Andy Murray must hang on until Wimbledon before he retires

By David Lord / Expert

It was tough watching Andy Murray’s tearful announcement that this Australia Open could be his last tournament.

A persistent hip injury has made it too painful to continue at 31 years of age, and even though he would receive a rousing and genuine farewell at Melbourne Park, as he’s universally respected, the home of tennis is where he should call halt. The Scot is loved at SW19.

For as long as he lasts in the 2019 edition, Murray will play before a packed centre court where he’s won two Wimbledons, and a sardine-like packed open-air ‘Murray Mound’ at the back of the grandstand with a huge television screen.

That crowd will go ballistic the day Sir Andy Murray hangs up his racquet, and he thoroughly deserves a grand farewell of that magnitude, more so than one from the furthest Slam on the planet.

(Photo: AAP)

So where does he stand in the pecking order of world tennis?

Andy Murray is an integral member of the Big Four with Roger Federer, Novak Djokovic and Rafael Nadal.

Of the last 52 men’s Grand Slam singles finals, the quality quartet has won 47 of them – that’s domination.

Djokovic and Nadal have won 15 apiece, Federer 14, and Murray three – only Stan Wawrinka with three, Juan Martin del Potro and Marin Cilic have broken the mould.

Federer leads the way with $117 million in career prize money, from Djokovic’s $115 million, Nadal’s $102 million, and Murray’s $61 million – the top four of all-time.

On those stats, it appears Murray is the junior partner of the four, but he’s the only one to wear two Olympic gold medals around his neck, downing Federer in straight sets to win in London in 2012, and del Potro in four at Rio.

And he’s also the only one of the four to go through an entire Davis Cup campaign unbeaten in eight singles, and three doubles, when Great Britain won in 2015 for the first time in 79 years.

Only John McEnroe and Mats Wilander have achieved that feat.

Murray’s three biggest successes were beating Djokovic to win his first Slam at the 2012 US Open in five sets, and Wimbledon in 2013, again downing Djokovic in straight sets, and Milos Raonic in straight sets in 2016.

But Djokovic has been Murray’s Achilles heel, winning four of Murray’s five Australian Open finals in 2011, 2013, 2015, and 2016, and Murray’s sole French final in 2016.

Federer was the only other one to beat Murray in a Slam final, taking out the 2010 Australian Open in straight sets.

(AP Photo/Andy Brownbill)

So the kid from Dunblane in Scotland has come a long way from the three-year-old who first picked up a tennis racquet, who played his first tournament at five, and was good enough to be playing with, and against, adults at eight.

At nine, Murray went through hell at Dunblane Primary School when a mad-crazed gunman murdered 16 of his schoolmates and injured dozens more. He still doesn’t talk about how he hid under a desk to escape the carnage.

But no doubt it steeled him to become one of Scotland’s favourite sporting sons alongside Sir Chris Hoy, 11-time world champion cyclist, and winner of six Olympic golds, Sir Jackie Stewart, three-time world formula one champion, and Sir Kenny Dalglish with 102 soccer caps for Scotland, plus 204 games for Celtic, and 355 for Liverpool.

In the top four for tennis, and top four for Scotland, says it all.

But there’s one more thing to mention.

Whenever Andy Murray was successful throughout his career, the British media claimed him as representing Great Britain.

But whenever he lost he was a Scot.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

When Sir Andy Murray does call halt, they better get it right: he’s a Scot, and very proud of it.

And Wimbledon is the perfect place for the Scot to say farewell.

The Crowd Says:

2019-01-16T05:05:03+00:00

anon

Roar Pro


Murray won the same number of majors as Wawrinka. IMO there was only ever a 'big 3'. He was a step below Djokovic, Nadal and Federer (despite having a winning record against Federer early on).

2019-01-15T21:25:15+00:00

Oblonsky‘s Other Pun

Roar Guru


At present, yes. But in our sport, grand slams are disproportionately important. Undoubtedly, Murray was more consistently good over a longer period of time. However, I'd already argue that Stan at his peaks were probably better. If he wins a fourth slam, in my mind he would have the career I would be more envious of.

2019-01-15T21:22:44+00:00

Chris Kettlewell

Roar Guru


I think that, even while Stan has the same number of slams as Murray, the big difference between the two has been that Murray spent a long time at the top, just behind the top 3, constantly struggling to try and break into that group and make it a top 4, but was always right there as the fourth one just behind them until that short point where he broke through for major wins and even reached number one. While Stan also had that short period where he did incredibly well and won 3 slams, outside of that golden stretch he hasn't been as consistently up near the top pushing the top 3 like Murray has. But I still think that it's a big 3, and Murray's just outside that group, but still a step ahead of the chasing pack.

2019-01-14T09:35:07+00:00

Patrick

Guest


If Stan manages to win the US - still unlikely, but he has proven 3 times he can win a slam - he will have won a career grand slam. That would be something. A really underrated champion in a great era

AUTHOR

2019-01-14T01:05:02+00:00

David Lord

Expert


Fionn, you clearly missed my friendly dig when you first mentioned Rafa, Fed, and Nadal as Murray's toughest opponents - Nadal got two mentions, Novak missed out.

2019-01-13T22:35:01+00:00

TomCarter'sSprintCoach

Guest


I also think David may have skipped over the 2008 US Open final and the 2012 Wimbledon finals, both won by Federer. In fact I think all but one of Murray's wins against Federer have been outside of grand slams.

2019-01-13T21:40:42+00:00

Oblonsky‘s Other Pun

Roar Guru


David, as someone who has played tennis competitively and coached for well over a decade, and who follows the tour very closely, I can assure you that grand slams continue to trump Olympic medals every time. The Olympics is just far less important, and are best of three aside from the final, albeit they are bigger than masters. With respect, he didn't battle against Fed and Nadal his entire career. Nadal had a 71% win rate against Murray, and the last time he beat Nadal in a slam was 2010. Federer has beaten him the last 5 times in a row, without losing a set. Murray got 6 of his 11 wins against Federer before 2010. Fed has won 12 of the last 17. Murray was simply clearly outclassed by all of Fed, Nadal and Djok. He is still a great player, but not as great as the others.

AUTHOR

2019-01-13T20:32:49+00:00

David Lord

Expert


Fionn, even if Stan Wawrinka wins another Slam which would be a miracle, he'll still be two Olympic gold medals behind Andy Murray, which Wawrinka will never win. And with respect, the Scot as you say battled throughout his career with Rafa, Fed, and Nadal. What happened to Novak, his Achilles heel?

2019-01-13T20:19:17+00:00

Oblonsky‘s Other Pun

Roar Guru


David, while the line that whenever Murray lost he became a Scott to the British media is often repeated, I have never found that. I think that they stuck through him thick and thin, and were rewarded for it. Murray was a great player. Spectacularly athletic who put his heart and soul into every match. He didn't have the abilities of his competitors (indeed, I would not be surprised if Stan Wawrinka wins another slam and retires with more than Murray, and thus arguably having the better career) but he still managed to win three grand slams despite having to face Rafa, Fed and Nadal - and struggling against all three of them. His work ethic is an inspiration to all young tennis players, and I hope they emulate him in this. He thoroughly deserves to go out at Wimbledon. I believe the Lawn Tennis Association would surely give him a wild card also, regardless of his ranking, so hopefully he can hang on until Wimbledon and make a fine exit on centre court, regardless of what happens.

Read more at The Roar