Indian quicks leave Australia battered and bruised

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

Australia’s fragile batting line-up was further undermined yesterday when Aaron Finch suffered a finger injury and Peter Handscomb’s technique was exposed yet again on a high-octane day of Test cricket in Perth.

The Aussie attack bowled with an exhilarating mix of skill and brute force to dismiss India for 283, only for the visiting bowlers to produce perhaps the most menacing spell ever seen from an Indian team.

By stumps the hosts were 4 for 132, leading by 175, but that scoreline did not accurately reflect just how much the Indian attack troubled Australia.

After settling down on Day 2, the Perth pitch quickened on Day 3 to provide perfect conditions for two attacks which contain an array of fearsome bowlers.

While Australia have often bullied visiting teams with the ball, never before has a touring Asian team returned fire like India did yesterday.

Led by express quick Jasprit Bumrah, India’s attack pummelled the Australian batsmen.

First rookie opener Marcus Harris had his helmet broken by a ferocious Bumrah bouncer.

Then Finch suffered a withering blow on his right index finger, which looked sickeningly swollen immediately he removed his batting glove.

That short ball from Mohammed Shami forced Finch to retire hurt just as he was building momentum on 25 from 30 balls.

Finch went for an X-ray, which showed no fracture to his index finger, and he is expected to bat today. But it remains to be seen whether he will be fit for the Boxing Day Test.

This will add another element of uncertainty to Australia’s preparation for that match, alongside concerns about Handscomb’s form.

In the lead-up to this series I expressed reservations about Handscomb’s recall to the Test team.

The Victorian was dropped during the Ashes last year when his curious technique was picked apart by England.

Then he returned for this series despite having made no significant changes to his batting approach as well as having averaged just 32 in first-class cricket since being dropped.

(AAP Image/David Crosling)

There was, to my mind, minimal justification for his recall. I expected India’s talented pace attack to sternly test his technique, pinning him to the crease and targeting bowled and LBW, just like England did. So it has been.

After four innings in this series Handscomb has 68 runs at 17, bringing his return in his last five Tests to 154 runs at 17.

Yet it is not his lack of runs which stands out most at present. Instead it is the manner in which he’s being dismissed.

India’s pacemen are toying with Handscomb. Well aware that he thrives on width, that he seeks to free his arms at every opportunity, they have bowled extremely full and straight to him.

Then, once they’ve sensed his frustration building, the Indian quicks have offered him wide sucker balls which he’s edged behind.

Yesterday was his ugliest dismissal of the series as he missed a full Ishant Sharma off cutter by at least ten centimetres and was plumb LBW.

As in last summer’s Ashes, Handscomb is being found out by elite Test quicks. It is hard to see the story changing in the third Test.

Meanwhile, Australia again donated a clutch of wickets to India. Harris shouldered arms only for a Bumrah in-ducker to rattle his stumps.

Later Shaun Marsh went for an optimistic hook shot before he was set and feathered it through to the wicketkeeper.

Then Travis Head, for the second time in the Test, sliced the ball down the throat of deep third man.

Head had been impressive in weathering some high-quality bowling as he moved to 19 from 49 balls, only to waste this good start.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

This left veterans Usman Khawaja (41*) and Tim Paine (8*) to nurse Australia to stumps.

Khawaja started his innings nicely, looking more fluent than he has at any point in this series. That was in a large part due to the inability of the Indian bowlers to execute their plan to the left-hander.

Early in a Test innings Khawaja loves to tuck the ball through the leg side off his hip and his pads. India gave him plenty of opportunities to do so yesterday after denying him this scoring avenue in his first three innings of the series, a tactic which had caused him frustration.

Yesterday it was some persistently wide bowling by part-time offie Hanuma Vihari which got under the skin of Khawaja.

He flirted with a succession of these offerings before edging one to first slip, where Ajinkya Rahane offered him a reprieve just before stumps.

That could turn out to be the pivotal moment in this Test. If Khawaja can exploit this chance and bat through the first 90 minutes this morning, Australia’s lead should be above 250.

Such a target would be an enormous task for India given the state of the pitch, the quality of the Australian attack and the length of the tourists’ tail.

The Crowd Says:

2018-12-17T08:02:42+00:00

Drew

Roar Rookie


Cummins doesn't get first crack at the tail either. Misses the chance to rack up some gimme wickets.

2018-12-17T07:36:54+00:00

Phillip

Guest


Australia is once more in a position to strike, lets hope the pacemen this time around take most of the wickets and not just leave it all up to the lone spinner, if the three fail again then the run chase will be damn tight.

2018-12-17T05:50:24+00:00

Harvey Wilson

Roar Rookie


It's so great to finally see express pace coming out of India. They can't just rely on spinners.

2018-12-17T05:23:36+00:00

Steele

Guest


Yes Don, I concede you are right about Maxi the bowler. They prob wouldn’t pick him as a fifth bowler. Yet MMarsh has been getting a gig, even promoted to vice captain, despite not delivering at all as a bowler. Is Maxis dibbly dobs really that inferior to Marshes medium pacers? I know your answer, but more than a few are not so sure.

2018-12-17T05:04:13+00:00

Steele

Guest


Agree with JamesH. Burns should come in regardless of who goes out. He is one of the few legit batsman plying their trade. The question is, which all rounder is the best package for Melbourne. I’d be happy with Maxwell or Stoinis. There really is a dearth of options. Cannot see the selectors dropping two players though.

AUTHOR

2018-12-17T05:03:14+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Jason Gillespie was similar - so many times he would bowl incredibly well and yet not get rewarded with wickets. Whereas guys like Starc and Mitch Johnson often can bowl ordinary-to-poor and still grab handfuls of wickets. It's a vagary of this great format.

2018-12-17T04:58:55+00:00

Steele

Guest


Don, I agree with using current form, basically you have just made negative comments in regards to Wade, which doesn’t fit your argument. Disregarding Harris, he is the form batsmen. Could care less about his bowling, he justifies selection ahead of Handscomb just on batting.

2018-12-17T04:44:45+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


What a silly comment, Phillip. Follow some cricket. Who do you think you are having conversations with?

2018-12-17T04:40:11+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


Wade's bowling is pedestrian at best and his fielding is atrocious...even with gloves on. Let's see him get runs in the top 4 not at #6.

2018-12-17T04:29:15+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


Maxwell would be a good selection (indeed, he'd be my selection) but his bowling is just not a factor. If they want a 5th bowler, it won't be Maxi. He should be there in Handscomb's spot.

2018-12-17T04:26:47+00:00

Chris Kettlewell

Roar Guru


I don't know what it is about Cummins though. He's regularly in that situation, where he's described as bowling the best of all the bowlers but just not getting the wickets to show for it. Is there just something he's missing in his bowling to take him from constantly bowling well to actually taking bags of wickets? Is he accurate and works the batsmen over well but just doesn't get the ball to move enough? Or something else?

2018-12-17T04:26:26+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


Let go of averages as your driver and you'll have a lot more cricket options. Go with current form.

2018-12-17T04:24:34+00:00

Chris Kettlewell

Roar Guru


Defending under-par totals in conditions that don't offer much for the bowler can have a tendency to push the bowlers to try too hard in trying to bowl wicket balls. The result of this can often be that the bowling standard goes down instead of up. If the batting lineup can put on more defendable totals, it will help the bowlers also!

2018-12-17T04:10:31+00:00

Chris Kettlewell

Roar Guru


Pretty sure he'd moved from middle order to opening for Qld before he ever did it for Australia.

2018-12-17T04:03:57+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


Agree with pretty much everything, although I don't think the selectors can justify picking M Marsh now. They publicly said they needed him to score runs in the Shield and he didn't. Burns would be a really solid number 5 and can open if they decide to bump Finch down the order (or if he isn't fit).

2018-12-17T04:02:58+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


How's your negativity looking today?

2018-12-17T04:01:57+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


He's never been able to play a moving ball.

2018-12-17T03:41:52+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


Brendon, really? You can't blame Peever and co for that. You are just not as great a fan of cricket as cricket fans are.

2018-12-17T03:41:25+00:00

Steele

Guest


So James, you just named nine better batsman than Stoinis and Marsh, which is easy. Yet only Maxwell rolls his arm over out of that lot. The feeling is, the bowlers need some relief going into Melbourne. Which I think is reasonable. So basically your not quite getting it. To make your point more salient you need to find nine batsmen who can bowl some relief overs and are a better package than Stoinis/Marsh. Players in this category :) Maxwell Marnus Agar Pattinson Head Cartwright Moises Faulkner This is what I came up with, for mine Maxy is the only one I would definitely choose over Stoinis/Marsh. After that it gets interesting.

2018-12-17T03:30:06+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


Me too. They could bring in any of Burns, Patterson, Maxwell or Wade right now and I'd be content. Although I'd prefer a right hander for balance. It's such a pity Ferguson hasn't had a great start to the Shield or he'd be a lock.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar