Pacific nations could boycott World Cup in response to World League snub

By News / Wire

Members of a Pacific Island players’ support group in Europe are considering boycotting the Rugby Union World Cup in response to plans for a new world league that excludes Fiji, Samoa, and Tonga.

All three teams have qualified for the Rugby World Cup in Japan in September.

Pacific Rugby Players Welfare, which claims a membership of 600 mainly Pacific Island-heritage players throughout the European leagues, says senior test players have proposed that members make

themselves unavailable for the Rugby World Cup.

“A boycott is a legitimate player protest at World Rugby’s reported plans to exclude the Pacific for as long as 12 seasons from a new TV-driven world league of the top 12 test teams,” PRPW said in a statement on Friday.

PRPW head Dan Leo, the former Samoa lock, also called on the three Pacific national unions “to break out of their position of silence and submission and support their players.”

Leo said they have the backing of Pacific Rugby Players, the players’ union with 400 male and female members, “to fend off this world-be threat to the survival of Pacific Island rugby.”

He said both organisations also support International Rugby Players, the global players’ union, which criticised the world league proposal this week for being elitist and disregarding players’ welfare.

World Rugby’s reported plan features the 10 teams across the Six Nations and Rugby Championship, plus Japan and the United States, both of whom were below Fiji in the world rankings but had far larger commercial markets. The plan set off an outcry against the exclusion of the Pacific Island sides and Georgia.

The Pacific Islands’ impact on world rugby dwarfs their influence in boardrooms at the game’s highest levels.

At the last Rugby World Cup in 2015 in England, almost a quarter of all players had Pacific Island heritage. They also feature in six of the world’s top eight sides: New Zealand, Ireland, Wales, England, Australia, and France.

The Crowd Says:

2019-03-02T08:38:37+00:00

toppa

Guest


and you assume because this article mentions NZ its a NZer writing this...people forget NZ is a Island in the pacific

2019-03-02T06:29:24+00:00

Cole

Roar Rookie


We should be standing with them in this. We along with a our Kiwi neighbors are people of the South Pacific too and should be making sure our kin are treated properly! (That shouldn’t just go for Ruggas either but it would be a nice start)

2019-03-02T03:58:08+00:00

mjseesred

Roar Rookie


If the islander players with other international teams got involved this could get very interesting.

2019-03-02T01:06:29+00:00

Mister Football

Roar Guru


Agree, I support them as well, and Australia and NZ should also be supporting our nearest neighbours rather than worrying about Japan, Argentina and Italy.

2019-03-01T23:36:47+00:00

Brainstrust

Roar Rookie


it doesn't seem irrelevant to you as usual NZ trying to claim all the credit for the Pacific islands in rugby. There are plenty of examples of players directly from the Pacific islands, Fiji sevens team, the English international that was in the process of being deported. In the case of Tonga and Samoa you have more living overseas, and in the case of Tonga Auckland is their biggest population center. Cook Islands has only a small population compared to those overseas. Every big country is super efficient at finding anyone with a grandparent , haven't the Irish and Welsh got their own geneological research teams, and you question how many time is not someone ten generations back because there is no one to police it.

2019-03-01T20:21:47+00:00

soapit

Guest


good on them. its simply not right for them to be locked out of that comp (if that is what is being proposed).

2019-03-01T20:00:05+00:00

Max Power

Guest


It is irrelevant as to where players heritage comes from You can’t clsum a country is important because 50 years ago their grand father moved to NZ

Read more at The Roar