Smith sizzles in the summer of Stokes

By Peter Hunt / Roar Guru

They are images that will remain scorched into our minds for as long as this epic English summer of 2019 is remembered.

It’s early in the World Cup and England are playing South Africa. Lower-order batsman Andile Phehlukwayo goes down on one knee and sweeps Adil Rashid powerfully towards the square leg boundary.

It looks like the ball may go for six. A four, at least, is assured.

But then Ben Stokes saunters into view. He tracks the flight of the ball and launches himself off his left foot. With his right knee now parallel to the ground and his right arm stretching towards the heavens, Stokes has contorted his athletic body so that his back is facing the batsman. But, crucially, so is the palm of his twisted right hand.

Stokes plucks the ball from sky – its triumphant flight abruptly terminated – and Stokes falls to the ground, rolling across the grass, before casually standing and raising his right hand in jubilant exultation.

The summer of Ben has begun.

Jump forward to the climax of the World Cup final. Stokes has already played a mighty innings to bring England within sight of victory. They need 15 to win from six balls. But the first two strokes of the final over go to fieldsmen and Stokes cannot score. Now it’s an improbable 15 from four. Perhaps England will fall valiantly short.

But Stokes is not done yet. He plays a glorious slog sweep and the ball soars over the mid-wicket fence. Nine runs to win. Three balls to come.

Then comes a moment of unscripted mayhem which will cause controversy for years. After heaving the ball towards deep mid-wicket, Stokes is galloping back for a crucial second run as the throw flashes back from Martin Guptill towards the expectant keeper.

A direct hit and Stokes will be out. As he catapults himself in a powerful dive towards the crease, the darting ball collides with Stokes’ grasping bat and is deflected to the boundary for an additional four runs.

Suddenly, the target is a mere three from two. One good hit will do it.

A suicidal second run sees Adil Rashid run out at the bowler’s end but, crucially, leaves Stokes on strike for the final ball. One run will send the final into a super over. Anything more than one run and England wins.

Stokes bunts the full toss towards mid-wicket and he hurtles down the pitch, his legs pumping powerfully. He gets to the other end. The scores are tied. He tumble turns. Back towards the keeper he sprints. Have England won the World Cup? Stokes has done his part. Yet he turns to see Mark Wood diving forlornly as the bowler’s end stumps are broken.

Stokes spontaneously drop-kicks his bat and throws his head to the sky in anguish. Not out 84, but the quest is not complete.

(Photo by Clive Mason/Getty Images)

Stokes helps England post 15 runs in the super over. New Zealand do the same and, for reasons which are lost in a labyrinth of shifting laws, England are awarded the trophy.

But none of that matters in the moment. As Guptill is run out, Stokes falls onto his back and roars with primal elation as he lies on the turf at Lord’s.

It’s one of the greatest one-day matches of all time. It’s certainly the best World Cup Final. And Stokes – in his summer of celebration – is the man of the match.

Just six weeks later, the greatest limited-overs contest is overshadowed by, arguably, the greatest Test. And Stokes is again at the centre of the gladiatorial cauldron.

Australia have set England a daunting 359 runs to win. If they fall short, the Aussies retain the Ashes.

At 3 for 141, an English win appears unlikely. But Stokes bats cautiously, with his eyes focused on stumps and a new day beyond. He resumes the next morning in the same gear. As English wickets fall, and as an Australian victory draws closer, Stokes remains steadfast.

Seventy-three to win and the last man at the crease.

Now Stokes switches to T20 mode. Powerful swipes down the ground. An audacious reverse-sweep over the point fence for six. A ramp shot over first slip for another six. Fielders challenged. Fielders vanquished, as Stokes hits the ball between the boundary-riders, or over their heads.

It’s happening so quickly that heads are spinning and fingers are fumbling.

Jack Leach plays the ball from his hip with the same casual nonchalance with which he wipes his glasses. Stokes seizes on the opportunity and sprints down the pitch to tie the score. And, on the next ball, Stokes smashes a loose delivery to the cover boundary to secure England’s epic victory in the most emphatic fashion.

More primal roaring. More iconic images.

(Photo by Gareth Copley/Getty Images)

This should be the summer of Stokes. Of Ben’s benediction. Or a knighthood, at least.

But for all his gallantry and for all his artistry, his exploits will be overshadowed by the sheer dominance of an eccentric little fellow named Steve Smith.

Smith’s string of high scores is simply unprecedented. Don Bradman scored 947 runs in five Tests in 1930. But even the Don failed occasionally. He was bowled for eight in his first innings of the series at Trent Bridge and, later, he was caught for 18 in the fourth Test at Old Trafford. Sure, he accumulated a healthy heap of runs in between, but Bradman, at least, demonstrated that he was mortal.

Steve Smith, however, never fails.

He has allowed nothing to stand in between him and his demoralising decimation of the English bowling attack. Not the shame of what he allowed to happen in Cape Town. Not the total lack of recent experience in the first-class arena. Not the pantomime (and uncultured) booing which has plagued him all summer. Not even being felled by a vicious bouncer and the painful flashbacks that followed.

