Are the Lakers wasting a year of LeBron’s prime?

By Ryan O'Connell / Expert

When you sign the best player in the league – and arguably the greatest player of all time – while he’s still in his prime, your goal for the season should be the NBA championship.

Therefore, given the Lakers were fortunate enough to acquire LeBron James this past off-season, their goal for the 2018-19 season should be the title. But is it?

LeBron James just turned 34 years of age and is in his sixteenth season in the NBA. It’s incredible that he could still be in his prime, but he certainly is. Though his intensity isn’t there game-to-game, and – in an understatement for the ages – he isn’t always ‘locked in’ on the defensive end, he remains the best player on the planet.

That fact is rammed home come playoff time, when LeBron removes any doubt that he’s still the best. Last year’s playoff run with a mediocre Cleveland team might be the most impressive I’ve seen from one player, as LeBron simply eviscerated opponents game-after-game on his way once more to the Finals.

Yet as great as LeBron still is, he is much closer to the end of his career than he is the start. Father Time remains undefeated, and LeBron being sidelined at present with a groin injury has reminded us all of that. We should savour every minute he is on the court because he won’t be playing forever.

Which brings us nicely to the Lakers and the window of opportunity they have left with LeBron.

Unfortunately, the current Lakers roster is one that’s split into two completely different timelines.

In LeBron, Rajon Rondo, Tyson Chandler and JaVale McGee, you have a core that is built to win now. OK, as good as he’s been this season, including JaVale in that group is a bit of a stretch, along with a slight insult to the other three, but the point is, those guys are at the tail-end of their careers and don’t really have time on their side. They’re looking to win right now.

Conversely, Lonzo Ball, Kyle Kuzma, Brandon Ingram and Josh Hart represent the other core of the Lakers, and they’re young and inexperienced. Though all have shown more than enough talent to prove they’ll be in the league for a long time, none of them are presently ready to be the second-best player on a title-winning team. Nor do we know if any are guaranteed to be All-Star level players in the future.

(AP Photo/Chris Szagola)

In short, this young core needs time to develop.

For all the angst over Ball and Ingram’s play this year, it’s worth pointing out that they’re still just 21 years of age. Yes, they have unacceptably quiet games far too often. Yes, their passion and intensity has rightfully been called out. Yes, they make immature mistakes. Yes, their perimeter shooting is definitely a work-in-progress. Yes, their ultimate ceiling remains unknown, and may not be as high as many think.

However, they’re 21. That is still insanely young.

So, the Lakers have a roster that is placed at diametrically opposed stages of their careers. The two cores can be summarised as: ‘young and not ready’, versus ‘old and not long left’. Which translates to the Lakers having two goals this season: development and/or winning.

Needless to say, that creates a dilemma for Lakers’ management, because each core is inhibiting the other from achieving its goals.

So which goal should be the primary one?

It would be absolutely crazy, and borderline negligent, to waste a year of LeBron’s prime, especially at 34 years of age. Wasting a year of a 28-year old superstar’s prime is a little bit different, but at 34 you need to be competing for the title, or you’re doing a disservice to LeBron.

Yet in their current state, the Lakers are not realistic threats to win the championship. LeBron’s greatness ensures they are a dangerous team, whom everyone would like to avoid once the playoffs start, but no one is picking the Lakers to be hoisting the Larry O’Brien trophy at the end of the season.

The young players, along with other individuals on the roster, do have some trade value. It’s completely realistic that the Lakers could put together a trade package – or two – that brings in talent that could help LeBron compete for the title this season.

So why haven’t the Lakers been super aggressive in trade talks?

Well, first of all, who is to say they haven’t? Though unlikely in the modern world, perhaps any discussions with other teams simply haven’t been leaked to the public.

What’s more likely, however, is that one of the following factors is weighing on Laker management’s minds:

1. They believe the coming off-season provides them with their best chance to add another superstar player.

2. They don’t want to trade for talent if it means gutting their roster of depth, and therefore not really moving the needle enough for them to be legitimate contenders anyway.

3. They rate their young players extremely highly and don’t want to lose them.

4. They feel the current Golden State Warriors’ dynasty could come to an end this season, dramatically increasing the odds of a different team winning next year.

(AP Photo/Tony Avelar)

In fact, it may be a combination of all four factors that has seen the Lakers sit on their hands and not make a move.

With the trade deadline of February 7 looming large on the horizon, the Lakers action or inaction will be telling. Given the urgency to surround LeBron with the pieces required to challenge for the championship ASAP, if the Lakers don’t make a move before the deadline, fans can only hope that means the Lakers’ decision-makers – Magic Johnson, Rob Pelinka and Jeanie Buss – are confident they can execute a plan in the off-season that will catapult them into serious championship contention for 2019/20.

Be that a trade for Anthony Davis or the signing of Kawhi Leonard, the Lakers definitely need to sign a player of that ilk to make what they’re doing this current season even remotely palatable; for the only thing worse than wasting a full season of LeBron James’ brilliance, is wasting two.

Fans, and LeBron, will be more forgiving of somewhat making up the numbers this season, if it leads to seriously contending next year. However if this season ends up being a waste for virtually nothing, the Lakers front office will have blood on their hands.

And as history tells us, having a King’s blood on your hands rarely ends well for you.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2019-01-19T07:06:54+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


Tristo! Yeah, the Lakers track record of developing youngsters is terrible. I can’t even think who the last young player they had who grew within the organisation. I mean, I think it’s Kobe, and I’m not even joking.

