AFL community shocked with Ablett suspension

By News / Wire

Geelong are certain to take Gary Ablett’s striking charge to the AFL tribunal after he was hit with a shock one-game ban.

It is the first suspension of the two-time Brownlow Medallist’s 328-game career.

He was reported in the first quarter of Sunday’s win over Essendon for striking Dylan Shiel high with a forearm.

Match reviewer Michael Christian announced the suspension on Monday afternoon and unless Geelong are successful at the tribunal, Ablett will miss next Sunday’s game against North Melbourne.

Ablett has been among the Cats’ best so far this season in his new permanent half-forward role, with Geelong a game clear at the top of the ladder.

The overwhelming view was that Ablett would be fined and certainly Geelong coach Chris Scott’s comments post-match made it clear that the Cats did not think that the incident warranted a ban.

Shiel was not forced from the field and was high among Essendon’s best with a game-high 33 possessions.

But match reviewer Michael Christian graded it as intentional conduct, with low impact and high contact and that equated to a one-game suspension.

“The guidelines specify that a raised forearm is usually consistent that a strike is intentional,” Christian said.

“Gary’s forearm was raised, he jumped off the ground and made contact with Dylan Shiel.

“Nothing is ever clear-cut, there’s lot of grey in lots of things, so it takes time to consider all aspects.

“We feel we’ve come to the right conclusion.”

He said it was similar to Hawthorn youngster James Cousins, who also was suspended for a game last week on a striking charge.

Christian was asked whether Shiel’s ability to play out the game influenced the the grading.

“In terms of impact, basically considering all the evidence … there was certainly enough in our view to constitute low impact,” he replied.

Christian said the AFL considered there was forceful head-high contact, even though the initial impact was with the forearm rather than the elbow.

Asked what weight was given to Ablett’s tribunal record, Christian replied: “nothing at all.

“I’m charged with the responsibility, (along) with Steve Hocking, to assess each incident in isolation,” Christian said.

“So that wasn’t taken into account.”

Christian said he also looked at an incident where Ablett appeared to drop his knees into an opponent, but decided it did not need a report.

Ablett is the only player facing suspension after the weekend’s games.

Western Bulldogs forward Billy Gowers can escape with a $1000 fine for head butting Richmond defender Dylan Grimes.

“I didn’t like the action, but when it came to grading, there was negligible impact,” Christian said.

“It’s an action we don’t want to see in the game.”

Brisbane forward Eric Hipwood was fined $2000 for striking and Gold Coast forward Jack Martin can accept a $1000 misconduct penalty.

Gold Coast pair Alex Sexton and Ben Ainsworth were fined $1000 apiece for misconduct against West Coast’s Brad Sheppard.

The Crowd Says:

2019-05-07T09:42:29+00:00

User

Roar Rookie


Israel said liars go to hell and after that sugary me so honest malarkey Ablett brought forth I reckon he'll be joining his dad in hell for lying to tribunal hearing s or the coroner as Gary snr did. Only stand up Christian in this episode was the mro.

2019-05-07T09:21:28+00:00

Dalgety Carrington

Roar Guru


Hahaha. Are there any decisions the tribunal doesn't overturn? You'd be nuts not to appeal a MRO suspension if you were in clubland.

2019-05-07T08:46:54+00:00

Gyfox

Roar Rookie


He got off!

2019-05-07T07:57:42+00:00

Peter Warrington

Guest


actually 4.2B of the Guideline does allow for consideration of potential injury, for intentional head-high strikes. wouldn't apply here (as didn't, eventually, in Dusty's similar "no lasting damage" incident).

2019-05-07T05:44:58+00:00

Cat

Roar Guru


I agree with what you are saying but the AFL has never punished the possibility, its always based on the outcome. The reality is Shield din't even need a trainer to come out and missed not a second of game time. That to me is a fine based on the AFL's long standing practices.

2019-05-07T04:14:51+00:00

Jmh

Roar Rookie


I was surprised it was a week and not a fine

2019-05-07T01:13:45+00:00

JR

Guest


I liked the decision made. It would have taken very little for that hit to have ended very badly. Off the ground, elbow raised, ball already well gone, deserves a week for being stupid. If you get caught driving dangerously you can't argue that you didnt cause a crash, so why should this dangerous action that thankfully didn't injure Shiel not be punished?

Read more at The Roar