And certainly not the English bowlers. Or the English captain’s tactics.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

Seriously, when Joe Root enlists the aid of the bogeyman to scare his children into well bred English behaviour, he’ll be invoking images of a somewhat oddly shaped man, with sandy hair, a collection of idiosyncratic tics and nervous twitches, and with elastic limbs that seem to be powered by their own electric current.

But for all his foibles, Smith has mastered the art of pragmatic batting. He does whatever it takes to score runs. It doesn’t matter what kind of contentious contortions he twists his body into. Provided he defends his wicket, he’ll do it. He’ll go down on one knee, and place the other knee behind his head – whilst waving one hand in the air – if it helps him hit the ball through the in-field.

So while Ian Botham and Andrew Flintoff have had Ashes summers named after them, I fear that Ben Stokes will not be given the same honour.

For Stokes, a summer of heroics is insufficient.

Unless, at the Oval, Stokes has one last majestic spell of bowling, or one last innings overflowing with cavalier gallantry, left in him.

If England win the final Test, does a World Cup win and a drawn Test series trump losing the Ashes?

Will it be Stokes’ summer? Or will 2019 be forever remembered for Steve Smith’s sublime symphony of batsmanship?

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2019-09-11T03:58:46+00:00

Peter Hunt

Roar Guru


Yes, absolutely. My take is that the personal trauma / shame of being banned for a year has exacerbated the nervous condition which manifests itself in more exaggerated idiosyncratic behaviour. But let me stress that this is just my personal lay opinion.

2019-09-11T03:20:27+00:00

RAGAV

Roar Rookie


I feel his twitching and fidgeting has become more pronounced since his comeback. It has been more overt say compared to the World cup as well. He is probably entering a bubble/zone with all these idiosyncrasies/superstitions(as he himself says) where he is oblivious to everything else.

2019-09-11T03:18:05+00:00

RAGAV

Roar Rookie


Have you noticed that his twitching and fidgeting has become more pronounced after the comeback? I don't recall similar movements in the World Cup as well, probably because he does not leave the ball as much. I feel he is entering a cocoon or zone where he becomes oblivious to anything outside the bowler, field settings and the ball.

2019-09-10T23:00:39+00:00

Omnitrader

Roar Rookie


I hope he gets it

AUTHOR

2019-09-10T22:26:17+00:00

Peter Hunt

Roar Guru


My memory is that Anderson only ever troubled Australia in favourable bowling conditions with Duke ball. Like you, RAGAV, I don't remember Anderson ever performing in a backs-to-the-wall situation for England. I stand to be corrected.

AUTHOR

2019-09-10T22:21:50+00:00

Peter Hunt

Roar Guru


Wow Jumbo! You're assuming - I think - that Smith's OTT behaviour is voluntary. I don't have any special expertise, but I'm pretty confident it's the result of a nervous condition and completely involuntary. I don't think Steve is trying to taunt anybody. He's just being Steve.

2019-09-10T19:01:15+00:00

RAGAV

Roar Rookie


Fantastic post. Broad and Anderson, they are such a fascinating pair. All great fast bowler discussions in the last decade and never is Broad in any of them but Anderson was always compared to Dale Steyn. I used to follow England tests only against Australia and except in the test series in Australia in 2010-11 and one test in 2015 Ashes in England, I frankly don't remember Anderson causing a huge turnaround or momentum switch in a single session or two. I can recall various moments where Broad has stood up and run through Australian batting line up in a single session though. Even in 2013-14 Ashes in Australia when Johnson demolished England, Broad was the one who performed consistently. Anderson is the poster boy for fair weather performer and he represents England as good frontrunners. When England are in a backs to the wall situation, he does not seem to produce a match winning spell. Anderson was there in all the series where Smith has dominated England bowling. So I don't think he would have created much impact against Smith. He might have done well against Labuschagne or the tail.

2019-09-10T17:30:37+00:00

Jumbo

Guest


Fine player, but won't be universally respected until he stops taunting the bowlers with his ridiculously OTT leaves and other antics.

AUTHOR

2019-09-10T11:21:39+00:00

Peter Hunt

Roar Guru


Don't bet against him.

AUTHOR

2019-09-10T11:19:41+00:00

Peter Hunt

Roar Guru


"Did he run over his dog or something?" Classic Mike! That made me laugh. I agree with your analysis of the bowling, though.

2019-09-10T08:51:10+00:00

Raimond

Roar Guru


I think the English would have walked off the pitch by then. :laughing:

2019-09-10T08:09:08+00:00

Mike B

Guest


Thanks Paul. I mentioned Broad because I wanted to make some that the bowling to Smith has been pretty good at times, with Broad being the stand out. Archer of course has been devastating in patches and we know what he did to Smith in the 2nd Test. He'll learn about Test cricket and how to be consistent but it's been an excellent start from Jofra. For the life of me I don't understand why Root under bowled Woakes. Did he run over his dog or something? I thought Woakes was bowling well and he showed guts with the bat. It was good batting that hammered Ali back to County cricket and they've coped well with Leach, who has bowled ok at times. Stokes has been a bit pedestrian really and needed to step up with the bat. I can't see that Overton gave them much - not as good as Woakes with bat or ball.