2019-01-16T13:04:05+00:00

Tristan Rayner

Editor


Hey mate. The Lakers confound me. They both are and are not wasting a prime year of LeBron. Until he was injured, things were sailing along more or less as we’ve seen from LeBron’s new teams: adjustment is required, but overall success is there. Now that both he and Rondo are injured, we’re seeing what you’re talking about. Organisation issues include no shooting coach, which is showing in terrible FT% night after night. Even something as core basketball as Lonzo’s inability to finish a layup is being “fixed” by him spending time with Rondo. Not with an actual coach, a former player that could provide help, but because Rondo is injured and is helping out. C’mon. I’m parroting someone I read or listened to but you see it in the progression of D’angelo Russell’s game, and even just his shooting percentages, at an unexpectedly good organisation at the Nets, compared to the lethargy of improvement from the “young core” in LA. Anyway – assuming no trades are made – it all hangs on LeBron’s participation and this over/under: 30.5 regular season games. If he plays out more than 30 games, the Lakers make the playoffs and probably make a run. If he plays less, it’s seriously likely they even scrape in and face the Warriors first round, or miss out.

2019-01-15T21:19:11+00:00

Jerry

Guest


I don't think the toxic comments would necessarily rule out KD. He was basically saying that playing with LeBron means his team-mates get a huge amount of intense, often negative, media scrutiny. But KD already gets that attention following the move to GS so he's really got nothing to lose on that front.

AUTHOR

2019-01-15T20:03:16+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


No. Nope. Not at all. But if he suffers another injury and misses extended time again? It’s not the worst idea in the world.

2019-01-15T16:43:57+00:00

callumgasowski

Roar Rookie


Ryan mate, you really reckon Lebron is going to wanna tank and would agree to do that? LeBron especially a player like him. Very extreme view.

2019-01-15T06:16:25+00:00

LFrank

Guest


Yep True. I think most people might not have been expecting rings in LA this year (Lebron included), so one wasted year is bad, but easy enough to write off as 'developing'. But if the Lakers can't find another superstar and next season ends up being another poor or even middle-of-the-road one, there will be some very nervous people in expensive suits in LA around this time next year. It'll be the second year that makes or breaks a few people.

AUTHOR

2019-01-15T03:39:21+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


Don't disagree with too much there, but it still adds up to wasting a year of LeBron's prime, and risking a second year too.

AUTHOR

2019-01-15T03:38:17+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


Yes. Yes it is crazy. Haha!

2019-01-15T03:30:20+00:00

BA Sports

Roar Guru


Is it crazy to suggest that part of signing LeBron was as much about getting the inside running for LeBron junior and the "Not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5 not 6 not 7 rings..." he could bring to LA? And anything they can pick up in the meantime with LBJ senior is a bonus...

2019-01-15T01:57:16+00:00

LFrank

Guest


G'day Ryan. I agree in one sense, but not sure I share your concerns in another... I think the Lakers expected to fill two superstar slots last off-season, but when that didn't happen they patched up the team with one-year contracts in the hope of making another big signing either during this season or next offseason. With that in mind I'm not as concerned about the young and old cores of the team, as I think there was some method to that madness. They were never going to contend with the squad they had, but they surrounded the younger core with some grizzled veterans to help them learn and develop. Prior to Lebron's injury the team were slowly trending in the right direction. I think LA's best chance of finding the second superstar would be via trade - I'm struggling to see why KD or AD would want to sign with LA in Free Agency to play alongside another superstar when KD has had to play second fiddle for a few seasons now and AD has shown (since Boogie's injury) that he is comfortable with being a team's centrepiece. Wouldn't be the first time I've been wrong though.

AUTHOR

2019-01-14T23:47:19+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


Geez, I like that last paragraph. Hope you’re right!

2019-01-14T22:58:48+00:00

astro

Roar Rookie


Best case scenario - the Lakers know AD is coming at some stage this year, or in the off-season. He rejects the offer from the Pelicans, tells teams the only place he'll re-sign is LA, which should scare the likes of Boston. From there, the Lakers would more or less have an empty roster other than Lebron and Davis and probably one of Ingram/Ball/Kuzma, so plenty of cap room to sign good role players...guys like Reddick, Ariza, Taj Gibson etc, as the 2019 free agent pool is very deep. Worst case scenario - I think this is close to happening right now! Lebron is out, and the young guys are actually hurting their trade value by not playing well. Walton is under pressure. Fans are restless. Only way it gets worse is none of the big free agents next year want to sign there or prefer to play elsewhere. AD is traded to Boston etc... But my gut tells me Lebron knows what he's doing. He wouldn't have signed with LA if it meant wasting years of his prime. I think he knows AD is coming...

AUTHOR

2019-01-14T22:27:56+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


I think they'd love to get any of those 3, but they all come with a risk. Durant's "toxic" comments about LeBron would suggest he's not coming to the Lakers. If the Pelicans continue to suck, Davis may ask for a trade but there's no guarantee the Lakers can put together the best package. And no one knows what Kawhi will do. There is a scenario where the Lakers miss out on all 3, plus Klay stays with the Warriors, Kyrie stays with the Celtics, Boogie goes elsewhere, etc, etc, etc, and the Lakers can't get the other star they desperately want. What then?

2019-01-14T21:31:56+00:00

Josso

Guest


Ryan, if they wait for the off season, who are they likely to make a play for (KD, AD, KL)? And what would they be willing to give up?

AUTHOR

2019-01-14T20:15:12+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


One extreme view: considering the Lakers own their draft pick this year, and LeBron James is currently injured, they could outright tank the rest of the season. A top 3 of the draft pick could add a talent that is ready to help right away, or be a valuable trade chip in getting another star.

Read more at The Roar