Fans out of pocket as another Boxing Day sales pitch falls flat

By Jason Hosken / Roar Guru

Melbourne Cricket Ground curator Matthew Page was on a hiding to nothing despite his positive spin leading into day one of the Boxing Day Test.

Despite the fallout from last year’s unbreakable Ashes-road, the former WACA green man stood next to no chance of finding any extra spice using the same antiquated drop-in infrastructure.

Writing the death knell of a pitch with one side yet to bat is usually fraught with danger. However, yesterday’s covering of fluffy grass turned out to be nothing more than a sheep in wolves clothing, and the lifeless evidence so far points to another wicket-less bore fest.

At two for 215, India will feel on top with Virat Kohli set and the ball starting to come onto the bat.

A year earlier, Australia were similarly placed at three for 244. From there, the contest meandered to a lifeless draw as only 21 wickets fell over the closing four days.

The writing was on the wall only two overs after the national anthems with Tim Paine taking routine lengths from Mitchell Starc and Josh Hazlewood below knee height. With no new ball swing, cut off the seam was everything, and there was none.

(Photo by Francois Nel/Getty Images)

For all the pre-game talk of juicy improvements, the day one action proved on par with the most recent Sheffield Shield offering where only 31 wickets fell in the match between Victoria and Western Australia.

Sydney and the Gabba are last of the traditional in-situ squares but already after one Test, the new Perth drop-in offers all the unique qualities of its WACA neighbour.

Adelaide, for the most part, offers the five-day transitional qualities for the game’s best to entertain.

As it stands after day one, the docile Melbourne pitch has not offered anything to suggest an improvement on last year’s ‘poor’ rating as judged by ICC match referee Ranjan Madugalle.

Madugalle didn’t hold back in his match report saying, “The nature of the pitch did not change over the five days and there was no natural deterioration. As such, the pitch did not allow an even contest between the bat and the ball as it neither favoured the batsmen too much nor it gave the bowlers sufficient opportunity to take wickets.”

For one of the largest and if not most popular Test matches on the global cricket calendar, it is a damning comment that Cricket Australia can’t ignore beyond this summer.

According to ESPN Cricinfo, the MCG square is in line for a facelift in March when the current pitch configuration that has been in place since the late 1990s will be removed and replaced by a system like those used in Adelaide and Perth.

The report says the system is designed to allow a greater flow of moisture between the pitches in the square and into the wider sand and earth base around them, allowing for greater variation and deterioration over the course of a match.

For the 70,000-plus who part with their hard-earned on Australian cricket’s most hyped day, the change can’t come fast enough.

The whispers that the Boxing Day Test could be forced from the MCG sound too ludicrous to believe but they’ll soon be fact the longer the excavators are denied entry.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

The Crowd Says:

2018-12-28T00:02:29+00:00

Brendon the 1st

Roar Rookie


What I don’t understand is the curator (the same man who has been responsible for the crap WACA pitches for years) can blame the drop in system the MCG have but I remember the MCG pitch being spicy up until about 3 years ago, using the same system they have now, what’s changed in the last 3 years? If it’s like this next year, heads have to roll.

2018-12-27T07:43:43+00:00

Noah Barling

Roar Pro


I think we are forgetting that the WACA is available AND Hobart is been snubbed for a road in Canberra.

AUTHOR

2018-12-27T06:05:20+00:00

Jason Hosken

Roar Guru


Player safety would’ve contributed to the Perth downgrade. Fair enough too, the Indian tail were nothing more than targets in the second dig - tough viewing regardless of the result.

2018-12-27T05:57:34+00:00

DickieDoodle

Guest


From all the talking up of the pitch, its again a bit of a disappointment in a snooze fest. I thought ICC was a bit harsh on its ratings for the Perth pitch.

2018-12-27T04:07:28+00:00

Sloany

Roar Rookie


Adelaide Oval is great for the cricket close to the action and the pitches play well. Nearly always a result there. Adelaide, Perth and the MCG all have drop in pitches. Surely they can teach Melbourne how to make a decent drop in pitch.

AUTHOR

2018-12-26T23:21:45+00:00

Jason Hosken

Roar Guru


Much closer to the action in Sydney too. That said, without checking the stats, I suspect Melbourne wins hands down with fans through the gate regardless of the opponent. I've not been to the new Adelaide but it seems to have all the other grounds covered for pitch quality and spectator desires. Give them two Tests.

2018-12-26T23:10:20+00:00

Adam Willis

Guest


They only really pass 60K on Day 1, unless it's an Ashes test. After that it looks half full. Sydney is a much better venue for cricket, and generally sold out the 1st 3 days.

AUTHOR

2018-12-26T23:07:23+00:00

Jason Hosken

Roar Guru


Nothing worse than waking in the outta with blistered lips and ears like crispy bacon.

AUTHOR

2018-12-26T23:03:29+00:00

Jason Hosken

Roar Guru


Ha, covered in fine sand...ya know it makes sense!!

AUTHOR

2018-12-26T22:57:27+00:00

Jason Hosken

Roar Guru


I guess it shows AFL is the priority. The window for change must be small and inconvenient. Then again when was the last time anybody felt threatened by action from the ICC? I just can't see Melbourne losing the game, no matter had bad the deck Melburnians will always stream through the gates. Optus in Perth is the next biggest ground with a capacity of around 60k. Even at its worst Melbourne is still the most financially viable for Cricket Australia.

2018-12-26T22:26:09+00:00

John

Guest


The pitch is terrible and yesterday was a snnoze fest.

2018-12-26T22:17:10+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


I'm trying to imagine the hit on the Vic economy if they lost the Boxing Day Test. I'm also trying to work out why little was done to the actual surface, even though they had 12 months warning from the ICC. It seems some poor thinking on the part of the MCG might cost it and Melbourne tens of millions of dollars.

2018-12-26T22:06:13+00:00

kk

Roar Pro


Melbourne and Malthoid would make for a merry marriage.

AUTHOR

2018-12-26T21:13:44+00:00

Jason Hosken

Roar Guru


I thought Marsh bowled well, good line and length and a few near 140km/h. They may have held up a tad in the wicket causing Kohli to curb his attack. Starc still below his best and in the opening stages without swing and bounce looked almost pedestrian at times. Unlucky in his final spell, his in-swing was back and could easily have knocked over a couple. Shame Paine couldn’t hang on to the Kohli edge - you reckon with a new ball it would’ve carried at regulation height on most other decks.

2018-12-26T17:37:58+00:00

Kopa Shamsu

Guest


The pitch seems to have quickened up a bit as day went on with being little inconsistent in bounce. But this is not what I expected TBH specially after first 2 test & all the talk regarding even contest . Very disappointed.

2018-12-26T17:18:38+00:00

anon

Roar Pro


Starc was pretty bad though, and how Mitch Marsh was so economical with his 125 km/h deliveries on a dead pitch didn't make sense. If Kohli was looking to pile on runs he'd put 4/6 Marsh deliveries to the boundary. It was almost like they were trying to hold themselves back against Marsh

Read more at The Roar