new Kookaburra alongside Aaron Finch.

Travis Head was also no certainty to play earlier in the week, with the South Australian skipper said to be facing a battle to hold off the challenges presented by all-rounder Mitchell Marsh and recalled Victorian captain Peter Handscomb. But then Head was hardly mentioned and somehow his place became secure.

Langer spoke to Michael Clarke’s new mate ‘Gerald Wheatley’ on Melbourne radio on Tuesday morning – that’s SEN’s Gerard Whateley, for the record – and his thoughts seemed to be taken a number of different ways.

(Scott Barbour/Getty Images)

Colleague David Lord read the tea leaves initially as Langer saying, “The final composition of the batting line-up rests between debutant Marcus Harris and Peter Handscomb on the comeback trail”.

“That comment means Aaron Finch, and Mitchell Marsh, are definite starters,” he wrote on the day.

Other reporting around the traps, including on cricket.com.au and on these very pages, carried the Langer quote that quickly uncemented Marsh’s spot in the side.

“We’re pretty sure Marcus Harris will make his debut, which is very exciting for him,” the quotes had Langer saying.

“We’ll make the decision on the last batting spot … at this stage I’d say it’ll be either Peter Handscomb or Mitchell Marsh who’ll take the five or six position,” the coach said, making the remarkable admission that the last spot in the batting order would come down to the only two batsmen left in the squad.

Langer went on to hint that the state of the Adelaide Oval wicket might convince the Australians than the New South Wales pace trio of Mitchell Starc, Josh Hazlewood and Pat Cummins along with spinner Nathan Lyon wouldn’t require an extra medium-pace option in the form of the younger Marsh.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

But that hint was given on Tuesday, with two whole days of pitch preparation and South Australian sunshine still to come. Paine naming the XI yesterday had to have come with the assumption that the pitch wasn’t going to going to drastically change colour over the final day of curation.

And with the confirmation of the XI, Handscomb’s return and Marsh’s omission, many of the worst fears and plenty of the selection angst went out the window.

Six specialist batsmen, keeper Paine and the four bowlers is the recipe that plenty of us were calling for last summer, when it was ironically decided that Marsh as the fifth bowler gave the team a better balance than Handscomb as the sixth batsman. Now a bit of grass in Adelaide will give us the chance to see if this is true.

There’s no doubt the Mitchell Marsh will remain in the frame for the remaining Tests this summer, indeed, with Paine confirming the plan yesterday was to “send him back to Shield, get some more cricket under his belt knowing at some stage we’re probably going to need him.”

The selection intrigue that produced something of an unexpected Australian XI will no doubt carry on through the series.

But it’s already given the summer a nice little kick already.

The Crowd Says:

2018-12-06T08:46:45+00:00

The Bush

Roar Guru


Funny thing is, while there are moments when he looks good, what is the actual potential he’s shown? I know he captained U19 Aus to victory, but he was no particular stand out star, two other batsmen scored more runs. He’s never had a great Shield season. It’s sorta like Billy Bean from Moneyball - looks like he should be amazing but isn’t. Still, who knows, the dream would be team changing. We used to talk about Watto never fulfilling his potential, but at least he showed real glimpses. He had quite decent FC career as well, so the potential was there.

AUTHOR

2018-12-06T00:47:38+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


John, not 30 minutes before this comment you wrote above, "AUS have a greater chance of bowling first and hopefully getting India out for cheap. " It's a rather dramatic change of mind in half an hour... (not to mention the early wickets since)

AUTHOR

2018-12-06T00:45:07+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


Had very much the same reaction, James. I like Handscomb's inclusion, but I would've been on board with the benefits had Marsh played..

AUTHOR

2018-12-06T00:43:49+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


I was quite take aback by the bold declaration, Bushy. That something could be so forcefully declared with seemingly no room for the possibility that a team might change...

AUTHOR

2018-12-06T00:42:31+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


I just have this feeling India will win the toss and bat, but lose both openers early... :lol:

AUTHOR

2018-12-06T00:41:47+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


Yep, top comment Bushy. The race to be outraged is only matched by the race to write people off early...

2018-12-06T00:21:50+00:00

Kopa Shamsu

Guest


Dropping Sir M Marsh was a brave & very hard decision.

2018-12-05T23:59:10+00:00

IAP

Guest


I don't think he has the potential to be a top-liner. He's had more than enough chances to prove his worth. His dad was average, his brother was average, he's average at best.

2018-12-05T23:35:42+00:00

john goerge

Guest


India win the toss and bat first. (sigh) Well there goes the test match. We will need to be on our game in Perth next week.

2018-12-05T23:35:10+00:00

Ouch

Roar Rookie


Never? I hope he returns and fulfills his potential. If he did he'd be a fantastic asset to the team.

2018-12-05T23:34:31+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


I know I'm in the minority but I didn't really care whether or not they went with M Marsh or Handscomb. On Aussie decks I don't think one is significantly more likely to succeed than the other. The schadenfreude of Aussie fans at Mitch's omission is kinda funny and sad at the same time. But at last, test cricket.

2018-12-05T23:21:19+00:00

Chris Love

Roar Guru


Nice article. Just watched the opening remarks from the new look team at Ch7. Have to say that I’m really optimistic that the new (commentary) team is really looking the goods. I couldn’t really tell but is dizzy’s hair Blonde? Trent Copeland I thought was a left field choice but like the way he presents himself. Big opportunity for him considering he’s one of the form bowlers of the shield this year.

2018-12-05T23:09:23+00:00

john goerge

Guest


Fingers crossed that we win the toss and BOWL first. AUS have a greater chance of bowling first and hopefully getting India out for cheap. If we bat first, forget about it, all gone for around 180 I'm guessing.

2018-12-05T22:55:29+00:00

Ben

Roar Rookie


Totally agree. It’s the selectors who should be bagged for giving him so much chances instead of sending him back to the shield.

2018-12-05T22:53:26+00:00

doug heffernan

Guest


Bush: "if he nails the Shield over a few seasons, I’d welcome him back with open arms" He will be back for the next test in Perth. I would stake my house on it.

2018-12-05T22:40:54+00:00

The Bush

Roar Guru


What's with the negativity? I'm no fan of his batting, or his bowling either I guess, but I don't wish the bloke ill and if he nails the Shield over a few seasons, I'd welcome him back with open arms. The kids only 27; talk about calling it early.

2018-12-05T22:39:08+00:00

The Bush

Roar Guru


"spoke to Michael Clarke’s new mate ‘Gerald Wheatley’" Loved this line. Also love the bit about your mate who "isn't going to watch". Yeah right. Test cricket is in the DNA and we love nothing more than a bunch of underdogs sticking it to the man (Kohli). If there's even a sniff of a win, the team will be right back in vogue.

2018-12-05T22:15:03+00:00

john goerge

Guest


Brett, The big question is then: What is your prediction for the 1st test?

2018-12-05T21:40:49+00:00

IAP

Guest


Hallelujah! Finally M.Marsh is gone. Let's hope he never returns.

2018-12-05T21:13:24+00:00

doug heffernan

Guest


Brett, what a great article. I feel the same way. Feeling slightly more interested and confident now that the infection is gone. Mitch Marsh is finally in the grasp of.......knocker. The only thing he will be performing is getting the Gatorade powder to water ratio correct. I don't think he could even do that. I think the way he handled himself on the radio the other day with the thumbs up to Geoff Lawson was the final straw too. Acted like a buffoon, spoke poorly just saying stock standard responses, quite uninspired. Geoff Lawson was spot on. He did not deserve his spot. Joe Burns could make quadruple the runs at number 6 for example. Even Kurtis Patterson would get more runs. The list goes on and on.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar