The death of ten-metre offsides

By Lochlan Prentice / Roar Rookie

Every weekend around the grounds, whether it’s under-tens or first-grade rugby, you can hear a few common phrases.

You might hear players and spectators screaming to the referee, “Get ‘em onside,” or, “He’s offside, sir”. These calls have always been just another part of watching or playing a game.

To an extent those passing these comments do have a point. The tendency for players in NRL games to creep up in front of the referee in order to gain an advantage by getting off their defensive line and allowing the attacking team less time with the ball is seen in every single NRL game. This can sometimes be seen as applying good defensive pressure or getting up in the opponent’s face.

However, it has come to the stage where it is adversely affecting the quality of attacking play and therefore the overall experience of a spectator watching the game.

(Mark Kolbe/Getty Images)

The NRL laws regarding the ten-metre offside are fairly vague. Section 11(10)(g) of the NRL Laws & Interpretations 2019 states:

All defending players are required to be ‘in line’ with the Referee marking the 10 metres. The Referee will call “go” when the ball is clear of the ruck and then the defensive line is entitled to move forward.

There is no doubt that players are retiring the original ten metres. However, this “clear of the ruck” line seems like quite a grey area. Can players start moving forward when the tackled player has touched the ball with his foot? Or is it when the dummy-half has touched the ball? The timing may seem insignificant; however, think about the value of a tenth of a second to a halfback going for a matchwinning field goal or about the centre with half a second extra to get a pass off to put his winger over in the corner.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

The aim of the ten-metre law at a play the ball is to give the attacking team time to reset and run their next play. By not letting the defence rush up early, the attacking plays are becoming overly rushed, decreasing in quality and providing an overall worse experience to those watching the game.

Of course some will say these players rushing up isn’t a problem. It is, after all, good to apply pressure onto attacking players, and we are talking about a high-intensity sport. However, for the sake of the quality of football and the principle of playing by the rules practically, this rule should be enforced properly.

In the recent Tigers vs Roosters game at BankWest Stadium there were only two penalties all game for offside within the ten. However, all game both teams were consistently infringing, and I’m a firm believer that it influenced the quality of the game overall.

Of course the referees are trying to stop blowing so many penalties this year, and I am absolutely in favour of letting the game be free-flowing. However, an infringement is an infringement and should be called. If it’s not, it will manifest into a culture.

We are at a stage where it is a tactic to come off the line early. Coaches have started using this in their game plans as they know the referees don’t call it up. This is clearly a problem and it’s adversely affecting the quality of the attacking play in NRL.

For the sake of my blood pressure and I’m sure that of many others who see the blatant offsides every week, someone please fix this.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2019-07-06T09:28:35+00:00

Lochlan Prentice

Roar Rookie


Completely agree with you there mate

2019-07-06T09:27:13+00:00

Rellum

Roar Guru


It has to be when the dummy half touches the ball. Right now it seems to be when the ball touches the ground.

AUTHOR

2019-07-06T09:00:14+00:00

Lochlan Prentice

Roar Rookie


Thanks very much, Paul. I agree with your take on the law regarding only moving up when the dummy half has touched the ball. The creeping up has become a culture within the game and this only begs the question, What's the point of having the rule if it's not going to be enforced? It will be interesting to see what extent these offsides get to before it is addressed.

AUTHOR

2019-07-06T08:59:42+00:00

Lochlan Prentice

Roar Rookie


— COMMENT DELETED —

AUTHOR

2019-07-06T08:55:32+00:00

Lochlan Prentice

Roar Rookie


Thanks, Will. I am also a fan of Jeff Younis. Give him a go.

2019-07-06T08:44:07+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


A very good first article Lochlan. This has been a problem in the game for at least 40 years and you're right, it does kill off attacks for sure. "Clearing the ruck" to me, is all about the tackled player clearing the ball to the dummy half by playing it with his foot. In other words, the defending side should ONLY be able to move when the dummy half touches the ball. Obviously sides both creep inside the 10 and also anticipate the ref saying "go". Blow a few penalties early on and this practice will stop - maybe bin a few players if the ref thinks sides arent taking the rule seriously.

2019-07-06T08:43:51+00:00

shortmemory

Guest


100%. QLD rushing defence in Origin 1 was almost entirely reliant on getting off the line early. Chambers' tackle that led to Wighton's intercept pass to Gagai was made after shooting off the line early. The ball clears the ruck when it clears the foot playing the ball. Leave before that, you're offside. Pretty simple.

2019-07-06T07:45:57+00:00

Will Barlow

Roar Rookie


Great article Lochlan. I think Jeff Younis should be promoted to centre ref in order to fix this issue. Some valid points raised too.

Read more at The Roar