2019-09-10T07:44:32+00:00

Omnitrader

Roar Rookie


needs 300 odd to be beat Bradman

AUTHOR

2019-09-10T04:53:08+00:00

Peter Hunt

Roar Guru


Based on his average in both this Ashes series and the previous one in Australia, Raimond, you can expect another 270 runs if Smith bats twice!

AUTHOR

2019-09-10T04:19:58+00:00

Peter Hunt

Roar Guru


Thanks Paul. I appreciate it! To be honest, whilst I am thrilled that Australia have retained the Ashes - and nothing can take that away - for me, a drawn series at 2-2 would be rather hollow. I think it's imperative that we don't lose at the Oval.

2019-09-10T03:35:49+00:00

Raimond

Roar Guru


The sheer relentlessness of Smith is kind of scary. I wouldn’t be surprised if he got another hundred in the final Test.

2019-09-10T02:34:36+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


hi Peter, yet another excellent article. You certainly know how to string words together! I finished reading this piece and my first thought was an old saying, "to the victor, go the spoils". History tends to be written by the winners and, as far as Australia's concerned, it's won. I realise the series isup for grabs, but the aim IMO, when the squad was announced, was 1) to retain the Ashes then 2) to win the series. The most important step's been achieved and that was largely as a result of some outrageous batting from S Smith. Sports people talk about "winning key moments" and Smith has done that far more successfully than Stokes. I'm sure there will be some sort of Stokes biography in years to come which will eulogise his summer, but IMO, the keen judges will know Smith was scarily good virtually all the time, whereas Stokes was that good only a few times. The spoils, the bragging rights, etc rightly belong to the bloke who was down and out 18 months ago. It's hard to think of a more brilliant comeback to big time cricket.

2019-09-10T02:25:05+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


this is a terrific post Mike. Lots of really good thoughts.

AUTHOR

2019-09-10T01:02:59+00:00

Peter Hunt

Roar Guru


Thanks for your thoughtful post, Mike. I really enjoyed it. It wasn't underhanded, but England did try some unorthodox tactics to Smith in Brisbane in the most recent home Ashes series, where they bowled over his head and wide of off-stump. They essentially tried to bore him out. But Smith's patience ran much deeper than England's and he scored 141 not out. I agree with you 100% about Broad. He's a tremendous bowler and a decent bloke. If you haven't listened to it, his podcast series with Stephen Fry is terrific. I also agree with Anderson. Sorry, never rated him.

2019-09-10T00:50:38+00:00

Mike B

Guest


Stokes, for all his efforts, has not been the difference in the Ashes. Smith has been. Without Stokes the score would now be 3-0. It took us to be without Smith for the score to be 2-1. In this Ashes series Stokes has been remarkable at times, Smith has been remarkable every time. If Smith does falter in the 5th Test then that sentence will read: When it has mattered in this Ashes series Stokes has been remarkable at times, Smith has been remarkable every time. Fortune has gone England's way a number of times this summer but the sheer relentlessness of Smith has ultimately driven England to a state of despair. For me, this Ashes series has been defined by another Stokes moment. When he took the catch off the Leach no-ball, instead of throwing the ball to the air in celebration, Stokes threw the ball into the turf in an expression of total frustration, relief, and pent up anger at the prolonged torture Smith had subjected him/them to. AND that was before he registered the no-ball call. You can only imagine the feelings when Root gathered them around in a circle with the "come on lads we 'll get him again" speech. I suspect in the back of each English players mind they were thinking "no we won't-that was our chance and it's gone. Don't talk to us as if we're stupid Rooty". I have been following Test cricket since the Bob Massie 1972 debut ( I was 8 years old) and I have never seen anyone do what Smith has done. There have been many individual feats of astonishing performances (including that Massie effort, Mitch Johnson in the recent 5-0 whitewash, Botham in 1981, VVS Laxman and the follow-on innings etc) but this performance by Smith has given me an insight as to how Bodyline came about. The Poms were just so tortured and exasperated by Bradman they were willing to lower themselves to whatever depth in order to stop the pain and anguish. I believe if Smith continues treating them like this, we may well see some new underhanded strategy develop. Through this series I have come to admire and quite like Broad. I think he has maintained his game throughout and personally, I'd have him in my team a long way before Anderson. I've seen Jimmy drop his bundle a number of times in Australia and he's a fair weather player. I believe Broad shows a good dose of ticker and I think Jimmy's injury is the best thing to happen to him because Smith would've treated him with nonchalantly on his home turf and I reckon we might have seen a bit of dummy-spitting.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar